velindre cancer centre - transforming cancer services · velindre cancer centre reptile survey...

$: Velindre Cancer Centre - Transforming Cancer Services · Velindre Cancer Centre Reptile Survey Report ... \Users\hou71361\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\pims01- ... (MML) has been$
Velindre Cancer Centre

Reptile Survey Report

1 February 2017

Velindre NHS Trust

364561 ES01 B

C:\Users\hou71361\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\pims01-pims\c2105645170\364561 ES01 Reptile Survey Report Rev B.docx

Mott MacDonald

Fitzalan House Fitzalan Road Cardiff CF24 0EL United Kingdom T +44 (0)29 2046 7800 F +44 (0)29 2047 1888 mottmac.com

Velindre NHS Trust Unit 2 Charnwood Court Parc Nantgarw Nantgarw Cardiff CF15 7QZ

Velindre Cancer Centre

Reptile Survey Report

1 February 2017

Velindre NHS Trust

Mott MacDonald | Velindre Cancer Centre

364561 | ES01 | B | 1 February 2017 C:\Users\hou71361\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\pims01-pims\c2105645170\364561 ES01 Reptile Survey Report Rev B.docx

Issue and revision record

Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description

A 17th December 2016

J Brown J Bates M Phillips First Issue

B 1st February 2017

M Hemmings J Brown M Phillips Comments Addressed

Information class: Standard

This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-

captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.

We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used

for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by

other parties.

This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other

parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.

This report has been pr epared sol el y for use by the party which commissi oned it (the ‘Client’) i n connecti on with the capti oned proj ect. It should not be used for any other purpose. N o person other than the Client or any party who has expressl y agreed ter ms of r eliance with us (the ‘Reci pient(s)’) may rel y on the content, i nformati on or any vi ews expressed i n the repor t. We accept no duty of care, responsi bility or liability to any other r eci pient of thi s document. This r eport is confi denti al and contains pr opri etar y intell ectual property.

No representati on, warranty or under taki ng, expr ess or i mplied, is made and no responsi bility or liability is accepted by us to any party other than the Cli ent or any Reci pient(s), as to the accuracy or completeness of the i nformati on contai ned i n this r eport. For the avoidance of doubt this r eport does not in any way purpor t to i nclude any legal , insur ance or fi nanci al advice or opi nion.

We disclai m all and any liability whether arising i n tort or contrac t or other wise which it might otherwise have to any party other than the Cli ent or the Reci pient(s), in r espect of this report , or any infor mation attri buted to i t.

We accept no r esponsibility for any error or omission i n the r eport which is due to an error or omission i n data, infor mation or statements supplied to us by other par ties incl udi ng the client (‘D ata’). We have not i ndependentl y verified such D ata and have assumed it to be accurate, complete, reli abl e and current as of the date of such infor mation.

Forecasts presented i n this document were pr epared usi ng Data and the report is dependent or based on D ata. Inevitabl y, some of the assumptions used to develop the for ecasts will not be realised and unantici pated events and circumstances may occur. C onsequentl y M ott MacDonal d does not guarantee or warr ant the concl usi ons contained i n the repor t as there are li kel y to be differ ences between the for ecas ts and the ac tual results and those di ffer ences may be material. Whil e we consi der that the infor mation and opini ons gi ven i n this r eport are sound all parti es must rel y on their own skill and j udgement when making use of it .

Under no circumstances may this report or any extr act or summar y ther eof be used in connection wi th any public or pri vate securities offering i ncluding any rel ated memorandum or prospectus for any securities offering or stock exchange listing or announceme nt.

Mott MacDonald | Velindre Cancer Centre


Contents

Executive summary 1

1 Introduction 2

1.1 Background 2

1.2 Site Options 2

1.2.1 Site A 2

1.2.2 Site B 2

1.2.3 Site C 3

1.2.4 Site D 3

1.2.5 Site E 3

1.3 Legislation and Planning Context 3

1.4 Scope of this Report 3

2 Methodology 4

2.1 Desk Study 4

2.2 Field Survey 4

2.3 Survey Limitations 5

3 Results 7

3.1 Desk Study 7

3.2 Field Survey 7

3.3 Summary 8

4 Discussions and Recommendations 9

4.1 Discussions 9

4.1.1 Potential Impacts 9

4.2 Recommendations 9

5 References 11

Appendices 12

A. Site Options 13

B. Reptile Location Map 15

Mott MacDonald | Velindre Cancer Centre 1


Executive summary

Mott MacDonald Limited has been commissioned by Velindre NHS Trust to undertake a reptile

presence / likely absence survey of all suitable habitats within the proposed Whitchurch Hospital

Campus located in the northwest of Cardiff, south Wales. The purpose of the assessment is to

undertake a review of the current habitats which are able to support reptiles and inform the

development of the site for a new hospital facility.

