Researcher Development Programme Pathway 2

2016/17

The University of Worcester is committed to ensuring that disabled people, including those with specific learning difficulties and/or mental health difficulties are treated fairly. Reasonable adjustments to provision will be made to ensure that disabled students and other disabled people are not disadvantaged. This handbook can be provided in a variety of formats upon request.

This handbook is for advice and guidance only and is not a substitute for the formal Academic Regulations and Procedures of the University of Worcester. In case of any conflict these formal statements and requirements take precedence over the handbook.

Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in the handbook at the time of publication. The University reserves the right to change the information given at any time.

© 2016 University of Worcester

Contents

1. BACKGROUND TO THE PROGRAMME........................................................................4

2. EDUCATIONAL AIMS OF THE PROGRAMME...............................................................4

3. INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES AND LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT METHODS.................................................................................................................4

4. PROGRAMME INFORMATION...................................................................................6

Worcester’s Researcher Development Programme.............................................................6

External Training................................................................................................................8

Postgraduate Certificate in Research Methods...................................................................8

5. YOUR COURSE IN CONTEXT.......................................................................................9

6. MANAGEMENT OF YOUR COURSE...........................................................................10

7. COURSE ADMINISTRATION.....................................................................................10

Course Notices..................................................................................................................10

SOLE Pages.......................................................................................................................10

Research School................................................................................................................10

Student Services...............................................................................................................11

8. SUPPORTING YOUR LEARNING................................................................................12

9. METHODS FOR EVALUATING AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY AND STANDARDS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING......................................................................................12

10. ASSESSMENT..........................................................................................................12

Assessment Strategy........................................................................................................12

Regulation of assessment.................................................................................................12

How your work is assessed...............................................................................................13

Word limits......................................................................................................................13

Submission of coursework................................................................................................13

Submission Deadlines and Late Work...............................................................................13

2

Return and Collection of Marked Work.............................................................................13

How your work is marked.................................................................................................14

Feedback on your work.....................................................................................................14

Mitigating Circumstances.................................................................................................14

Cheating...........................................................................................................................14

Guidance on Presentation of Assessed Work.....................................................................15

11. FEEDING BACK YOUR VIEWS AND OPINIONS...........................................................15

Appeals and Complaints...................................................................................................15

APPENDICES.....................................................................................................................16

Appendix 1 - Programme Specification for PG Cert in Research Methods..........................16

Appendix 2 - Module Specifications..................................................................................20

Appendix 3 - Programme of Workshops and Courses........................................................28

3

1. Background to the programme

As a research student at University of Worcester, you are required to engage in a core programme of training and development as you progress through your research degree, with further optional learning opportunities also available to you. The Researcher Development Programme will provide you with the general and subject-specific knowledge, skills and behaviours to support you in the completion of your research degree. More than this, however, it will contribute to your continuing professional and personal development.

The programme has been developed employing Vitae’s Researcher Development Statement and all elements of the programme have been mapped on to Vitae’s Researcher Development Framework.

2. Educational aims of the programme

Prior to commencing your research degree you will be allocated to one of two pathways depending on your prior experience and knowledge as a researcher. This will determine which elements of the programme are core and which are optional. The expectation is that you will engage fully with the core elements but you will pick and choose from the optional elements dependent on your own needs. This handbook is for research students on Pathway 2 of the Researcher Development Programme. Students on this pathway have the option of undertaking the PG Cert in Research Methods (see Section 4).

The rationale of the programme is to develop and enhance the skills, both generic and specific, that a research student needs to complete their research degree and to become an effective researcher. Furthermore, the programme also seeks to highlight and then to enhance skills that a research student develops in the course of their research degree which are transferable to their future career.

The aims of the programme are:1. To prepare the student for the key stages of the research degree process, i.e.

registration, transfer and examination2. To develop and enhance core research skills3. To develop and enhance transferable skills4. To develop and enhance the skills needed for writing both their thesis and for

publication5. To develop and enhance core IT and library skills6. To develop and enhance research skills specific to the subject area of the research

degree7. To provide knowledge and understanding of the broader context of research in the

UK and internationally8. To enable the student to disseminate their knowledge and practice effectively to

academic and professional communities

3. Intended learning outcomes and learning, teaching and assessment methods

Research Skills

Students will be able to:

1. Recognise and validate research problems

4

2. Demonstrate original, independent and critical thinking, and the ability to develop theoretical concepts

3. Demonstrate a knowledge of recent advances within their field and in related areas4. Demonstrate an understanding of relevant research methodologies and techniques

and their appropriate application within their research field 5. Critically analyse and evaluate their findings and those of others6. Summarise, document, report and reflect on their progress

Knowledge and Understanding of Research Environment

Students will be able to:

1. Show a broad understanding of the context, at the national and international level, in which research takes place

2. Demonstrate awareness of issues relating to the rights of other researchers, of research subjects, and of others who may be affected by the research, e.g. confidentiality, ethical issues, attribution, copyright, malpractice, ownership of data and the requirements of the Data Protection Act

3. Demonstrate appreciation of standards of good research practice in the institution and in their discipline

Research Management

Students will be able to:

1. Apply effective project management through the setting of research goals, intermediate milestones and prioritisation of activities

2. Design and execute systems for the acquisition and collation of information through the effective use of appropriate resources and equipment

3. Identify and access appropriate bibliographical resources, archives, and other sources of relevant information

4. Use information technology appropriately for database management, recording and presenting information

Communication Skills

Students will be able to:

1. Write clearly and in a style appropriate to purpose, e.g. progress reports, published documents, thesis

2. Construct coherent arguments and articulate ideas clearly to a range of audiences, formally and informally through a variety of techniques

3. Constructively defend research outcomes at seminars, conferences, etc

5

4. Programme Information

Worcester’s Researcher Development Programme

The Researcher Development Programme (RDP) is organised around 7 thematic “clusters”, consisting of modules, courses and workshops, delivered face-to-face by subject specialists from across the University and the dedicated Researcher Development Team, or online through our virtual learning environment. Some of these clusters are “core”, i.e. all students should engage fully with these clusters; others are “optional”, i.e. you may pick and choose which workshops or courses from these clusters you wish to engage with dependent on your own individual needs and where you are in your research degree.

Please note: There is no summative assessment requirement for pathway 2 students, unless you choose to study for the Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) in Research Methods, i.e. you are expected to engage with the 3 core workshop clusters, but not complete the assessment associated with RTP401 and RTP402.

The clusters are as follows:Core Workshop Clusters:

1. Developing and Managing Your Research (RTP401: 20 credit module, level 7)2. Dissemination, Impact and Engagement (RTP402: 20 credit module, level 7)3. Finishing Your PhD and Beyond

Optional Workshop Clusters:

1.2.3.4. Developing Yourself and Leading Others5. Data Analysis6. Research Methods7. Governance

Details of the modules, workshops and courses in each cluster for 2016/17 can be found in the programme in Appendix 3, although please note this programme is open to change. The up-to-date programme is available at www.researcherdevelopmentatworc.com.

You can book your place on face-to-face workshops through the booking portal at:www.worcester.ac.uk/workshops

Please note that in the core clusters, all face-to-face workshops are also delivered through Blackboard, our VLE. For workshops in the optional clusters, whenever possible materials relating to these workshops will also be available through Blackboard.

To help you to think about when you might most usefully engage with the different clusters we have identified three stages of your research degree as follows:

Stage One: Starting out – normally equivalent to Year 1 full time of the PhD or Years 1-2 part time

Stage Two: Moving forward – normally equivalent to your Year 2 full time of the

6

PhD or Years 3-4 part time Stage Three: Reaching your goal - normally equivalent to your Year 3-4 full time of

the PhD or Years 5-6 part time

The diagram overleaf suggests the stages at which each cluster might be most relevant, although you are of course entitled to engage with any of the workshops at any time during your research degree.

7

Stage three

Stage two

Stage one

Developing Yourself and Leading Others

The workshops in this cluster will facilitate personal effectiveness and help you develop resilience as a researcher. It also introduces concepts that facilitate becoming a leader in the research arena.

Completing Your Research Degree and

BeyondThese workshops focus on your transfer from MPhil to PhD, writing up your thesis and preparing yourself for the final viva

Data Analysis

This cluster introduces software, methods and approaches to both qualitative & quantitative data analysis.

Governance

This cluster incorporates workshops on key areas that you need to know about to be an effective researcher. Namely, copyright, data management, ethics, IPR etc.

Research Methods

This cluster of workshops is delivered by Professors and expert Senior Researchers. These lunchtime sessions focus on a range of methodology-related issues across different disciplines.

PgCert Research Methods

Dissemination, Impact and Engagement

(RTP402)This cluster will help you to develop the skills to disseminate your research visually, verbally and textually to different audiences. Workshops are also focussed on enhancing impact of and engagement with your research.

Subject Specific Methods Module

This module focuses on subject specific research methods and is agreed at interview.

Developing and Managing Your

Research (RTP401)These workshops provide a foundation enabling you to develop a research project and manage all aspects of it. Also included are research integrity & governance workshops.

OPTIONAL WORKSHOP CLUSTERS

OPTIONAL WORKSHOP CLUSTERS

CORE MODULES

External Training

Although we seek to offer a full programme of modules, workshops and courses for our students, there may be some aspects of your development as a researcher we cannot support through the programme, particularly when these relate to very specific skills or knowledge. In these instances, we may be able to support you to undertake appropriate external training or development. There are a number of external training providers, most of whom (although not all) charge for the courses they run. These are just a few of these providers:

British Library Training Programme Day Courses in Social Research (University of Surrey) Institute of Historical Research National Centre for Research Methods Social Research Association

Postgraduate Certificate in Research Methods

Students on Pathway 2 have the option of undertaking the Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) in Research Methods. If you would like to undertake the PgCert please advise the module leader as soon as possible.

The PG Cert consists of 3 x 20-credit modules (two of which form part of the core RDP clusters: Developing and Managing Your Research; and Dissemination, Impact & Engagement).

