Directions:

1. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

2. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

3. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 4. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.5. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.6. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.2. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.3. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

4. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: CYRIL ALIVIOAsst. Lead Researcher: NESSA ARNOZAResearch Associate: QUEENCY YOSORESResearch Associate: APPLE MONICITResearch Associate: ASHLEY CAMPOMANESResearch Associate: JOSEPHINE BARUMAN

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Directions:

7. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

8. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

9. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 10. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.11. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.12. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES5. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: JOY GERONAAsst. Lead Researcher: MIRAFLOR BULADACOResearch Associate: JUDE ADLAWANResearch Associate: ALMA MAGNOResearch Associate: DIANA TAPALESResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

Directions:

13. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

14. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

15. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 16. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.17. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.18. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES9. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.10. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.11. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

12. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: HANAH LOU SANCHEZAsst. Lead Researcher: SHERYL MAE ULGASANResearch Associate: SAMANTHA ROSALResearch Associate: NHIEL ROMEROResearch Associate: DEBBIE ESCANILLAResearch Associate: JEAN BULALAQUE

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Directions:

19. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

20. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

21. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 22. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.23. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.24. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES13. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.14. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.15. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

16. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: JUBEL LIBARIOSAsst. Lead Researcher: ANA MARIE QUEVEDOResearch Associate: TRESHA JORQUIAResearch Associate: FATIMA DIRONResearch Associate: KENNETH BONTILAOResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Directions:

25. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

26. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

27. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 28. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.29. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.30. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES17. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.18. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.19. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

20. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: JAMES KINGSLEY MISTULAAsst. Lead Researcher: JOYCE TOMARONGResearch Associate: EMELITA CATUBIGResearch Associate: JAY GEREBESEResearch Associate: MONEL PEPITOResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Directions:

31. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

32. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

33. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 34. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.35. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.36. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES21. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.22. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.23. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

24. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: ZSHANAIAH MAE CABAHUGAsst. Lead Researcher: JUCELLE INOCResearch Associate: CHRISTIAN JOHN DESABILLEResearch Associate: GINAVEL MIERResearch Associate: ELRON JOHN BALABAResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Directions:

37. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

38. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

39. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 40. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.41. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.42. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES25. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.26. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.27. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

28. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: KATRES JEAN LAPASAsst. Lead Researcher: MARY ANN COYOCAResearch Associate: JERICO CANDIDOResearch Associate: JEZELLE ARANAResearch Associate: ERRAH REBUSAResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

Directions:

43. The research title, major research question, and sub-problems all in one, will be the Third Mastery Examination.

44. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

45. Submit your output on or before November 24, 2017. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY. 46. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.47. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.48. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

RESEARCH TITLE

MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION/STATEMENT

SUB-PROBLEMS/QUESTIONS

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002

RUBRICS FOR THIRD MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS

GENERAL RULES29. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Third Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH –

OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.30. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.31. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

32. The score given will be final and irrevocable unless changes are made with proper basis. Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations

Below Average (less than 17 points):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work

Area of Assessment Points EarnedArea 1. Research TitleThe research title summarizes the main idea, has a concise statement of the main topic, includes the major variables, and show the relationship of the main variables of the study. Further, it should qualify to the number of words that a research title should have (10-15 words).

Area 2. Major Research Question/StatementThe major research problem generally identifies the issue being understudied. It should be stated in a clear manner and must be explicitly presented.

Area 3. Sub-problems/questions

The question isolates, categorize, describe, or name factors and situation thus having a good structuring and construction in question form.

The question determines the relationship among factors that have been identified. Proper and correct sentence construction is followed.

The question has provided the statement on the prediction of what will happen next. It provides a clear idea of the manipulation of variables being studied.

General Comments: _______/90

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Total Score

Lead Researcher: MARVIN MAGDADAROAsst. Lead Researcher: RODEL TISONResearch Associate: DIANA ARDIZAResearch Associate: MARIBELLE NARVASAResearch Associate: HANNAH PATINDOLResearch Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer

RC CODE: SH-GAS-B12-407-002