Originally a number of potential sites were under consideration for development (sites A to E).

Optioneering reduced this to two (D and E), with Site E being the preferred development site. All

the sites (A to E) were surveyed. A total of seven surveys were undertaken between 12th May

and 30th June 2016, during the optimum survey period for reptiles. Reptile surveys were

undertaken within Sites A, B, C, D & E within habitat considered suitable to support this species

group. Surveys were undertaken to inform the proposed development of any potential

constraints associated with this species group. Both grass snake and adder were recorded.

The preferred option for the proposed development of the new hospital facility is now

understood to be development Site E. This site is comprised of an area of rough grassland,

scrub adjacent to woodland.

Historic records of all four common species of reptile (adder, grass snake, slow worm and

common lizard) have been identified within 2km of the site. Site E is considered to support a

‘Good grass snake population’ and a ‘Low adder population’. Sites C & D are considered to

support a ‘Low grass snake population’.

Recommendations for mitigation will need to be reassessed once the detailed design has been

completed. However, it is considered that the most appropriate mitigation for the impacts on

reptiles will incorporate trapping and translocation.



1 Introduction

1.1 Background

Mott MacDonald Limited (MML) has been commissioned by Velindre NHS Trust to undertake a

reptile presence / likely absence survey of all suitable habitats within the proposed Whitchurch

Hospital Campus located in the northwest of Cardiff, south Wales. The purpose of the

assessment is to undertake a review of the current habitats with potential to support reptiles and

inform the development of the site for a new hospital facility – the Velindre Cancer Centre

(VCC).

At the time of the surveys the project was in an optioneering stage with Sites D or E being

considered for development. The surveys included all the surrounding sites (A, B and C) to

account for access options and context of the surrounding areas. It is now considered that Site

E is the preferred option, as such the discussion and recommendations presented within this

report will focus on the results for Site E.

Sites A to E, plus the proposed northern access route are all situated around the existing

Velindre Hospital (Appendix A). Velindre Hospital is located in the northern suburbs of Cardiff,

south Wales. The centre of the site is located at National Grid Reference ST145805, near

Junction 32 of the M4 motorway. The site covers an area of approximately 46 hectares (ha) and

lies in a semi urban setting.

The existing hospital campus is bounded to the south by Velindre Road and residential

properties, to the east by Park Road (A4054) and residential housing, to the north by a disused

railway cutting which is part of a Local Nature Reserve and a supermarket and to the west by a

Site of Special Scientific Interest and Nature Reserve, dropping down in level to Forest Park

Road, the River Taff and the Glamorgan Canal with residential housing beyond.

1.2 Site Options

A brief description of each site and options are provided below and are shown on the site layout

drawing (Appendix A).

1.2.1 Site A

Located in the south eastern corner of the overall site and contains buildings from the existing

Velindre Cancer Centre. It is unlikely that this area of the site will be developed to facilitate the

construction of the new facility and will remain untouched by the proposed VCC development.

1.2.2 Site B

Located in the central southern section of the overall site within Whitchurch Hospital. The

hospital was built in the early 1900’s as a psychiatric asylum and became the main centre for

mental health services in Cardiff. Many of the hospital buildings are Grade II listed. Access is

from Park Road. The buildings are generally two storeys in height, with the water tower

significantly taller. The rear grounds are a Registered Park and Gardens and exhibit a parkland

character of lawns and mature planting. The gardens feature six Grade II listed timber shelters.

The site is accessed from Park Road via a formal gateway and Gatehouse.



1.2.3 Site C

Located directly to the north of Whitchurch Hospital. This site comprises an open area of green

space laid out for bowls, football/ rugby and cricket with associated facilities including a cricket

pavilion. An access road provides a circulatory access road around the greenspace with a large

central car park and further areas of grass and parkland trees. This site is not proposed to be

taken forward as a development site.

1.2.4 Site D

Located in the southwestern corner of the Whitchurch Hospital campus and previously the site

of a country house “Velindre”. Formerly proposed as the site for a new Mental Health Hospital

the site was cleared of several healthcare buildings and has remained vacant since the hospital

scheme was cancelled. This site is not proposed to be taken forward as a development site.