Module 1

RTP401: Developing and Managing Your Research

This module is a core research training module delivered through the Research School that focuses on developing the core research skills needed in preparation for your research. The module is available both face-to-face and at a distance through Blackboard (or you may take a blended learning approach with prior agreement from the module lead). The module specification can be found in the appendices to this Handbook. NB: For PgCert students’ attendance at workshops is mandatory (or engagement with on-Line modules with prior agreement).

As part of the assessment for RTP401 students will compile a Personal Development Plan in the first few weeks of their degree. This should be done using Vitae’s Researcher Development Framework, a resource that you will receive support in using. The plan should be revisited on a regular basis but certainly at the beginning of each academic year.

Module 2Subject-specific research methods module

This module is normally drawn from the Masters provision offered by the academic institutes at Worcester. The module is normally identified at interview or if this is not possible then after you have completed an analysis of your training needs and in discussion with your Director of Studies. If is felt there is no appropriate module then you will normally undertake RTP404: Negotiated Study (see below), although on some occasions it may be

8

agreed that you undertake a module offered through another institution. Please note that while many level-7 modules offered by Worcester are available through distance learning, this is not the case in every instance.

or

RTP404: Negotiated Study (Researcher Development Programme)

This module allows students to construct a plan of work focused on developing their knowledge and understanding of research methods and key methodological and theoretical issues appropriate to their subject area and to their research project. This plan should be negotiated with their Director of Studies and agreed with the module leader. The module can be made available face-to-face or at a distance depending on the agreed plan of work. The module specification can be found in the appendices to this Handbook.

Module 2 is normally taken during Stage 1 of your research degree.

Module 3

RTP402: Dissemination, Impact and Engagement

This module is a core research training module delivered through the Research School which aims to develop your skills, knowledge and behaviours relating to the dissemination of your work through presentations, publications and other media aimed at both academic and non-academic audiences. The module is available both face-to-face and at a distance through Blackboard (or you may take a blended learning approach with prior agreement with the module lead). You are expected to attend all workshops plus three mandatory half day practice based sessions. More information on these can be found in the module specification in the appendix at the back of this Handbook.

This module is normally undertaken at the beginning of Stage 2.

This is the award map for the PG Cert:

Level 7Module

CodeModule Title Credits Module status Pre-requisites

RTP401 Developing and Managing Your Research

20 Optional for Pathway 2

None

Various Subject-specific research methods

20 Optional for Pathway 2

None

orRTP404 Negotiated Study 20RTP402 Dissemination,

Engagement & Impact20 Optional for Pathway

2None

Students on Pathway 2 would normally be expected to gain Recognition of Prior Learning for the subject-specific module.

9

5. Your course in context

Like all Higher Education courses in the UK, this award is designed with reference to the Academic Infrastructure, a means of describing academic standards in terms of the academic level you are expected to achieve and, in broader terms, the content that will be covered.

The programme is designed to meet with the QAA UK Quality Code for Higher Education (Chapter B11 Research Degrees).

It also meets with the relevant FHEQ qualification descriptors.

It has also been designed in accordance with Vitae’s Researcher Development Statement.

6. Management of your course

The programme falls under the auspices of the Research Degrees Programmes Committee which as a significant part of its remit monitors and reviews the Researcher Development Programme. The Committee meets three times a year and its membership is as follows:

Chair of Research Degrees Board (Chair) Manager of Research School (Secretary) Course leader for Researcher Development Programme Programme Leader for the Professional Doctorate Research Degree Coordinator from each Academic Institute Student Representative from MPhil/PhD (one FT and one PT) Student Representative from each Professional Doctorate Programme Student Representative from an MRes programme In attendance - Vice President Students Union, PVC Student Experience, nominee ILS

Research Degrees Programmes Committee reports to Research Degrees Board (RDB) which has responsibility for the research degree process as a whole. RDB receives the Researcher Development Programme’s Annual Evaluation Report, a report which outlines student evaluation and feedback on the programme and agrees to any suggested changes to the programme.

In addition, all students are able to present their views on the programme less formally through the Research Student Forum which meets twice each academic year.

7. Course Administration

Course Notices

Information about the programme will be communicated to students primarily through email. Normally this will be through your Worcester email account unless you indicate otherwise.

Information will also be posted on the website and the GRS Twitter account as appropriate.

SOLE Pages

Important announcements will be made via the “My Message” system and “Latest News” containers on the SOLE home page.

10

Research School

The RS is the administrative department responsible for your student record. The RS organises registration, keeps a central record of your progress and provides guidance regarding modules.

11

Staff in the RS and their availability is as follows:

Staff Role Office Days of WorkKaran Atkin Professional Doctorate Administrator Mon 8:30-2; Wed

8:30-2

Katherine Bruce Administrator Mon-Fri

Joanna Jervis RDB Administrator Mon-Fri

Rosie Plimmer Researcher Development Officer Tues, Weds, Thurs

Charlotte Taylor Researcher Development Officer Mon-Fri

Helen Tabinor Research School Manager Mon, Tue, Wed 8:30-2:30; Thu 8:30-12:30

John-Paul Wilson Director of Research Mon-Fri

Student Services

firstpoint is the first point of contact for all students’ enquiries. We can provide information, advice and guidance on accommodation, fees, finance, registration, ID cards, disability support, module choice, international student issues, purchasing a bus pass or car parking permit; in fact anything to do with student life at Worcester!

