viacom vs youtube

Upload: rafat-ali

Post on 31-May-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    1/12

    VNFIgD STATES DISTRICICOURTFOR THE OUTHERN DXSJRICT OFm- --- ---.- r n fT, - -/ I L>d ~ ,#t,\ i I jWACOM INTERNATIONAL INC..COMEDYPARTNERS. iOUNTRY MUSIC TE&'ISION, INC., iPARAMOUNT PICTURESCORPORAnON, )andBLACK ENTFRTTAINMENTTELEVISION )=, ) ,---*)

    - ) Carc No. 07 Civ. 2103 (US))v. 1Y O ~ E ,NC., YOUTUBE, L W , nd

    1)Go0Gl.E INC., )

    C. Yoo'hbe, Inc,YoclTobe, LCC, d Gbgkhe. You?tbeWr%*")are r c p r a d y BlrtlitBeck Aswrm h l e d w & ScottLLPandWisrm&mini Gocdrich& R d , .C.Il. A CONCIsE STATEMENTOFTHE 198UESASTHEYNOW APpEiR

    1. ThoV i m Plaint% (which inchd. P m a m c ~ t ictumsmd-VIleedingcablcnctwodcsinc~~,ComedyCmWdB~~cgc

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    2/12

    that Dtfmlants Googls andYou'hh haveknowingly and ntmti-matedandoperatod theirYm'hh webaitctopromote mdprofitfrommasshe copyright i&hgcmmt o f t e l d mprogram and fcatun,6bnaon anunprpccdtntDdscale invoking hundredsof tbollsands ofpiratedvideo clips. Ddend&mtSm hacbyviillfullyviolating tbc atollcctualp r o m ight8that wcrtmetedmdmade valuableby ths nvestmmt ofcnalivity, time, talent, energy, and o n d r s of c-t produeas ofV i a n d t h ontentowners.2. Defmdanbconductc~llstiluiw irect copyrightMiiq-t, inducmrntof copyright idhgancnt, cootribuhy copyrightm a n o u t , and

    vicariouscopyright i&hgmmt. Viacorn sseksm h s s only againatDezkubnb'in6ingingactivity, notany innocentornonin6ringingcoaduct3. B a s e d a n ~ p u b l i c ~ t h e v i a c o m P ~ c x p a c tDeftndnmr toplaceheavy relimccm he no-cdcddbhlxupMby theDigital Millennium CopyrightAct, 17U.S.C. 512(c) (%MU").Tho DMCAis not 8 defeasctoW t v , but limitsdiefagainstMingml m d c r c a h i a ~ c c s . ~ t i s a o r p ~ b

    thm DMCA, mmultiplemuons.4. Defdmta haveprofited emmum@ h m hisw e m e a t A~ p t l t o f ~ S 1 . 6 5 b U i a a r ~ p r i o c t h a t G o a g l e p a i d f o r

    1. P ~ ' d a i m s i n t h i s l a w a u i t ~ t 0 s i l o n c a . .bwndrcdr ofmilliomof p+e -tho globewho srchrngc + b yi n f o r m a t i o l q n c w q d ~ ~ & Y o l i ~ ' a ~ h o o t i n gservice.2. Plaintiff&clpim thatYouTnbc has d i r e d y orindirrctly n6inpdplaintiffs'copyrights.An hpwhntpan of the casewin be plaintiffs'of hc ~ ~ V Q I L CfwpyrightedworLs and allegedi n f i i n ~ a t ~ s o t h a t t h e p u t i o l c a n d s * r m i m w ~ p ~

    ow0 and hay. egistad eachaf he copyrightedmatcdd it clpims (0haveb e m infringed.

