Version 1: August 2020

Table of Contents

About the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge ................................................................. 1

NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge Timeline ................................................................... 3

Requirements Checklist ........................................................................................................................ 4

Acronym Dictionary and Defined Commonly Used Phrases ....................................................... 5

Rover Challenge Requirements ........................................................................................................... 7

1. General Rules .............................................................................................................................. 7

2. Registration (US Teams) and Proposal Process (International Teams) Required

Documentation ..................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 US Teams Registration Process ........................................................................................ 7

2.2 International Team Proposal Process ............................................................................... 8

2.3 All Teams .............................................................................................................................. 8

3. Communication & Documentation Requirements ............................................................. 9

4. Team Member Requirements .................................................................................................. 9

5. Pre-Competition and Competition Day Rules ................................................................... 10

6. Mission Readiness Review (MRR) Requirements ............................................................ 11

7. Excursion Readiness Review (ERR) Requirements ........................................................ 14

8. Vehicle Requirements ............................................................................................................. 15

9. Excursion Requirements & Course Information .............................................................. 15

Course Descriptions, Design and Point Allocations .................................................................... 17

Point Breakdown ............................................................................................................................... 34

International Team Proposal Requirements ................................................................................... 37

Project Milestones & Requirements ................................................................................................. 39

Design Review .................................................................................................................................... 39

Operational Readiness Review ...................................................................................................... 41

Awards ..................................................................................................................................................... 43

i

About the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge https://www.nasa.gov/roverchallenge • www.nasa.gov/stem/artemis

Each year, the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge (HERC) features an engineering design challenge to engage students worldwide in the next phase of human space exploration. The competition provides an authentic engineering experience for high school and college students. In its second year as an Artemis Student Challenge, student teams design, build and test technologies that enable rovers to perform in a variety of environments. Explorers can learn from the challenges of our predecessors as we pursue future Artemis missions. In 1971, Alan Shepard, Stuart Roosa and Edgar Mitchell launched on Apollo 14, an extraordinary, complex mission to the Moon. Like other missions, their story is one of man’s battle against almost impossible odds, a story of highs and lows. While Roosa remained in orbit aboard the capsule, one task assigned to Shepard and Mitchell was to explore the Cone Crater to better understand the Moon’s early history. Scientists believed that rocks near the crater’s edge would yield some of the oldest material. At one point during the trek, Shepard’s heart rate reached 150 beats per minute (bpm). Both astronauts were stopping to take breaks, perspiring and gulping intakes of oxygen, and the internal temperature of their suits was rising dramatically. The crew had been gone from the lunar module Antares for two hours and were running out of time and oxygen. They had difficulty navigating the slopes and fell 30 minutes behind schedule. As a result, they reached a point within 50 feet of the rim of the crater before turning back toward Antares. The crew gathered 99 pounds (45 kilograms) of lunar material and achieved the goal of reaching the vicinity of the crater. Teams design and create rovers capable of traversing a challenging exoplanetary-like landscape. These engineering challenges, however, are motivated by the assignment of mission objective tasks to be accomplished along the way. Just as in the Apollo 14 surface mission described above, teams have to make real-time decisions about which mission objectives to attempt and which to leave behind—all driven by a limited, virtual eight-minute supply of oxygen. Teams earn points as they progress through all stages of the competition, including documenting and presenting their designs and products in design reviews. The competition course requires two students, at least one female, to traverse a terrain using the student-designed vehicle of approximately 0.50 miles that includes a simulated field of asteroid debris, boulders, an ancient streambed, and erosion ruts and crevasses. The challenge’s weight and time requirements encourage the rover’s compactness, light weight, high performance and efficiency. As part of the competition, rover entries are tested to see that they would fit into a lander equipment bay, a maximum 5 feet long by 5 feet tall by 5 feet in volume. Teams earn points by successful completion of design reviews, designing and assembling the rover that is lightweight, successfully completing course obstacles, performing tasks throughout the mission; and meeting pre-and post-challenge requirements. Each team is permitted up to two excursions: The greater score of the two excursions will be added to previous points for the final team score. HERC aligns with the Artemis mission to return to and explore the Moon. The competition emphasizes designing, constructing and testing technologies, including tools, mobility devices and traversing in unique environments. Teams must document their designs and technologies in a Design Review and Operational Readiness Review, mimicking NASA’s design cycle process.

1

NASA plans to send the first woman and next man to the Moon by 2024 and develop sustained human presence by 2028. Lunar science on the surface of the Moon will be conducted with polar and nonpolar landers and rovers to explore areas not investigated by Apollo. This student design challenge encourages the next generation of scientists and engineers to aid in the design process by providing innovative designs and unique perspectives. The challenge also continues the agency’s legacy of providing valuable experience to students who, may be responsible for planning future space missions including crewed missions to other worlds. Competition objective: Design, development, and test of a human-powered rover and accompanying components for successfully navigating more than a 0.50 mile course inclusive of mission tasks within the allotted time. The team with the highest number of points accumulated throughout the project year in each category (high school and college) will be the winner. In case of a tie, the team with the fastest excursion completion time will be the winner.

2

Timeline Thurs., Aug. 20, 2020

Thurs., Oct. 8, 2020

Thurs., Nov. 5, 2020

Thurs., Nov. 6, 2020

Thurs., Nov. 12, 2020

Thurs., Nov. 19, 2020

Wed., Jan. 13, 2021

Jan. 14-28, 2021

Thurs., Feb. 11, 2021

Wed., Mar. 10, 2021

Mar. 11-25, 2021

Thurs., Mar. 25, 2021

Thurs., Apr. 15, 2021

Guidebook released; Request for Proposal (RFP) released for International teams.

Registration opens for U.S. Teams.

Electronic copy of International team proposals due by 4:00 p.m. CDT (9:00 p.m. UTC) to MSFC-RoverChallenge@mail.nasa.gov.

Receipt of submissions will be confirmed via email response.

HERC Registration closes for U.S. teams

HERC Selected International teams announced and their registration opens

Team social media presence established, social media links list submitted.

Kickoff webinar and Q&A.

Design Review submission due.

Design Review team presentations – Design should be complete and construction in progress.

Student Data Information and Media Release forms due for all teams. Final list of teams shall be complete. Team photos are due.

Operational Readiness Review submission due.

Operational Readiness Review presentations – Rover and components should be complete and testing in progress.

Photos of completed Rover for verification readiness due.

Competition Day 1: Team Check-in, MRR, Safety Briefing, Course Walk-through.

Fri., Apr. 16, 2021 Competition Day 2: Excursion 1; Surveys completed.

Sat., Apr. 17, 2021 Competition Day 3: Excursion 2; Awards Ceremony.

