vendor performance management survey results nov 7th
DESCRIPTION
Summary of the survey results from the CPPC conference Nov 2012 brought to you by QCsolver.caTRANSCRIPT
Graphical Results by Question
32 82.05%5 12.82%2 5.13%0 0%
Totals 39 100%
8 20.51%6 15.38%0 0%4 10.26%4 10.26%1 2.56%
16 41.03%Totals 39 100%
0 2.63%2 5.26%1 2.63%3 7.89%7 18.42%9 23.68%
14 36.84%1 2.63%
Totals 38 100%
5 8.06%20 32.26%13 20.97%
1 1.61%0 0%3 4.84%4 6.45%1 1.61%
11 17.74%4 6.45%
Totals 62 100%
9 23.68%11 28.95%
1 2.63%4 10.53%
13 34.21%Totals 38 100%Greater than 200
5.) How many competitive bids did your group issue in
2011? (multiple choice) Responses
1 to 4950 to 99100 to 149150 to 199
CMCHSCNConstruction AssociationISMOtherNone
4.) Other than CPPC which Organization(s) do you belong
to? Pick as many as you would like! (multiple choice) Responses
OPBAOIPMACNIGPOECM
25 to 99100 to 249250 to 499500 to 9991000 to 24992500 +
Federal/Provincial
3.) How many employees work for your organization?
(multiple choice) Responses
1 to 910 to 24
MunicipalAcademic (University/College)School BoardHealth CareBroader Public SectorPrivate Sector
IndifferentSadAngry
2.) How do you compare to MTO - which sector are you
in? (multiple choice) Responses
Turning Graphical Results by Question
Session Name: New Session 11-7-2012 3-42 PMCreated: 11/12/2012 1:25 PM
1.) Which image best describes how you feel today…
(multiple choice) Responses
Happy 82%
12.8% 5.1% 0%
Happy Indifferent Sad Angry
20.5%
15.4%
0% 10.3%
10.3%
2.6%
41%
Municipal Academic (University/College)
School Board Health Care
Broader Public Sector Private Sector
Federal/Provincial
2.6% 0% 5.3% 2.6%
7.9%
18.4%
23.7%
36.8%
1 to 9 10 to 24 25 to 99 100 to 249
250 to 499 500 to 999 1000 to 2499 2500 +
8.1%
32.3%
21%
1.6% 0%
4.8%
6.4%
1.6%
17.7% 6.4%
OPBA OIPMAC NIGP
OECM CMC HSCN
Construction Association ISM Other
None
23.7%
29%
2.6%
10.5%
34.2%
1 to 49 50 to 99 100 to 149 150 to 199 Greater than 200
Confidential
Gerald Ford: [email protected]/11/2012
Page 1
Arthur Skuja: [email protected]
Graphical Results by Question
9 24.32%14 37.84%
4 10.81%0 0%
10 27.03%Totals 37 100%
17 17.35%16 16.33%15 15.31%
8 8.16%17 17.35%17 17.35%
8 8.16%Totals 98 100%
10 10.20%9 9.18%
19 19.39%6 6.12%6 6.12%
11 11.22%19 19.39%
1 1.02%9 9.18%8 8.16%
Totals 98 100%
2 6.25%3 9.38%
13 40.62%13 40.62%
1 3.12%Totals 32 100%
200 22.96%49 5.63%44 5.05%
172 19.75%92 10.56%
106 12.17%158 18.14%
50 5.74%Totals 871 100%
Quality of the final deliverablesProviding value added servicesMaintaining timelines/deadlinesBudget/cost controlHaving a vendor contact for dispute resolutio...
Excellent
10.) What is important for an effective engagement?
(priority ranking) Responses
Effective communication throughout engagementQuality of resourcesAvailability of resources to carry out contra...
9.) On a scale from 1 to 5, what is the average score you
give to your contractors when you do evaluations?
(multiple choice) Responses
PoorAcceptableStandardGood
New vendorProject complexityClient DissatisfactionRepeat vendorsLength of EngagementEvery Project
8.) What triggers an evaluation? (multiple choice) Responses
PeriodicBudget ThresholdContract performanceProject profile
FormsTemplatesUser Guides & ManualsProgress meetingsPerformance documentation3rd Party verification
11 to 2526 to 4950+
7.) Which tools or methods do you use? Pick as many as
you would like! (multiple choice) Responses
Checklists
6.) On average how many vendor performance
evaluations do you do per year? (multiple choice) Responses
None1 to 10
24.3%
37.8%
10.8%
0% 27%
None 1 to 10 11 to 25 26 to 49 50+
17.3%
16.3%
15.3% 8.2% 17.3%
17.3% 8.2%
Checklists Forms
Templates User Guides & Manuals
Progress meetings Performance documentation
3rd Party verification
10.2% 9.2%
19.4%
6.1% 6.1% 11.2%
19.4%
1% 9.2% 8.2%
Periodic Budget Threshold Contract performance
Project profile New vendor Project complexity
Client Dissatisfaction Repeat vendors Length of Engagement
Every Project
6.2% 9.4%
40.6%
40.6%
3.1%
Poor Acceptable Standard Good Excellent
23%
5.6%
5.1%
19.8% 10.6%
12.2%
18.1% 5.7%
Effective communication throughout engagement
Quality of resources
Availability of resources to carry out contra...
Quality of the final deliverables
Providing value added services
Maintaining timelines/deadlines
Confidential
Gerald Ford: [email protected]/11/2012
Page 2
Arthur Skuja: [email protected]
Graphical Results by Question
15 31.91%12 25.53%
4 8.51%0 0%
10 21.28%6 12.77%
Totals 47 100%
9 25%11 30.56%16 44.44%
Totals 36 100%
25 80.65%6 19.35%
Totals 31 100%
2 6.90%7 24.14%8 27.59%
12 41.38%Totals 29 100%
ProposalsEvaluationsBothNeither
Depends
13.) Do you share performance results with vendors?
(multiple choice) Responses
YesNo
14.) Do you tie VPM data to proposal evaluations and
vendor selection? (multiple choice) Responses
Missing linkage between contract and performa...Comparative Consistency
12.) Is the use of bonding a viable alternative to vendor
performance management? (multiple choice) Responses
YesNo
Responses
Not enough timeEnd user input difficult to getPoor systemsNot required
11.) What are your greatest challenges to having an
effective VPM! (multiple choice) 31.9%
25.5% 8.5%
0%
21.3%
12.8%
Not enough time
End user input difficult to get
Poor systems
Not required
Missing linkage between contract and performa...
Comparative Consistency
25%
30.6%
44.4%
Yes No Depends
80.6%
19.4%
Yes No
6.9%
24.1%
27.6%
41.4%
Proposals Evaluations Both Neither
Confidential
Gerald Ford: [email protected]/11/2012
Page 3
Arthur Skuja: [email protected]
Graphical Results by Question
21 70%6 20%3 10%
Totals 30 100%
18 51.43%6 17.14%6 17.14%5 14.29%
Totals 35 100%
IndifferentSadAngry
SpecificGeneralProduct Category
16.) And how do you feel now? (multiple choice) Responses
Happy
15.) Do you tie vendor qualification to specific
procurements or a general work or product category?
(multiple choice) Responses
70%
20% 10%
Specific General Product Category
51.4%
17.1%
17.1% 14.3%
Happy Indifferent Sad Angry
Confidential
Gerald Ford: [email protected]/11/2012
Page 4
Arthur Skuja: [email protected]