value co-creation in platform...
TRANSCRIPT
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Jeffrey Pittaway, Erkko Autio, David Rejeski
Value co-creation in platform ecosystems:SynBio cases in Finland and California
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Value chains and platforms
Pagani/Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation
(a) Closed Vertically Integrated Model
(b) Loosely Coupled Coalitions
(c) Multisided Platform
Figure 1. Three Types of Control Point Constellations
Value creation. For this value system configuration model we
distinguish four main sequential primary activity categories:
(1) content creation, (2) multimedia packaging and services,
(3) network and infrastructure equipment provision, and
(4) telecommunication service provision (Figure 2). The ten-
dency to integrate these main activities is driven by the need
to achieve independence, control the content access in order
to guarantee access to the most interesting and innovative
contents (i.e., contractual agreements, primarily between TV
channels and film production companies), and acquire access
control on the target user.
Value capture. As the industry structure is vertical and tend
to integrate the main functions the value capture is controlled
by key players (mainly media companies) integrated in all of
the four main sequential primary activity categories.
Type 2: Loosely Coupled Coalition Model
We examine next the emergence of digital broadcasting
systems as an incremental innovation. Digital broadcasting
systems enable the delivery of more TV channels and the high
622 MIS Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 2/June 2013
Pagani/Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation
(a) Closed Vertically Integrated Model
(b) Loosely Coupled Coalitions
(c) Multisided Platform
Figure 1. Three Types of Control Point Constellations
Value creation. For this value system configuration model we
distinguish four main sequential primary activity categories:
(1) content creation, (2) multimedia packaging and services,
(3) network and infrastructure equipment provision, and
(4) telecommunication service provision (Figure 2). The ten-
dency to integrate these main activities is driven by the need
to achieve independence, control the content access in order
to guarantee access to the most interesting and innovative
contents (i.e., contractual agreements, primarily between TV
channels and film production companies), and acquire access
control on the target user.
Value capture. As the industry structure is vertical and tend
to integrate the main functions the value capture is controlled
by key players (mainly media companies) integrated in all of
the four main sequential primary activity categories.
Type 2: Loosely Coupled Coalition Model
We examine next the emergence of digital broadcasting
systems as an incremental innovation. Digital broadcasting
systems enable the delivery of more TV channels and the high
622 MIS Quarterly Vol. 37 No. 2/June 2013
Source: Pagani 2013, MIS Quarterly
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Platform ecosystems Generativity
Foster Generativity?
Avoid Pitfalls?
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Static governance mechanisms
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Dynamic governance mechanisms
Dattee, Autio, Alexy. 2017. “Manoeuvring in zero visibility:
Building platform momentum in high-uncertainty situations,”
Academy of Management Journal (forthcoming)
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Governance modes X ecosystem life cycle?
Birth Expansion Leadership Renewal
Source: Moore 1993, Harvard Business Review
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Evolution of an ecosystemBirth
Industry
High
Low
Sig
nific
ance
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Keystone
Univ.
Policy
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Finland California
Keystone
Policy
Industry Univ.
Policy
Industry
Univ.
Policy
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Evolution of an ecosystemLeadership Slow Growth
High
Low
Sig
nific
ance
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Keystone
Univ.
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Finland California
Keystone
Univ.
Policy
Industry
Policy
Policy
PolicyPolicy
Industry
Industry
Industry
Univ.
Policy
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Evolution of an ecosystemRenewal & Expansion
High
Low
Sig
nific
ance
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Univ.
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Univ.
Finland California
Keystone
Univ.Univ.
PolicyPolicy
Industry
Open Source
Policy
Keystone
Policy
Industry
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Evolution of an ecosystemLeadership Tipping Point
High
Low
Sig
nific
ance
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Keystone
Univ.
High
Low
Sig
nific
ance
Governance ModeStatic Dynamic
Univ.
Finland
TIPPING POINTCalifornia
SUSTAINABLE
Keystone
Policy
Industry
Univ.
Policy Industry
Industry
Policy
Univ.
Policy
Industry
Open Source
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Lessons learned (preliminary)
• Dynamic and static governance modes
• Mix should adapt to ecosystem life cycle
• Life cycle is not linear
• Don’t formalise too early
• Keystone actors:
• Firms, Individuals: sufficient but not necessary at birth, renewal
• Open source: supports sustainability
• Policymakers should fund business model experimentation
Jeffrey Pittaway and Erkko Autio
Jeffrey Pittaway, Erkko Autio, David Rejeski
Value co-creation in platform ecosystems:SynBio cases in Finland and California