viscous means flows in nearly inviscid faraday waves
DESCRIPTION
VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES. Elena Martín Universidad de Vigo, Spain - Drift instabilities of spatially uniform Faraday waves. - clean free surface - slightly contaminated free surface - Mean flow effects in the Faraday internal resonance. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS INNEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES
Elena Martín Universidad de Vigo, Spain
- Drift instabilities of spatially uniform Faraday waves.- clean free surface- slightly contaminated free surface
- Mean flow effects in the Faraday internal resonance
![Page 2: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Nearly inviscid Faraday waves
This coupling has effect in the dynamics beyond threshold
Weakly nonlinear dynamics of nearly inviscid Faraday waves is coupled to the associated viscous mean flow (streaming flow)
small parametric forcing
(wforcing ~ 2w0)
![Page 3: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Drift Instabilities
Douady, Fauve & Thual (Europhys. Lett. 10, 309, 1989)
Reflection symmetry breaking of the mean flow
Drift instabilities of spatially constant and spatially modulated drift waves in annular containers
.
Drift modes Compresion modes
![Page 4: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Usual amplitude equations
Weakly damped + spatially uniform + monochromatic Faraday wave
SW
![Page 5: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Simplified model = 2D + x-Periodic, no wave modulation
• Nondimensional model
free surface:
![Page 6: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Formulation (Martin, Martel & Vega 2002, JFM 467, 57-79)
x-periodic functions, period L
![Page 7: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Boundary layers and bulk regions
Matching with the
bulk region
Limit Singular perturbation problem
![Page 8: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Linear analysis (Martel & Knobloch 1997)
Slow non-oscillatory mean flow
Inviscid modes
water
Viscous modes
Infinite non-oscillatory modes exist for each k, whose damping grow with the wave number k
)
![Page 9: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Weakly nonlinear analysis: bulk expansions
![Page 10: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Amplitude equations
Weakly damped + spatially uniform + monochromatic Faraday wave
Drifted
SW
![Page 11: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
usual Navier Stokes equations
+
Mean flow equations
const.
![Page 12: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Coupled spatial phase-mean flow equations
![Page 13: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Mean flow stream functionMean flow vorticity
Numerical results: SW(L/2), basic solution
Surface waves: Standing waves
Mean flow: Steady counterrotating eddies (obtained by Iskandarani & Liu (1991))
Symmetries: x-reflexion, periodicity (L/2)
Stability: Depends on the mean flow
Re = 260, k = 2.37, L = 2.65 (kL=2
![Page 14: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Numerical Results: Primary Instability of SW
• Hopf bifurcacion
k = 4
SW(L/2)
![Page 15: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Numerical results: bifurcation diagrams (depend strongly on k, L)
k = 4, L =
![Page 16: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Numerical Results: Primary Instability of SW
• Hopf bifurcacion
SW(L/2)
k = 2.37
![Page 17: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Numerical results: bifurcation diagrams (depend strongly on k, L)
k = 2.37, L = 2.65
![Page 18: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Numerical results: Oscillating SW, no net drift
Surface waves: Oscillating standing waves with no net drift
Mean flow: array of laterally oscillating eddies whose size also oscillates
Symmetries: x-reflexion after half the period of the oscillation, periodicity (L/2)
Stability:
k = 2.37, L = 2.65 (kL=2
![Page 19: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Numerical results: Oscillating SW, no net drift
Surface waves: Oscillating standing waves with no net drift
Mean flow: laterally oscillating eddies whose size also oscillates (different size for each pair of eddies)
Symmetries: x-reflexion after half the period of the oscillation
Stability:
k = 2.37, L = 2.65 (kL=2
![Page 20: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Numerical results: TW
´
Surface waves: Drifted standing waves, constant drift
Symmetries: None, Stability:
k = 2.37, L = 2.65 (kL=2
![Page 21: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Numerical results: SW
Surface waves: Standing waves
Symmetries: x-reflexion Stability:
k = 2.37, L = 2.65 (kL=2
![Page 22: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Numerical results: 2L SW
Surface waves: Standing waves
Symmetries: x-reflexion, periodicity (L/2)
k = 2.37, L = 5.3 (kL=2
![Page 23: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Numerical results: 2L SW
Surface waves: Standing waves
Symmetries: x-reflexion
k = 2.37, L = 5.3 (kL=2
![Page 24: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Numeric results: 2L TW
Surface waves: Drifted standing waves, constant drift
Symmetries: None
k = 2.37, L = 5.3 (kL=2
![Page 25: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Numerical results: chaotic solutions
k = 2.37, L = 5.3 (kL=2
![Page 26: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Formulation with surface contamination (Marangoni elasticity+surface viscosity), Martin & Vega 2006, JFM 546, 203-225
![Page 27: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Surface contamination: upper boundary layer changes
Matching with the
bulk region
![Page 28: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Coupled spatial phase-mean flow equations
![Page 29: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Surface contamination parameter
![Page 30: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Standing wave solutions SW(L/2)
Surface contamination
k = 2.37, L
![Page 31: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
k =2.37, L
Primary instability of SW(L/2)
![Page 32: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
k =2.37, L
Primary instability of SW(L/2)
![Page 33: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Bifurcation diagram k L
![Page 34: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Complex attractors
Re =274
Re =276.4
k =2.37, L
![Page 35: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
More complex attractors
Re =780
Re =1440
k =2.37, L
![Page 36: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Mean flow effects in the Faraday internal resonance
Forcing 2(k) 33k)
excites nonlinear interaction
Forcing 6(3k) k)
![Page 37: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Faraday internal resonance 1:3 (Martin, Proctor & Dawes)
Four counterpropagating surface waves A(t), B(t), C(t), D(t), n=3
![Page 38: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Faraday internal resonance 1:3
Amplitude equations
![Page 39: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Faraday internal resonance 1:3
Mean flow equations
![Page 40: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Results: forcing frequency 2
![Page 41: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Results: forcing frequency 2
![Page 42: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Results: forcing frequency 2
PTW
CPTW
Chaotic
![Page 43: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Bifurcation diagram: forcing frequency 2
with mean flow without mean flow
![Page 44: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Results: forcing frequency 6
with mean flow without mean flow
The mean flow seems to stabilize
the non resonant solution |A|=|B|=0.
