validation of a school reform rubric
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
1/15
Validation of a SchoolReform Rubric
Susan Gracia
RIC Faculty Research
Conference
April 27, 2007
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
2/15
CSR
The objective of the federal Comprehensive SchoolReform (CSR) Program is to improve studentachievement by supporting the implementation ofcomprehensive school reforms based on scientifically
based research and effective practices so that allchildren, especially those in low-performing, high-povertyschools, can meet challenging state content andacademic achievement standards (CSR ProgramGuidance, July 26, 2002).
Specifically, comprehensive school reform is a means toimprove student achievement through reorganizing andrevitalizing the entire school, rather than implementingisolated programs.
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
3/15
CSR Components
CSR schools must plan a comprehensive program, asdefined by these 11 eleven components:
Effective, research-based, replicable methods and strategies
Comprehensive design with aligned components
Professional development Measurable goals and benchmarks
Support within the school
Support for principals and staff
Parental and community involvement
External technical support and assistance Evaluation strategies
Coordination of resources
Scientifically-based evidence of improved student achievement
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
4/15
CSR Evaluation
Implementation/progress of each component
needs to be documented
A number of instruments exist Rubrics, surveys, etc. purport to be able to
identify stages of implementation of each
component
E.g., CSR Implementation Continuum
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
5/15
Present Study
CSR Implementation Continuum was
modified into a series of survey scales
153 teachers in CSR schools rated theirperceptions of CSR implementation in their
schools along the 11 CSR components
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
6/15
Research Questions
Do survey scales fit the Rasch model?
If so:
What is the nature of the continuum of CSRimplementation (for each component)?
Does the continuum of CSR implementation
match the CSR Implementation Continuum
rubric? How can measurement of CSR implementation be
improved?
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
7/15
Rasch model
People and items form a hierarchy of less than/more
than on a continuum (variable)
People are more likely to agree with easy (to
endorse) items than difficult (to endorse) items Respondents perceiving high CSR implementation
are more likely to endorse all items than those
perceiving low implementation
Probability of providing responses defines an order
of respondents and items
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
8/15
Rasch model
Parameters are neither sample nor test
dependent
Total scores have interpretable meaning
Ordinal data is converted to interval data
Missing data is not problematic
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
9/15
Model (PD Scale)
CSR implementation data fit the model
Fit statistics were well within defined bounds
Item reliability = .97
How precisely items can be located on the latent variable Person reliability = .86
The Rasch equivalent of the KR-20 or Cronbach Alpha"test reliability" statistic
Item and person separation indices are 5.63 and2.48 Items have sufficient breadth and persons are well-
discriminated.
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
10/15
Variable Map
A yardstickresulting from data
Reveals the operational definition of what the
CSR PD scale is measuring.
The variable map allows one to see how
items spread out over the continuum of CSR
implementation and how respondents
distribute on the CSR implementationvariable.
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
11/15
Respondents MAP OF Items
|
6 XXXX +
|
|
|
XX |
|
5 +
|
|
XXXXX T|
X |
|
4 XXXX +
||
XXXXX |
XXXXXX |
S|
3 XXXXX +
|
XXX |
XXXXXXXXXXX |
XXX |
|
2 XXXX +
XXXX | MANY PD OPPS AVAILABLE TO PARENTS/COMMUNITY
XXXXXXX M|
XXXXXXXXXX |T
XXXXXXX |
XXXXXXXXX |
1 XXXXXXXXXX + STAFF RECEIVE FEEDBACK ON STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
XXXX |SXXXX |
XXX |
XXXX | PD PLAN RELATED TO SCHOOL GOALS/STAFF INPUT
STAFF REGULARLY ATTENDS PD & WORKGROUPS
XX S| PD CONTINUOUS, DIRECTED TOWARD COMMON GOALS
SCHOOL DEVELOPS INTERNAL CAPACITY FOR PD
0 XXXXXXX +M
XXX | PD IS ONGOING PROCESS BASED ON STAFF NEEDS
XXX | PD OPPS FOCUS ON FACULTY NEEDS RE: STRATEGIES
SCHOOL HAS GENL PLAN FOR PD
SCHOOL PROVIDES ONSITE PD & TIME FOR REFLECTION
XX |
| SOME PD OPPS AVAILABLE ONSITE
XX |S
-1 XX +
| PD OPPS RELATED TO GOALS
STAFF GENERALLY ATTENDS PD
X T|
|T
|
|
-2 +
|
|
|
X |
|
-3 +
|
Most
difficultitems to
endorse
People reporting
highest
implementation
Easiest items
to endorse
People reporting
lowest
implementation
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
12/15
Correspondence with original CSR
Implementation Continuum
If expectations of what is being measured are
based on good theory, the results shown in
the empirical map should correspond to the
conceptual one
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
13/15
Respondents MAP OF Items
|
6 XXXX +
|
|
|
XX |
|
5 +
|
|
XXXXX T|
X |
|4 XXXX +
|
|
XXXXX |
XXXXXX |
S|
3 XXXXX +
|
XXX |
XXXXXXXXXXX |
XXX |
|
2 XXXX +
XXXX | Level 5XXXXXXX M|
XXXXXXXXXX |T
XXXXXXX |
XXXXXXXXX |
1 XXXXXXXXXX + Level 3
XXXX |S
XXXX |
XXX |
XXXX | Level 2 Level 4
XX S| Level 5 Level 5
0 XXXXXXX +M
XXX | Level 4
XXX | Level 1 Level 3 Level 3
XX || Level 2
XX |S
-1 XX +
| Level 1 Level 3
X T|
|T
|
|
-2 +
|
|
|
X |
|
-3 +
|
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
14/15
Results
Implementation as laid out in CSR
Implementation Continuum rubric does not
match implementation continuum as revealed
through survey data
Similar results for all 11 scales/CSR
components
CSR Implementation Continuum should berevised to reflect empirical data
-
7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric
15/15
REVISED CSR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION RUBRIC
1 2 3 4 5Professional development
opportunities at my school
are related to school,district, or state goals.
Staff, in general, attends
professional development
activities.
Some professional
development opportunities
are available onsite.
The school provides some
onsite professional
development opportunities
as well as time for
reflective practice.
The school has a general
plan for professional
development.
Professional development
opportunities focus on the
needs of faculty to
implement improvement
strategies.
Professional development
is an ongoing process
based on staff needs toimplement improvement
strategies.
Professional development
is continuous and self-
directed towards theachievement of
collectively developed
school wide improvement
goals.
The school develops
internal capacity to provide
onsite professional
development to its faculty
and sponsors small gradelevel or subject matter
work groups of teachers
for reflective practice.
Staff regularly participates
in professional
development activities and
in small grade level or
subject matter work groups
to reflect on practice.
The professional
development plan is
related to school wide
improvement goals and is
the result of staff input.
Instructional staff receive
feedback on the
implementation ofimprovement strategies.
Many of these professional
development services are
available to parents andcommunity members.