1.2.5 Site E

Located within and beyond the northern extents of the Whitchurch Hospital campus. Previously

grazing land the fields are now populated by long grass and scrub vegetation. Site E is the

preferred option. The survey area also included options for a northern access road and

emergency access that cuts through an area of woodland which is part of the Local Nature

Reserve. This site is part of a Non-Statutory Designated Site, and is adjacent a Statutory

Designated Site (The Glamorganshire Canal Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).

1.3 Legislation and Planning Context

The four common reptile species, adder (Vipera berus), grass snake (Natrix natrix), common

lizard (Zootoca vivipara) and slow worm (Anguis fragilis), are protected under Schedule 5 of the

Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981, as amended) against deliberate and/or intentional killing,

injuring and trade.

1.4 Scope of this Report

The objectives of the report are as follows:

● Present the results of the desk study and field survey;

● To make an assessment of the potential impacts on reptiles;

● To identify potential constraints with regards to reptiles; and

● To provide recommendations for further survey work and/or mitigation and licensing

requirements.



2 Methodology

2.1 Desk Study

A desk study was undertaken, the results of which are set out within the Preliminary Ecological

Assessment (Mott MacDonald: 2015), to collate any reptile data within 2km of the proposed

development site. Only records less than ten years old were considered valid and relevant. The

following sources were reviewed / consulted:

● South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre (SEWBReC) (2015);

● Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC); and

● Biodiversity Action Reporting System (BARS).

2.2 Field Survey

All surveys undertaken in 2016 were carried out using standard methodologies as

recommended in the Herptofauna Workers Manual (JNCC: 1998) and the Herptofauna Groups

of Britain and Ireland Maintaining Best Practice (1998). The methodology also incorporated the

guidance set out in Froglife (1999) Advice Sheet 10.

A total of 133 artificial refugia, comprising of a mixture of bitumen roofing felt (~50 x 40 cm) and

corrugated bitumen and plastic roofing sheets (~100 x 60 cm) were placed within suitable

habitat at a density of approximately 1 every 20m at least 10 per hectare (see Appendix B,

drawings 1 to 5) within Sites D, C and E. The artificial refugia were set out on 22nd April 2016.

The artificial refugia were placed only in habitat considered suitable or optimal for reptiles. The

refugia were numbered and mapped to ensure that none were missed during the subsequent

surveys.

A total of seven surveys were undertaken between 12th May and 30th June 2016, which is the

optimum survey period for reptiles. All surveys were undertaken during suitable weather

conditions for basking reptiles (generally when the air temperature was between 10-200C and

there was no rain, see Table 1 for weather conditions). During each visit, a visual survey of the

area and artificial refugia was carried out with any naturally basking reptiles noted before the

artificial refugia was surveyed for any reptiles sheltering underneath.

Table 1: Summary of the weather conditions

Visit Date Weather

1 12/05/2016 14oC, dry, sunny with a light breeze.

2 17/05/2016 14oC, dry, overcast no wind.

3 24/05/2016 11oC, dry, sunny no wind.

4 10/06/2016 18oC, dry, sunny no wind.

5 15/06/2016 14oC, dry, overcast no wind.

6 24/06/2016 19oC, dry, sunny with a light breeze.

7 30/06/2016 17oC, mainly dry with a moderate wind.

During each survey the species, number of individuals, age class, refuge number and, where

possible, sex were recorded.



The peak count of each species obtained by a survey under suitable survey conditions within

one day was used to estimate the reptile population size. The scoring methodology set out in

Froglife was used (Table 2).

In order to assess the importance of the site for reptiles, the site was assigned a total

‘assemblage’ score dependant on the relative size of reptile population scores of all species

present within the site.

This precautionary approach has been developed because of the complex relationship between

numbers of animals detected during surveys and the actual population size.

Table 2: Criteria for estimating population size and assessing the site

Species Low Population Score 1

Good Population Score 2 Exceptional Population Score 3

Adder <5 5 – 10 >10

Grass Snake <5 5 – 10 >10

Common Lizard <5 5 – 20 >20

Slow-worm <5 5 – 20 >20

Source: Froglife: 1999

The location of the individual reptiles was mapped to understand the distribution of reptiles

across the site, see Appendix B drawings 1 to 5.

2.3 Survey Limitations

Reptile activity follows seasonal patterns and changes over the course of the year as well as

from year to year (being partially dependant on migration to / from neighbouring sites). Reptile

species such as snakes are known to migrate between suitable habitat features especially

between summer and winter.

