Slide 1

Slide 2

Virginias Newest Opportunity: Improve Quality of Life & Support More People Through the Settlement James W. Conroy, Ph.D. The Center for Outcome Analysis www.eoutcome.org

Slide 3

Todays Outline 4 1. History & Trends - Deinstitutionalization 4 2. Personal Journey 4 3. The Science: How do we know people are better off? 4 4. Economy of Scale Concepts 4 5. Virginias great opportunity Better lives for 1000s of people Better results for each public dollar Need: Independent, Individualized, Annual, Quality of Life Tracking System To keep the system honest and convince any skeptics

Slide 4

Very Big Versus Small Institution versus Community 4 This is a settled issue Pennhurst Study et seq. 4 Media, scandals, courts, Olmstead decision 4 Institutions have declined 4 Community options are preferred in every way

Slide 5

Source of The Institutional Model 4 Brought to the U.S. in 1848 4 By Samuel Gridley Howe 4 From a model program in Germany 4 The vision was a self- sufficient agrarian community 4 Free from pressures of normal life 4 Protected, safe, healthy 4 Massachusetts School for Idiotic Children (Fernald)

Slide 6

By 1866, Howe Said This: 4 all such institutions are unnatural, undesirable, and very liable to abuse. 4 We should have as few of them as is possible, and those few should be kept as small as possible. 4 Such persons [with disabilities]... should be kept diffused among sound and normal persons.

Slide 7

Regimentation 1915

Slide 8

And This (In 1866!): 4 all such institutions are unnatural, undesirable, and very liable to abuse. 4 We should have as few of them as is possible, and those few should be kept as small as possible. 4 Such persons [with disabilities]... should be kept diffused among sound and normal persons.

Slide 9

Slide 10

And Finally (in 1866!): 4 I would take heed, however, against multiplying them unnecessarily. 4 I would keep them as small as I could. 4 I would take the most stringent measurements for guarding against those undesirable effect 4 and for dispensing with as many of them as may be possible.

Slide 11

Skewed Values in America 4 1969: The average cost per person at Pennhurst was $5.90 per day 4 The average cost of keeping a leopard at the Philadelphia zoo was $7.15 per day 4 Was this the Economy of Scale thinking at work?

Slide 12

Institutional Decline, Community Rise

Slide 13

Slide 14

Movement from Institution to Community From large, segregated, historically state of the art settings To small, integrated, more recent models of what a home means

Slide 15

For 100+ Years, What Did America Do With People Like Mike? 4 Diagnose him 4 Exclude him from school 4 Tell his parents that he needed medical care 4 That he could never learn and would bring no joy to the family 4 That he needed to live in a large facility

Slide 16

Why Did Parents Do This? 4 Because professionals told them to 4 Primarily doctors 4 Doctors had authority 4 Knew whats best 4 With the best intentions

Slide 17

Acceptance of the Institutional Model 4 First publicly funded facilities --- 4 1848 Fernald Center, Massachusetts 4 1849 Dorothea Dix Center, North Carolina 4 1849 California Prison Ship, San Francisco Bay 30 inmates Stockton 1851

Slide 18

We Did Not Stop There 4W4We adopted and spread the eugenics scare period of human history 4141880-1920 4A4America decided These people are inferior 4T4They cannot be permitted to breed 4T4They should be isolated from society for that and other reasons

Slide 19

Americas Sad History in the Disability Field 4 Americas great judge, Oliver Wendell Holmes, was the source of many of these ideas 4 As we all know, the writings of Holmes were later used extensively by the Nazis 4 At this time in U.S. history, the facilities were named things like Pennhurst Home for the Segregation of the Feeble Minded and Epileptic

Slide 20

Slide 21

This Is Where I Came In 4 A personal note 4 1970, just out of University 4 No idea what to do with a degree in Physiological Psychology 4 Got a strange job by pure chance 4 Working on a national survey of people with developmental disabilities 4 Right at the national peak of institutions

Slide 22

The Pennhurst Longitudinal Study 4 Began in 1979 4 Largest such study ever done 4 Tracked 1,154 people 4 Visited every person every year 4 Surveyed every family every year 4 Measured qualities of life and satisfaction and costs 4 (This process still continues in 2007)

Slide 23

Purposes of Pennhurst Longitudinal Study 4 Track 1,154 people 4 Are these people better off? 4 In what way(s)? 4 How much? 4 At what cost? 4 What problems and deficiencies can be detected and addressed?

Slide 24

Aspects of Quality of Life 4 power to make ones own life choices (self determination) 4 skill development 4 emotional adjustment 4 challenging behavior 4 attitudes and experience of caregivers 4 health 4 use of medications 4 earnings 4 hours per week of productive activity 4 relationships 4 family contacts 4 financial interest in the home 4 satisfaction 4 individual wishes, and ambitions 4 home environment 4 family/next friend opinions and satisfaction 4 integration 4 individual planning process

Slide 25

What Kind of People? 4 Average age 39 years at the beginning of the study 4 Had lived at Pennhurst an average of 24 years 4 64% male 4 33% had seizures 4 13% blind 4 4% deaf 4 18% unable to walk 4 50% nonverbal 4 47% less than fully toilet trained 4 40% reported to be violent at times 4 86% severe or profound

Slide 26

Pennhurst Class Members: Adaptive Behavior Development

Slide 27

Pennhurst Class Members: Improved Self-Control of Challenging Behavior

Slide 28

Pennhurst: Strong Initial Family Resistance to Community Idea

Slide 29

Pennhurst: 1991 Community Family Satisfaction

Slide 30

Different Question: Has Your Relatives General Happiness Changed Since Moving?