3

Requirements Checklist

Item Due Date

1. US Registration opens and International Team Proposals submitted October 8, 2020

2. US Team Registration closes November 5, 2020

3. International Team Selections Announced November 6, 2020

4. Team Social Media List November 12, 2020

5. Design Review Report January 13, 2021

6. Student Data Information February 11, 2021

7. Media Release Forms February 11, 2021

8. Team Photos February 11, 2021

9. Operational Readiness Review Report (ORR) March 10, 2021

10. Rover Photo Verification March 25, 2021

11. Mission Readiness Review (MRR) April 15, 2021

12. Safety Meeting April 15, 2021

13. Onsite Registration April 15, 2021

14. Excursion Readiness Review (ERR) – Excursion Day 1 April 15, 2021

15. Excursion Day 1 April 16, 2021

16. Post-Excursion Review (PER) – Excursion Day 1 April 16, 2021

17. Student and Mentor/Advisor Surveys April 16, 2021

18. Excursion Readiness Review (ERR) – Excursion Day 2 April 17, 2021

19. Excursion Day 2 April 17, 2021

20. Post-Excursion Review (PER) – Excursion Day 2 April 17, 2021

4

Acronym Dictionary and Defined Commonly Used Phrases

Assembly Tools – Any tools, straps, etc., that teams need to contain the rover in the 5-ft. cube configuration or to assemble the rover, but not needed for traversing the course or completing the tasks. These assembly tools may be left in the designated tool area adjacent to the assembly area as part of the timed assembly process.

Design Review – The Design Review demonstrates that the maturity of the design is appropriate to support proceeding with full-scale fabrication, assembly, integration, and test. It determines that the technical effort is on track to complete the mission operations, meeting mission performance requirements within the schedule constraints.

Driver – Synonymous with crew, one or both student team members (at least one female) that propels the vehicle over the course.

Excursion – An attempt to traverse the course to accumulate points. Teams will have two excursion opportunities (weather permitting), one on Friday and one on Saturday of the competition. Final rankings are based on the greater point total of the two possible excursion attempts and points accumulated during design and readiness reviews. Teams are not required to attempt excursions on both days.

ERR – The Excursion Readiness Review, or ERR events occur both days prior to course excursion and include safety and task material inspection.

HEO or HEOMD – Human Explorations and Operations Mission Directorate provides the Agency with leadership and management of NASA space operations related to human exploration in and beyond low-Earth orbit. HEOMD is a contributor to this competition.

HERC – Human Exploration Rover Challenge

Kg – Kilograms

MRR – The Mission Readiness Review, or MRR events occur the day before the first excursion runs. This includes the volume constraint, weighing the vehicle and unfolding/assembling the vehicle.

mL or ml – Milliliter

NASA – National Aeronautics and Space Administration

ORR – Operational Readiness Review, or ORR examines the actual system characteristics and procedures used in the system or end product’s operation and ensures that all system support reflect the deployed state of the system. It establishes that the system is ready to transition into an operational mode through examination and analysis.

PPE – Personal Protective Equipment

PER – The Post-Excursion Review, or PER occurs after course completion and includes task completion inspection.

Pit Area – The area designated for preparing the team’s vehicle and task components.

5

Pit Crew & Machine Shop – Employees of the NASA Metallic Materials and Processes Division of the Materials and Processes Laboratory and Jacobs Engineering utilizing a machine shop to assist with repairs.

STEM – Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics

Task Materials – Task materials include all equipment needed for completing the tasks on the course. This may include items such as cameras, instrument deployment equipment, collection tools, storage containers, etc. These materials are allowed for use only in the task sites.

TS – Task site(s)

USSRC – United States Space & Rocket Center

Vehicle – Synonymous with rover, the vehicle is the student-built rover designed to traverse the course during excursions.

6

Rover Challenge Requirements

1. General Rules 1.1 Individuals or teams may be excluded from participation at the discretion of NASA for

unauthorized behavior, including but not limited to (i) impersonating a NASA official whether intentionally or in a manner that results in confusion, (ii) misuse of the logos or identifiers of NASA, any sponsoring organization, or any infringement of a commercial logo or trademark, (iii) failure to abide by competition rules, directives or instructions from the competition host or organizer, and (iv) asserting or implying a NASA affiliation or sponsorship where none exists.

1.2 Additionally, the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge does not host pre-competitions or competitions conducted by any organization other than NASA Marshall Space Flight Center’s Office of STEM Engagement. This NASA competition is neither affiliated with, nor sponsors or endorses any Rover Challenge competition other than the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge. Outside competitions have no bearing on the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge qualification or registration process, and representation to the contrary is strictly prohibited. No competition may imply any affiliation with NASA or use the NASA logo without permission of NASA Headquarters. Any assertions made by organizations that represent themselves as “NASA Outreach Program Europe Director,” “Official NASA Rover Ambassador,” “International Judge,” or any similar titles suggesting a tie to NASA are unauthorized. Representations or suggestions that any organization or individual can assure teams of being accepted for registration or participation in the challenge are unauthorized. All requirements for participation in the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge are outlined in this guidebook.

1.3 A team member or mentor/advisor found to be behaving in an unsportsmanlike way may be disqualified.

1.4 The scoring decisions of the judges are final. If an appeal is warranted, the mentor/advisor or the team leader shall submit the appeal in writing for consideration to the activity lead within 30 minutes of the posting of the score in question. The final decision of the activity lead and head judges shall prevail.

1.5 Teams not meeting any requirement listed may be disqualified. 1.6 Students on the team will do 100% of the project, including design, construction of

their vehicle and task components (including performing work that is supported by a professional machinist for the purpose of training or safety), written reports, presentations, and competition preparation. Excessive use of past work will result in disqualification, but teams are permitted to use vehicle designs from the 2020 season.

2. Registration (US Teams) and Proposal Process (International Teams) Required Documentation

2.1 US Teams Registration Process 2.1.1 Online registration for the competition is automated and electronically monitored.

All US teams shall register via the site provided during the open period.

7

2.1.2 Each team will fill out a registration form. All information shall be completed for the registration to be valid. Teams registered will receive a confirmation email upon successful completion of registration.

2.1.3 Each U.S. school or institution may register up to two teams. However, if more teams register for the challenge than can be accommodated, schools or institutions with more than one team shall down select or consolidate to one team for the competition.

2.2 International Team Proposal Process 2.2.1 International teams shall submit a proposal for consideration to compete. A written

proposal submission shall follow and answer the requirements outlined in the International Team Proposal Requirements section found in this guidebook.

2.2.2 Teams will be scored based on a rubric developed from the International Team Proposal Requirements. The top proposals will be selected to compete and allowed to register for the competition.

2.2.3 Proposals shall be written by the student members on the team. 2.2.4 Proposals submitted after the deadline (date and time received) will not be

considered. 2.2.5 International teams may propose one team per school or institution for

consideration. 2.2.6 Once accepted, teams will be allowed to register via the site provided during the

open period. 2.2.7 Each accepted team will fill out a registration form. All information shall be

completed for the registration to be valid. Selected teams will receive a confirmation email upon successful completion of the registration form.