Based in the Pierson Study and Guidance Centre on St Johns Campus, firstpoint Advisers will be able to resolve the majority of enquiries, but can also refer students on to colleagues with specific expertise, or make appointments with specialist services, such as Counselling and Mental Health, when necessary.

Confidential consulting spaces are available, so you can discuss more sensitive issues in confidence.

Also in firstpoint you can meet with our Careers and Employability team, who can help you to find part-time work which will fit round your study commitments, develop your career plans, and enhance your employability. In addition, you will find information on our Study Abroad programme, which offers you the opportunity to spend time studying overseas, and details of study skills workshops and materials to help you succeed in your chosen course.

Opening hours

8.30am to 4.00pm Monday to Friday.

Contact us

If you are looking for information, advice or guidance on anything relating to life as a student at the University of Worcester, call in to talk to us at any time during opening hours, or alternatively, email firstpoint@worc.ac.uk or telephone 01905 542551

12

Supporting your learning

The University has an Equal Opportunities Policy, together with equality schemes and action plans promoting equality in relation to race, disability, gender, age and sexual orientation. Progress in implementation is monitored by the Equality and Diversity Committee.

The Disability and Dyslexia Service within Student Services provides specialist support on a one to one basis.

Students are also provided with: a half-day day induction session for their RDP which incorporates a specific

introduction to the Researcher Development Programme and to library and IT resources plus a series of induction workshops across their first week

the Handbook for Research Students and Supervisors day to day support through the Research School (GRS) training opportunities for career planning through the GRS and the Careers Service support through the International Office for overseas students support through the Language Unit for International Students access to the Disability and Dyslexia Service

8. Methods for evaluating and improving the quality and standards of teaching and learning

Every effort is made to evaluate and enhance the quality and standards of this programme. This is achieved in a number of ways through:

Annual Evaluation Report External Examiner Report Student evaluation of modules Research Degrees Programmes Committee Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (National)

9. Assessment

Assessment Strategy

A range of formative and summative assessment methods are used within the programme from various forms of written assignments to oral presentations to critical self-reflection.

The course is fully compliant with UW regulations for assessment, mitigation, appeals and complaints. For further details on any of these areas please follow this link to the Registry website or see the UW Student Handbook.

Regulation of assessment

The course operates under the Postgraduate Regulatory Framework (pdf) which sets out the full regulations for passing modules, grading of modules, retrieving failed modules and other requirements for awards.

You will be assessed by coursework. The minimum pass mark is D- for each module.

13

The following awards will be available upon meeting the following requirements:

Award Requirement Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) 60 credits at Level 7 of the FHEQ

An Exam Board reviews and confirms results for modules, and considers candidates’ mark profiles to make decisions about progression, awards and classifications as appropriate.

How your work is assessed

Each assessment item has published specific marking criteria contained in the module outline given to you at the beginning of the module.

Word limits

The ‘word limit’ for assignments is a guide but students should not submit work that is 10% under or over these ‘limits’ or they may be penalised.

Submission of coursework

Submission dates and procedures will be set out in the Module outline provided at the beginning of each module.

Submission Deadlines and Late Work

There is a Late Submissions Procedure which applies only to written assignments and not to any other forms of assessment. You will find the full Procedures on the “My Course Details” tab of your SOLE page or in the Postgraduate Regulatory Framework.

Work handed in within 5 days of the original deadline will be marked and feedback given but the mark will be capped at the minimum pass mark, unless a successful exceptional mitigating circumstances claim is subsequently submitted.

Work submitted later than 5 days but within 14 days of the published due date will not have the work marked but it will be recorded that the work had been submitted. Work submitted after 14 days will be treated as a non-submission

Reassessments submitted late will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission.

Non-submission of assessment items will result in failure of the module with no right of reassessment. This means that you will need to retake the module.

Return and Collection of Marked Work

You will be informed by email when your assignment has been marked and moderated internally. Your mark will at this stage only be provisional and will need to be confirmed by the external examiner.

A final transcript of results will be available on-line via your SOLE page once marks have been agreed internally and externally. To view your results click on the ‘My Results’ Tab when using your SOLE page.

14

How your work is marked

Your work is marked by the module leader and this mark is moderated by a second marker. All assignments are moderated and verified.

A sample of student work is then submitted to an external examiner for comment.

Feedback on your work

Feedback in the academic realm can take many forms, but each can be used to improve your performance. Some of the different types of feedback include:

Written comments from your tutor, usually attached to your assignments Verbal comments from your tutor associated with your work Generic feedback from tutors covering particular strengths/weaknesses found in the

work of a particular student group Comments from other students about your work (peer feedback) Your own comments and reflections on your work (self assessment & feedback).

Mitigating Circumstances

These are defined as exceptional circumstances, outside of your control, that have affected your academic performance.

The following represent grounds for the submission of a claim:

Serious illness Serious illness of partner, relative or friend Bereavement Excessive employment demands which were substantial and temporary (part-time

students only)

Claims of exceptional mitigating circumstances should be submitted on the mitigating circumstances form before results are considered by the Board of Examiners and before the published deadline.

