validation questionnaire
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 Validation Questionnaire
1/4
Adopted from Hypermedia Courseware Evaluation InstrumentBy Georgiadou Elissavet and Anastasios A. Economides
University of Macedonia
Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State UniversitySouth La Union Campus
College of Computer ScienceAgoo, La Union
E-Learning Presentation Skills in IT
Name(Optional):
____________________________________________________________
Direction: Rate the following items by checking the box that corresponds with
your answer. Be guided with the ratings below.
5 Strongly Agree 2 Disagree4 Agree 1 Strongly Disagree
3 Undecided 0 Cannot be Evaluated(unavailable)
A. Evaluation of the Content
5 4 3 2 1 0
1. The content is reliable.
2. The origin of information is known.
3. Balance presentation of information.
4. The authors and the publishers are reputable.
5. Bias-free viewpoints and images.
6. Balanced representation of cultural, ethnic and
racial groups.7. Correct use of grammar.
8. Current and error-free information.
9. Concepts and vocabulary relevant to learners
abilities.
10. Information relevant to age group curriculum.11. Information of sufficient scope and depth.
12. Logical progression of topics.
13. Variety of activities, with options for
increasing complexity.
Page 1 of4
-
8/7/2019 Validation Questionnaire
2/4
Adopted from Hypermedia Courseware Evaluation InstrumentBy Georgiadou Elissavet and Anastasios A. Economides
University of Macedonia
B. Organization and Presentation of the Content
B.1. Pedagogical Parameters
B.1.1 Instructional Theories - Curriculum
5 4 3 2 1 014. The design of the system is based on reliable
learning and instructional theories and is directly
related with the content of the curriculum.15. The application of the system is possible in
various topics of the curriculum.16. The application of the system is possible on
issues related with the curriculum.17. The system can be used by learners alone,
without the need of any instructional objects.
B.1.2 Structure
5 4 3 2 1 0
18. The content is structured in a clear and
understandable manner.19. The structure allows the learners to move
around freely in different units.20. The structure permits learners to advance,
review, see examples, repeat the unit or escape
to explore another unit.
B.2 Design Factors
B.2.1 Interactivity Navigation Feedback
B.2.1.1 Interactivity
5 4 3 2 1 0
21. The interactivity of the system is according to
the maturity of the students.22. Provides opportunities for interaction at least
every three of four screens.23. The content is chunked into small segments
and includes build in questions, reviews,
summaries for each segment.24. Poses frequently questions to the users that
do not interrupt the learning process.
Page 2 of4
-
8/7/2019 Validation Questionnaire
3/4
Adopted from Hypermedia Courseware Evaluation InstrumentBy Georgiadou Elissavet and Anastasios A. Economides
University of Macedonia
25. Ask students to apply what have learnt rather
than memorize it.26. Uses rhetorical questions during instruction to
get students to think the content.27. Allows learners to discover information
through active exploration.
B.2.1.2 Navigation
5 4 3 2 1 0
28. Help key to get procedural information.
29. Glossary key for seeing the definition of any
term.30. Objective key for reviewing the courses
objectives.31. Content map key for seeing a list of options
available.32. Summary and review key for reviewing whole
or parts of the lesson.33. Menu key for returning to the main page.
34. Comment key for recording a learners
comment.35. Example key for seeing examples of an idea.
36. Key for moving forward or backward in a
lesson.37. Key for accessing the next lesson in a
sequence.
Screen Design Section
5 4 3 2 1 0
1. The speed of the program is satisfactory.
2. Horizontal scrolling bars are not used.
3. The system includes local links in order to
facilitate.4. The system is flexible and allows students to
access all its contents.
Page 3 of4
-
8/7/2019 Validation Questionnaire
4/4
Adopted from Hypermedia Courseware Evaluation InstrumentBy Georgiadou Elissavet and Anastasios A. Economides
University of Macedonia
5. The first page is understandable.
6. The system in general has a distinct and easily
recognized character.7. The information is organized into small and
functional units.8. The system includes alternative ways of
presentation.9. The system includes content map.
10. The system includes search engines.
11. The main navigation tools are always on
display to increase speed of use and save.12. The way that the navigation tools work is
easily understandable.13. Each learning unit is presented under the
same design principles.14. External links are loaded in a separate
window.15. The system includes synchronous
communication channels.16. The system includes asynchronous
communication channels.
http://dmst.aueb.gr/en2/diafora2/Phd_thesis/Zaharias.pdf
Page 4 of4
http://dmst.aueb.gr/en2/diafora2/Phd_thesis/Zaharias.pdfhttp://dmst.aueb.gr/en2/diafora2/Phd_thesis/Zaharias.pdf