2.3 All Teams 2.3.1 All US teams and selected international teams shall fill out the online registration

form.

8

2.3.2 Teams shall submit the Student Data Information and Media Release forms by the

required due date. A link to the Student Data Information form will be included in the team’s confirmation email.

3. Communication & Documentation Requirements 3.1 Communication to the activity leads of the HERC shall be through the mentor/advisor,

team lead, and/or student team members. All communication shall be sent via email to MSFC-RoverChallenge@mail.nasa.gov. The subject line shall include the subject matter of the communication and the official school name.

3.2 The team shall establish a social media presence to inform the public about team activities.

3.3 Teams shall email all deliverables to the NASA project management team via the email provided by the deadline specified in the guidebook. All deliverables shall be in PDF format and meet the requirements outlined in this guidebook.

3.4 All verbal and written communication shall be in the English language. 3.5 The Design Review and Operational Readiness Review reports shall be in Arial, size

12 font on 8.5 x 11 paper with 1 inch margins. Each report shall include the team name and report title on the cover page. All pages shall be numbered. Reports shall not exceed the page limit. Any additional pages will not be scored.

3.6 The team will provide computer equipment necessary to perform a video teleconference with the panel. This includes, but is not limited to, a computer system, video camera(s), speaker telephone and a sufficient internet connection.

3.7 Each team is required to submit their participation survey by the end of the Competition Day 2. A team will not be allowed to start their Competition Day 3 until each team member, including the mentor/advisor has completed the survey.

3.8 The team will engage a minimum of 200 participants in educational, hands-on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) activities. Teams are encouraged to target middle school aged participants (grades 5-9) and conduct the STEM Engagement activities virtually. To satisfy this requirement, all events shall occur between the dates of team acceptance or registration and the ORR due date where the team’s final report of STEM Engagement activities will be documented.

4. Team Member Requirements 4.1 The team will be representatives of enrolled students from a high school, an accredited

institution of higher learning, an institution such as a science center, museum, planetarium, or youth-serving organization.

4.2 High School team members will be composed of students ages 14 through 19. All team members will be enrolled in a high school per U.S. standards.

9

4.3 College/University team members will be those students that are composed of students ages 19 and older. All team members will be enrolled in a college/university.

4.4 Age and enrollment verification may be requested. 4.5 Each team, regardless of division, shall identify and be accompanied by an adult age

21 or older to serve as a mentor, advisor, and/or educator/faculty representative, called the mentor/advisor.

4.6 Teams shall identify two team members as drivers (at least one female) to propel the vehicle through the course.

5. Pre-Competition and Competition Day Rules 5.1 Teams are required to submit a Design Review report and participate in a virtual

presentation that will make up 15% of the team’s overall score. Successful completion of this Review, as determined by the review panel, is required for a team to proceed to ORR.

5.2 Teams are required to submit an ORR report and participate in a virtual presentation that will make up 15% of the team’s overall score. Successful completion of this Review, as determined by the review panel, is required for a team to proceed to competition days.

5.3 Rovers may be shipped to the USSRC in advance of the competition. The USSRC will not receive any rovers that do not have pre-paid return shipping documents with their rover equipment. All rovers shall be crated by the team for return shipping pickup. The USSRC does not provide a facility, tools, or equipment for assembling or disassembling rovers and/or crates. Rovers shall be shipped via the following address:

The U.S. Space & Rocket Center Attn: Warehouse Manager 1 Tranquility Drive Huntsville, AL 35805

5.4 The consumption of alcoholic beverages or controlled substances by any team member or mentor/advisor at any time during the event is strictly prohibited and is grounds for disqualification of the team.

5.5 U.S. federal, Alabama state, and Huntsville city laws and regulations solely define what is legally permitted on the grounds. As such, firearms and other weapons are not permitted to be carried by facility visitors on USSRC property.

5.6 In accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations, the use of drones (unmanned or manned flying vehicles) during any Rover Challenge activity is prohibited.

5.7 Driving the rover on the course or in the parking lot in a reckless or unsafe manner is not permitted.

5.8 Pit Area: Teams are provided two parking spaces and must fit all equipment needed in the spaces provided. Only vehicles registered for the competition will be allowed. All other vehicles and trailers shall be parked outside the pit area. Parking passes, inclusive of contact information, must be displayed in the front windshield of registered vehicles in the pit area. All vehicles without identification or those blocking other team spaces will be towed at the owner’s expense. (Exception: Loading/unloading the vehicle and equipment prior to 10:00 a.m. Thursday).

5.9 Teams shall utilize appropriate PPE when performing construction activities, such as welding, handling metal components and using tools anywhere on the USSRC

10

property or neighboring areas. Teams shall also exercise appropriate safety precautions during the design and build phases of this competition.

5.10 Vehicle numbers will be provided in the registration packet on two printed 8.5 by 11-inch sheets of waterproof paper. Vehicle numbers shall be affixed to the front and driver’s left side, clearly displayed for judges to see.

5.11 The order of teams entering the course may not follow the exact order indicated by the team number. It is intended to follow the order, however, readiness by the teams will determine the ultimate order in which they begin based on the assigned time windows.

6. Mission Readiness Review (MRR) Requirements

6.1 Teams shall participate in the MRR during the pre-determined time window on Competition Day 1. Time windows and the method for obtaining a time window will be communicated to teams well in advance of the competition. Teams that do not

11

participate may be considered an exhibition team, provided they meet all the safety requirements.

6.2 Teams arriving late to their time window or having arrived on time but not being ready to participate in the MRR will receive a 5-point penalty.

6.3 Volume Constraint: Vehicles shall meet the 5 x 5 x 5-foot volume constraint (a cubical space that is 5 feet wide [1.524 meters] on each side) in the collapsed condition. A frame will be placed over the collapsed vehicle for verification. No modifications or team contact is permitted during the volume test. Tapes, straps or other devices may be used to hold the rover together in the collapsed configuration; however, all such devices will be included in weighing the vehicle. Teams may or may not include task materials (i.e. instrument panel, tools for collecting samples, storage containers, camera). Teams receive 4 points for fitting in the volume constraint or 0 points for being outside the volume constraint.

6.4 Weight: The vehicle shall be weighed in the collapsed position with all components

needed for the mission, including task materials. 6.4.1 Vehicles weighing less than 130 lbs will receive 5 points. 6.4.2 Vehicles weighing 131 to 170 lbs will receive 3 points. 6.4.3 Vehicles weighing 171 to 210 lbs will receive 1 point. 6.4.4 Vehicles weighing more than 210 lbs will receive 0 points.

