vander vaal forces
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 1/132
Van der Waals force
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search
In physical chemistry, the van der Waals force (or van der Waals interaction), named after
Dutch scientist Johannes Diderik van der Waals, is the sum of the attractive or repulsive
forces between molecules (or between parts of the same molecule) other than those due to
covalent bonds or to the electrostatic interaction of ions with one another or with neutral
molecules.[1] The term includes:
force between two permanent dipoles (Keesom force)
force between a permanent dipole and a corresponding induced dipole (Debye force)
force between two instantaneously induced dipoles (London dispersion force)
It is also sometimes used loosely as a synonym for the totality of intermolecular forces. Van
der Waals forces are relatively weak compared to normal chemical bonds, but play a
fundamental role in fields as diverse as supramolecular chemistry, structural biology,
polymer science, nanotechnology, surface science, and condensed matter physics. Van der
Waals forces define the chemical character of many organic compounds. They also define the
solubility of organic substances in polar and non-polar media. In low molecular weight
alcohols, the properties of the polar hydroxyl group dominate the weak intermolecular forces
of van der Waals. In higher molecular weight alcohols, the properties of the nonpolar
hydrocarbon chain(s) dominate and define the solubility. Van der Waals-London forces grow
with the length of the nonpolar part of the substance.
Contents
1 Definition
2 London dispersion force
3 Van der Waals forces between macroscopic objects
4 Use by animals
5 References
6 Further reading
7 External links
[edit] Definition
Van der Waals forces include attractions between atoms, molecules, and surfaces. They differ
from covalent and ionic bonding in that they are caused by correlations in the fluctuating
polarizations of nearby particles (a consequence of quantum dynamics[2]).
Intermolecular forces have four major contributions:
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 2/132
1. A repulsive component resulting from the Pauli exclusion principle that prevents the
collapse of molecules.
2. Attractive or repulsive electrostatic interactions between permanent charges (in the
case of molecular ions), dipoles (in the case of molecules without inversion center),
quadrupoles (all molecules with symmetry lower than cubic), and in general between
permanent multipoles. The electrostatic interaction is sometimes called the Keesominteraction or Keesom force after Willem Hendrik Keesom.
3. Induction (also known as polarization), which is the attractive interaction between a
permanent multipole on one molecule with an induced multipole on another. This
interaction is sometimes called Debye force after Peter J.W. Debye.
4. Dispersion (usually named after Fritz London), which is the attractive interaction
between any pair of molecules, including non-polar atoms, arising from the
interactions of instantaneous multipoles.
Returning to nomenclature, different texts refer to different things using the term "van der
Waals force". Some texts mean by the van der Waals force the totality of forces (including
repulsion); others mean all the attractive forces (and then sometimes distinguish van der Waals-Keesom, van der Waals-Debye, and van der Waals-London).
All intermolecular/van der Waals forces are anisotropic (except those between two noble gas
atoms), which means that they depend on the relative orientation of the molecules. The
induction and dispersion interactions are always attractive, irrespective of orientation, but the
electrostatic interaction changes sign upon rotation of the molecules. That is, the electrostatic
force can be attractive or repulsive, depending on the mutual orientation of the molecules.
When molecules are in thermal motion, as they are in the gas and liquid phase, the
electrostatic force is averaged out to a large extent, because the molecules thermally rotate
and thus probe both repulsive and attractive parts of the electrostatic force. Sometimes this
effect is expressed by the statement that "random thermal motion around room temperature
can usually overcome or disrupt them" (which refers to the electrostatic component of the van
der Waals force). Clearly, the thermal averaging effect is much less pronounced for the
attractive induction and dispersion forces.
The Lennard-Jones potential is often used as an approximate model for the isotropic part of a
total (repulsion plus attraction) van der Waals force as a function of distance.
Van der Waals forces are responsible for certain cases of pressure broadening (van der Waals
broadening) of spectral lines and the formation of van der Waals molecules. The London-van
der Waals forces are related to the Casimir effect for dielectric media, the former being themicroscopic description of the latter bulk property. The first detailed calculations of this were
done in 1955 by E. M. Lifshitz.[3][4]
[edit] London dispersion force
Main article: London dispersion force
London dispersion forces, named after the German-American physicist Fritz London, are
weak intermolecular forces that arise from the interactive forces between instantaneous
multipoles in molecules without permanent multipole moments. These forces dominate the
interaction of non-polar molecules, and also play a less significant role in Van der Waals
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 3/132
forces than molecules containing permanent dipoles or ionized molecules. London dispersion
forces are also known as dispersion forces, London forces, or instantaneous dipole – induced
dipole forces. They increase with the molar mass, causing a higher boiling point especially
for the halogen group.
