validation of a school reform rubric

Upload: susan-metzger-gracia

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    1/15

    Validation of a SchoolReform Rubric

    Susan Gracia

    RIC Faculty Research

    Conference

    April 27, 2007

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    2/15

    CSR

    The objective of the federal Comprehensive SchoolReform (CSR) Program is to improve studentachievement by supporting the implementation ofcomprehensive school reforms based on scientifically

    based research and effective practices so that allchildren, especially those in low-performing, high-povertyschools, can meet challenging state content andacademic achievement standards (CSR ProgramGuidance, July 26, 2002).

    Specifically, comprehensive school reform is a means toimprove student achievement through reorganizing andrevitalizing the entire school, rather than implementingisolated programs.

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    3/15

    CSR Components

    CSR schools must plan a comprehensive program, asdefined by these 11 eleven components:

    Effective, research-based, replicable methods and strategies

    Comprehensive design with aligned components

    Professional development Measurable goals and benchmarks

    Support within the school

    Support for principals and staff

    Parental and community involvement

    External technical support and assistance Evaluation strategies

    Coordination of resources

    Scientifically-based evidence of improved student achievement

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    4/15

    CSR Evaluation

    Implementation/progress of each component

    needs to be documented

    A number of instruments exist Rubrics, surveys, etc. purport to be able to

    identify stages of implementation of each

    component

    E.g., CSR Implementation Continuum

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    5/15

    Present Study

    CSR Implementation Continuum was

    modified into a series of survey scales

    153 teachers in CSR schools rated theirperceptions of CSR implementation in their

    schools along the 11 CSR components

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    6/15

    Research Questions

    Do survey scales fit the Rasch model?

    If so:

    What is the nature of the continuum of CSRimplementation (for each component)?

    Does the continuum of CSR implementation

    match the CSR Implementation Continuum

    rubric? How can measurement of CSR implementation be

    improved?

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    7/15

    Rasch model

    People and items form a hierarchy of less than/more

    than on a continuum (variable)

    People are more likely to agree with easy (to

    endorse) items than difficult (to endorse) items Respondents perceiving high CSR implementation

    are more likely to endorse all items than those

    perceiving low implementation

    Probability of providing responses defines an order

    of respondents and items

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    8/15

    Rasch model

    Parameters are neither sample nor test

    dependent

    Total scores have interpretable meaning

    Ordinal data is converted to interval data

    Missing data is not problematic

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    9/15

    Model (PD Scale)

    CSR implementation data fit the model

    Fit statistics were well within defined bounds

    Item reliability = .97

    How precisely items can be located on the latent variable Person reliability = .86

    The Rasch equivalent of the KR-20 or Cronbach Alpha"test reliability" statistic

    Item and person separation indices are 5.63 and2.48 Items have sufficient breadth and persons are well-

    discriminated.

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    10/15

    Variable Map

    A yardstickresulting from data

    Reveals the operational definition of what the

    CSR PD scale is measuring.

    The variable map allows one to see how

    items spread out over the continuum of CSR

    implementation and how respondents

    distribute on the CSR implementationvariable.