12

6.5 Assembly: From the collapsed position, a signal is given to the two drivers to unfold/assemble their vehicle, and the stopwatch is started. The stopwatch stops when the vehicle is completely assembled, all assembly tools and implements are placed in a designated area, and both team members are seated in the rover. Additionally, the drivers shall have on all PPE, seat belts attached, and feet on the pedals with their hands up to signal assembly is complete. Any component not part of the rover used for traversing the course shall be left in the tool area before the assembly is considered complete. The tool area is a marked, rectangular area that is near the assembly judging location. All task materials shall be attached to the vehicle.

6.5.1 Assembly times of 2:00 minutes or less will receive 2 points. 6.5.2 Assembly times of 2:01 to 4:00 minutes will receive 1 point. 6.5.3 Assembly times of more than 4:00 minutes will receive 0 points.

6.6 Size Constraint: Assembled vehicles shall be no wider than 5 feet (1.524 meters), as

measured from the outside of one wheel to the wheel on the opposite side. The wheel-pairs with the widest separation will be used for measurement. There are no constraints for overall height and length of the assembled vehicle, however a rover with drivers that has its center of gravity placed too high or too far from the center of the vehicle is at risk of tipping over and injuring drivers.

13

6.7 Clearance Constraint: A rover with drivers in position, ready to traverse the course shall have no less than 12 inches (30.48 cm) clearance between the ground and the lowest point of the rover oriented in the lowest position with which drivers have contact.

6.8 Drivers shall demonstrate readiness to proceed to ERR by powering the team’s rover back to the pit area without aid. Teams unable to prove the rover is ready for competition will receive a 5-point penalty.

7. Excursion Readiness Review (ERR) Requirements 7.1 Teams arriving late to their time window or having arrived on time but not being ready

to participate in the Excursions will receive a 5-point penalty. This penalty is inclusive of being late due to incomplete participation survey submissions.

7.2 Judges will photograph each vehicle and conduct an inspection of task materials and safety requirements.

7.2.1 All task materials will be inspected prior to the excursions. Task materials shall be unique to each rover and have the team number marked on each item.

7.2.2 Task tools may be used at multiple tasks, barring any cross contamination for sample retrieval tasks (i.e. cameras, appendages).

7.2.3 Teams will be awarded 1 point per task for having the proper tools for each task that the team plans to attempt. Maximum total is 5 points.

7.2.4 Seat Restraints: Each rover shall have robust, practical seat restraints for each of the drivers. The restraints must be capable of preventing the drivers from being thrown from their seats should the vehicle be forced to a sudden stop. The

14

preferred method of restraint is a motor vehicle seat belt. Seat restraints shall be worn at all times when the vehicle is moving on or off the course. A vehicle will be stopped by an official or judge should either driver not be secured by the seat restraint while the vehicle is in motion, Vehicles will be held in the stopped position until the required restraint(s) are firmly in place.

7.2.5 Protrusions: All sharp edges and protrusions must be eliminated or guarded, as necessary to insure safety as determined by the safety judge. No appendages, such as stilts, may be used on the feet of the drivers.

7.2.6 Driver Attire: Specific PPE is required prior to any team being allowed to traverse the course during the entirety of the excursion. This includes:

7.2.6.1 Eye protection, e.g. safety glasses, goggles, or face shield; 7.2.6.2 Commercially manufactured head protection, e.g. bicycle helmet; 7.2.6.3 Full-fingered gloves; 7.2.6.4 Long-sleeved and long-torso shirts; 7.2.6.5 Long pants – dangling pants shall be wrapped or taped down; 7.2.6.6 Socks; and 7.2.6.7 Enclosed shoes – shoelaces shall be wrapped or taped down.

7.2.7 Injury and Signals: Drivers who are injured, bleeding, or incapacitated shall be removed from the excursion to receive medical attention. Injuries can occur in adjusting vehicle components, such as chains, during the excursion. Each team shall develop a signal system between the two drivers to ensure hands are clear before proceeding. Drivers will be asked to describe their communication plan to the Marshall Safety Action Team, or MSAT member and/or other judge before the excursion.

8. Vehicle Requirements 8.1 Teams shall design, build, and test vehicles capable of traversing hills up to 5 feet

(~1.5 meters) high and pathways inclined up to 30 degrees in their direction of travel. Vehicles shall be capable of having a turning radius of 15-foot (4.57 meters) or less. Vehicles shall be designed for both speed and the ability to perform on the unique terrain.

8.2 Wheels: Teams shall design and fabricate non-pneumatic wheels, inclusive of the outer surface (treads) making contact with the terrain and the supporting structure (rims, spokes, etc.). Only hubs containing bearings or bushings may be commercially used as a component of the wheel.

8.3 Propulsion System: Vehicles shall be human-powered. Energy storage devices, such as springs, flywheels, or batteries are not allowed to be used as part of the drivetrain.

8.4 Vehicle Dynamics: Vehicles, inclusive of drivers, shall have a center of gravity low enough to safely handle slopes of 30 degrees front-to-back and side-to-side.

8.5 Bike chains are discouraged.

9. Excursion Requirements & Course Information 9.1 Upon successful completion of MRR, teams are permitted two excursions of the

course, one on Competition Day 2 and one on Day 3, weather permitting. 9.2 The course is comprised of 14 obstacles and five mission tasks. Eleven of the

obstacles have bypasses, where teams can strategically choose to attempt the obstacle for points, or bypass it for 0 points.

15

9.3 Excursion Time: Teams have 8:00 minutes to complete each excursion. Teams shall accumulate points by successfully traversing obstacles and completing mission tasks.

9.3.1 Teams arriving after 8:00 minutes per excursion are ineligible for competition awards based on excursion performance. Those on the course after 8:00 minutes will be notified that their excursion is aborted. They will either be removed from the course or shall proceed with haste to the end, utilizing each available bypass and unable to accrue additional points.

9.3.2 The stopwatch stops when a team either crosses the finish line or reaches the 8:00-minute limit, whichever comes first.

9.3.3 Judges may make drivers aware of their excursion times periodically, however teams are encouraged to use their own timing devices on the vehicle for strategic on-course decisions. Teams shall not be reliant on excursion times announced by judges. A team’s timing device will not be used for the official time. The judging officials will maintain the official excursion time.

9.4 The drivers for the first excursion shall be the same as those that conducted MRR. Substitutes from the team may be made for either or both drivers for the second excursion, or Competition Day 3.

9.5 Using poles or other implements to propel or push the rover is not allowed. A driver’s use of his or her hands on the wheels (as with a wheelchair) to rock or otherwise facilitate moving the vehicle is permitted.

9.6 Communication devices are allowed as long as one driver can hear ambient sounds/instructions from judges.

9.7 Obstacle attempts: Drivers shall be on the vehicle prior to the obstacle being attempted. Drivers not on the vehicle (pushing, pulling) will receive 0 points for the obstacle attempt. Drivers attempting an obstacle but unsuccessfully completing it will earn 1 point for that obstacle. Drivers that do not directly approach the obstacle, gets off the vehicle or veers off is considered an unsuccessful attempt.