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    3/12

    3 Plaiatiffs'claims llrc barredM d a f d y Lhe MillenniumCowrightA n ' s (DMCA) SafeHuborprovLion~,ncludiog 17U.S.C. 8SI~(C)-& (4.o ~ l b b c w i l low that it espectsthstmpmr$nccofintellectualpmpatyrightsby notonly complyinn with thcDMWs safeh a r b o r o b l i g a ti o a s b a tb y g o i n g w d l b c y o n d i ts ~ m p r o t c c tintellectualpmpeay rights, inchding those ofPhintEa. By hip la-plaintiffs neck to upset tbscarefulbLnce thatCmgrcmwmrrtnrotedinthcDMCA which balanm, the ligbhofcop* holdersand theawd oproteci wmmuuicatim on he intCmet

    4. YouTubs ssssrtstbc followingadditiolraldefensesagainstp Mclaims.thedoctrintoffoiruse,tbedochincofsubstential~b6it@ngusc,tstoppcl,~ ,Laches.cogyrieht~,uncleanhrad8,mde ~ s n a r s r implied liccmwgnmtbd byP M c.g., p h h i f f ~uttingtheir ownworkscm YouTubsa crmittiug othas todo the srmc).

    5 . Plaint&% cldm actualor8taWay damages, as well as iqjwxtive rrlief.Atissucwillbcplainti f fs 'cntit lanmttoanydamagcs,incl~whaherp ~ h a w ~ b c m r d E t s d 6 0 m ~ m Y o U ~ . n dw b c t h a p l a i n t i f f i , h v c f d l t d t o ~ a n y o f t h c l r a l b @ ~ .

    that theVia- %mtii& srsa& to o b imsb qmp&tc dkov ay . AAa aper iodofES1diramEythepat icrwi l l~ in~BSIphtbcwayin~cht h i s d i r c a v c r yw i l l b s ~ psmSrwillpioxitbthisdiauwmysothaSitoccwearlyammgt~inthedircovarypcaiDdt~pmnittaantotimdywpp lmd its idd&&n of rrscaada@gbta soddkpd infrinsing wcuka,andtopsrmicYou-meto*cppraprLbPdkemay~thcsearorlclaadallegcdinf. - la.

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    4/12

    Mnrch7,2008-E.chplrtyagrrestoproduce3 0 - 4 0 ~ a n s ' ~ t s b y t h i p d a t c ,Bnchcmtadimtobe identifiedby thelupcahgparty d o r t h o ~ ~ p e r t y , l lthenqnestjngperty's option,a d ointly~ t i a t e d b y t h e p a r t i e s t o t h i a d t b cPrcmierLesguecrse,Puchas@tiunstohavec o a c W no i.ta thanNoMmbsr27,2007. AAaMarch 7,2008. tbeparticswill usetheirbest efforts toprodwe documents forranaininpcu8~tobeidcntifiedwsoonM pnctiableafte~ arch 7,2008.March 7,2 0 0 8 w i l l b e 1 1 ~ c b f 0 r t ~ * d a t e f m o ~ ~~ N s t o d i a l ~ w r a s . T h e p a t t i c s a ~ p s ethatdocmmt+ti= w i l l bc complstcdsothrttheparticswillhanrdcquatetimeto~ - ~ t i ~ l ~ l b y ~ m S c p t e m k r7.2MHIdrtc.DocmnentProduotimahallbc

    bYJu l y 7 .m

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 4 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    5/12

    v. TBE NAMES OPTEEPmSoNSTOBEDEP06P9:YIACOM: Inmaidanccwith thoageddcpasitianW a , iacCm, intoodst ~ ~ t h s f o l l o w i n g p o o p l e .I h i r ~ n n r y b o ~ b y V i a o o m ~ ~ c s a cpgmacs. Tlds l i r tdoeswt inchdsp~aanswi thknowIodg~of~e ' s imdY o u W r systems,ESIpmerwian efforts, former employ^^^ md thtdpaticswithmlcvam knowledge.