[edit] Van der Waals forces between macroscopic objects
For macroscopic bodies with known volumes and numbers of atoms or molecules per unit
volume, the total van der Waals force is often computed based on the "microscopic theory" as
the sum over all interacting pairs. It is necessary to integrate over the total volume of the
object, which makes the calculation dependent on the objects' shapes. For example, the van
der Waals interaction energy between spherical bodies of radii R 1 and R 2 and with smooth
surfaces was approximated in 1937 by Hamaker [5] (using London's famous 1937 equation for
the dispersion interaction energy between atoms/molecules[6] as the starting point) by:
(1 )
where A is the Hamaker coefficient, which is a constant (~10−19 - 10−20 J) that depends on
the material properties (it can be positive or negative in sign depending on the intervening
medium), and z is the center-to-center distance, i.e. the sum of R1, R2, and r (the distance
between the surfaces): .
In the limit of close-approach, the spheres are sufficiently large compared to the distance
between them, i.e. , so that equation (1) for the potential energy
function simplifies to:
(2 )
The van der Waals force between two spheres of constant radii ( R1 and R2 are treated
as parameters) is then a function of separation since the force on an object is the
negative of the derivative of the potential energy function, .
This yields:
(3 )
The van der Waals forces between objects with other geometries using the
Hamaker model have been published in the literature.[7][8][9]
From the expression above, it is seen that the van der Waals force decreases with
decreasing particle size (R). Nevertheless, the strength of inertial forces, such as
gravity and drag/lift, decrease to a greater extent. Consequently, the van der Waals forces become dominant for collections of very small particles such as
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 4/132
very fine-grained dry powders (where there are no capillary forces present) even
though the force of attraction is smaller in magnitude than it is for larger particles
of the same substance. Such powders are said to be cohesive, meaning they are
not as easily fluidized or pneumatically conveyed as easily as their more coarse-
grained counterparts. Generally, free-flow occurs with particles greater than
about 250 μm.
The van der Waals force of adhesion is also dependent on the surface topography.
If there are surface asperities, or protuberances, that result in a greater total area
of contact between two particles or between a particle and a wall, this increases
the van der Waals force of attraction as well as the tendency for mechanical
interlocking.
The microscopic theory assumes pairwise additivity. It neglects many-body
interactions and retardation. A more rigorous approach accounting for these
effects, called the "macroscopic theory," was developed by Lifshitz in 1956.[10]
Langbein derived a much more cumbersome "exact" expression in 1970 for spherical bodies within the framework of the Lifshitz theory[11] while a simpler
macroscopic model approximation had been made by Derjaguin as early as
1934.[12] Expressions for the van der Waals forces for many different geometries
using the Lifshitz theory have likewise been published.
[edit] Use by animals
Gecko climbing glass
The ability of geckos – which can hang on a glass surface using only one toe – to
climb on sheer surfaces has been attributed to the van der Waals forces between
these surfaces and the spatula (plural spatulae), or microscopic projections, which
cover the hair-like setae found on their footpads.[13][14] A later study suggested
that capillary adhesion might play a role,[15] but that hypothesis has been rejected
by more recent studies.[16] [17] [18] There were efforts in 2008 to create a dry glue
that exploits the effect.[19] In 2011, a paper was published relating the effect to
both velcro-like hairs and the presence of lipids in gecko footprints.[20]
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 5/132
INTERMOLECULAR BONDING - VANDER WAALS FORCES
This page explains the origin of the two weaker forms ofintermolecular attractions - van der Waals dispersion forces anddipole-dipole attractions. If you are also interested in hydrogenbonding there is a link at the bottom of the page.
What are intermolecular attractions?
Intermolecular versus intramolecular bonds
Intermolecular attractions are attractions between onemolecule and a neighbouring molecule. The forces of attractionwhich hold an individual molecule together (for example, thecovalent bonds) are known as in t ramolecular attractions.These two words are so confusingly similar that it is safer toabandon one of them and never use it. The term"intramolecular" won't be used again on this site.
All molecules experience intermolecular attractions, although in
some cases those attractions are very weak. Even in a gas likehydrogen, H2, if you slow the molecules down by cooling thegas, the attractions are large enough for the molecules to sticktogether eventually to form a liquid and then a solid.
In hydrogen's case the attractions are so weak that themolecules have to be cooled to 21 K (-252°C) before theattractions are enough to condense the hydrogen as a liquid.Helium's intermolecular attractions are even weaker - themolecules won't stick together to form a liquid until thetemperature drops to 4 K (-269°C).
van der Waals forces: dispersion forces
Dispersion forces (one of the two types of van der Waals forcewe are dealing with on this page) are also known as "Londonforces" (named after Fritz London who first suggested how theymight arise).