Information on how to submit a claim of Mitigating circumstances can be found via your SOLE page in the “My Course Details” tab, or via the link above on the Registry Services website. Full procedures and regulations regarding mitigation can also be found here.

Cheating

Cheating is a serious offence and takes many forms including:-

Plagiarism – passing off the work of someone else as it if is your own. Collusion – working closely with someone else to produce an assignment that is

meant to be the work of an individual

The Internet is frequently used to download material to use in assignments. The University deals severely with students who cheat and penalties extend to suspension and withdrawal for a second (or particularly serious first) offence. In order to avoid an allegation of cheating make sure that you follow guidance on conventions for referencing and for use of

15

quotations. If you are in any doubt, check with your Director of Studies who will be happy to advise you.

Guidance on Presentation of Assessed Work

All assignments must be word-processed. There is no specific guidance on format beyond that work should use a clear, readable font and leave sufficient margins for comment.

Bibliographies and referencing style should be in keeping with your subject area, although more general guidance will be provided through RTP401

10. Feeding back your views and opinions

Informal opportunities are provided to provide feedback on individual modules while the module is in progress. A more formal evaluation of the module is undertaken at the end of the module.

Four students sit on the Course Committee and they will garner the views of other students and forward these to the committee.

All students also have the opportunity to present their views on the Research Training Programme through the Research Student Forum.

Appeals and Complaints

Sometimes things do go wrong. In most cases matters can be resolved quickly and informally through discussion with your Director of Studies. However, if you continue to be dissatisfied with the response then you should make an academic appeal or a complaint.

If you are appealing against an academic decision, you should follow the Appeals procedure (.pdf). You will find details here of how to challenge a decision. The complaints procedure for research students is set out in the Handbook for Research Students and Supervisors.

16

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Programme Specification for PG Cert in Research Methods

1 Awarding institution/body: University of Worcester2 Teaching institution: University of Worcester3 Programme accredited by: n/a4 Final award: PG Certificate5 Programme title: PG Certificate in Research Methods6 Pathways available: n/a7 Mode and/or site of delivery: taught programme8 Mode of attendance: FT and PT, block or weekend9 UCAS Code: n/a10 Subject /Professional Benchmark statements: the programme is mapped on to Vitae’s Researcher

Development Statement and on to the QAA’s UK Quality Code for Higher Education (Chapter B11 Research Degrees).

11 Date of Programme Specification preparation/revision: July 201412 Educational aims of the programme

All students enrolled on a research degree programme must undertake the Research Training Programme in order to progress. They may also undertake (and are strongly encouraged to do so) the optional elements of the programme in order to be eligible for the PG Certificate in Research Methods. The PG Certificate is only available to those undertaking a research degree at Worcester.The rationale of the programme is to develop and enhance the skills, both generic and specific, that a research student needs to complete their research degree and to become an effective researcher. Furthermore, the programme also seeks to highlight and then to enhance skills that a research student develops in the course of their research degree which are transferable to their future career.The aims of the programme are:

1. To prepare the student for the key stages of the research degree process, i.e. registration, transfer and examination

2. To develop and enhance core research skills, e.g. planning a research project3. To develop and enhance the skills needed for writing both their thesis and for publication4. To develop and enhance core IT and library skills, e.g. the use of reference management

software5. To develop and enhance research skills specific to the subject area of the research degree, e.g.

specific statistical packages, specific methodological approaches6. To provide knowledge and understanding of the broader context of research in the UK and

internationally7. To enable the student to disseminate their knowledge and practice effectively to academic and

professional communities13 Intended learning outcomes and learning, teaching and assessment methods

Research Skills

Students will be able to:

1. Recognise and validate research problems2. Demonstrate original, independent and critical thinking, and the ability to develop theoretical

concepts3. Demonstrate a knowledge of recent advances within their field and in related areas4. Demonstrate an understanding of relevant research methodologies and techniques and their

appropriate application within their research field17

5. Critically analyse and evaluate their findings and those of others6. Summarise, document, report and reflect on their progress

Knowledge and Understanding of Research Environment

Students will be able to:

1. Show a broad understanding of the context, at the national and international level, in which research takes place

2. Demonstrate awareness of issues relating to the rights of other researchers, of research subjects, and of others who may be affected by the research, e.g. confidentiality, ethical issues, attribution, copyright, malpractice, ownership of data and the requirements of the Data Protection Act

3. Demonstrate appreciation of standards of good research practice in the institution and in their discipline

Research Management

Students will be able to:

1. Apply effective project management through the setting of research goals, intermediate milestones and prioritisation of activities

2. Design and execute systems for the acquisition and collation of information through the effective use of appropriate resources and equipment

3. Identify and access appropriate bibliographical resources, archives, and other sources of relevant information

4. Use information technology appropriately for database management, recording and presenting information

Communication Skills

Students will be able to:

1. Write clearly and in a style appropriate to purpose, e.g. progress reports, published documents, thesis

2. Construct coherent arguments and articulate ideas clearly to a range of audiences, formally and informally through a variety of techniques

3. Constructively defend research outcomes at seminars, conferences, etc

14 Assessment Strategy

A range of formative and summative assessment methods are used within the programme from various forms of written assignments to oral presentations to critical self-reflection.

