vol 7-1-041 055 azridjal aziz, distribution of two-phase flow in a distributor
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
1/15
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyVol.7,No.1(2012)41-55SchoolofEngineering,TaylorsUniversity
41
DISTRIBUTIONOFTWO-PHASEFLOWINADISTRIBUTOR
AZRIDJALAZIZ1,2
,AKIOMIYARA1,
*,FUMIAKISUGINO1
1DepartmentofMechanicalEngineering,SagaUniversity,
1Honjomachi,Saga-shi,8408502,Japan2DepartmentofMechanicalEngineering,RiauUniversity
KampusBinaWidya,Km12,5,Sp.Baru,Panam,Pekanbaru,28293,Indonesia
*CorrespondingAuthor:[email protected]
Abstract
The flow configuration and distribution behavior of two-phase flow in a
distributormadeofacrylicresinhavebeeninvestigatedexperimentally.In this
study, air and water were used as two-phase flow working fluids. The
distributor consistsofone inlet andtwo outlets,which are set asupper and
lower,respectively.Theflowvisualizationatthedistributorwasmadebyusing
a highspeedcamera. The flow rates of air and water flowing out from the
upperandloweroutletbranchesweremeasured.Effectsofinclinationangleof
the distributor were investigated. By changing the inclination angle from
verticaltohorizontal,unevendistributionswerealsoobserved.Thedistribution
of two-phase flow through distributor tends even flow distribution on the
vertical position and tends uneven distribution on inclined and horizontal
positions. It is shown that even distribution could be achieved at high
superficialvelocitiesofbothairandwater.
Keywords:Two-phaseflow,Distributor,Distribution,Visualization,Angle.
1.Introduction
Flowmal-distributionoftwo-phaseflowmixturesinheatexchangerswithparallel
flowcircuitsreducethethermalperformancewheretheheattransferoccurs.Often,flowratesthroughthechannelsarenotuniformandintheextremecase,almostno
flowthroughsomeofthem,whichexhibitsapoorheatexchangingperformance.
The situation becomesmorecomplicatedespeciallywith two-phase flows [1]. In
evaporators,uniformdistributionisessentialtoavoiddry-outphenomenonandthe
resulting poor heat exchange performance. In condensers, uneven distributionof
liquidcouldcreatezonesofreducedheattransferduetohighliquidloading.Thus,
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
2/15
42A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Nomenclatures
A Area,m2
Q Volumetricflowrate,L/min
R Deviationratio
U Superficialvelocity,m/s
Subscripts
1 Outlet1
2 Outlet2
G Gasphase,airL Liquidphase,water
in the design and optimization of compact heat exchangers with parallel flow
technologies, understanding of two phase distribution in themanifolds aregreat
importance[2-4].
Tae and Cho [5] have investigated two-phase flow distribution and phase
separationthroughvarioustypesofbranchtubesinsingleT-junction.Wenetal.
[6] investigated how to improving two-phase refrigerant distribution in themanifoldoftherefrigerationsystemwiththreedifferentdistributorconfiguration.
Manyvariablesaffectthedistributionoftwo-phasemixtures,includinggeometric
factors(manifoldcross-sectiondesign,branchcouplings,location,andorientation
of the tubes) and onthe inlet flowconditions (flowrate, flowstructure, vapor
fraction, and heat load on the tubes). Due to this complexity, no general
physically basedmethodhasbeendevelopedto describetheflowconditions in
heat exchangermanifolds andpredict thetwo-phase flowdistribution.Kimand
Sin[7]studiedairandwatertwo-phaseflowdistributioninaparallelflowheat
exchanger.Duetocomplexity,onlyalimitednumberofstudieshaveinvestigated
thephenomenonthatoccursintwo-phaseflowdistributors.
Recently,theuseofsmalldiametertubeisbecomingofinterestinimproving
the heat exchanger performance,but a largepressuredropwillbe occurin thesmalltubeand itwould bedecrease the heat transferperformance. Inorder to
reduce the pressure drop and to obtain a higher heat transfer coefficient of
refrigerant flow, the flowmust bedistributed into severalchannels byusinga
distributor.Therefrigerantdistributorwilldistributerefrigerantflowequallyfrom
thethermostaticexpansionvalveintoeachevaporatorchannel.
