vapor pressure - department of environmental sciences at …rodenburg/522/v… · ppt file · web...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 4
Vapor Pressure
pº = Pressure of a substance in equilibrium with its pure condensed (liquid or solid) phase
Why do we care?
-spills
-pesticide application
-will lead us to Henry’s law constant
Air
WaterOctanol
A gas is a gas is a gasT, P
Fresh, salt, ground, poreT, salinity, cosolvents
NOM, biological lipids, other solvents T, chemical composition
Pure Phase(l) or (s)
Ideal behavior
PoL
Csatw
Csato
KH = PoL/Csat
w
KoaKH
Kow = Csato/Csat
w
Kow
Koa = Csato/Po
L
Ranges of pº (atm)– PCBs – 10-5 to 10-9
– n-alkanes – 100.2 to 10-16
• n-C10H22 ~ 10-2.5
• n-C20H42 ~ 10-9
– Benzene ~ 10-0.9
– toluene ~10-1.42
– Ethylbenzene ~ 10-1.90
– propyl benzene ~ 10-2.35
– carbon tetrachloride ~ 10-0.85
– methane 102.44
• Even though VP is “low”, gas phase may still be important.
Phase diagram
picture of three-phase diagram
Ideal Gas Law
nRTpV p = pressure
V = volume
n = moles of gas
R = gas constant
T = temperature (Kelvin)
Thermodynamic considerations(deriving the van’t Hoff equation)
21 dd
consider a gas: if T or P is changed and equilibrium is re-established:
the change in chemical potential in the two systems is equal
dpVdTSddpVdTSd
222
111
where S = molar entropy
and V = molar volume
12
12
21
21
)()(
VS
VVSS
dTdp
at equilibrium
STHGG
02112
substituting:
12
12
VTH
dTdp
for a liquid vaporizing, the volume change can be assumed to be equal to the volume of gas produced, since the volume of the solid or liquid is negligible
012 pRTVV gas Q. where did the n go?
A. this is molar volume
212
00 )(RTHp
dTdp
212
0lnRTH
dTpd
dxdu
udxud 1ln
recall (calculus!)
where H12 = Hvap (gas) or Hsub (solid)
= energy required to convert one mole of liquid (or solid) to gas without an increase in T.
Hvap is a function of T.
As T approaches the boiling point, Hvap increases rapidly
At T < boiling point, Hvap increases slowly
from 0-40ºC, Hvap can be assumed to be constant
The van’t Hoff equation
212
0lnRTH
dTpd
integrate assuming Hvap is constant:
aRTHp
120ln
BTAp 0ln
Antoine equation
if Hvap is not constant:
acT
bp
0lnanother Antoine equation
Using Hvap to predict VP at other temperatures
211
2 11lnTTR
Hpp vap
T
T
211
2 11lnTTR
HKK
T
T
As we saw in the thermodynamics lecture:
Specifically,
Note the change in slope when the substance is solid (sublimation)
Hsub = Hmelt (~25%) + Hvap (~75%)
still use liquid phase as reference:
Hypothetical subcooled liquid
= liquid cooled below melting point without crystallizingcompound pºs < pºL
1,4-dichlorobenzene 3.04 2.76phenol 3.59 3.4122’55’ PCB 7.60 6.6422’455’ PCB 8.02 7.40
Becomes important later when we talk about solubility
-log P
Molecular interactions affecting vapor pressure
Molecule:molecule interactions in condensed phase (L or s) have greatest affect on VP
strong interactions lead to large Hvap, low VP
weak interactions lead to small Hvap, high VP
Intermolecular interactions can be classified into three types:
van der Waals forces (nonpolar)
Polar forces
Hydrogen bonding
van der Waals forces• nonspecific• function of size (number of
electrons)• consist of:
– London dispersive energies • fleeting areas of charge
– Induced dipoles• areas of charge arising from
interactions with a polar molecule
“nonpolar”
Polar interactions:dipole-dipole interactions
• permanent areas of charge on two molecules attract
Hydrogen bondsSpecificdonors and acceptors
table 4.3
compound (class) (H-donor) (H-acceptor)alkanes 0 01-alkenes 0 0.07aliphatic ethers 0 0.45aliphatic aldehydes 0 0.45aliphatic alcohols 0.37 0.48carboxylic acids 0.60 0.45benzene 0 0.14phenol 0.6 0.31naphthalane 0 0.2f luorene 0 0.2pyrene 0 0.29DCM 0.1 0.05Water 0.82 0.35
Part of Table 4.3
Vapor Pressure Estimation Technique
5.14))((1.152149.4ln
2
2
23/2*
iiDi
DiiLiL n
nVp
based on regression of lots of VP data, best fit gives:
pressure in Pa, where:
index refractive
y)(MW/densit memolar volu
Di
iL
n
V
refractive index (response to light) is a function of polarizability.
see table 3.1, also might be available in the CRC
sizepolarizability
H-bonding ability
Refractive index
Difference between polarity and polarizability
Trouton’s ruleAt their boiling points, most organic compounds have a similar entropy of vaporization:
Svap (Tb) = 85 – 90 J/molK
We can be slightly more accurate with Kistiakowsky’s expression:
Svap (Tb) = KF(36.6 + 8.31ln(Tb)) J/molK Tb in K (eqn 4-20)
KF = 1 for most compounds
At the boiling point: vapbvap STHG 0
So if we know Tb, we can estimate Hvap (at the boiling point) fairly accurately
exception: strongly polar or H-bonding compounds
Table 4.2
Estimating VP at other T (need Hvap)
bTpaTH iLvap )(log)( 1*
1
Recognize that Hvap is not constant.