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    11/15

    Respondents MAP OF Items

    |

    6 XXXX +

    |

    |

    |

    XX |

    |

    5 +

    |

    |

    XXXXX T|

    X |

    |

    4 XXXX +

    ||

    XXXXX |

    XXXXXX |

    S|

    3 XXXXX +

    |

    XXX |

    XXXXXXXXXXX |

    XXX |

    |

    2 XXXX +

    XXXX | MANY PD OPPS AVAILABLE TO PARENTS/COMMUNITY

    XXXXXXX M|

    XXXXXXXXXX |T

    XXXXXXX |

    XXXXXXXXX |

    1 XXXXXXXXXX + STAFF RECEIVE FEEDBACK ON STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION

    XXXX |SXXXX |

    XXX |

    XXXX | PD PLAN RELATED TO SCHOOL GOALS/STAFF INPUT

    STAFF REGULARLY ATTENDS PD & WORKGROUPS

    XX S| PD CONTINUOUS, DIRECTED TOWARD COMMON GOALS

    SCHOOL DEVELOPS INTERNAL CAPACITY FOR PD

    0 XXXXXXX +M

    XXX | PD IS ONGOING PROCESS BASED ON STAFF NEEDS

    XXX | PD OPPS FOCUS ON FACULTY NEEDS RE: STRATEGIES

    SCHOOL HAS GENL PLAN FOR PD

    SCHOOL PROVIDES ONSITE PD & TIME FOR REFLECTION

    XX |

    | SOME PD OPPS AVAILABLE ONSITE

    XX |S

    -1 XX +

    | PD OPPS RELATED TO GOALS

    STAFF GENERALLY ATTENDS PD

    X T|

    |T

    |

    |

    -2 +

    |

    |

    |

    X |

    |

    -3 +

    |

    Most

    difficultitems to

    endorse

    People reporting

    highest

    implementation

    Easiest items

    to endorse

    People reporting

    lowest

    implementation

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    12/15

    Correspondence with original CSR

    Implementation Continuum

    If expectations of what is being measured are

    based on good theory, the results shown in

    the empirical map should correspond to the

    conceptual one

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    13/15

    Respondents MAP OF Items

    |

    6 XXXX +

    |

    |

    |

    XX |

    |

    5 +

    |

    |

    XXXXX T|

    X |

    |4 XXXX +

    |

    |

    XXXXX |

    XXXXXX |

    S|

    3 XXXXX +

    |

    XXX |

    XXXXXXXXXXX |

    XXX |

    |

    2 XXXX +

    XXXX | Level 5XXXXXXX M|

    XXXXXXXXXX |T

    XXXXXXX |

    XXXXXXXXX |

    1 XXXXXXXXXX + Level 3

    XXXX |S

    XXXX |

    XXX |

    XXXX | Level 2 Level 4

    XX S| Level 5 Level 5

    0 XXXXXXX +M

    XXX | Level 4

    XXX | Level 1 Level 3 Level 3

    XX || Level 2

    XX |S

    -1 XX +

    | Level 1 Level 3

    X T|

    |T

    |

    |

    -2 +

    |

    |

    |

    X |

    |

    -3 +

    |

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    14/15

    Results

    Implementation as laid out in CSR

    Implementation Continuum rubric does not

    match implementation continuum as revealed

    through survey data

    Similar results for all 11 scales/CSR

    components

    CSR Implementation Continuum should berevised to reflect empirical data

  • 7/28/2019 Validation of a School Reform Rubric

    15/15

    REVISED CSR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION RUBRIC

    1 2 3 4 5Professional development

    opportunities at my school

    are related to school,district, or state goals.

    Staff, in general, attends

    professional development

    activities.

    Some professional

    development opportunities

    are available onsite.

    The school provides some

    onsite professional

    development opportunities

    as well as time for

    reflective practice.

    The school has a general

    plan for professional

    development.

    Professional development

    opportunities focus on the

    needs of faculty to

    implement improvement

    strategies.

    Professional development

    is an ongoing process

    based on staff needs toimplement improvement

    strategies.

    Professional development

    is continuous and self-

    directed towards theachievement of

    collectively developed

    school wide improvement

    goals.

    The school develops

    internal capacity to provide

    onsite professional

    development to its faculty

    and sponsors small gradelevel or subject matter

    work groups of teachers

    for reflective practice.

    Staff regularly participates

    in professional

    development activities and

    in small grade level or

    subject matter work groups

    to reflect on practice.

    The professional

    development plan is

    related to school wide

    improvement goals and is

    the result of staff input.

    Instructional staff receive

    feedback on the

    implementation ofimprovement strategies.

    Many of these professional

    development services are

    available to parents andcommunity members.