To keep the heat exchanger performance, refrigerant should be distributed
equally througheachpipe.However,the refrigerantflowthroughdistributoris
noteasyflowdividedequally,andthedriftconditionoftherefrigerantflowwill
beinfluencedbytheshapeandpositionofthedistributor.Sometimes,itcouldbe
leadto decreaseof heat exchangerperformance. It isnecessarytomaintainthe
performance of the heat exchanger by minimizing this drift condition. In air
conditioners,vaporandliquidofarefrigerantflowthroughdistributor.Although
air andwater flow in the distributor issomewhat different from the two-phaserefrigerantflow,experimentsofthedistributionofair-watertwo-phaseflowgive
valuableinformation.Flowobservationsarepossibleonlyforairandwaterflow.
Inthisstudy,experimentalresearchisaimedtoclarifygeneralcharacteristics
offlowanddeviationofair-watertwo-phaseflowsthroughthedistributor.The
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
3/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor43
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
flowratesofeachphaseflowingintheoutletafterdistributorbranchesupperand
lower were measured. To understand the two-phase flow behavior in the
distributor,flowdistribution patternsofairandwaterhavebeen observedbya
high-speedcamera.Effectsof inclinationangleofthedistributoronflowpattern
andflowrateofairandwaterwerealsoinvestigated.
2.Experiments
2.1.Experimentalapparatusandprocedure
Figure 1 illustrates the experimental apparatus. The experimental apparatus
consistsofairandwatersupplysystem,mergingsection,distributortestsection,
twogas-liquid separator, airmeasuring bath, andwatermeasuring cylinder.Air
flowrateandwaterflowratebeforeenteringtotestsectionaresetupusingaflowmeterandair-waterwillmixinthemergingsection.
The test section consistsof anentrance tubewithdiameter of8 mm and a
distributorwithtwooutlet tubes,upper and lowerwith diameter of5mm.The
entrancetubehas400mmtubelengthfromthedistributorinlettoensureafully
developedflow.Thedistributorwasmachinedand polished forma rectangular
block of acrylic resin. The transparent block facilitates flow visualization
observation.To investigatetheslopeeffectofthedistributor,theangledirectionof the test sectioncan changed toother angle. The whole test section and the
detailofthedistributorareshowninFigs.2and3,respectively.Inthisstudyair
and water wereused as two-phaseflowworking fluid.Waterwas suppliedby
water source in laboratory. Air was supplied by air-compressor with set up
pressure regulator. Both the air and water flow rate were controlled by using
calibrated rotameter before entering the merging section. The accuracy of the
rotameteris6%.
Theexperimentswere conducted indifferentslopesof thedistributorin 0,45and90withvaryingairandwaterflowrates.Theinclinationangle0isused
for horizontal position, 45 for inclined position and 90 is used for vertical
position.Themeasurementsofairandwaterflowratesateachexitofdistributor
weretakenafterthegas-liquidseparator.Airflowratewasmeasuredbytheair
measuringbath andwater flowrate bythewatermeasuringcylinder.The flow
Fig.1.ExperimentalApparatus.
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
4/15
44A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
visualizationandphotographs of flow patternswere capturedusing highspeed
videocamera(KeyenceMotionAnalyzingVW-6000)atshutterspeed1/30.000
second,frameratepersecond(fps)at500fps,andreproductionspeedat15 fps.
Duringthewholeseriesoftests,severalrunsweremadetochecktherepeatability
of the data. The data presented are average values of ten measurements. The
errorsoftheairandwaterflowratemeasurementsareconsideredtobeacceptable
andtheyareevaluatedas6.14%and5.19%,respectively.
TheuncertaintieswereestimatedusingthemethodsuggestedbyBell[8]and
Moffat[9].Themeasurementuncertaintiesoftheairandwaterflowrateswere4.0%and1.9%,respectively.
2.2.Datareduction
Theair-watervolumetricflowratewastakenafterflowout fromthegas-liquidseparator.Thevolumetricflowratesofairinoutlet1andoutlet2areQ
G1andQ
G2
and the volumetric flow rates of water are QL1 and QL2, respectively. The
deviation ratioR defined withEqs. (1) and (2). Theair deviation ratio isRG,
andthewaterdeviationratioisRL.Where,subscriptGisforairandsubscriptL
forwater.