9.8 Task attempts: Five tasks are located throughout the course and may attempt for points within the allotted time.

9.8.1 If teams fail to have tools for a particular task at ERR and PER, points will not be awarded for that task.

9.8.2 Tools associated with tasks shall remain on the rover throughout the entirety of the excursion with the exception of the instrument package, which is left at the TS, if attempted.

9.8.3 Task materials may not be shared with other teams including those from the same institution.

9.8.4 Teams shall come to a complete stop immediately adjacent each task to be attempted.

9.9 Judges have the authority to remove a disabled or slow vehicle from the course when it will affect the excursion time of the next successive vehicle. The excursion time for the disabled/slow vehicle halts at the point of removal and resumes once the successive vehicle has passed.

9.10 Individuals (team members and supporters) shall not follow the vehicle around the course during the excursion. Teams may post members at locations along the course, if desired.

16

Course Descriptions, Design and Point Allocations Note: The course obstacles and tasks outlined below are subject to change. Please check periodically for updates. Photos are provided as examples of the obstacle from a previous year and may or may not be the same.

Obstacle 1 – Undulating Terrain (2 Points) This gently uneven surface is replicated by wooden ramps causing the rover to be tilted to the right or to the left as only the wheels on one side of the rover are elevated at a time. The ramps range from 6 to 12 inches (15.24 cm to 30.48 cm) in height with gradual ingress and egress slopes, all covered with gravel.*Note: Task 5 may be attempted before Obstacle 2 or during the return after Obstacle 11.

17

Obstacle 2 – Crater with Ejecta (2 Points) This large crater is about 3 feet in diameter with a vertical height of 8 inches. Rays of ejecta, the material thrown out of the crater on impact. The whole assembly is covered by gravel. Boulders are added to direct the rovers to traverse the large crater.

3

*Note: this obstacle is in a different location than in previous years.

Obstacle 3 – Transverse Incline (4 Points) The slope of this obstacle is perpendicular to the direction of rover traverse. The simulated lava or rock outcropping surface is smooth. The angle of elevation of the incline is about 20 degrees. Avoid tipping over by lowering the center of gravity and by leaning to the high side the incline. Traction will assist on this smooth surface (no gravel).

18

Obstacle 4 –High Butte – Martian Terrain (6 Points) This feature is a test of the rover’s climbing ability. This butte is 5 feet high (1.524 meters) with a 20-degree incline before and after the peak.

19

Obstacle 5 –Large Ravine – Martian Terrain (4 Points) A remnant of an ancient erosion channel, this 2-foot depression, about 8 feet wide, provided a conduit for liquid runoff on the Martian surface.

20

Task 1

Task 1 – Spectrographic Analysis (9 points) For this task, a simulated terrain or analysis site shall be photographed utilizing red, blue, and yellow color filters. The camera should be able to display the photographs quickly for the PER judge. Teams will provide the photographic device and the appropriate filters. The colors that shall be used are red, blue, and yellow. Teams shall photograph the site once unfiltered and once with each filter such that the filtered photographs’ composite encompasses the full spectrum of the unfiltered photo. Internal filters that are optical/mechanical and part of the camera/device are acceptable; however, the use of software that applies a filter to the camera will not be accepted. Drivers may get off the rover to make the appropriate photographs. All photos shall be taken with equipment properly stored before continuing to traverse the course.

- Teams receive 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task. This inspection will be made during the ERR.

- Teams receive 1 point for each of the four total photographs taken at the analysis site, for a possible 4 points.

- Teams receive 1 point for each photograph returned and successfully demonstrated to the PER judge. Teams shall finish before 8:00 minutes to receive these points, for a possible total of 4 points.

21

Obstacle 6 –Sand Dunes – Martian Terrain (3 Points) Images from NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter show sandy slopes composed of fine-grain (soft) material. Best passage is achieved by navigating to pass between the dunes to avoid traversing them. Individual dunes are about 2 feet high and 3 feet wide at the base, randomly scattered on the Martian surface. Rovers benefit from flotation (large wheel footprints) on soft surfaces.

22

Task 2 – Instrument Deployment (10 points) A simulated remote location needs instrumentation deployed and correctly oriented to support mission objectives. For this task, the instrumentation will be a solar-powered instrument that the teams shall deploy in the proper compass orientation. The device shall be built by the teams and will require the following components: A solar cell, a functioning on/off switch, and a power-indication light that illuminates when the switch is on and operates on solar power. (A light source will be provided to simulate the Sun and accommodate for the possibility of inconsistent Sun coverage.) Teams will need to provide their own compasses. Teams will be required to deploy the instrument in a designated compass orientation and demonstrate successful operation by turning switch to the “on” position with the indicator light illuminated by the solar power. At the TS, teams will be given a compass orientation (relative to magnetic north) in which to deploy the instrument. Teams will need a marker or fiducial on the instrument in order to properly orient and for judges to verify orientation. The instrument will also need to be open on the bottom such that it can be inspected to verify that no stored energy power sources are present. All the components to build the instrument package may be purchased.

- Teams receive 2 point for having all tools or instruments necessary to attempt the task. This inspection will be made during the ERR.

- Teams receive 3 points for deploying and successfully orienting the instrumentation at the TS.

- Teams receive 4 points if the instrumentation functions properly after orientation and deployment, i.e., the switch is turned on and light illuminates with judge verification.

- Teams receive 1 point for demonstration of photograph of functioning device to the PER judge. Teams shall finish before 8:00 minutes to receive these points.

23

Obstacle 7 – Crevasses (3 Points) Crevasses result from cracks in the surface regolith or from erosion by liquid and/or molten material forming ruts in underlying material. The crevasses vary in width between 1 and 4 inches. Avoid having the rover wheels stuck in these cracks, which are 4 to 6 inches (10.16 cm to 15.24 cm) deep.

Obstacle 8 – Ice Geyser Slalom (3 Points) – no bypass available A series of simulated Ice Geysers impede the path down this long curving hill. This obstacle requires that teams carefully navigate down to the bottom of the hill without coming into contact with any of the geysers. Steering and braking systems will be of utmost importance to do this. The steep incline will be followed by a marked exit lane through which rovers shall pass without touching its boundaries.

24

Obstacle 9 – Lunar Crater (5 Points) This area surrounding the Lunar Excursion Module replica consists of asphalt lava with craters of various sizes and strewn boulders. The large crater will test the surface clearance of the rovers. A wide circle is traversed within this large crater.

25

Task 3 – Core Sample Retrieval (9 points) Teams will need to collect one core sample while on or off the rover. To collect the sample, the team will need to use a core sample retrieval tool designed and created by the team. The sample consists of loose rock or mineral grains bound together by a liquid. The sample shall be taken to a depth of at least 7.87 inches (20 cm) and contain a volume of at least 0.95 cubic inches (15.5 cubic cm). The dimensions of the sampling area measure approximately 35.56 cm (14 inches) deep and 29.972 cm (11.8 inches) in diameter. Core samples deeper than the container will not be possible.

