video: 28538094 ... · 28538094/7e7ec9678e senha: fgv2015 • independent public prosecutors...

30
Video: https://vimeo.com/rivello/review/1 28538094/7e7ec9678e Senha: fgv2015

Upload: vuongkiet

Post on 16-Sep-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Video:

https://vimeo.com/rivello/review/128538094/7e7ec9678e

Senha: fgv2015

• Independent Public Prosecutors Attorney-General is appointed by, but

independent from the President

• Newly enacted Public Administration

Transparency Act

• Newly enacted Money Laundering Act (with plea barganing for whistleblowers)

• Supreme Court with a high level of legitimacy

Database

1.488.201 cases (1988-2013)

14.047.609 docket entries

2.692.587 parties

780 types of docket entry

24.710 legal field classifications

The Team

6 researchers with legal background

5 researchers with computer

science / statistics background

The efficiency challenge

38 open doors

1 AC Injunction

2 ACO Ordinary Private Law Suit

3 ADC Declaratory Action of Constitutionality

4 ADI Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality

5 ADO Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality by Omission

6 ADPF Claim of Fundamental Principle Violation

7 AI Interlocutory Appeal

8 AImp Claim for Recusal

9 AO Ordinary Suit

10 AOE Special Ordinary Suit

11 AP Criminal Suit

12 AR Rescission Suit

13 ARE Extraordinary Appeal with Interlocutory Appeal

14 AS Claim for Suspicion

15 CC Jurisdiction Conflict

16 Cm Communication

17 EI Exception of Incompetence

18 EP Execution of Sentence

19 Ext Extradition

20 HC Habeas Corpus

21 HD Habeas Data

22 IF Federal Intervention

23 Inq Investigation

24 MI Writ of Injunction

25 MS Writ of Security

26 OACO Opposition in Ordinary Private Law Suit

27 Pet Petition

28 PPE Probation for Extradition

29 PSV Binding Precedent Proposal

30 RC Criminal Appeal

31 Rcl Complaint

32 RE Extraordinary Appeal

33 RHC Habeas Corpus Appeal

34 RMS Habeas Data Appeal

35 RvC Criminal Revision

36 SL Injunction Suspension

37 SS Security Writ Suspension

38 STA Suspension of Preliminary Injunction

If the Court were required to hear every case that a nation

of 180 millions litigious people could litigate, the judicial

process would quickly break down.

The share of abstract constitutional review cases

received by the Court is negligible

“It seems most unlikely that the country would tolerate having

the decisions of so final and powerful a judicial body depend

on which three justices happened to sit in each case.”

Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes

Justices behave similarly in certain individual rulings

In 2013, the Justices received more cases than any other type of judge in Brazil

2013

State Courts

- Trial Court 1.351

- Court of Appeal 1.294

Federal Courts

- Trial Court 815

- Court of Appeal 3.726

Labor Courts

- Trial Court 867

- Court of Appeal 1.226

Supreme Court 4.015

Source: “Justica em Numeros” and STF’s website, compiled by Laura Osorio

Average time to decide cases has remained

above 1 year in recent times

Even in abstract constitutional review cases the

Court only decides as a collegiate body 10% of the time in recent years

The current tendency is that the number of new cases will stabilize at ~60k per year. There is a meaningful increase in

cases from small claims courts

The vast majority of cases arriving at the Court pertain to

Administrative Law. Consumer Law has increased significantly in the last decade

Top subjects Administrative Law

Salary (civil servants);

Economic Plans,

Retirement pensions

Salary (military servants),

Top subjects Tax Law Tax Credits;

Added-Value Tax;

Social contributions;

Social security contributions;

Top subjects Social Security Law

Initial earnings and adjustments;

Benefits in kind;

Revisions;

Death pension

In 2013 the Court’s main clients were the federal government, banks and telephone companies

1 Federal Government

2 National Social Security Institute

3 Oi (Phone Company)

4 Federal Union Public Defender’s Office

5 State of Sao Paulo 6 Federal District 7 Federal Prosecutor’s Office 8 State of Rio de Janeiro 9 State of Minas Gerais

10 State of Bahia 11 Bank of Brazil 12 State of Rio Grande do Sul 13 Santander Bank 14 Telemar (Phone Company) 15 Bradesco Bank

23x more

A public servant has 23 times more chances to see the Court try a

case that is relevant to them than a regular worker

Some states are overrepresented (even after correcting by GDP). Rio Grande do Sul is both significant to the Court’s docket (large circle)

and one of the most overrepresented (higher up in the graph)

Impact in the Court’s Practice

Average # of days to publish collegiate

rulings, per case reporter

While cases by some Justices are published in an average of 41

days, others are delayed for nearly a year

Less than a month later, Supreme Court changes

rules on deadline to publish

rulings

Impact in the Court’s Practice

Quantitative Discourse analysis

Was the “Mensalão” a political trial?

Research by Ivar Hartmann and

Renato Rocha Souza

Quantitative Discourse analysis

Bulk analysis of word frequency in 250k words, by type: verbs, nouns, adjectives, expressions

Quantitative Discourse analysis

Little difference in discourse Acquital opinions: more general criminal legal principles – e.g. ‘law’, ‘conduct’, ‘attribution’ Conviction opinions: more case-specific elements – e.g. ‘operations’, ‘payments’, ‘companies’, ‘loan’