( ) ( )2121 GGGGG QQQQR += (1)
( ) ( )2121 LLLLL QQQQR += (2)
R=1statesthatallfluidflowoutfromtheupperoutlet,R=0statesthatthere
isnodeviation,andR=-1statesthatallfluidflowoutfromtheloweroutlet.
ThesuperficialvelocitiesUofeachfluidaredefinedwithEqs.(3)and(4).UG
istheairsuperficialvelocityandUListhewatersuperficialvelocity.
AQUGG
= (3)
AQU LL = (4)
whereAisflowareaofinlettube.
400mm
70mm
Fig.2.TestSection.
Distributor
88mmmm55mmmm
55mmmm
InletOutlet1
Outlet2
Fig.3.Distributor.
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
5/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor45
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
3.ResultsandDiscussion
TheexperimentalconditionsareplottedonflowpatternmapsasshowninFigs.
4(a)and4(b),whichareMandhanemapforhorizontalflowandSekoguchimap
forverticalflow.InFig.4(a),solidlinesindicatecriteriaofMandhaneetal.[10]
anddashedlinesindicatecriteriaofBaker[11].TheSekoguchimap[12]isfor
upward and concurrent vertical flow. Three types of symbols mean different
inclination,suchasblackcirclefor0,squarefor45,andtrianglefor90.
The experiment was carried out on the condition of the water superficial
velocityUL isconstant with changingconditionsof air superficialvelocityUG
Fig.4.ExperimentalConditionsonFlowPatternMaps.
101
100
101
102
101
100
SuperficialGasvelocity[m/s]
SuperficialLiquidVelocity[m/s]
Bubbleflow
Slugflow
Frothflow
Annularflow
B S6
B F10
S F10
S F6
F A10
F A6
(c) (d) (e)
(h) (i) (j)
(m)(n)
(o)
(r) (s) (t)
(w) (x) (y)
(b)
(g)
(l)
(q)
(v)
(a)
(f)
(k)
(p)
(u)
(z)
(aa)
(ab)
(ac)
(ad)
(ad)
(b)Sekoguchi[12]MapforVerticalFlow.
101
100
101
102
101
100
Dispersedflow
BubbleElongated
Bubbleflow
Stratifiedflow
Slugflow
Waveflow
AnnularAnnularMistflow
SuperficialGasVelocity[m/s]
SuperficialLiquidVelocity[m/s]
(c) (d) (e)
(h) (i) (j)
(m)(n) (o)
(r) (s) (t)
(w) (x) (y)
(b)
(g)
(l)
(q)
(v)
(a)
(f)
(k)
(p)
(u)
(z)
(aa)
(ab)
(ac)
(ad)
(ad)
(a)Mandhane[10]andBaker[11]MapsforHorizontalFlow.
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
6/15
46A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
fromlowtohighorviceversa.Experimentaldatahavebeenobtainedunderthe
conditionsof superficialvelocities of air andwater, which are 0.06,0.15,0.7,
3.31,17.92m/sforairand0.03,0.06,0.33,0.82,3.54m/sforwater,respectively.
In the present experiment, developed two-phase flows,which are achieved
beforethedistributor,agreetotheseflowpatternmapsforboththeconditionsof
horizontal and vertical. The experiments cover stratified flow, wavy flow,
elongatedbubbleflow,dispersedflow,slugflow,bubbleflow,andannularflow.
Identificationoftheflowpatternswerecarriedoutusingflowpatternssuggested
byMassoud [13]andGhiaasiaan [14].Theexperimentsof differentdistributorinclination angle at 0, 45 and 90 were conducted under same superficial
velocitycondition,thoughtheyaresomediscrepancies.
Typicalphotographsoftheobservedflowpatternsfordistributorposition0o
(horizontal)areshowninTable1thatcorrespondingwithpointa,b,c,d,ande,
wheretheairsuperficialvelocityisvariedfromlowtohigh(0.06m/sto19.57
m/s)andwatersuperficialvelocityiskeptathighvelocity,around3.54m/s.
Table1.ObservedFlowPatternforPointofa,b,c,d,andeatHigh
SuperficialVelocitiesofWaterrelativelyConstantandvariesofAir
fromLowtoHighatDistributorPosition0o.
