vanilla tcp? alasdair allan. ivoa interop meeting, may 2006 1 why tcp? traditional and still the...

19
Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan

Post on 19-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

Vanilla TCP?Vanilla TCP?Alasdair AllanAlasdair Allan

Page 2: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

2

Why TCP?

• Traditional and still the best

• Because we’ve always done it that way– not always a bad thing– everyone knows how

• Minimum buy-in for users

• Minimum buy-in for publishers

• Fast, little if any overhead

Page 3: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

3

User buy-in…

• 92 lines of Perl, including;– ACK messages– IAMALIVE messages– error handling– re-connection– message parsing

Page 4: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

4

Publisher buy-in…

• 130 lines of Perl, including;– ACK messages– IAMALIVE messages– error handling– re-connection– multiple clients

Page 5: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

5

What we’ve done so far?

• Convenience layer and parser (Perl, C++ & Java?)– building common cases (including GCN)– http://voevent.sourceforge.net/

• Prototype event network live and on sky• Limited (hard-wired logic) brokering

– using <What>• Archiving and persistent storage• RSS test feed(s)

– programmatic– human readable?

Page 6: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

6

TCP(V) prototypes

• VOEvent over “vanilla” TCP/IP

• Acknowledgement of passed message

• Basic health checks on the endpoints

Page 7: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

7

An architecture diagram showing; publishers, subscribers, filters (e.g. relays) and repositories, along with the more complicated aggregators and brokers.

“Atomic” services

• Publisher• Relay• Repository• Subscriber• Listener

• Author• Author

• Listener

Page 8: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

8

TCP(V) client/server

• Subscriber (client) opens a socket connection to a a Publisher (server) and listens for events on that port.

• Subscriber (client) will send an acknowledgement to the Publisher (server) on receipt of an event.

• Publisher (server) will periodically send an “iamalive” packet to all Subscribers (clients).

• Subscribers (clients) will reply with an “iamalive”.

Page 9: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

9

Event flow

Publishers Publishers BrokerBroker Subscribers

Subscribers

RepositoryRepository

# # # #<VOEvent role=“observation”> . . .</VOEvent>

# # # #<VOEvent role=“ack”> . . .</VOEvent>

Page 10: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

10

VOEvent Network

Caltech

SDSS SNe U Wash/Stanford

PairitelBerkeley

Palomar P60Caltech

Palomar-Quest Caltech

RAPTOR x 8LANL

Liverpool TelescopeLa Palma

Faulkes NorthHawaii

Faulkes SouthAustralia

OGLE IIILas Campanas

JACHawaii

Exeter

VOEvent

Other

Event Flow

Microlensing Survey Exeter

UKIRTHawaiiSkyDOT

(database)

PublisherFilterRepository

LANL

SWIFT etc

GCNNASA GSFC

GCN-2NASA GSFC

Backbone

Data MiningExeter

NOAO

SurveysCTIO/KPNO

Tools/ServicesCommunity

Key RolesAuthorSubscriber

ULTRACAMLa Palma

SuperNova SurveyExeter

Page 11: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

11

Alternative transport

• RSS 2.0

• eSTAR– SOAP– Plastic (over XMLRPC)

• Caltech– Jabber/XMPP

• NOAO– Java Messaging– Mule

Page 12: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

12

RSS 2.0

• Parallel (on the side?) development to TCP(V)

• The vanilla of the Web 2.0 era

• What RSS is not,– a transport layer– a protocol for document exchange

• It’s “just” a document format– envelope for VOEvent

Page 13: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

13

RSS feed

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<rss version="2.0">

<channel>

<title>VOEvent GCN Notices</title>

<language>en</language>

<description>RSS feed for GCN notices</description>

<link>http://voeventnet.caltech.edu/GCN.html</link>

<item>

<title>MILAGRO_Source trigger 886-1</title>

<description>

<p>Possible GRB The event time is 2005-12-01T16:24:15 UT. Location RA 232.1248 Dec 62.9797 (J2000)</p>

</description>

<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:09:52 PST</pubDate>

<link>http://voeventnet.caltech.edu/Notices/ivo_GCN_MILAGRO_58_886-1_2005-12-01T16:24:15.xml</link>

<author>Scott Barthelmy GCN [email protected]</author>

<comments>http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3_archive.html</comments>

<enclosure url=“http://estar.org.uk/event.pl?id=886-1” length=“2440” type=“application/xml+voevent” />

</item>

.

.

.

</channel>

</rss>

Page 14: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

14

RSS feeds

eSTAR native feed (includes OGLE III feed)

http://www.estar.org.uk/voevent/eSTAR/eSTAR.rdf

RAPTOR/TALONS feed (includes GCN translation)

http://www.estar.org.uk/voevent/RAPTOR/RAPTOR.rdf

Caltech feed (re-published GCN translation)

http://www.estar.org.uk/voevent/Caltech/Caltech.rdf

See the eSTAR website http://www.estar.org.uk/ for more information.

Page 15: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

15

Where are we going?

• Event brokering (aggregators)– time critical– non-time critical (data mining?)

• Event archiving and persistent storage– REST (and SOAP) interfaces– persistence of data products

• Search service– REST interface

• Authentication– signatures

Page 16: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

16

We should not mandate transport!

• We should not tie our document or protocol standards to a single mode of transport;– bad design decision– RFC 1149, see http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/– longer term problems

Page 17: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

17

Cathedral and the Bazaar

• Design by committee– cathedrals– slums

• Design by dictate– lottery

• Design by market pressure– betamax vs. VHS– market pressure

Page 18: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

18

Conclusions

• Probably need a backbone protocol

• Probably going to be TCP(V)– low buy-in for both publishers and subscribers– fully supported across different platforms– momentum is in that direction

• But other transport mechanisms are needed

Page 19: Vanilla TCP? Alasdair Allan. IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006 1 Why TCP? Traditional and still the best Because we’ve always done it that way –not always

IVOA Interop Meeting, May 2006

19

The 2nd HTN WorkshopJuly 23-26, 2006 in the Institut für Astrophysik, Göttingen, Germany

Aims• Establish the standards for interoperability between robotic

telescope networks.

• Work towards the establishment of an e-market for the exchange of telescope time.

• Establish the standards for interoperability with the Virtual Observatory (VO) for event notification.

See http://www.telescope-networks.org/ for details.