Slide 31

What Kind of People Made the Largest Proportional Gains?

Slide 32

Pennhurst Mortality

Slide 33

Pennhurst Costs Study, 1982

Slide 34

Did the Pennhurst Results Meet the Scientific Test of Replication? 4 Yes, 1356 people in Connecticut 4 Yes, 1000 people in Oklahoma 4 Yes, 400 people in New Hampshire 4 Yes, 1100 people in North Carolina 4 Yes, 200 people in Kansas 4 Yes, 400 people in Illinois 4 Yes, 2400 people in California

Slide 35

Now We Have Followed More Than 7,000 People 4A4As they moved out of institutions 4I4Into regular homes in communities 4O4Other researchers have gotten the same results 4A4Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, France, Sweden, etc.

Slide 36

Movement from Institution to Community From large, segregated, historically state of the art settings To small, integrated, more recent models of what a home means

Slide 37

Questions? 4 What is the status of state institutions in your state and the prognosis for the future? 4 Poll: How many states are now free of state institutions for people with intellectual & developmental disabilities? 4 Poll: In what year will the last public institution close?

Slide 38

Economics 4 The notion of Economy of Scale 4 Would seem to imply that larger settings would cost less per person 4 But how do we explain $$$ of institutions? The epitome of assembly line thinking Actually cost the MOST The most costly human service EVER > $200,000 4 Is there such a thing as Diseconomy of Scale? 4 Yes

Slide 39

Economy of Scale 1: Larger Organization, Lower Cost Per Unit

Slide 40

Economy of Scale 2: Diminishing Returns

Slide 41

Economy of Scale 3: Diseconomy of Scale

Slide 42

Economy of Scale 4 Large institutions are the highest cost National average now over $200,000/person 4 Institutions must be above the point of diminishing returns 4 Where is the tipping point within community settings? 4 When we consider homes size 1 to 10? 4 What is the best size? (On the average)

Slide 43

Scientific Literature: Sociology 4 (Slaters classic ideal size 5 never too big, never too small)

Slide 44

Scientific Literature: Organizational & Industrial Psychology 4 (Little known scientific questioning of entire Economy of Scale assumption) 4 (Misapplication of industrial production models to human service systems)

Slide 45

Tug of War & Individual Effort 4 Kohler, back in 1927 4 Measured Tug of War games by # of players 4 Up to size 12 4 Extra person did NOT add full strength 4 Each new person pulled 10% less energetically 4 Free Ride phenomenon in groups

Slide 46

Cost: Economy of Scale Idea 4 In economics, EFFICIENCY (production of quality, salable products) increases with size (modern doubts) 4 Human services quality product = better quality of life 4 When size gets above 6, quality drops 4 So we try to fix it by adding staff 4 Then the larger settings get more costly 4 But the outcomes do not improve 4 Because the extra staff interact more with EACH OTHER and NOT with the people in the home

Slide 47

Slide 48

PA 1992: Per Diem Cost x Size

Slide 49

Did People with More Severe Disabilities Really Cost Much More in the Community?

Slide 50

What Size Is Best? 4 We do have a lot of evidence 4 Size studies published by Conroy 2011 4 A few examples

Slide 51

Progress in Independent Functioning by Size of Home: 2200 People in Oklahoma, US 1990-1996 (100 point scale) -0.4

Slide 52

Loneliness Negative Reponses National Core Indicators 2008, N=1580

Slide 53

Like Home? Negative Responses National Core Indicators, 2008, N=1661

Slide 54

Choice & Self-Determination National Core Indicators 2006

Slide 55

Human Economy of Scale 4 Younger = More need for individual attention 4 Severe disabilities = More need for individual attention 4 Smaller home = More individual attention 4 More individual attention = better development 4 Small 4 More Individual Attention 4 Better Outcomes 4 Break point: around 6 above 6 we get bad outcomes 4 Best outcomes 1 to 4 4 Book to read Small is Beautiful: Economics As If People Mattered

Slide 56

Good or Bad Social Policy? Probably the most successful American social experiment of the Boomer generation

Slide 57

You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else. Winston Churchill

Slide 58

Virginias Time for Change is NOW YearCenterSize 2009 2014Southside Virginia Training Center (SVTC) Closes 254 2015Northern Virginia Training Center (NVTC) Closes 172 2016 0 2017 0 2018Southwestern Virginia Training Center (SWVTC) Closes 156 2019 0 2020Central Virginia Training Center (CVTC) Closes 490 1072

Slide 59

Virginia Will Really Need Evidence: A Cost/OutcomeTracking Project 4 An independent scientific assessment 4 Are people better off after leaving? 4 Independent 4 Annual 4 Every person, every year, face to face 4 Qualities of life, services & supports, costs, family surveys 4 Every year, with scientific confidence, we can tell all stakeholders Are people better off, in what way(s), at what cost?

Slide 60

Thank You And Good Luck!

Slide 61

Q & A Center for Outcome Analysis Havertown, PA www.eoutcome.org jconrocoa@gmail.com 610.668.9001