    (1) Eric Schmidt

    (12) -M.ya(13) JulioPekmwic(14) S u m Wojield

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 5 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    6/12

    (22) BradleyH O ~ E

    YOUTUBE: AfterdccummtdiscoMyhasbeen exchanged, You'Me intad6todcpossthsfoUowhgpcople.Thia L i s t m s y b c n o d i f i c d a r m C c p r c ~ .nadditiw o he. listbelow,YcuTubsdm bo take 30@)(6) dqmitiom onESI topics formlcvmtViacom eatitier, odcposs thirdparties with relevantknowledgo rmd may deposefolmsr mployocrofV i ntitieswi&rdevantb l *

    (2 ) Michael FrioLks(3) s t o p h a a m

    7 ) Adam-(8) --9) Amy owd dl(10) Steve P m U(11) BobBIlrirh(12) KluliPatcl(13) JaronWitt(14) Nada Stimtt

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 6 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    7/12

    (17) BlairHanisan(18) UtCtFilippo(19) ScOnRoeach

    (27) JoeS i(28) I m u k . ~ D i l l m

    VI. STATEMENTOF ANY JJMITATIONSTOBE PLACEDONDISCOVERY,INCLUDINGANY PRoTBXlWEOR C O N F L D ~k FmtectiveOrdcrkruM.

    1. Theparticshave=ached agmenmt on ll items inthePmtectivcOrder.2. Plainti& reserve the right to seek tomodi fy the pmtectivoada inorda

    to be pamitrad tosharoMd8ntial information withpersons authorizbd

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 7 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    8/12

    to receiveornvicw suchdocumcnbmo ther materials under ap t d wordarenteredinmv Otbaa h efrmdants contardtM t isnot~-appmp&te for anyonoo k h artiesto this case and thePraiaLearms case tohave accesstoths d d a m i a Imatericlls disclosedrmda

    B. Thopmtw haveagreedtoa dpulationreganling he mchmgeof expert d d t sand d m t i o t l l l andanon-waiverstipuMi01~

    I. Vicom ard YouTube have Dgrssd tbnt, tothecxm@cable,discoverywillk odhaid with Pran ie rhague v. YouTube,CaseNO.07Civ 3582 ("PremierLeagw c h ction"). V h o m . Remie~eagueLimited and BourneCo. rc okily refeudtoas "thsCo-Plaimiffs"f0rplnpasesofthisssction.

    2. A U p a r t i c s t o b o t h a c t i o n s ~ t b s t ( i ) ~ ~ s d i n o n s ~a h a l l k ~ ~ i n b o t h ~ o n q ( u ~ ~ m t a l r c n i n a n ea c t i o n ~ l m d c s m s d t a k e n i n b o t b ~ , r m d ( i i i ) ~ ~ e s a P k e damd~waedinollcaaionaballbcdeemedciskedmd~inbothactions.

    3. Format of d i m m y . l l i epartiawillnegotiate an ES] lan andagreetor dd r a s hnd c opy~ f a rmr t up r t o f ~ pmpo r aL

    t i m r m ; h r r l l y ~ t o b y t t m p a t i r r , ~ w i t h t h e d o u a ' rsckddiqader. UnlcnsolholrPbtrOrrsd~thcpPaies.depaihuof6qmswill ba M d t location specified by counssl forthslwtypmwag be wiblcss.D. TbebelowLrmiOtions-thtV~k.~whi~re~dp l a i a t i f f s , i n c ~ ~ a u m p l e , I f i l o g A t o m P ' ' t,SpikcW,mdMTVN o t w c u k a m ~ p a r t o f V i ~ o n a l , a w 3 r r r e n o t ~ ~ t obe third particsforgrapostlof the belowagrwment.E. Theparticsjointlyp r q e x the fdlmving a d d i t i d limiratiomon dkovery :Inansffort to c tkaffoas ard saermlinc discovery,thepartiash v s agrsod tothe followingLimitson the iateofdepwitions:

    1. Fact depositions: ThcCollective PlaintifEsmay togsthsr taka up@ 225hoursof-tion testimonyof YooTubewitncsnes. The&~ectiveP maytogethertakc up o 150hounr of depoaitioa testimonyof third pdm. YauTube