It is not possible to provide an accurate population size without undertaking detailed capture,

mark and release surveys which require a substantial effort. However, it is possible to provide

an indication of the relative population sizes by using the peak counts, as detailed in Table 2.

The site is used regularly by local dog walkers and residents. A number of the artificial refugia

were vandalised or taken from site during the survey period. Table 3 summarises the loss of

artificial refugia over the seven surveys for transects A, B & E located in Site E. Transect C and

D were located within fenced off areas away from public access, hence no vandalism occurred.

Due to the loss of artificial refugia in Site E (comprising of 64% of all refugia within this area), a

population size estimate cannot be provided in accordance with the methodology set out in

Froglife. Given the vandalism, the peak count of each species has been calculated in regards to

the percentage of refugia lost with the assumption that reptiles would have been recorded at the

same frequency throughout Site E (i.e. adding an additional 64% to the peak counts within Site

E). Calculations are provided in the estimations of population size.



Table 3: Summary of missing Artificial Refugia.

Survey Number

Artificial Refugia at Start of Survey Lost Artificial Refugia Overall Percent lost

1 A: 42

B: 34

E: 16

A: 0

B: 0

E: 0

A: 0%

B: 0%

E: 0%

2 A: 42

B: 32

E: 16

A: 0

B: 2

E: 0

A: 0%

B: 6%

E: 0%

3 A: 42

B: 20

E: 8

A: 0

B: 14

E: 8

A: 0%

B: 41%

E: 50%

4 A: 32

B: 8

E: 5

A: 10

B: 26

E: 11

A: 23%

B: 76%

E: 70%

5 A: 32

B: 8

E: 5

A: 10

B: 26

E: 11

A: 23%

B: 76%

E: 70%

6 A: 32

B: 8

E: 5

A: 10

B: 26

E: 11

A: 23%

B: 76%

E: 70%

7 A: 28

B: 6

E: 5

A: 14

B: 28

E: 11

A: 44%

B: 83%

E: 70%



3 Results

3.1 Desk Study

Fifty four records of reptiles were identified within 2km of the proposed development site. These

included; one record of adder (located approximately 2km from the site), nine records of

common lizard (closest record located approximately 0.4km from the site), twelve records of

grass snake, (closest record located approximately 0.65km away) and thirty two records of slow

worm (closest record located approximately 0.4km away).

3.2 Field Survey

The surveys confirmed the presence of grass snake within the suitable habitat on site, one

adder was observed during the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) survey, this information

has been added to reptile survey 4.

To provide a suitable estimate of reptiles on site the peak count of each species has been

calculated in regards to the probability reptiles would have been recorded at the same

frequency throughout Site E, therefore the percentage of artificial refugia has been factored into

the results. The calculations follow the formula:

Peak count x % loss of artificial refugia = probability score

Probability count = peak count + probability score.

The following tables describe the results for the survey. Separate tables have been provided for

sites D, C and E.

Table 4: Summary of survey results, Site D

Site Visit Adder Grass Snake Common Lizard Slow worm

1 0 1 0 0

2 0 1 0 0

3 0 1 0 0

4 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 0 0

6 0 0 0 0

7 0 0 0 0

Peak Count 0 1 0 0

Population Class N/A Low N/A N/A

Reptile Score N/A 1 N/A N/A



Table 5: Summary of survey results, Site C

Site Visit Adder Grass Snake Common Lizard Slow worm

1 0 0 0 0

2 0 1 0 0

3 0 1 0 0

4 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 0 0

6 0 0 0 0

7 0 0 0 0

Peak Count 0 1 0 0

Population Class N/A Low N/A N/A

Reptile Score N/A 1 N/A N/A

Table 6: Summary of survey results, Site E

Site Visit Adder Grass Snake Probability Grass Snake**

Common Lizard

Slow-worm

1 0 3 3 0 0

2 0 5 5 0 0

3 0 6 6 x 0.50 = 3

6 + 3 = 9

0 0

4 1* 6 6 x 0.70 = 4.20

6 + 4.20 = 10.2

0 0

5 0 6 6 x 0.70 = 4.20

6 + 4.20 = 10.2

0 0

6 0 1 1 x 0.70 = 0.70

1 + 0.70 = 1.70

0 0

7 0 1 1 x 0.70 = 0.70

1 + 0.70 = 1.70

0 0

Peak Count 1 6 10.2 0 0

Population Class Low Good Good N/A N/A

Reptile Score 1 2 2 N/A N/A

* recorded during the NVC survey.

