vdot’s work zone research and practices
DESCRIPTION
VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices. Ben Cottrell Virginia DOT Research Council. ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS FOR FLAGGING OPERATIONS. Steve Jones Ben Cottrell. Introduction. In 1983, MUTCD was revised to specify use of STOP/SLOW paddle as primary hand-signaling device. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices
Ben CottrellVirginia DOT Research Council
![Page 2: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS FOR
FLAGGING OPERATIONS
Steve Jones
Ben Cottrell
![Page 3: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• In 1983, MUTCD was revised to specify use of STOP/SLOW paddle as primary hand-signaling device.
• Paddle has been the standard since 1987.
![Page 4: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background
• ATSSA asked FHWA to adopt proposed sign.
• In 1987, the two signs were included in ongoing FHWA human factors study using a driver simulator.
• Study concluded that proposed sign was not understood by drivers, and request was denied.
![Page 5: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Paddle gained acceptance, and its use increased in work zone traffic control.
• Existing sign is not an accurate representation of traffic situation encountered by drivers.
Background (cont.)
![Page 6: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• To evaluate ability of current and proposed sign to convey its intended message.
• To satisfy FHWA requirement of a human factors study on understanding and acceptance of proposed sign.
Purpose
![Page 7: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Literature review• Development of survey questionnaire• Identification of participants• Mailing of survey• Analysis of survey results• Development of conclusions
Methodology
![Page 8: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Sample groups chosen (open ended)– Younger drivers in driver’s education classes– Older (> 50) drivers at local senior center
• Survey mailed (multiple choice)– Addresses randomly selected from Internet phone
books– 4,500 questionnaires mailed out
Identification of Participants & Mailing of Survey
![Page 9: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Survey Statistics
• 3,600 delivered• 1,383 replies including 20 via web site
– 759 existing sign– 624 proposed sign
• 38% return rate
![Page 10: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Correct – implies clear understanding of intended sign meaning
• Substantially correct – implies substantive understanding of intended sign meaning
• Incorrect – implies total lack of understanding of intended sign meaning
Response Codes
![Page 11: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Survey Question 1 Have you ever seen this sign in Virginia?
Existing Sign
no22.4%
yes77.6%
Proposed Sign
no35.2%
yes64.8%
![Page 12: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Survey Question 2What do you think the sign means?
Existing Signsubst. correct22.3%
correct76.5%
Proposed Sign
subst. correct23.9%
incorr27.5% correct
52.3%
![Page 13: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Survey Question 3 Where would you expect to see this sign?
Existing Sign
correct96.4%
Proposed Sign
correct91.4%
.
![Page 14: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Survey Question 4 What would you do if you saw the sign while
driving?
Existing Sign
correct65.6%
substant. correct32.4%
incorrect2.0%
Proposed Sign incorrect4.2%
correct78.7%
substant correct17.1%
![Page 15: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Study Limitations• Survey approach• Survey Language - “flagger” versus traffic control person - influence of stop sign symbol - similarity in choices - sign meaning and driver behavior • Single sign versus sign series
![Page 16: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusions• The proposed sign accurately symbolizes
what motorists will see.• The correct meaning of the existing sign
was clearer to more respondents than the proposed sign.
• Designation of “flagger” as the only correct response was biased in favor of the existing sign. “Stop ahead” as an incorrect response was considered debatable.
![Page 17: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Conclusions (cont.)• More respondents associated the
desired driving behavior with the proposed sign than the existing sign.
• Asking what drivers would do when they see a sign is a better measure than asking what the sign means.
• The proposed sign performs as good as if not better than the existing sign.
![Page 18: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Recommendations• The Traffic Engineering Division should
seek FHWA approval to modify the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual to allow the use of the proposed sign.
• VDOT, in cooperation with other state DOTs and national groups, should request that the FHWA modify the MUTCD to allow the use of the proposed sign.
STATUS: Under Review by FHWA
![Page 19: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
For more information:
• Research Brief
http://virginiadot.org/VTRC/briefs/00-r8rb/night_work_zone_flash.htm
• Final Report http://virginiadot.org/VTRC/main/online_reports/pdf/00-r8.pdf
![Page 20: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
IMPROVING NIGHT WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL
![Page 21: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Why Night Work?
![Page 22: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Worker Safety
![Page 23: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Motorists’ Safety
![Page 24: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• The objective: to examine traffic control for night work zones from the perspective of both worker and motorist.
• Approach: investigate practices of other state DOTs, identify the problems associated with traffic control for night work zones, and potential strategies to resolve them.
