Page 1
Visualizationof Hans Kelsen’s
Pure Theory of Law
Vytautas ČYRASVilnius University Vilnius, [email protected]
Friedrich LACHMAYERUniversity of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, [email protected]
FCASL Workshop “The Fundamental Concepts and the Systematization of Law”http://fundamentalconcepts.wordpress.com/
In conjunction with JURIX 2011, Vienna14 December 2011
Guido TSUNOChuo University
Tokyo, [email protected]
Page 2
INTRODUCTIONIs (Sein) – Ought (Sollen) (leagal meaning, Sinn, rechtliche Bedeutung)
2
Page 3
Language of the Pure Theory of Law
3
Modus
Sein (‘is’)
Sollen (‘ought’)
Sinn (meaning)
Page 4
Metalevel
Pure Theory of Law
4
Is (Sein)A speach, a paper Stage
Page 5
Metalevel
Pure Theory of Law
Rules
5
Meaning (Sinn)A law, a legal decision
Ought (Sollen)= legal meaning
(rechtliche Bedeutung)
Is (Sein)A speach, a paper Stage
Page 6
1. INTERPRETATIONOF FACTUAL REALITY
6
Page 7
Factual situation
7
Situation, Facts
Page 8
Interpretation: Legal facts
8
Situation, Facts
Meaning („Sinn“)
Interpretation
Page 9
Scheme of legal interpretation
9
Situation, Facts
Meaning („Sinn“)
Scheme ofinterpretation
Interpretation
Page 10
Norm
10
Situation, Facts
Meaning („Sinn“)
Scheme ofinterpretation
Interpretation
Norm
Reaction
Page 11
Norm as a scheme of legal interpretation
11
Situation, Facts
Meaning („Sinn“)
Scheme ofinterpretation
Interpretation
Norm
Reaction
Page 12
2. INTERPRETATIONOF LEGAL TEXTS
12
Page 13
Legal text
13
Norm
Legal text
Page 14
Legal text
14
Norm Terms
Legal text
Page 15
Interpretation of the content
15
Norm Terms
Legal text
Interpretation of the content
Page 16
Modal indifferent substratum
16
Terms
Norm Terms
Legal text
Interpretation of the content
Modal indifferent substratum
Page 17
17
Terms
Norm Terms
Legal text
System of terms:thesaurus, taxonomies, ontologies
Interpretation of the content
Modal indifferent substratum
Page 18
3. INTERPRETATIONOF LEGAL ACTS
18
Page 20
20
Meaning:valid legal act
interpretationInterpretation
Page 21
Hypothesis
21
Meaning:valid legal act
interpretationInterpretation
Page 22
Hypothesis
22
Meaning:valid legal act
interpretationInterpretation
Concept of basic norm
Page 23
Hypothesis
23
Meaning:valid legal act
interpretationInterpretation
Concept of basic norm
Page 24
4. DOUBLE-NORM
24
Page 25
Hypothetical norm
25
ReactionCondition
if then
Page 26
Categorical norm
26
To Do
Page 27
Another concept (Luhmann)
27
FinalityReactionCondition
Page 28
5. HIERARCHY OF NORMS
28
Page 29
29
Constitution
Law
Statute
Decision
Law of state
Page 30
European Union law
30
Constitution
Law
Statute
Decision
EU secondary law
EU primary law
Page 31
International law
31
Constitution
Law
Statute
Decision
EU secondary law
EU primary law
International law
Page 32
Private treaty
32
Constitution
Law
Statute
Decision
Private treaty
EU secondary law
EU primary law
International law
Page 33
Basic norm
33
Constitution
Law
Statute
Decision
Private treaty
EU secondary law
EU primary law
International law
Basic norm
Page 34
6. NORM-MONISM
34
Page 35
Legal order = norms
35
The legal order consistsonly of norms
NormNorm Norm Norm
Norm Norm
Page 36
Definition ∈ norm
36
Legal definitions are only part of norms
Norm Definition
Page 37
∃ other legal elements
37
Another concept:there are other legal elements, too.E.g., indicative legal definitions
Legal norm
Indicative legal elements
Page 38
Logical Jurisprudenceby Hajime Yoshino
38
Legal OrderLegal norms Legal sentences
Page 39
Legal Lexica
39
Legal OrderLegal norms Definitions
Project by Guido Tsuno
Page 40
7. PURIFICATION
40
Deconstruction of traditional legal theory
Page 41
Person
41
Traditional concepts of Personality = Substance
Person
Page 42
Person
42
Person
PTL: person as a quantityof rights and duties
Person
Traditional concepts of Personality = Substance
Page 43
Person
43
Person
PTL: person as a quantityof rights and duties
Page 44
Apotheosis
44
PTL deconstruction of traditional legal theories
but on the contrary: “apotheosis” of the own concept
Pure Theory