FlowPatternImage PointSuperficial
Velocity
Deviation
Ratio
a UG=0.06m/s
UL=3.85m/s
RG=0.198
RL=-0.041
b UG=0.14m/s
UL=3.80m/s
RG=0.036
RL=-0.059
c UG=0.70m/s
UL=3.66m/s
RG=0.255
RL=-0.018
d UG=2.46m/s
UL=3.58m/s
RG=0.486
RL=-0.075
e UG=19.57m/s
UL=2.83m/s
RG=0.091
RL=-0.023
Dispersedbubblyflow
Dispersedbubblyflow
Dispersedbubblyflow
Annulardispersedflow
Annulardispersedflow
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
7/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor47
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Fortheallconditions,thewaterdeviationratiosRLarenegativethoughthey
areclosetozeroasshowninTable1. Itshowedthattheevenlydistributionofwateronthedistributorinupperoutletandloweroutletcouldachievedatthehigh
watersuperficialvelocitywithincreasingoftheairsuperficialvelocity.
Ontheotherhand,theairdeviationratiosRGarepositiveanditisnotsimple
variation.Increasingtheairsuperficialvelocity,RGdecreasesfirst,increases,and
decreasesagain.Theflowpatternoftheseconditionsisvariedasfollows.Atthe
pointsaandb,smallbubblesareuniformlydistributedthoughthepointbismore
uniform.However,theflowpatternbecomestheannulardispersedflowatpointdwheretheairslugtendstoflowupperpartofthetube.Increasingairvelocity,the
flow ismoredisturbed and air isevenlydistributed. Inthehighwater velocity
region,thewaterflowisdominantandtheairvelocityhasinsignificanteffect.
Theflowpatternidentificationbyvisualobservationisquitesubjective,itis
necessarytodefinetheassociatedflowpatternindetails.Thedescriptionofflow
patternonMandhane [10] and Baker [11] flow patternmap givenin Fig. 4(a)agreewiththeflowpatternimageasshowninTable1.
Thisflowpatterncoverdispersedbubblyflowandannulardispersedflowfor
highliquidsuperficialvelocityand it isagreewithflowpattern fromMassoud
[13]andGhiaasiaan[14].Itcanbeconcludedthattheequalliquiddistribution,
whichisrequiredtokeephighperformanceofevaporator,isonlyaccomplished
undertheconditionofhighvaporandliquidvelocities.
Theexperimentalresultswithtypicalphotographforpointofy,t,o,j,andeat
distributor position 0o (horizontal) are shown in Table 2. The air superficial
velocityiskeptathighvelocity,around18m/s,andwatersuperficialvelocityis
variedfrom0.03m/sto2.83m/s.TheairdeviationratiosRGarepositiveforall
theconditions,thoughtheyareratherclosetozeroasshowninTable2.
Itindicatedthatevenifthehighairsuperficialvelocity,theairflowslightly
driftsto upperoutlet independently ofwater flow rate.On the otherhand, the
waterdeviationratiosRLarenegativethoughthevalueisapproachingzerowitha
gradualincreasingofwatersuperficialvelocity.Thevisualizedflowregime(seeTable2)canbefurtherclassifiedintoannular
flow, annularmist flow, and annular dispersed flow. It can be confirmedwith
Mandhane[10]andBaker[11]flowpatternmapasshowninFig.4(a).Itcanbe
explainedthatfromTable2theuniformdistributionofairwasobtainedathigher
air velocity, where at these conditionRG approaches zero. The more uniform
distributionforwatercanbeachievedwithincreasingwatervelocity.
Figure5showstheexperimentalresultsofdistributorposition0o(horizontal)
withdeviationratioonsuperficialvelocitiesofairandwaterwhichare0.06,0.15,0.7, 3.31, 17.92 m/s for air and 0.03, 0.06, 0.33, 0.82, 3.54 m/s for water,
respectively.Figure5(b)showstheflowpatternmapofMandhane[10]andBaker
[11]forhorizontalpositionwithcirclemarkforexperimentalresults.
Atwatersuperficialvelocityconstanton0.03,0.06,0.33,0.82,3.54m/swithair superficial velocity is varied from low to high (0.06m/s to 17.92m/s) asshowninFig.5(a),theflowdistributionofairinthedistributortendstoevenly
distributed at high air superficial velocity, the air deviation ratios RG in this
conditionispositivethoughtheyareratherclosetozero.