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 8 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    9/12

    may take up o225how f dqwsiitiOn tertimollyof the CollsCtiw Plainti@, and150horns ofdepontion tatbony of third plrties. Thisproposal:(a) Inchdo11 a mgxinnrmof 25 horn or esch sidekxESIdepcsxilionaMderRule 3O(bX6). For example,YouTubemay iakc upto25hours ofBSI&u i&sf the ~ollcctiwlain&, andt h c c o l l ~ ~ ~ P ~ i a ~ ( P m a y t a k e i q , t o 2 5 ~ 0 fESI relateddcposltions of YouTubc.@) Limits each factwi- doposition to 7 ours, cxwpt3O(bX6)~tioms;pmvided.tbattbs~~smaycatsndthislimitaonby

    agrOemanforspccifdc~iticmsdwillcoopwtsingoodfaitht oMChau c h a g n amnZandpm~ t h a t i f t h e pm t h ~M C h ~ i n a p o r t i c l r k r a r c t h c ~ g ~ m a y s e c k~ l l ~ h ~ o n ~ m e C a m t f o r g o 0 d c n u c ;(c) Assumer tbrt d o n f a parly countsagrina thapr~y'#ine limits (OD( tbcpatythonoticed the dcpodtion);(d) AssrmvsthstachpsrtyWgivagcodf i i tb~~ofhowbngt h e y w i l l ~ w i t h ~ w i t n o p l 4 8 h o u n , p r i o r t o t b e ~ ~

    (a) m y ave25~~ n heV i hintitT8,s n d l b V i s P o m P t i a t i f b ~ U m y - n u o f 2 5mbmgamh 00 Def*(i) AniDtorroOlltorytbrtulaforaantaiupiaceof'" 5011f o r O I O h p * i n t i f i ~ ~ o a e ~ ~ .

    W. ANTICIPATEDnUD8OFEXPWT 'l'wmmw,IFANY

    Plaintiffs a n t i c i i thatSrrpattcStimonywillid&,utmtnecessarilybc Lindtdto,ha foltowing fields:

    I. Technological w a , including the opeadanof theY o u W and Googlev i d s o w ~ ~ a r d f i I ~ D C h n o t o g i c s . a a d o t b c r r c l a t o d2. TheYouTubc, &qle Video, andGooglebu8imes.s models, khdiug tbccontributionof~ u t h o ~g h t e d contentto the c 1success of YouTubs andGoogle.

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 9 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    10/12

    601 ThirtsgfhShKZN.W.~ 1 U X ) S o u t hWssbinntan.DC ZUl05-3823

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 10 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    11/12

    Susan1.KohlmmnPdcrH. armaMa#hswW.AlsdoIfJQLI~GI& BlockLLP919Third Avenue37thFloorNew YorL,NY 10022Tclcphona(212) 891-1690Facdmile (212) 891-1699SHEARMAN& STERLING LLP

    Stuart I. Baskin (SB-9936)StephenFi&bd~~SP-3410)Jolm Oueli (JG-8427)599LodDgtonAv t~u eNew Yo& NY 10022Tclepboae(212)S46400Fauimils (212) 848-7179

    WILSON~6N6~nODDRlCH stR M .C.

    6% PageMillRod'PnloAlto, CA 4304

    ToniaMarieOrwllctteKhucraorEmilyAlice SmithW i h SaasiniOooQich& RosatiP.C.1301 Avc~lns m maricPr40thPLr.New York.NY 10019Telephone(212)999-5800F&la (212)999-5899BARTLIT BECK RERMAN PALBNCHAR& SCOTT LLP

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 11 of 12

  • 8/14/2019 Viacom Vs YouTube

    12/12

    Philip S. BeckMark S.Ouwelcm .. .RcbsccaWeinskin Bacon (Inohac pending)~ S . C o a L . .Carrie k JablonskiCamthousePlace54W. ubbad St.. . ,suitc 300 . . . . ..- . . :Chicago, IL60610 - : , .. .- . - - , ; , . . ,Tclcphmc 3 12)4 9 4 4 6 5Pmimile (312) 4944440

    X PROVISIONFOR APPROVALOF TEECOUL1TAND SIGNATURELLN& FORTaeCOURT

    Dated: NswYork,NovYak~ u y s 1 $ 2 ~

    L .JL&HONORAIUg OIfLOL.STANTON,U.S.DJ. r'

    Case 1:07-cv-02103-LLS Document 58 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 12 of 12