The origin of van der Waals dispersion forces
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 6/132
Temp orary f luctuat ing dipoles
Attractions are electrical in nature. In a symmetrical moleculelike hydrogen, however, there doesn't seem to be any electrical
distortion to produce positive or negative parts. But that's onlytrue on average.
The lozenge-shaped diagram represents a small symmetricalmolecule - H2, perhaps, or Br2. The even shading shows that onaverage there is no electrical distortion.
But the electrons are mobile, and at any one instant they might
find themselves towards one end of the molecule, making thatend -. The other end will be temporarily short of electrons andso becomes +.
Note: (read as "delta") means "slightly" - so + means "slightlypositive".
An instant later the electrons may well have moved up to theother end, reversing the polarity of the molecule.
This constant "sloshing around" of the electrons in the moleculecauses rapidly fluctuating dipoles even in the most symmetricalmolecule. It even happens in monatomic molecules - moleculesof noble gases, like helium, which consist of a single atom.
If both the helium electrons happen to be on one side of theatom at the same time, the nucleus is no longer properlycovered by electrons for that instant.
How temp orary dipoles give rise to intermo lecular
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 7/132
attract ions
I'm going to use the same lozenge-shaped diagram now torepresent any molecule which could, in fact, be a much morecomplicated shape. Shape does matter (see below), but keeping
the shape simple makes it a lot easier to both draw the diagramsand understand what is going on.
Imagine a molecule which has a temporary polarity beingapproached by one which happens to be entirely non-polar justat that moment. (A pretty unlikely event, but it makes thediagrams much easier to draw! In reality, one of the molecules islikely to have a greater polarity than the other at that time - andso will be the dominant one.)
As the right hand molecule approaches, its electrons will tend tobe attracted by the slightly positive end of the left hand one.
This sets up an induced dipo le in the approaching molecule,which is orientated in such a way that the + end of one isattracted to the - end of the other.
An instant later the electrons in the left hand molecule may wellhave moved up the other end. In doing so, they will repel theelectrons in the right hand one.
The polarity of both molecules reverses, but you still have +attracting -. As long as the molecules stay close to each otherthe polarities will continue to fluctuate in synchronisation so thatthe attraction is always maintained.
There is no reason why this has to be restricted to twomolecules. As long as the molecules are close together this
synchronised movement of the electrons can occur over huge
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 8/132
numbers of molecules.
This diagram shows how a whole lattice of molecules could beheld together in a solid using van der Waals dispersion forces.An instant later, of course, you would have to draw a quitedifferent arrangement of the distribution of the electrons as theyshifted around - but always in synchronisation.
The strength of dispersion forces
Dispersion forces between molecules are much weaker than thecovalent bonds within molecules. It isn't possible to give anyexact value, because the size of the attraction variesconsiderably with the size of the molecule and its shape.
How m olecular size affects the strength of the disp ersion
forces
The boiling points of the noble gases are
helium -269°C
neon -246°C
argon -186°C
krypton -152°C
xenon -108°C
radon -62°C
All of these elements have monatomic molecules.
The reason that the boiling points increase as you go down thegroup is that the number of electrons increases, and so alsodoes the radius of the atom. The more electrons you have, andthe more distance over which they can move, the bigger thepossible temporary dipoles and therefore the bigger thedispersion forces.
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 9/132
Because of the greater temporary dipoles, xenon molecules are"stickier" than neon molecules. Neon molecules will break awayfrom each other at much lower temperatures than xenonmolecules - hence neon has the lower boiling point.
This is the reason that (all other things being equal) biggermolecules have higher boiling points than small ones. Biggermolecules have more electrons and more distance over whichtemporary dipoles can develop - and so the bigger moleculesare "stickier".
How m olecular shape affects the strength of the dispersion
forces
The shapes of the molecules also matter. Long thin moleculescan develop bigger temporary dipoles due to electron movementthan short fat ones containing the same numbers of electrons.
Long thin molecules can also lie closer together - these
attractions are at their most effective if the molecules are reallyclose.
For example, the hydrocarbon molecules butane and 2-methylpropane both have a molecular formula C4H10, but theatoms are arranged differently. In butane the carbon atoms arearranged in a single chain, but 2-methylpropane is a shorterchain with a branch.
Butane has a higher boiling point because the dispersion forcesare greater. The molecules are longer (and so set up biggertemporary dipoles) and can lie closer together than the shorter,fatter 2-methylpropane molecules.
van der Waals forces: dipole-dipole interactions
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 10/132
Warning! There's a bit of a problem here with modern syllabuses.The majority of the syllabuses talk as if dipole-dipole interactions werequite distinct from van der Waals forces. Such a syllabus will talk aboutvan der Waals forces (meaning dispersion forces) and, separately,dipole-dipole interactions.
