viii simpósio iberoamericano de cadastro 24-26 august 2015, brasília/br g. schennach, chair of fig...

VIII Simpósio Iberoamericano de Cadastro 24-26 August 2015, Brasília/BR

G. Schennach, Chair of FIG Commission 7 Cadastre & Land Management

Progress in modern cadastre

Progress in modern cadastreChallenging existing models and paradigms

Gerda Schennach, Austria Chair of FIG Commission 7

Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying, Austria




The Value of Cadastre for Society

UN Declaration of Human RightsArticle 17 par (1): Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in

association with others

cadastre provides a feeling of security to land owners a valuable asset for income to many groups essential for creating and keeping economy alive creates responsibility for land and home at owners

a tool for preventing from land abuse and corruption a part of society

but sometimes too slow, too costly, not on political agenda




Core Interests in Registration of Land

security of land tenure for land ownersequal conditions for equal rightstransparency of rights

registration keeps land use sustainablepublic income by taxationgovernment / planning / economy

Balance of Interests

Interest Groups

Citizen




basic requirements

Interest Groups

political willingness

a legal framework

communicationtechnology property models

structures and procedures

investors

governments

economy/business

civil societyNGOs, NPOs




Cadastral systems

different requirements (taxation, geometry e.a.) but always reflecting land or housing rights

diversity of systems linked to culture and to history in many countries private and public stakeholders with different

PPP models cadastre is often still considered as a privilege to selected groups

of professionals public authorities and professionals in private practice keep most

of the information

There Accepted Expertise Technology




A changing surrounding




Changing the Paradigm

Cadastre for Society gets created by Society technology is available and cheap new type user society growing land owners get active information providers citizen as passive data providers

Stakeholders become Decisionmakers user profiles changing ► communities community creates their own "regulations„ standards set by communities

Citizen become Shareholders communities are core part of the (formal) processes citizen are owner of information self-monitoring systems secure fit-for-purpose - quality




Technology

Challenging the models




Security

TrustBusiness

models

Transparency

X

The 4 basic principles




land owners/citizen become main partners

society trust systems rather than stakeholders

technology/systems/web/clouds

availability/accessibility of data

new silos

provide long-term evidence on land

historical evidence on who and when and what (WWW)

transparency of conditions for access

transparency of processes to stakeholders

Security

TrustBusiness

models

Transparency

X




procedures need to be smart and transparent to public

make origin of data visible

categorize authentity / legal status

publicity of data under privacy aspects

access to silos, awareness of clouds

track routes of information – what is where

transparency of who has access / definition of responsibilities

community self-monitoring procedures

Security

TrustBusiness

models

Transparency

X




long-term existence of infrastructures / archives / cloud

key moderators / facilitators / responsibility

protection of data against manipulation of data

prevent from data grabbing

attacks by (non-compliant) interest groups

fraud

securing rights and systems in post- and pre-disaster/conflict areas

long term archives

Security

TrustBusiness

models

Transparency

X




society is user and producer

communities produce similar products / substitutes

public authorities take role as facilitator and moderator

open source technologies vers. proprietary solutions

shift of power from authorities to communities/providers/citizen/society

ownership of data (citizen, third party, community data…) and structures (hosts, clouds…..) not clear

infrastructures for big data mgt.

open government data vers. open data

distributed responsibility models

Security

TrustBusiness

models

Transparency

X




The Role of the Civil Society

society, economy, global environment…. NGOs, interest groups … global networks international professional associations (FIG, ISPRS, …..) global community

strong partnerships, 4P Cadastre (Public, Private, People, Professionals)

overcome slow, costly, intransparent systems

raise awareness for need

establish sustainable systems (financing, conflict resistance, adaptable to new technologies, stable in changing environments




Cadastral Template 2.0 D. Steudler (CH)

FIG Commission 7Cadastre & Land Management

Joint WG C3/C7 3D Cadastre

WG 7.1Fit-For-Purpose

LACh. Lemmen (NL)

WG 7.2LM in

CC and PP Disaster areas

D. Páez (CO)

WG 7.3Crowdsourcingof Land RightsR. McLaren (UK)

WG 7.4Citizen

CadastreG. Iván (HUN)

Chair G. Schennach (A)




see you:

FIG Com3/Com7 and FIG Com7 Annual Meeting Internat. Workshop on Crowdsourcing of Land

Information15-20 Nov 2015, Malta, http://com7fig.wix.com/fig-commission7-2015

FIG Internat. Workshop FIG Com2/Com7 Role of Land Professionals and SDI in Disaster Risk Reduction

25-27 Nov 2015, Nepal, http://www.workshopnepal2015.com.np

[email protected]@gmail.com

viii simpósio iberoamericano de cadastro 24-26 august 2015, brasília/br g. schennach, chair of fig...

Documents