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
8/15
48A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Ontheotherhand,atairsuperficialvelocityconstanton0.06,0.15,0.7,3.31,
17.92m/swithwatersuperficialvelocityisvariedfromlowtohigh(0.03m/sto
3.54m/s)asshowninFig.5(a),theflowdistributionofwaterinthedistributor
tendstoevenlydistributedathighwatersuperficialvelocity.
ThewaterdeviationratiosRLinthisconditionisnegative,thoughthevalueis
approachingzerowithincreasingwater superficialvelocity.So itcanbestated
that the deviation ratios R are approaching zero or it tends evenly flow
distributionthroughthedistributorathighsuperficialvelocitiesofairandwater.
Table2.ObservedFlowPatternforPointofy,t,o,j,andeatHighSuperficialVelocitiesofAirrelativelyConstantandvariesin
WaterfromLowtoHighatDistributorPosition0o.
FlowPatternImage PointSuperficial
Velocity
Deviation
Ratio
yUG=17.90m/s
UL=0.03m/sRG=0.082
RL=-0.773
tUG=16.64m/sUL=0.06m/s
RG=0.114RL=-0.391
oUG=17.38m/s
UL=0.33m/s
RG=0.134
RL=-0.185
jUG=18.11m/s
UL=0.81m/s
RG=0.133
RL=-0.093
eUG=19.57m/s
UL=2.83m/s
RG=0.091
RL=-0.023
TheairdeviationratiosRG forpoint u, v andp arenegativefordistributorposition0o (horizontal) asshown inTable3 and Fig.5(a) witharrows sign.It
meansthatforthiscondition,bothairandwatertendtoflowoutatloweroutlet
(seeflowpatternimageinTable3),almostnofluidflowoutattheupperoutletinthiscondition.Whenthesuperficialvelocitybothairandwaterareverylow,most
oftheairaccompanieswiththewaterflowingoutfromtheloweroutlet.
Annularflow
Annularflow
Annularmistflow
Annularmistflow
Annulardispersedflow
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
9/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor49
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Figure6showstheexperimentalresultsofdistributorposition45o(inclined)
withdeviationratioonsuperficialvelocitiesofairandwaterwhichare0.06,0.7,
17.92m/s for air and 0.03,0.33, 3.54 m/s for water, respectively. Figure 6(a)
shows thesuperficial velocity forairandwater with deviationratio,where theexperimentalresultsmarkedwithacircle.
Deviationratioispositiveforair(RG)andnegativeforwater(RL).Figure6(b)showstheflowpatternmapofMandhane[10]andBaker[11]atinclinedposition
45owithcirclemarkforexperimentalresults.Thiscircleismatchwiththecircle
inFig6(a).Atwatersuperficialvelocityconstanton0.03,0.33,3.54m/swithair
superficialvelocityisvariedfrom0.06m/sto17.92m/s,theflowdistributionof
Fig.5.ExperimentalConditionsinCircleMark
onDeviationRatioandFlowPatternMapsfor0o.
101
100
101
102
101
100
Dispersedflow
BubbleElongated
Bubbleflow
Stratifiedflow
Slugflow
Waveflow
AnnularAnnularMistflow
SuperficialGasVelocity[m/s]
SuperficialLiquidVelocity[m/s]
(c) (d) (e)
(h) (i) (j)
(m)(n) (o)
(r) (s) (t)
(w) (x) (y)
(b)
(g)
(l)
(q)
(v)
(a)
(f)
(k)
(p)
(u)
(z)
(aa)
(ab)
(ac)
(ad)
(b)Mandhane[10]andBaker[11]MapforHorizontalFlow.
(a)SuperficialVelocityonDeviationRatio.
v
y,t,o,j,e
a,b,c,d,e
RL
RG
u,p
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
10/15
50A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
air tends to even distribution athigh air superficial velocity.Although the air
deviation ratioRG at pointe isbigger than the pointo andy, it isresulted of
inclined position45o and high air superficialvelocity; air tends to flowout at
upperoutletbecauseofgravity.
Table3.ExperimentalConditionsforPointofu,v,andpatvariesSuperficialVelocitiesofAirandWateratDistributorposition0
o(Horizontal).
FlowPatternImage PointSuperficial
Velocity
Deviation
Ratio
uUG=0.07m/s
UL=0.03m/s
RG=-0.464
RL=-0.753
vUG=0.16m/s
UL=0.03m/s
RG=-0.916
RL=-1
pUG=0.07m/s
UL=0.06m/s
RG=-0.462
RL=-0.891
For all conditions, the air deviation ratiosRG are positive though they are
ratherclosetozero,asshowninFig.6(a)witharrows(alsoseeTables4and5).