18

15 Programme structures and requirements

Level 7Module

CodeModule Title Credits Module status Pre-requisites

RTP401 Developing and Managing Your Research

20 Mandatory for Pathway 1

None

Various Subject-specific research methods

20 Mandatory for Pathway 1

None

orRTP404 Negotiated Study 20RTP402 Dissemination,

Engagement & Impact20 Mandatory for

Pathway 1None

The programme consists of two 20-credit modules focused on generic research skills and methods delivered by the Research School and one 20-credit module focused on subject-specific research skills and methods. The subject specific module is drawn from the Masters provision offered by Institutes at Worcester. Where no appropriate module is available within Worcester’s Masters provision then the student will normally be expected to undertake RTP404: Negotiated Study Module. A student on Pathway 2 of the Researcher Development Programme may apply for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) for the subject specific module.16 QAA Academic Infrastructure

The programme is designed to meet with the QAA’s UK Quality Code for Higher Education (Chapter B11 Research Degrees).It also meets with the FHEQ qualification descriptors.It has also been designed in accordance with Vitae’s Researcher Development Statement.17 Support for students

Students are provided with: a half-day day induction session for their RDP which incorporates a specific introduction to the

Research Training Programme and to library and IT resources the Handbook for Research Students and Supervisors day to day support through the Research School (GRS) an introduction to the process of Personal Development Planning (PDP) training opportunities for career planning through the GRS and the Careers Service support through the Student Advice Bureau support through the Student Information and Guidance Centre support through the International office for overseas students support through the Language Unit for International Students access to the Disability and Dyslexia Service

18 Admissions policy, criteria and procedures

Students may only undertake this programme if they have already been admitted to a research degree programme at the University of Worcester.

19

19 Methods for evaluating and improving the quality and standards of teaching and learning

Quality and standards are maintained through: annual monitoring report, external examiner reports and student evaluation of modules. In addition, the programme is subject to comment and review through the Research School Steering Group and through the Research Student Forum and the Research Supervisors’ Forum.20 Regulation of assessment

Students are assessed by course work. The minimum pass mark is D- for each module.

The following awards will be available to students who meet the following requirements:

Award RequirementPostgraduate Certificate (PG Cert)

60 credits at Level 7

The awards of PG Cert may be made with Merit or Distinction.

21 Indicators of quality and standards

In 2006 the University’s management of the quality and standards of its research degree programmes was identified as appropriate and satisfactory by the QAA.

In 2011, the institution was audited by the Quality Assurance Agency. The audit confirmed confidence in the University's management of the quality of its academic programmes and the standards of its awards22 Career Opportunities & Links with Employers

The programme is designed to develop core research and transferable skills and to enhance the employability of a research degree student both within an academic and research context but also outside of this context.Please note: This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical student might reasonably be expected to achieve and demonstrate if s/he takes full advantage of the learning opportunities that are provided. More detailed information on the learning outcomes, content and teaching, learning and assessment methods of each module can be found in the module study guide and course handbook. The accuracy of the information contained in this document is reviewed by the University and may be checked by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

20

Appendix 2 - Module Specifications

The following pages comprise full details of all the RTP modules available to you on this course.

MODULE SPECIFICATION RTP401

Module Code and Title

RTP401: Developing & Managing Your Research

Department Research School

Location of Teaching

UW

Subject Open to all subject areas

Module Leader

Rosie Plimmer

Module Type:

PhD, MPhil, MRes, PG Cert

Module Level & Credits

7 (M), 20 credit version and 15 credit version (feeding into certain MRes programmes)

Mode of Delivery

For FT pathway 1 students in semester 1, this module is mandatory and is delivered through a series of face-to-face workshops on Thursday afternoons which can be blended with online materials. For PT pathway 1 students in semester 1, they can choose whether they wish to attend the face2face workshops in semester 1, or the block sessions held in semester 2. If PT pathway 1 students choose to attend the face2face sessions in semester 1, they have the same hand in dates for assessments as FT students.

For PT pathway 1 students in semester 2, this module is mandatory and is delivered through a series of face-to-face workshops on Thursday afternoons which can be blended with online materials. Alternatively, PT students can also attend the block sessions for RTP401 which are delivered through a 2 half-day and 1 full day block of workshops (run over 3 continuous days) which are blended and supported with online materials.

For FT and PT pathway 1 semester 2 students, this module is mandatory and is delivered through a 2 half-day and 1 full day block of workshops (run over 3 continuous days) which are blended and supported with online materials.

The course can also be completed entirely through distance learning, although attendance at some face-to-face workshops and training courses is recommended.

Module Status in relation to courses

Mandatory for PhD (RTP Pathway 1), MPhil, Masters by Research. Mandatory for MRes students.

Pre-requisites

None

Co-requisites None

Restricted & excluded combinations

None

21

Short Module Descriptor:

This module provides the appropriate training for research students to be able to identify the key skills, knowledge and behaviours required of an effective researcher, and any gaps that they may have; to identify key literature in the field and present a critical overview of that literature; to develop a research question or hypothesis and articulate how they will go about answering that question; to plan a programme of research and to present their ideas to academic and non-academic audiences.