Especially if Tb is high (> 100ºC), the estimate of Hvap from Trouton/Kistiakowsky may not be valid at the temperature of interest.
Empirically, Hvap is a function of the VP:
211
2 11lnTTR
Hpp vap
T
T
FIG 4.7
From a data set of many compounds, Goss and Schwarzenbach (1999) get:
0.70)298(log80.8)298( * KpKH iLvap
Less empirically,
assume Hvap is linearly proportional to T (i.e. assume that the heat capacity, Cpvap is constant:
)()()()( TTTCTHTH bbvappbvapvap
substitute this expression into the Clausius-Clapeyron equation and integrate from Tb to T:
TT
R
TC
TT
R
TC
TTRTH
P
bbvappbbvapp
b
bvap
ln)(
1)(
11)(ln 0
don’t let notation confuse you. (Tb) means at the boiling point. You do not multiply Hvap by the boiling point
but we still need to know Cp(Tb)!
)()( bvapbbvap TSTTH Recall:
substitute:
TT
R
TC
TT
R
TC
RTS
p
bbvapp
bbvappbvap
ln)(
1)()(
ln 0
generally:)(8.0)( bvapbp TSTC ranges from 1.0 to 0.6
and Svap(Tb)~ 88 J/molK
finally!
TT
TTp bb ln5.8119ln 0
OK for liquids with Tb < 100ºC
High MW compounds, need correction for intermolecular forces (but we don’t have their boiling points anyway!) (For refinements see equation 4-33)
Can estimate boiling points, see p. 120
in atm
TT
TTTKp bb
bF ln8.018.1)ln4.4(ln 0
KF is the Fishtine factor, usually 1, but sometimes as high as 1.3 (see p 113)
the old edition gave (where KF =1):
in atmEqn 4-33
solids?those previous equations yielded the vapor pressure of the hypothetical subcooled liquid.
How can we correct this to give the true vapor pressure of a solid?
Prausnitz (1969):
Where Sfus(Tm) = entropy of fusion at melting point
unfortunately Sfus is much more variable than Svap
1
)(ln 0
0
TT
RTS
pp mmfus
L
s
)log2.192.95.56()( mfus TS J/molK
Where = number of torsional bonds and = rotational symmetry number (see p. 125)
the older edition of your book gave this simpler (but less accurate) equation:
Sfus(Tm) ~ 56.5 + 10.5(n-5) J/molK
Where n = number of flexing chain atoms.
if n<5, then ignore this term
Estimation of vapor pressures for polychlorinated biphenyls: a comparison of eleven predictive methodsLawrence P. Burkhard, Anders W. Andren, and David E. ArmstrongEnvironmental Science and Technology 1985, 19, 500 - 507
conclusions:
• non-correlative methods have poor predictive ability (error increases as VP decreases)
• correlative methods requiring a set of compounds with known P are much better
• best method: determine VP as function of GC retention times
Determination of vapor pressures for nonpolar and semipolar organic compounds from GC retention data (Hinckley et al, 1990)
• Chromatographed 2 reference compounds (eicosane and p,p’DDT) having known VP and Hvap versus a host of unknowns (PAHs, organochlorines, etc)
• Isothermal runs allow determination of RRT at several T• Comparison of RRT with reference compounds allows
determination of VP at given T• Comparison of changes in RRT with T and knowledge of
Hvap for reference compound allows calculation of Hvap
for all unknowns
Problem 4.2• In a dump site, you find an old 3-liter pressure bottle
containing FREON 12 with a pressure gauge that reads 2.7 bar. (First, you realize that this gauge was not manufactured in the US.) The temperature is 10ºC. What mass of FREON 12 is in the bottle?
• Also estimate the free energy, enthalpy, and entropy of condensation of FREON 12.
• You find the following info for FREON 12 in the CRC:
T deg C p/kPa-25 123
0 30825 65150 121675 2076
Problem 4.6
• estimate VP at 0C based on VP at 25ºC or based solely on Tb and Tm
log(p) @25C Tm (degC) Tb (degC)dimethyl phthalate 0.38 5.5 283.72,3,7,8-TCDD -6.7 305 446.5
(hint = 4)
Homework
• Do problems 4.3 and 4.4• Due 2/2/10