- Teams receive 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task. This inspection will be made during the ERR.

- Teams receive 4 points for a successful core sample extraction at the TS. - Teams receive 4 points for a successful return of the core sample that meets the designated

criteria during the PER. Teams shall finish before 8:00 minutes to receive these points.

26

Obstacle 10 – Bouldering Rocks (4 Points) Rovers shall navigate over this field of simulated asteroid debris (boulders) while not avoiding the debris. The asteroid fragments range in size from 3 to 12 inches (7.62 cm to 30.48 cm) and are situated close together, touching each other. Proceed with caution.

27

Task 4 – Solid Soil Sample Retrieval (13 Points) Teams will need to collect three separate soil samples of different sizes and consistencies while remaining on the rover (one sample from each of the three sample containers that are part of the display). To collect the samples, teams will need to use a sample retrieval tool designed and created by the team. The dimensions of the containers measure 3” deep and 5.5” across the tip, with a slight tapper down. See photo.

Teams need to design/procure a tool or tools that can collect solid samples and shall provide methods for preventing cross-contamination. Teams are not limited to the number of sample retrieval devices. Each sample shall be stored in a sealed, isolated, uncontaminated container, which is also provided by the team. The collection of samples shall be contained in a storage area or vessel on the rover. If the tool is used repeatedly, it shall be cleaned between each collection. Cross-contaminated samples will not receive points.

- Teams receive 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task. This inspection will be made during the ERR.

- Teams receive 3 points for each sample that is successfully retrieved and placed in the sample container. Each sample shall be at least 50 ml in volume. Individual sample containers are required for each collected sample to prevent cross-contamination. The sample container shall be sealable.

- Teams receive 1 point for each sample that is successfully returned uncontaminated and provided to the PER judge. Teams shall finish before 8:00 minutes to receive these points.

28

Obstacle 11 – Tilted Craters (2 Points) – no bypass available Rovers travel up a slope and then encounter medium craters on the descending side. The slope is gentle, about 15 degrees. Boulders force the rovers to traverse the two craters. The whole obstacle is covered by gravel.

29

Task 5 – Liquid Sample Retrieval (13 points/+5 bonus points) Teams shall collect three separate liquid samples in a diorama of different colors while remaining on the rover. To collect the samples, teams will need to use a sample retrieval tool designed and created by the team. The dimensions of the containers measure 3” deep and 5.5” across the tip, with a slight tapper down. See photo below.

Teams shall design/procure a tool or tools that can collect liquid samples and shall provide methods for preventing cross-contamination. Teams are not limited to the number of sample retrieval devices. Each sample shall be stored in a sealed, isolated, uncontaminated container, which is also provided by the team. The collection of samples shall be contained in a storage area or vessel on the rover. If the tool is used repeatedly, teams shall clean the tool between collections. Cross-contaminated samples will not receive points.

Teams may choose to design and build a 3D printed tool for additional points at Task 5. Teams shall also provide detailed discussion in the Design Review and ORR. The tool shall be 100% 3D printed with the exception of the uncontaminated container and/or storage area. Teams may also 3D print multiple appendages. Connectors to the appendages do not have to be 3D printed.

- Teams receive 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task. This inspection will be made during the ERR.

- Teams receive a bonus 5 points for the design, build, and use of a 3D printed tool. The 5 points will be awarded after all requirements are met including details in reports, inspection at ERR, use at the TS, and returning within the 8:00 minutes.

- Teams receive 3 points for each sample that is successfully retrieved and placed in the sample container. Each sample shall be at least 50 ml. Individual sample containers

30

are required for each collected sample to prevent cross-contamination. The sample container shall be sealable.

- Teams receive 1 point for each sample that is successfully returned uncontaminated and provided to the PER judge. Teams shall finish before 8:00 minutes to receive these points.

Obstacle 12 – Loose Regolith (4 Points) Meteoroid collisions with extraterrestrial surfaces produce fine-grain material, which is difficult to traverse. Beach sand (rounded grains) simulates this material, which allows wheel penetration. The depth of this simulant is 6 to 8 inches (15.24 cm to 20.32 cm). Traction and support (flotation) will assist in traversing this obstacle.

31

Obstacle 13 – Pea Gravel (4 Points) This ancient stream bed consists of small rounded pebbles deposited to a depth of about 6 inches (15.24 cm). Rover wheels might sink in this smooth obstacle material. Wheel flotation (support) will assist in traversing this obstacle.

Obstacle 14 – Undulating Terrain (2 Points) – no bypass available Like Obstacle 1, this obstacle consists of uneven terrain characterized by humps randomly positioned so that they occur first on one side of the rover, then on the other. Navigating the humps produces twisting forces on the rover chassis. Ramps covered with gravel simulate this landform.

32

33

Point Breakdown *Detailed point breakdown included in each obstacle task description. (TS – Judged at Task Site; PER – Judged at Post-Excursion Review).

Item Description Bypass Available

Possible Points

Summary of Point Breakdown

Pre-Competition Days Design Review Design Review N/A 15% 15% of overall score ORR Operational

Review Readiness N/A 15% 15% of overall score

Mission Readiness Review (MRR) MRR Late Penalty Teams arriving outside

their time window for MRR, or not being ready for the MRR.

N/A 5-point penalty 5 Points)

(-Penalty can be assessed once at MRR and will carry over in the MRR score for both excursion days.

MRR Readiness Penalty Teams not able to demonstrate the vehicle is ready to proceed to ERR, not being ready to compete.

N/A 5-point penalty 5 Points)

(-Penalty can be assessed once at MRR and will carry over in the MRR score for both excursion days.

Volume Constraint (This point total is carried over both days.)

Vehicles shall fit in 5 x 5 x 5-foot (1.524 meter x 1.524 meter) volume constraint.

N/A 4 4 points 0 points

for for

entire vehicle fit not fitting

Weight (This point over both days.)

total is carried Vehicle and task materials will be weighed.

N/A 5 5 points 3 points 1 point for0 points

for for

171 –for

less than 130 lbs 131 – 170 lbs

210 lbs more than 210 lbs

Unfolding/Assembly (This point total is carried over both days.)

Teams will be assessed on the amount of time it takes to unfold/assemble and ready the vehicle for course excursion.

N/A 2 2 points for 0:00 – 2:00 minutes 1 point for 2:01 – 4:00 minutes 0 points for more than 4:00 minutes

Excursion Readiness Review (ERR) Late Penalty Teams arriving outside

their time window, not being ready for Excursion Days

N/A 5-point penalty 5 Points)

(-Penalty can be assessed once per day arriving outside their excursion window being ready to compete.

for or not

ERR Inspection Teams will be inspected for safety requirements and task material requirements. Photos of Rover taken.