The standing wave |C|=|D| destabilizes
as in the non-resonant case
Non-resonant solution
Resonant solution
![Page 45: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Results: forcing frequencies 2 6
with mean flow without mean flow
Competition between the resonant basic state |A|=|B|,
|C|=|D| obtained for 2frequency and the non resonant solution |A|=|B|=0,
|C|=|D| obtained for frequency
For the case m1=m3, both states coexist and loose stability through a parity-breaking bifurcation. Not qualitatively new results
Non-resonant solution
Resonant solution
![Page 46: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Conclusions
• The results indicate that the usually ignored mean flow plays an essential role in the stability of the surface waves and in the bifurcated wave patterns
• The new states that appear, caused by the coupling with the mean flow, include travelling waves, periodic standing waves and some more complex and even chaotic attractors.
• The usual amplitude equations for the nearly inviscid problem are faulty. It is necesary to take into account the mean flow term.
• The presence of the surfactant contamination at the free surface enhances the coupling between the mean flow and the surface waves, specially for moderately large wave numbers.
• In spite of the 2D simplification, no lateral walls and no spatial modulation the model explains the drift modes observed by Douady, Fauve & Thual (1989) in annular containers
![Page 47: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Related references
• Martín, E., Martel, C. & Vega, J.M. 2002, “Drift instabilities in Faraday waves”, J. Fluid Mech. 467, 57-79• Vega, J.M., Knobloch, E. & Martel, C. 2001, “Nearly inviscid Faraday waves in annular containers of moderately large aspect ratio”, Physica D 154, 147-171• Martín, E. & Vega, J.M. 2006, “The effect of surface contamination on the drift instability of standing Faraday waves”, J. Fluid Mech. 546, 203-225 • Martel, E. & Knobloch, E. 1997, “Damping of nearly inviscid Faraday waves”, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5544-5548• Nicolas, J.A. & Vega, J.M. 2000, “A note on the effect of surface contamination in water wave damping”, J. Fluid Mech. 410, 367-373• Martín, E., Martel, C. & Vega, J.M. 2003, “Mean flow effects in the Faraday instability”, J. Modern Phy.B 17, nº 22, 23 & 24, 4278-4283• Lapuerta, V., Martel, C. & Vega, J.M. 2002 “Interaction of nearly-inviscid Faraday waves and mean flows in 2-D containers of quite large aspect ratio, Physica D, 173 178-203• Higuera, M., Vega, J.M. & Knobloch, E. 2002 “coupled amplitude-mean flow equations for nearly-inviscid Faraday waves in moderate aspect ratio containers” J. Nonlinear Sci. 12, 505-551
![Page 48: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
3D problem with clean surface (Vega, Rüdiger & Viñals 2004, PRE 70, 1)
![Page 49: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Conclusions
• For deep water problems, the destabilization of the SW takes place through a pitchfork bifurcation that leads to TW. The same happens for small K and high Marangoni or surface viscosity numbers.
• For small K and small Marangoni and surface viscosity numbers, the SW destabilize through a Hopf bifurcation. This bifurcation and the appearance sequence of the secondary bifurcations depend strongly on the values of the Marangoni elasticity and surface viscosity. Complex attractors appear
![Page 51: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
General Conclusions
• The results indicate that the usually ignored mean flow plays an essential role in the stability of the surface waves and in the bifurcated wave patterns
• The new states that appear, caused by the coupling with the mean flow, include limit cycles, drifted standing waves and some more complex and even chaotic attractors.
• The destabilization of the simplest steady state takes place through a Hopf bifurcation, while the appearance sequence and even the stability of the other described solutions depend strongly on the parameter values. Hysteresis phenomena is also obtained.
• It is inconsistent to ignore a priori in the amplitude equations the effect of the mean flow and retain the usual cubic nonlinearity.
![Page 52: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Conclusions
• The results indicate that the presence of the surfactant contamination at the free surface enhances the coupling between the mean flow and the surface waves, specially for moderately large wave numbers.
• For deep water problems, the destabilization of the SW takes place through a pitchfork bifurcation that leads to TW. The same happens for small K and high Marangoni or surface viscosity numbers.
• For small K and small Marangoni and surface viscosity numbers, the SW destabilize through a Hopf bifurcation. This bifurcation and the appearance sequence of the secondary bifurcations depend strongly on the values of the Marangoni elasticity and surface viscosity. Complex attractors appear
![Page 53: VISCOUS MEANS FLOWS IN NEARLY INVISCID FARADAY WAVES](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062221/5681474b550346895db48d7e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Numerical Results: Instability of SW
• Hopf bifurcacion
• Without taking into account the coupling evolution of the spatial phase and the mean flow:
Pitchfork bifurcation (the usual amplitude equations are faulty)