value added project practitioners conference 3 rd february 2006 biology group

16
Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Upload: eustace-douglas

Post on 01-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Value Added Project Practitioners Conference

3rd February 2006

Biology group

Page 2: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Rationale

Value added results vary between

schools, subjects and students.

Some of the variation is due to subject specific issues.

Page 3: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Biology Group

The purpose of the group is to: Allow biology teachers to meet, share good

practice and support each other. Try to ensure that targets are specifically

aimed at individual students. Allow subject specific issues to be addressed.

Page 4: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

The starting point

Provision of specific data may vary from school to school.

Biology teachers may vary in their knowledge and use of data analysis.

Monitoring procedures will be different. Teaching and learning techniques will vary.

Page 5: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Subject specific information

Who studies Biology? Who achieves the best results? Who provides the best value added? How difficult is Biology A level?

Page 6: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Biology studied by 20000+ students

Page 7: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Overall girls score higher than boys in most subjects

Page 8: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Overall and on average boys progress better than girls

Page 9: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

What pupils are likely to get based on GCSE results

Page 10: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

What data can we use?(Slides to follow relating to these.) ALIS and ALPS - predictions. ALIS and ALPS - analysis of results. Results in each GCSE band. Comparison with other subjects. Ethnicity information. Own school data and previous results. Module analysis.

Page 11: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

What we do – one example.

The role of the form teacher – discussion of general predicted grades and student targets. (Using ALPS).

The role of the Biology teacher – knowledge of the specific target grade for Biology (using ALIS).

Inspection of past results in each GCSE band.

Page 12: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

What we do – one example(Slides to follow related to these.) Student record keeping after AS. Monitoring of grade boundaries. Monitoring of “safety margins” related to grade

needed. Targeted module resits. Targeted support including peer support. Targeted UMS marks for January A2 exams. Discussion of when to resit a module.

(The implications of the unifying concepts paper.)

Page 13: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Teaching and Learning monitoring.(Slides to follow relating to these.)

Monitoring of overall module results. Analysis of reasons for variation. Targeted changes to the scheme of work or

teaching / learning strategies if appropriate. Analysis of which students underachieved. Pupil questionnaires (ALIS).

Page 14: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

What we still need to do.

Address the reasons for the “dip” early in the AS course.

Analyse the impact and appeal of the subject. Address precisely what the student needs to

do to successfully make the transition from GCSE to AS and AS to A2.

Use own questionnaires that may be more specifically useful.

Page 15: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Future plans – discussion of what would be useful. Berkshire Heads of Department and KS5

biology teachers to be contacted about joining the group.

Sharing of present strategies - related to success.

Needs and support identified. Meeting times to be arranged. Size/area of groups? Suggestions.

Page 16: Value Added Project Practitioners Conference 3 rd February 2006 Biology group

Contact details

Mary-Clare Maunder

Head of Biology

Reading School

RG1 5RE

[email protected]