N/A N/A See each ERR.

task for point reference earned at

Excursions Obstacle/Task Number Description Bypass Possible

Points Point Breakdown

1 Undulating Terrain Y 2 2 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

2 Crater with Ejecta Y 2 2 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for failure to at

completion

tempt Task 5 may be completed before Obstacle 2 or after Obstacle 11. 3 Transverse Incline Y 4 4 points for successful completion

1 point for attempt 0 points for failure to attempt

4 High Butte Y 6 6 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

34

Obstacle/Task Number Description Bypass Possible Points

Point Breakdown

5 Large Ravine Y 4 4 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

Task 1 (Obstacle 5 shall be attempted to attempt Task 1.)

Spectrographic Analysis Y 9 Four photographs 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task (ERR) 1 point for each photograph taken at the site (4 points) (TS) 1 point for each photograph returned before 8:00 (4 points) (PER)

6 Sand Dunes Y 3 3 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

Task 2 (Bypass cannot to complete the task.)

be used Instrument Deployment Y 10 Deploy solar power cell 2 points for having all tools and instruments necessary to attempt the task (ERR) 3 points for deploying and correctly orienting instrumentation (TS) 4 points for demonstrating instrumentation properly functions (turn switch, light illuminates) (TS) 1 point for photograph of functioning device if returned before 8:00 minutes (PER)

7 Crevasses Y 3 3 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

8 Ice Geyser Slalom N 3 3 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for failure to at

completion

tempt 9 Lunar Crater Y 5 5 points for successful

1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

Task 3 (Obstacle 9 shall be attempted to attempt Task 3.)

Core Sample Retrieval Y 9 Core Sample Retrieval 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task (ERR) 4 points for successful core sample extraction (TS) 4 points for successful return of core sample that meets designated criteria (PER)

10 Bouldering Rocks Y 4 4 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

Task 4 Solid Soil Retrieval

Sample Y 13 3 separate soil sample collections 1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task (ERR) 3 points for each successful collection, baggage, storage (9 points) (TS) 1 point for return of each sample, uncontaminated before 8:00 (3 points) (PER)

11 Tilted Craters N 2 2 points for successful completion 1 point for attempt 0 points for failure to attempt

Task 5 (This task may be attempted before Obstacle after Obstacle 11)

2 or Liquid Sample Retrieval Y 13+5 = 18 3 separate liquid sample collections

1 point for having all tools necessary to attempt the task (ERR) 5 bonus points for the design, build, and use of a 3D printed tool at the task after inclusion in the design review and ORR reports and tool verification (ERR) 3 points for each successful collection, baggage, storage (9 points) (TS) 1 point for return of each sample, uncontaminated before 8:00 (3 points) (PER)

35

Obstacle/Task Number Description Bypass Possible Points

Point Breakdown

12 Loose Regolith Y 4 4 points for successful

1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

13 Pea Gravel Y 4 4 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for bypass

completion

14 Undulating Terrain N 2 2 points for successful 1 point for attempt 0 points for failure to at

completion

tempt Post-Excursion Review (PER) Inspection N/A See each task for point reference earned at PER.

Total Possible Points 118 + 30% Design and Operational Readiness Review

36

International Team Proposal Requirements At a minimum, the proposing team shall identify the following in a written proposal due to NASA MSFC by the dates specified in the timeline.

Proposals shall not exceed 10 pages in length not including the cover page. Additional pages will not be considered as part of the proposal. Proposals should be submitted in a PDF format. Text should be Arial, size 12 font on 8.5 x 11 paper with 1 inch margins.

General Information:

1. A cover page that includes the name of the college/university or secondary education institution, mailing address, and date.

2. Name, title and contact information (including email address) for one adult educator. 3. Name, title, and contact information for the student team leader. 4. Name and title of the student team member who will take responsibility of the safety plan

(Safety Officer). 5. List of up to ten student team members (inclusive of the team leader and safety officer)

who will be committed to the project and their proposed duties.

Facilities/Equipment

1. Description of the facilities and hours of accessibility, necessary personnel, equipment, and supplies that are required to design and build the vehicle and components.

Safety

1. Provide a written safety plan for addressing the safety of the materials and tools used, and the student responsible, i.e. safety officer, for ensuring that the plan is followed.

2. Describe the plan for briefing students on hazard recognition and accident avoidance. 3. Describe methods to include necessary caution statements in plans, procedures, and

other working documents, including the use of proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

Technical Design

1. A proposed and detailed approach to the rover and its components. a. Include general vehicle dimensions, construction methods, and design. b. Include a detailed description of any new or used components c. Include wheel design and fabrication plans. d. Include drivetrain design and fabrication plans. e. Address any technical components that add to the vehicle’s design. f. Include an initial strategy for completion of the obstacles and mission tasks. g. Address major technical challenges and solutions.

STEM Engagement

1. Include plans and evaluation criteria for the required STEM Engagement activities.

37

Project Plan

1. Provide a detailed development schedule/timeline covering all aspects necessary to meet all milestones and complete the project successfully.

2. Provide a budget to cover all aspects necessary to complete the project successfully, inclusive of team travel.

3. Provide a funding plan. 4. Develop a plan for sustainability of the activity in the local area. This plan should include

established partnerships and an approach to regularly engage successive classes of students in STEM. It should include partners (industry/community), recruitment of team members, funding sustainability, and STEM engagement activities.

38

Project Milestones & Requirements

Design Review The Design Review makes up 15% of the overall score for the competition. It demonstrates that the maturity of the design is appropriate to support proceeding to full-scale fabrication, assembly, and integration; showing that the technical effort is on track to complete the operation and system development and mission operations in order to meet overall requirements within the identified cost and schedule constraints. Progress against management plans, budget, and schedule, as well as risk assessments are presented. This design review is a review of the final design of the rover and task components.

All analyses should be complete, and some critical testing should be complete. The Design Review Report and Presentation should be independent.

The panel expects a professional and polished report that follows the order of sections as they appear below.

Design Review Report

Page Limit: 10 pages (not including the cover page, table of contents page, and appendices that provide pictures, photos, or graphics that assist in explaining the contents in the design review report.)

1. Cover Page Team name (prominent), mailing address, contact information, and team member

information

2. Vehicle Criteria - Selection, Design, and Rational of Vehicle Design a. Review the design at a system level (i.e. wheel design, drivetrain design,

suspension), going through each system’s alternative designs, and evaluating the pros and cons of each alternative.

b. For each alternative, briefly present research on why the alternative should not be chosen.

c. After evaluating all alternatives, present the chosen vehicle design. - Describe each subsystem and the components within those subsystems - Describe how the design meets requirements for size, weight, volume, assembly

and clearance constraints. - Provide dimensional drawings of the leading design - Provide estimated masses for each subsystem - Provide sufficient justification for design selections

3. Task and Other Mission Components (i.e. telemetry, tools, containers)

a. Describe the objective of each mission component tool or equipment that supports the excursion.

b. If attempting the Task Challenge (3D-printed tool), the team must state the attempt and outline the design features.

c. Review the designs at a system level, briefly discussing alternative designs to each component and evaluating the pros and cons.