** percentage loss as recorded in Table 3.

3.3 Summary

Grass snakes were recorded within Sites D, C & E. Both grass snakes and adders were

recorded within Site E. The survey area consists of habitats suitable to support grass snakes

and adders; these include areas of rough grassland, field boundaries and scrub. The site

contains suitable hibernacula features such as spoil within Sites D & C. The adjacent woodland

areas also contain suitable hibernacula features for reptiles.

Grass snakes were assigned as having a ‘Good population class’ within Site E and a ‘Low

population class’ within Sites D & C. Adders were assigned as having a ‘Low population class’

within Site E.

It is considered that grass snake populations within all sites are breeding populations as sub-

adults and juveniles were recorded within Sites D, C & E.



4 Discussions and Recommendations

4.1 Discussions

The preferred option for the proposed development of the new hospital facility is Site E. This site

is comprised of an area of rough grassland, scrub adjacent to woodland areas.

Historic records of all four common species of reptile (adder, grass snake, slow worm and

common lizard) have been identified within 2km of the site.

Reptile surveys were undertaken within Sites D, C & E within suitable habitat considered to

support this species group. Surveys were undertaken to inform the proposed development of

any potential constraints associated with this species group. Both grass snake and adder were

recorded.

Site E is considered to support a ‘Good grass snake population’ and a ‘Low adder population’.

Sites D & C are considered to support a ‘Low grass snake population’.

4.1.1 Potential Impacts

The proposed development would result in a range of direct and indirect impacts on reptiles,

mainly the direct loss of large areas of optimal foraging and commuting habitat. The loss of such

a large area of foraging and commuting habitat in the area is considered likely to have a long

term impact on the local reptile population and ultimately result in a population reduction if left

unmitigated.

4.2 Recommendations

The most appropriate mitigation for the impacts on reptiles will incorporate a trapping and

translocation exercise, essentially removing all reptiles from the entire site. This will include

erecting a reptile fence and then using reptile tiles, catching the reptiles and moving them to a

receptor site.

A total relocation of reptiles is proposed as the only viable way to protect the reptiles from the

development works, to maintain the existing populations. Translocating them to a suitable

receptor site will maximise the opportunities to ensure the long-term viability of the populations

present.

A single receptor site is to be identified and suitably managed; this site should provide suitable

terrestrial habitats required, to include scrub, hibernacula, refuge, basking sites, and areas of

more rough / rank grassland.

The strategy for reptile mitigation will need to be agreed with Natural Resources Wales and the

Cardiff County Ecologist. However, the northern field contains suitable habitat for the identified

reptile population and it is considered this area would provide a good receptor site for

translocated reptiles. There is also the added benefit that this field is immediately adjacent to

the proposed development. Once the main development site is landscaped the translocated

population would therefore be able to naturally migrate back into the main development site.



In order to ensure the viability, it is recommended that the translocation is carried out in 2

phases:

● Enabling works; initial translocation confined to the area of the enabling works only. This

would take in the area of the Northern Access Route, plus any temporary construction

access routes required to facilitate construction of the bridge;

● Main site development area; translocation of reptiles from the remainder of the development

site.

Completing the translocation in a phased manner will ensure that the proposed receptor site is

not overwhelmed with an excessive number of reptiles at any stage and will (if required) allow

time to identify off-site receptor sites in the event that the northern field is unable to accept the

reptile population from the entire development site. In this case the translocation would proceed

with a relatively small number of reptiles being moved during the enabling works, allowing

further receptor sites to be assessed as required prior to commencement of main construction.

The development site will be landscaped sensitively to ensure that suitable vegetation and

habitat is present to allow recolonisation of the site by reptiles from the local area once the

landscaping is established.



5 References

FROGLIFE (1999) Advice Sheet 10: Reptile Survey – An introduction to planning, conducting

and interpreting surveys for snake and lizard conservation. Peterborough, Froglife

HERPETOFAUNA GROUPS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND (1998) Evaluating Local Mitigation/

Translocation. Programmes: Maintaining Best Practice and Lawful Standards HGBI advisory

notes for Amphibian and Reptile Groups (ARGs). HGBI, c/o Froglilfe, Halesworth. Unpubl.

JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE (1998) Herpetofauna Workers Manual Gent,

A. & Gibson, S. (eds). JNCC, Peterborough.

MOTT MACDONALD (2015) Preliminary Ecological Assessment, Velindre Cancer Centre report

for Velindre NHS Trust issued 18 December 2015.