![Page 25: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
METHODS
• Literature Review• Survey of State DOTs• Survey of VDOT Residencies• Review of Night Work Zones• Motorists Survey• Inventory of Strategies for Improvement
![Page 26: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Traffic Control Problems
State DOTsState DOTs• Poor visibility• Impaired drivers• Higher speeds and
lower volume• Insufficient lighting
VDOT ResidenciesVDOT Residencies• Poor visibility• Higher average
speed• Motorists inattention• Inadequate lighting
![Page 27: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Solutions
State DOTsState DOTs• Improve visibility of
workers• Use drums in taper• Detail lighting plan• Use police• Maintain devices
VDOT ResidenciesVDOT Residencies• Use police• Specify lighting
requirements• Use drums• Use heavier cones
![Page 28: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
• Reduced visibility, driver impairment or inattention, inadequate lighting, and lack of maintenance of traffic control devices are common problems.
![Page 29: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
• Traffic control for night work zones, in general, is adequate. Common problem areas: properly establishing work zones, maintaining the traffic control devices, and proper aiming and alignment of lighting to avoid glare.
![Page 30: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
• Despite the perception that night work zones are less safe, evidence for this was not available. Based on a limited amount of data, there was no evidence of the perceived higher speeds at night.
![Page 31: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Improving Visibility of Traffic Control Devices
• Worker and Work Vehicle Visibility• Managing Traffic
![Page 32: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Improving Visibility of Traffic Control Devices
Drums should be used in the transition area for lane closures.
Consider requiring the contractor to have full-time traffic control staff. This staff and VDOT staff should ensure that the traffic control complies with the VWAPM, work lights are not creating glare and work vehicle lights are not a distraction.
![Page 33: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Improving Visibility of Traffic Control Devices
Under conditions of limited sight distance, the transition area should be shifted upstream to improve the visibility of the taper. Similarly, when a lane closure merge point is near an entry ramp, the transition area should be shifted upstream to separate the two merge points.
![Page 34: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Worker and Work Vehicle Visibility
All workers should wear hard hats that have retroreflective material that is visible from all sides. Ways to make retroreflective clothing visible through the full range of body motions should be considered.
The NY DOT guidelines for use of work vehicle flashing and warning lights should be used.
![Page 35: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Managing Traffic PCMS messages should be
appropriate for the road conditions present. A PCMS should be considered for end-of-queue warnings in the early hours when traffic volumes may result in queues and as special attention getters later at night.
![Page 36: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Managing Traffic When appropriate, the message
“TROOPER ON SITE, SPEED LIMIT ENFORCED” should be used. The use of radar controlled PCMS should be considered as a countermeasure for speeding.
The police vehicle should be positioned to maximize its visibility.
![Page 37: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
• Recommendations should be presented to the Work Zone Safety roundtable for review, revisions, and implementation.
• Employee Safety and Health Division should have lead responsibility in the areas of worker safety clothing such as hard hats.
![Page 38: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
For more information:
• Research Brief
http://virginiadot.org/VTRC/briefs/00-r8rb/night_work_zone_flash.htm
• Final Report
http://virginiadot.org/VTRC/main/online_reports/pdf/00-r8.pdf
![Page 39: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
VDOT Work Area Protection Manual and Practices
![Page 40: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Focus
• Highlight some areas where VDOT exceeds MUTCD.
• Traffic control and safety.• Tools, training and public awareness.
![Page 41: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Cones and Signs
• standard size cone is 36 in. • warning signs
– 48 in. standard size– Fluorescent orange prismatic sheeting
One size only minimize errors in size and simplifies inventory.
![Page 42: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Pavement Markings
• Objective: to have pavement markings as good as or better than the original markings.
• Use a lot temporary tape.• Raised pavement markers used in
transition area.
![Page 43: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Lane Closures• Extensive use of Truck Mounted
Attenuators- TMAs shall be used on multilane highways with speed limit >45 mph- VDOT has >500 TMAs; contractors have 500-800 TMAs.
• Use two additional signs not in MUTCD: Lane ends and Keep Left/Right.
![Page 44: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Portable Changeable Message Signs
• Extensive use of PCMSs for lane closures and lane shifts especially when queues are expected.
• Experimenting with 12 small PCMSs mounted on pick up and dump trucks for pavement marking and environmental operations.
![Page 46: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
State Police in Work Zones
• Used in just about any interstate work zones especially in urbanized areas.
• Used on some primary and major secondary routes with high speeds.
• Police actively pursue speeders.
![Page 47: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Work Zone Safety Tools• Work Zone Safety Pocket Guide• Work Zone Safety Checklist
– Two page carbonless four copy form or electronic copy
– Completed by district safety officers during reviews and weekly by inspectors
• District Safety Officers have video recording system tied to DMI in vehicles
![Page 48: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Training
• Flagger Certification– Now: self administered program on
videotape– By late summer: PC based testing at local
DMV with photo id card • Work Zone Training with VRTBA
– 1 day course; 6-8/yr– 300-400 Contractor and VDOT staff /yr
![Page 49: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Public Awareness Campaign
• VDOT Internet site:http://virginiadot.org/comtravel/eoc/eoc-main.asp.
• Special Internet site for major projects.• Regular daily feature in local
newspapers and radio stations identifying work zones.
![Page 50: VDOT’s Work Zone Research and Practices](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052604/56812a93550346895d8e4165/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
QUESTIONS?