This module aims to provide students with:

generic preparation for postgraduate research, including the ability to present their research to a variety of audiences

the ability to identify their development needs as a researcher the knowledge and skills to plan a postgraduate research programme

Intended Learning Outcomes*

On successful completion of the module, students should be able to:

1. critically assess their own strengths and weaknesses as a researcher2. critically evaluate the skills, knowledge and behaviours required of a

researcher in their discipline3. critically evaluate current research in the relevant subject area4. synthesise clearly and coherently current research in the relevant subject

area and identify the key issues5. formulate appropriate research questions and hypotheses and articulate

an associated methodology6. demonstrate the ability to plan a research programme within the

timescales available7. present their research to an academic audience in an effective manner

Indicative Content

The module focuses on the following: Research degree processes Training and development needs of a researcher Finding and managing bibliographical information Developing the ‘literature review’ Identifying the research question Academic writing Planning and managing the project Methodology Research conduct and ethics Presenting your research proposal

Summative Assessment

Summative assessment consists of three parts:

Summative Assessment Items

Indicative Word Limit or equivalent (e.g. time)

WeightingIntended Learning Outcomes Assessed

Researcher Development Plan

As appropriate – length will depend on researcher experience, subject area, project

20% 1,2

Literature review 2,000-2,500 words 60% 3,4

Project and data management

As appropriate – length will depend on

20% 5,6

22

plan researcher experience, subject area, project

Sample assignment for summative assessment

Researcher Development Plan – the student is asked to produce a Researcher Development Plan based on their own personal training needs analysis (using Vitae’s ‘Getting Started in Research Lens’ as a starting point)

Literature Review – the student is asked to produce a literature review for their chosen subject area that critically evaluates current research, synthesising clearly and coherently contemporary thinking to identify key issues.

Project and Data Management Plan – the student is asked to compile a coherent project plan for the duration of their study that identifies activities and their critical path, milestones and any other important events that will impact on their research. The data management plan will identify the type of data being produced the students research and how this needs to be treated during and post-research.

Formative assessment strategy and examples of formative assessment

This module takes an action learning approach to learning; discussion and interaction between participants and tutors is an established feature of the learning approach and activity.

In addition, at the end of the module students are asked to deliver a 10-minute presentation to peers and academics setting out the current state of their proposal including a methodology section.

Supervisory teams attend the presentations and provide subject specific feedback while tutor’s provide more generic feedback on presentation skills, content, ability to handle questions etc

Learning and teaching strategy

The module is delivered through face-to-face workshops and training courses, supported by workshop ‘packages’ accessed through Blackboard. These consist of the material provided in the face-to-face sessions along with more in-depth material on the topics covered.

Learning and teaching methods*

ACTIVITY TYPE No. of Weeks & Hours/ Days

TOTAL

Taught Sessions 8 x 2.5 hours 20Guided Independent Study 180TOTAL 200

Attendance Policy /Requirement

Attendance face-to-face or completion of online/distance work package is compulsory for students undertaking the PgCert in Research Methods

Date Module Specification Approved

30 July 2016

Date and Record of Revisions

Reading Lists https://worc.rl.talis.com/lists/942383E1-8DBE-9170-B92B-25163FE41878.html

23

ODULE SPECIFICATION RTP402

Module Code and title

RTP402: Dissemination, Engagement & Impact

Institute Research School

Location of teaching

University of Worcester

Subject Open to all subject areas

Module Leader Charlotte E Taylor

Module Type PhD, MPhil, PG Cert

Module Level &Credits

7, 20

Mode of delivery

This module is delivered through a series of face-to-face workshops (delivered variously in lunchtime and evening sessions), which are blended and supported with online materials and through three intensive half-day core sessions which students are normally expected to attend.

The course can also be completed entirely through distance learning, although attendance at some face-to-face workshops and training courses is recommended.

Module Status in relation to courses

Mandatory for PG Cert in Research Methods

Pre-requisites None

Co-requisites None

Restrictions and excluded combinations

None

Short Module Descriptor

The ability to distil, present and effectively communicate research findings, to a variety of audiences (academic and non-academic) through a variety of mediums, is an essential part of the training for research students. Although the acquisition of some of these skills involves long term experience, it is important that good practice is acquired from the beginning.

Therefore, this module aims to: provide the opportunity for PG research students to gain knowledge of

the wider professional research context develop the experience and skills to effectively disseminate their

knowledge and practice within the wider research community and beyond

Intended Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of the module, students should be able to:1. Write clearly and coherently in a style appropriate to purpose 2. Communicate ideas and coherent arguments related to their research

in a variety of formats (writing, presentation, posters, images) to a range of audiences both formally and informally

3. Constructively defend research outcomes at seminars, conferences,

24

etc.4. Critically analyse, evaluate their findings and those of others 5. Understand the potential impact of their research in non-academic

contexts and how this impact can be measured and evidenced.6. Identify practical means by which they can enable impact from their

research (pathways to impact)Indicative Content

The module focuses on the following: Networking Producing a research poster Presentation skills Planning for publication Writing for publication Presenting research to different audiences Using social media as a dissemination tool Developing an impact/ engagement plan

Summative Assessment*

Students are expected to present a paper or poster at a conference or seminar series (allied to their discipline) in order to complete this module. They will not be assessed on the submission itself but they will be assessed on the abstract submitted for the conference; on a reflection on the conference poster/ presentation and on a write up of the paper or production of the poster with commentary. In addition, they will be expected to develop an impact/ engagement plan based on their ongoing research.