All intermolecular attractions are known collectively as van der Waalsforces. The various different types were first explained by differentpeople at different times. Dispersion forces, for example, weredescribed by London in 1930; dipole-dipole interactions by Keesom in1912.
This oddity in the syllabuses doesn't matter in the least as far asunderstanding is concerned - but you obviously must know what yourparticular examiners mean by the terms they use in the questions.Check your syllabus.
If you are working to a UK-based syllabus for 16 - 18 year olds, butdon't have a copy of it, follow this link to find out how to get one.
A molecule like HCl has a permanent dipole because chlorine ismore electronegative than hydrogen. These permanent, in-builtdipoles will cause the molecules to attract each other rathermore than they otherwise would if they had to rely only ondispersion forces.
Note: If you aren't happy about electronegativity and polar molecules, follow this link before you go on.
It's important to realise that all molecules experience dispersionforces. Dipole-dipole interactions are not an alternative todispersion forces - they occur in addition to them. Moleculeswhich have permanent dipoles will therefore have boiling pointsrather higher than molecules which only have temporary
fluctuating dipoles.
Surprisingly dipole-dipole attractions are fairly minor comparedwith dispersion forces, and their effect can only really be seen ifyou compare two molecules with the same number of electronsand the same size. For example, the boiling points of ethane,CH3CH3, and fluoromethane, CH3F, are
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 11/132
Why choose these two molecules to compare? Both haveidentical numbers of electrons, and if you made models youwould find that the sizes were similar - as you can see in thediagrams. That means that the dispersion forces in bothmolecules should be much the same.
The higher boiling point of fluoromethane is due to the largepermanent dipole on the molecule because of the highelectronegativity of fluorine. However, even given the largepermanent polarity of the molecule, the boiling point has onlybeen increased by some 10°.
Here is another example showing thedominance of the dispersion forces.
Trichloromethane, CHCl3, is a highly polarmolecule because of the electronegativity ofthe three chlorines. There will be quitestrong dipole-dipole attractions between onemolecule and its neighbours.
On the other hand, tetrachloromethane, CCl4, is non-polar. Theoutside of the molecule is uniformly - in all directions. CCl4 hasto rely only on dispersion forces.
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 12/132
advertisement: compare things at compare-stuff.com!
Next: Complementarity Up: Protein surfaces and binding Previous:
Hydrophobic interactions Contents
Electrostatic interactions
Hydrogen bonds, salt bridges and van der Waals also provide attractive
forces between molecules. Hydrogen bonds between protein and ligand
can be more favourable than between protein and solvent[Fersht,
1987], and although they are not found in large numbers in all
interfaces, they make an important contribution to the binding energy
of association. Hydrogen bonds via water molecules trapped in theinterface are also commonly observed. Hydrogen bonds and salt-
bridges are thought to confer specificity to interactions due to their
dependence on the precise location of participating atoms[Fersht,
1984,Fersht, 1987].
Van der Waals interactions occur between all neighbouring atoms in
structures and interfaces, but are not significantly different to those
made by the same atoms with solvent. Thus a requirement exists for
the atoms in the interface to be at least as densly packed as in bulk
solvent; implying shape complementarity as discussed in the following
section.
Copyright Bob MacCallum - DISCLAIMER: this was written in 1997
and may contain out-of-date information.
So which has the highest boiling point? CCl4 does, because it isa bigger molecule with more electrons. The increase in thedispersion forces more than compensates for the loss of dipole-dipole interactions.
The boiling points are:
CHCl3 61.2°C
CCl4 76.8°C
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 13/132
,
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 14/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 15/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 16/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 17/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 18/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 19/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 20/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 21/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 22/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 23/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 24/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 25/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 26/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 27/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 28/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 29/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 30/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 31/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 32/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 33/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 34/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 35/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 36/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 37/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 38/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 39/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 40/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 41/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 42/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 43/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 44/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 45/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 46/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 47/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 48/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 49/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 50/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 51/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 52/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 53/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 54/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 55/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 56/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 57/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 58/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 59/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 60/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 61/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 62/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 63/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 64/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 65/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 66/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 67/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 68/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 69/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 70/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 71/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 72/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 73/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 74/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 75/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 76/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 77/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 78/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 79/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 80/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 81/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 82/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 83/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 84/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 85/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 86/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 87/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 88/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 89/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 90/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 91/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 92/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 93/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 94/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 95/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 96/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 97/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 98/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 99/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 100/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 101/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 102/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 103/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 104/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 105/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 106/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 107/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 108/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 109/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 110/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 111/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 112/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 113/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 114/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 115/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 116/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 117/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 118/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 119/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 120/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 121/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 122/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 123/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 124/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 125/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 126/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 127/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 128/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 129/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 130/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 131/132
7/27/2019 Vander Vaal Forces
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vander-vaal-forces 132/132