variations in map-reading performance efficiency
DESCRIPTION
Variations in Map-Reading Performance Efficiency. Rick Bunch, University of North Carolina Greensboro Robert Earl Lloyd, University of South Carolina. Purpose and Problem. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rick Bunch, University of North Carolina GreensboroRobert Earl Lloyd, University of South Carolina
Measure the performance efficiency of participants as they engage in map-reading tasks that require the processing of geographic information
To identify the relationships between top-down and bottom-up processes related to searching and recalling geographic information
Accuracy and reaction times are frequently used as measures of success (performance efficiency) in cognitive experiments
This study examine three factors that could influence performance: gender, memory, and brain asymmetry
Data Gather Steps◦ Measure second and fourth digits◦ Bem Sex Role Inventory◦ Spatial Working Memory Span Test (Computerized
version of the Corsi Block Task)◦ Verbal Working Memory Span Test
Experiment◦ Participants were randomly presented with state names
for the 48 contiguous states of the U.S. and asked to identify each state on an unlabeled map
Independent Explanation2D/4D Ratio Recorded in millimeters
Gender Femininity, Masculinity, Undifferentiated, Androgynous
Spatial Working Memory
Average of highest recalled objects for each round
Verbal Working Memory
Average of highest recalled letters for each round
Area Area of each state
Population Population of each state
Distance Participants’ home state to state
F = 5.8, P > F = 0.016F = 17.3, P > F = 0.000
F = 15.5, P > F = 0.000 F = 0.6, P > F = 0.446
Gender revealed interesting differences
Participants with high spatial AND Verbal scores had better performance
2D/4D ratio had mixed results
Area of the state and distance from home state impacted performance