Summative Assessment Items

Indicative Word Limit or equivalent (e.g. time)

Weighting

Intended Learning Outcomes Assessed

1. Conference abstract As appropriate for conference

10% 1

2. Submission for Images of Research competition

As appropriate for competition

10% 2,3

3. Conference paper or Poster presentation with commentary

2,500 words for presentation; 1000 words for commentary

60% 1,2,3,4

4. Impact & Engagement Plan

1,500 words 20% 1,2, 5, 6

Sample assignments for summative assessment

Conference abstract (for paper or poster) – the abstract should follow the conventions of the conference to which it is submitted in style and in word length; these conventions should be highlighted in the submission. Please note, if the abstract is rejected by the conference this does not impact on the assessment per se.

Images of research - An image that encapsulates the student’s research in a way that is as visually appealing, creative and unique as possible with an accompanying text accessible to a non-academic audience.

Write up of the conference paper/production of poster for an identified conference – the student should present a written up version of the conference paper/ poster in the style/format of the identified conference. The length will be dependent on the conference requirements but the expectation is that the paper will be approx. 2500 words (for the paper) and the poster should be submitted with a 1000 word for the commentary.

Engagement/impact plan – this plan should set out a how the student intends to engage/ impact audiences (academic and non-academic) with their ongoing

25

research project. Students will be provided with example plans.

Formative assessment strategy and examples of formative assessment

The students will be asked to undertake a number of presentational tasks, e.g.: 3 minute ‘unprepared’ presentation focused on a randomly selected

object 5 minute presentation aimed at a lay audience on their research 15-20 minute practice presentation for conference paper

Learning and Teaching Strategy

An action orientated approach to learning will be adopted within the workshops, mirroring the action orientated nature of student’s own research. Participants’ will (in the context of their own research plan) discuss and interact with tutors and other participants, thus establishing a forum for learning between participants.The VLE will provide an on-going resource base for each workshop containing copies of slide presentations with additional back up notes. Moreover, additional resource in the form of online tutorials is available for some workshops along with short videos.

Learning and Teaching methods

Activity type Number of weeks and hours/days

Total

Taught sessions 12 x 1.5 hour3 x 3 hour

27

Guided independent study 173TOTAL 200

Attendance Policy/ Requirement

Attendance at core sessions, engagement face-to-face or with online workshops

Date Module Specification Approved

30 July 2016

Date & Record of Revisions

Reading Lists https://worc.rl.talis.com/lists/B2A6A5F7-4B59-B71D-D789-413832C2FE41.html

26

Module Code and title RTP404: Negotiated Learning (Researcher Development Programme)Institute Research SchoolLocation of teaching University of WorcesterSubject Open to all subject areasModule Leader Dr John-Paul WilsonModule Type PhD, MPhil, MRes, PG CertModule Level and Credits

20 credits at Level 7

Mode of delivery One or more of: lectures; training courses; workshops; tutorials; seminars.Module Status in relation to courses

Mandatory for some students undertaking the Researcher Development Programme and/or PG Cert in Research Methods1

Pre-requisites None

Co-requisites RTP401Restrictions and excluded combinations

None

Short Module Descriptor

This module allows students to construct a plan of work focused on developing their knowledge and understanding of research methods and key methodological and theoretical issues appropriate to their subject area and to their research project. This plan should be negotiated with their Director of Studies and agreed with module leader.

Intended Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of the module, students should be able to:1. Identify the principle methods for data collection appropriate to their

subject area and to their project;2. Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these methods;3. Identify and understand key methodological issues and challenges in their

subject area;4. Make judgements about the appropriate methodology to adopt in the

context of their own project.Summative Assessment Summative

Assessment Items

Indicative Word Limit

or equivalent (e.g. time)

Weighting

Intended Learning

Outcomes Assessed

Anonymous Marking

A study on a theme identified in liaison with the Director of Studies which explores methodological issues relevant to their project

4000 words 100% 1,2,3,4 No

Indicative Content Flexible dependent upon the theme of the study negotiated.

1 That is, where a student must take a subject specific module and no appropriate module is available in his/her subject area.

27

Learning, teaching and formative assessment strategy

Tutorial supervision will be given which guides the student towards effective independent completion of a research-based study.

Learning and Teaching methods

Activity type Number of hours TotalTaught sessions To be negotiated To be negotiatedGuided independent study

To be negotiated To be negotiated

TOTAL 200Attendance Policy/ Requirement

To be negotiated

Set Text n/aEssential Reading n/a

Further Reading n/aDate Module Specification Approved:

July 3 2013

Date and record of revisions

28

Appendix 3 - Programme of Workshops and Courses

Please see:

www.worcresearcherdevelopment.com

29