virtual rituals: applying goffmans face-work to an analysis of live chat reference encounters marie...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffman’s Face-Work to an Analysis
of Live Chat Reference Encounters
Marie L. Radford,Lynn Silipigni Connaway, &Jocelyn A. DeAngelis Williams
LRS IVLondon, Ontario, CanadaOctober 10-12, 2007
![Page 2: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives
$1,103,572 project funded by:• Institute of Museum & Library Services
(IMLS)
– $684,996 grant
• Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey & OCLC, Online Computer Library Center Inc.
– $405,076 in kind contributions
![Page 3: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives
Project duration: 2 1/2 Years (10/05-3/08)
Four phases:I. Focus group interviews
II. Analysis of 1,000+ QuestionPoint live chat transcripts
III. 600 online surveys
IV. 300 telephone interviews
![Page 4: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Phase II: Transcript Analysis
• Random sample– 7/04 to 11/06 (18 months)– 479,673 QuestionPoint sessions total– Avg. 33/mo. = 850 total, 850 examined
• 746 usable transcripts – Excluding system tests & tech problems
![Page 5: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Face-Work
“Much of the activity occurring during an encounter can be understood as an effort on everyone’s part to get through the occasion and all the unanticipated and unintentional events that can cast participants in an undesirable light, without disrupting the relationships of the participants”
(Goffman, 1967, p. 41)
![Page 6: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Face Defined
• Positive social value person claims
• Self-image in terms of approved social attributes
![Page 7: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Face-Work in Encounters
• Face is located in flow of events– Feelings about face reinforced by
encounters
– If better face is established – feel good
– If expectations not fulfilled – feel bad or hurt
– Neutral experience – expected, not memorable
![Page 8: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Kinds of Face-Work
• Rituals – Greetings & Closings
• Corrective Process – Repair & Apology
• Avoidance Process– Prevent Threats to Face
• Poise – Control Embarrassment
![Page 9: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Face-Work in Chat Reference
• Goffman provides a powerful way to frame analysis of chat encounters.
• Face & face-work appear in flow of transcript (event).
• Analysis identifies instances of face-work.
• Major categories – see handout.
![Page 10: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Interpersonal Communication Findings
• Relational Facilitators– Interpersonal aspects of the chat conversation that have
a positive impact on the librarian-client interaction and that enhance communication.
• Relational Barriers– Interpersonal aspects of the chat conversation that have
a negative impact on the librarian-client interaction and that impede communication.
![Page 11: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Transcript Examples
Positive Face-Work – Relational Facilitators
“Size of an Atom”
Question Type: Subject Search
Subject Type: Life Sciences; Biology (DDC: 570)
Duration: 39.75 min.
Negative Face-Work – Relational Barriers
“Mesopotamian Government”
Question Type: Subject Search
Subject Type: History of the Ancient World (DDC: 930)
Duration: 27 min.
![Page 12: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Face-Work Facilitators – Similarities
Category Librarians Users
Greeting Rituals 197 167
Apology 59 56
Seeking Reassurance 448 424
Offering Reassurance 137 119
(n=746 Transcripts)
![Page 13: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Facilitators – Differences Librarians vs. Users
Librarian Lower Numbers/Occurrence
Category Librarians Users
Alternate spelling/ abbreviation single words
76 263
Lower case 29 282
Self disclosure 38 583
Thanks 103 882
Praise/admiration 1 49
Expressions of enthusiasm 20 60
Punctuation for emphasis 87 207(n=746 Transcripts)
![Page 14: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Facilitators – Differences Librarians vs. Users
Librarian Higher Numbers/Occurrence
Category Librarians Users
Inclusion 137 119
Encouraging Remarks/Praise 83 39
Offering Personal Opinion 254 33
Polite Expressions 371 230
Suggesting Strategy in Tentative way
59 26
Ellipsis 277 207(n=746 Transcripts)
![Page 15: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Barriers – DifferencesLibrarians Vs. Users
User Higher Numbers/Average
Category Librarians Users
Disconfirming 16 74
Abrupt Endings 44 243
Impatience 3 45
Rude or Insulting 0 22
Goofing Around 2 24
Inappropriate Language 0 17
(n=746 Transcripts)
![Page 16: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Barriers – DifferencesLibrarians Vs. Users
Higher Numbers/Average
Category Librarians Users
Limits Time 13 0
Ignores Self Disclosure 10 0
Inappropriate Script or Response 12 4
Failing to Offer Reassurance 26 6
Disclaimer 27 0
Ignoring cues User wants more help 16 0
Premature or Attempted Closing 17 4
Failure to Refer 10 0
(n=746 Transcripts)
![Page 17: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Future Directions
• Continue to collect & analyze data– Online surveys
• 200 Librarian surveys completed• 200 Non-user surveys completed• 200 User surveys in progress
– Telephone interviews• 100 Librarians completed• 100 Users in progress• 100 Non-users in progress
![Page 18: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
End Notes
• This is one of the outcomes from the project Seeking Synchronicity:
Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives
• Funded by IMLS, Rutgers University, & OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
• Special thanks to Patrick Confer, Julie Strange, & Janet Torsney.
• Slides available at project web site: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/synchronicity/
![Page 19: Virtual Rituals: Applying Goffmans Face-Work to an Analysis of Live Chat Reference Encounters Marie L. Radford, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, & Jocelyn A. DeAngelis](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082805/5514e7dd55034693478b5ab8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Questions
• Marie L. Radford, Ph.D.– Email: [email protected]– www.scils.rutgers.edu/~mradford
• Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D.– Email: [email protected]– www.oclc.org/research/staff/connaway.htm
• Jocelyn A. DeAngelis Williams– Email: [email protected]