Appendices



A. Site Options

P:\Cardiff\MNS\Projects\364561 - Velindre Geo Enviro\Drawings\5 GIS\MXD\MMD-364561-EN-DR-00-XX-0128.mxd

Rev Date Drawn Description Ch'k'd App'dFitzalan HouseFitzalan RoadCardiffCF24 0ELT +44 (0)2920 467800F +44 (0)2920 467801W mottmac.com

The Placeholder text for ClientName and Address, LogosAlso go in this box

Velindre Cancer Hospital Site Options Map

Client

Title

DesignedDrawnGIS Check

J BrownC Houlker

J Wu

Eng CheckCoordinationApproved

J BrownJ Brown

M PhillipsScale at A3 Status Rev Security

INF P1 STD1:5,000

Notes

Key to Symbols

Location Map

Drawing Number364561-MMD-00-XX-DR-C-0128

© Mott MacDonald Ltd.This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. 0 100 200 300

Metres

[

© Crown copyright and database rights [2015]Ordnance Survey 100022432© Crown copyright and database rights [2016]Ordnance Survey 0100031673P1 16/02/17 CH For Information JJB MP

Site extentAccess optionsSite ASite BSite CSite DSite E

JJBCHJW

JJBJJBMP

AB

D

C

E



B. Reptile Location Map

")

")")

")

")")")

")

A1A2A3A4

A5A6A7

A8A9

A10A11

A12A13

A14A15A16A17

A18A19

A20A21

A22A23

A24A25

A26

A27

A28A29

A30A31A32

A33

A34

A35A36

A37

A38

A39A40

A41A42

P:\Cardiff\MNS\Projects\364561 - Velindre Geo Enviro\Drawings\5 GIS\MXD\MMD-364561-EN-DR-00-XX-0105 - 1009.mxd



Velindre Cancer HospitalReptile Survey ResultsSheet 1 of 5

Client

Title


J BrownJ Wu

A Davies


J BatesJ Brown


INF P1 STD1:2,500

Notes

Key to Symbols

Location Map

Drawing NumberMMD-364561-EN-DR-00-XX-0105

© Mott MacDonald Ltd.This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. 0 50 100 150 200

Metres

[

© Crown copyright and database rights [2015]Ordnance Survey 100022432© Crown copyright and database rights [2016]Ordnance Survey 0100031673P1 17/08/16 JW For Information JJB MP

Reptile refugia locationTotal number of grass snakes recorded:

") 1

") 2

") 4

") 5

") 6

JJBJWAD

JBJJBMP

A1

")")

")

")

")")

B24B25

B12B13

B14

B15B16

B17B18

B19B20

B21B22

B23

B1B2

B3B4

B5B6

B7B8

B9B10

B11

B26B27B28

B29B30

B31B32

B33B34





Client

Title


J BrownJ Wu

A Davies


J BatesJ Brown


INF P1 STD1:2,500

Notes

Key to Symbols

Location Map



Metres

[



") 1

") 2

") 4

") 5

") 6

JJBJWAD

JBJJBMP

A1

")C7 C8

C9C10

C1C2C3

C4C5C6

C11C12C13





Client

Title


J BrownJ Wu

A Davies


J BatesJ Brown


INF P1 STD1:2,500

Notes

Key to Symbols

Location Map



Metres

[



") 1

") 2

") 4

") 5

") 6

JJBJWAD

JBJJBMP

A1

")")

D1D2

D3D4

D5

D6

D7

D8D9D10D11

D12

D13D14D15

D16D17

D18D19

D20 D21D22

D23D24

D25D25D26

D27

D28

D29D30





Client

Title


J BrownJ Wu

A Davies


J BatesJ Brown


INF P1 STD1:2,500

Notes

Key to Symbols

Location Map



Metres

[



") 1

") 2

") 4

") 5

") 6

JJBJWAD

JBJJBMP

A1

E11E10

E9E8

E7E6

E5E4

E3E2

E1

E12

E13

E14

E15

E16

E17





Client

Title


J BrownJ Wu

A Davies


J BatesJ Brown


INF P1 STD1:2,500

Notes

Key to Symbols

Location Map



Metres

[



") 1

") 2

") 4

") 5

") 6

JJBJWAD

JBJJBMP

A1

velindre cancer centre - transforming cancer services · velindre cancer centre reptile survey...

Documents