value co-creation in platform...

12
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio Jeffrey Pittaway, Erkko Autio, David Rejeski [email protected] Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Upload: others

Post on 12-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Jeffrey Pittaway, Erkko Autio, David Rejeski

[email protected]

Value co-creation in platform ecosystems:SynBio cases in Finland and California

Page 2: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Value chains and platforms

Pagani/Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation

(a) Closed Vertically Integrated Model

(b) Loosely Coupled Coalitions

(c) Multisided Platform

Figure 1. Three Types of Control Point Constellations

Value creation. For this value system configuration model we

distinguish four main sequential primary activity categories:

(1) content creation, (2) multimedia packaging and services,

(3) network and infrastructure equipment provision, and

(4) telecommunication service provision (Figure 2). The ten-

dency to integrate these main activities is driven by the need

to achieve independence, control the content access in order

to guarantee access to the most interesting and innovative

contents (i.e., contractual agreements, primarily between TV

channels and film production companies), and acquire access

control on the target user.

Value capture. As the industry structure is vertical and tend

to integrate the main functions the value capture is controlled

by key players (mainly media companies) integrated in all of

the four main sequential primary activity categories.

Type 2: Loosely Coupled Coalition Model

We examine next the emergence of digital broadcasting

systems as an incremental innovation. Digital broadcasting

systems enable the delivery of more TV channels and the high

622 MIS Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 2/June 2013

Pagani/Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation

(a) Closed Vertically Integrated Model

(b) Loosely Coupled Coalitions

(c) Multisided Platform

Figure 1. Three Types of Control Point Constellations

Value creation. For this value system configuration model we

distinguish four main sequential primary activity categories:

(1) content creation, (2) multimedia packaging and services,

(3) network and infrastructure equipment provision, and

(4) telecommunication service provision (Figure 2). The ten-

dency to integrate these main activities is driven by the need

to achieve independence, control the content access in order

to guarantee access to the most interesting and innovative

contents (i.e., contractual agreements, primarily between TV

channels and film production companies), and acquire access

control on the target user.

Value capture. As the industry structure is vertical and tend

to integrate the main functions the value capture is controlled

by key players (mainly media companies) integrated in all of

the four main sequential primary activity categories.

Type 2: Loosely Coupled Coalition Model

We examine next the emergence of digital broadcasting

systems as an incremental innovation. Digital broadcasting

systems enable the delivery of more TV channels and the high

622 MIS Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 2/June 2013

Source: Pagani 2013, MIS Quarterly

Page 3: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Platform ecosystems Generativity

Foster Generativity?

Avoid Pitfalls?

Page 4: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Static governance mechanisms

Page 5: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Dynamic governance mechanisms

Dattee, Autio, Alexy. 2017. “Manoeuvring in zero visibility:

Building platform momentum in high-uncertainty situations,”

Academy of Management Journal (forthcoming)

Page 6: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Governance modes X ecosystem life cycle?

Birth Expansion Leadership Renewal

Source: Moore 1993, Harvard Business Review

Page 7: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Evolution of an ecosystemBirth

Industry

High

Low

Sig

nific

ance

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Keystone

Univ.

Policy

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Finland California

Keystone

Policy

Industry Univ.

Policy

Industry

Univ.

Policy

Page 8: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Evolution of an ecosystemLeadership Slow Growth

High

Low

Sig

nific

ance

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Keystone

Univ.

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Finland California

Keystone

Univ.

Policy

Industry

Policy

Policy

PolicyPolicy

Industry

Industry

Industry

Univ.

Policy

Page 9: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Evolution of an ecosystemRenewal & Expansion

High

Low

Sig

nific

ance

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Univ.

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Univ.

Finland California

Keystone

Univ.Univ.

PolicyPolicy

Industry

Open Source

Policy

Keystone

Policy

Industry

Page 10: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Evolution of an ecosystemLeadership Tipping Point

High

Low

Sig

nific

ance

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Keystone

Univ.

High

Low

Sig

nific

ance

Governance ModeStatic Dynamic

Univ.

Finland

TIPPING POINTCalifornia

SUSTAINABLE

Keystone

Policy

Industry

Univ.

Policy Industry

Industry

Policy

Univ.

Policy

Industry

Open Source

Page 11: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Lessons learned (preliminary)

• Dynamic and static governance modes

• Mix should adapt to ecosystem life cycle

• Life cycle is not linear

• Don’t formalise too early

• Keystone actors:

• Firms, Individuals: sufficient but not necessary at birth, renewal

• Open source: supports sustainability

• Policymakers should fund business model experimentation

Page 12: Value co-creation in platform ecosystemsplatformvaluenow.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Thu3.1.1...Value co-creation in platform ecosystems: SynBio cases in Finland and California

Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio

Jeffrey Pittaway, Erkko Autio, David Rejeski

[email protected]

Value co-creation in platform ecosystems:SynBio cases in Finland and California