39

d. Describe the preliminary interfaces with the drivers, vehicle and mission. e. Include drawings and schematics for all elements of the task or mission components.

4. Mission Performance Predictions

a. Demonstrate any simulated vehicle data and management through course design. b. Demonstrate any simulated component data and management through course

design.

5. Safety a. Demonstrate an understanding of all components needed to complete the project

and how risks/delays impact the project. b. Provide a preliminary Personnel Hazard Analysis. The focus of the Hazard Analysis

at this design review is identification of hazards, their causes, and resulting effects. Preliminary mitigations and controls can be identified, but do not need to be implemented at this point unless they are specific to the construction of the vehicle or components. (i.e. cost, schedule, personnel availability). Rank the risk of each hazard for both likelihood and severity.

c. Provide a preliminary Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) of the proposed design of the vehicle and components. The focus is identification of hazards, causes, effects, and proposed mitigations. Rank each risk of each hazard for both likelihood and severity.

6. Project Plan

a. Requirements Verification – demonstrate that the vehicle, drivers, and mission requirements identified in this guidebook are being met.

b. Timeline Verification – demonstrate that the timeline is on schedule to meet the requirements of this project.

Design Review Presentation

Time Limit: 15-minute presentation

It is expected that the team participants deliver the report and answer all questions. The mentor/advisor may attend, but shall not deliver the presentation. Include the following in your presentation:

- Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications - Component dimensions, materials, and justifications - Drawings, schematics, visuals of each major component and subsystems - Mission performance predictions - Requirements compliance

40

Operational Readiness Review The Operational Readiness Review, or ORR makes up 15% of the overall score for the competition. The ORR provides an assessment of the readiness of the personnel, processes/procedures, and vehicle and components to safely execute the mission. It provides support of tests and due diligence exercised in demonstrated readiness of engineering, operations, and processes and procedures.

The vehicle and components should be complete with critical testing in the final phases. The ORR Report and Presentation should be independent.

The panel expects a professional and polished report that follows the order of sections as they appear below.

Operational Readiness Review Report

Page Limit: 10 pages (not including the cover page, table of contents page, and appendices that provide pictures, photos, or graphics that assist in explaining the contents in the design review report.)

Cover Page

Team name (prominent), mailing address, contact information, and team member information

1. Vehicle Criteria – Design and Construction of the Vehicle

a. Describe any changes in the rover from the previous design review and explain why those changes are necessary.

b. Describe features that enable the vehicle to be excursion safe and ready. c. Demonstrate that the design can meet mission success requirements. d. Prove that the vehicle is fully constructed and document the construction process. e. Include schematics/images of the completed rover.

2. Task and Other Mission Components

a. Describe any changes in the task and mission support components since the design review and why those changes are necessary.

b. If attempting the Task Challenge (3D-printed tool), the team must state the attempt and outline the tool features.

c. Describe features that enable the task and other mission components to be excursion safe and ready.

d. Prove that the task and other mission components are fully constructed and document the construction process.

e. Include schematics for all elements of the task or mission components.

3. Mission Performance Predictions a. Describe how the vehicle is expected to perform through the course design. b. Describe how the task and mission components are expected to perform through the

course design. c. Describe any strategies the team has for successful performance through the course

design.

41

4. Safety

a. Update the Personnel Hazard Analysis and the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis to include: - Finalized hazard descriptions, causes, and effects of the vehicle and mission

components the team has built. - A completed list of mitigations addressing the hazards and/or their causes. - A completed list of verifications for the identified mitigations. This should include

methods of verifying the mitigations and controls are (or will be) in place, and how they will serve to ensure mitigation.

b. Include a list of procedures and checklists for competition days.

5. Project Plan a. Requirements Compliance – review and update the verification plan demonstrating

that the vehicle, drivers, and mission requirements identified in this guidebook are met.

b. Discuss any testing plans, completion of tests, and discussion of results. c. Timeline Verification – demonstrate that the timeline is on schedule to meet the

requirements of this project. d. Discuss STEM Engagement results

Operational Readiness Review Presentation

Time Limit: 15-minute presentation

It is expected that the team participants deliver the report and answer all questions. The mentor/advisor may attend, but shall not deliver the presentation. Include the following in your presentation:

- Vehicle dimensions and materials (inclusive of frame, wheels, drivetrain, etc.) - Component dimensions and materials (inclusive of task tools and components) - Drawings, schematics, visuals of each major component and subsystems - Mission performance predictions - Requirements compliance including test plans or accomplishments - STEM Engagement

42

Awards Awards are subject to change without notice.

Award

Categories

Criteria

Overall Winner High School College

& Awarded to the top overall teams in each category. Design reviews, educational engagement, safety, and a successful excursion will all factor into the Overall Winner.

Project Review Award (Design Review & ORR)

High School College

& Awarded to the team that is viewed to have the best combination of written reviews and formal presentations.

STEM Award

Engagement High School College

& Awarded to the team that is determined to have best inspired the study of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) related topics in their community. This team not only presented a high number of activities to a large number of people, but also delivered quality activities to a wide range of audiences.

Social

Media Award High School College

& Awarded to the team that has the most and creative social media presence throughout the project year.

active

Best Team Award

Spirit High School College

& Awarded to the team that is judged by their peers that display the “Best Team Spirit” during the competition weekend.

Featherweight High School & Awarded to the team that best addressed the Award College ongoing space exploration challenge of

weight management, delivering an innovative approach to safe minimization of rover weight.

Crash and Burn Best overall either Awarded to the team that does not celebrate Award High School

College or failure, but rather that all learn from failure,

do better, and be successful in our later attempts.

Task Challenge Award

High School College

& Awarded to the team that best demonstrates a 3D printed tool design for the liquid sample retrieval task.

Rookie Award

of the Year Best overall High School College

either or

Awarded to the top overall rookie team using the same criteria as the Overall Winner Award. If a rookie team is the Overall Winner, this award will go to the 2nd place Rookie Team.

43

Award Categories Criteria

Pit Crew Award High School

College & Awarded to the team as judged by the pit crew

that best demonstrates resourcefulness, motivation, good sportsmanship, and team spirit in repairing or working on their rover while the teams are in the pit area.

Other Awards High School College

& Other awards will be given based on components of the competition, such as discussions within Design Review and Operational Readiness Review reports or in-person competition.

the

44

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL 35812 www.nasa.gov/marshall

www.nasa.gov

NP-2020-08-37-MSFC G-549426