Ontheotherhand,wheretheairsuperficialvelocityiskeptconstanton0.06,0.7,
17.92m/sandwatersuperficialvelocityisvariedfrom0.03m/sto3.54m/s,the
waterdeviationratiosRLarenegativethoughthevaluesareapproachingzerowith
increasingwatersuperficialvelocity.Itmeansthattheflowdistributionofwater
tends to evenly distribution with increasing water superficial velocity. So it
showedthatequalflowdistributionthroughthedistributoratinclinedposition45o
occursathighsuperficialvelocitiesofairandwater.
The flow pattern image for point y, o and e at distributor position 45o
(inclined)areshowninTable4,wheretheairsuperficialvelocityiskeptathighvelocityaround17m/s,andwatersuperficialvelocityisvariedfrom0.03m/sto
2.97m/s.
At this condition, equal distribution of air achieved with decreasing water
superficialvelocity.ComparetoTable2,it showedthattheairflowdistribution
tendsmoreunevendistribution thanexperimental conditioninTable2. Onthe
other hand, the water deviation ratiosRL are negative, though the values are
approaching zero andmoreevenly distribution achievedwith increasing water
superficial velocity.These are similar to experimental results in Table 2.The
typicalphotographsofobservedflowpatternasshowninTable4,coverannular
flow, annular mist flow and annular dispersed flow, it can be confirmedwith
Mandhane[10]andBaker[11]flowpatternmapasshowninFig.6(b).
Stratifiedflow
Stratifiedflow
Stratifiedflow
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
11/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor51
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Fig.6.ExperimentalConditionsinCircleMarkon
DeviationRatioandFlowPatternMapsfor45 o.
The flow pattern image for point a, c and e at distributor position 45o
(inclined) are shown inTable5 where the water superficial velocityis kept at
highvelocityaround3.54m/s,andairsuperficialvelocityisvariedfrom0.06m/s
to16.37m/s.
Inthiscondition,thevalueofwaterdeviationratiosRLisapproachingzeroand
evenly distributionachievedwithincreasingair superficialvelocity.On theother
hand,atwatersuperficialvelocityaround3.54m/s,theairdeviationratios RGareapproachingzerowithlittlediscrepancyat pointe,airtendstoflowoutatupper
outletbecauseofgravity.Thevisualized flow regimeasshown inTable5 cover
dispersedbubblyflowandannulardispersedflow;itcangivegoodagreementwith
Mandhane[10]andBaker[11]flowpatternmapasshowninFig.6(b).
(a)SuperficialVelocityonDeviationRatio.
o,y
e
RL
RG
a,c,e
101
100
101
102
101
100
Dispersedflow
BubbleElongated
Bubbleflow
Stratifiedflow
Slugflow
Waveflow
AnnularAnnularMistflow
SuperficialGasVelocity[m/s]
SuperficialLiquidVelocity
[m/s]
(c) (e)
(m) (o)
(w) (y)
(a)
(k)
(u)
(z)
(ac)
(ad)
(b)Map[10,11]forHorizontalFlow.
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
12/15
52A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Table4.ExperimentalConditionsforPointofy,o,andeat
varyingSuperficialVelocitiesofWaterfromLowtoHighandAir
relativelyConstantatDistributorPosition45 o.
FlowPatternImage PointSuperficialVelocity
DeviationRatio
y UG=17.76m/s
UL=0.03m/s
RG=0.097
RL=-0.519
o UG=16.52m/s
UL=0.32m/s
RG=0.112
RL=-0.144
e UG=16.37m/s
UL=2.97m/sRG=0.251
RL=-0.117
Table5.ExperimentalConditionsforPointofa,c,andeat
varyingSuperficialVelocitiesofAirfromLowtoHighandWater
relativelyConstantatDistributorPosition45 o.
FlowPatternImage PointSuperficial
Velocity
Deviation
Ratio
aUG=0.06m/s
UL=3.84m/s
RG=0.178
RL=-0.016
cUG=0.84m/s
UL=3.72m/s
RG=-0.042
RL=0.014
eUG=16.37m/s
UL=2.97m/s
RG=0.251
RL=-0.117
Experimentalresultsofdistributorpositionindifferentinclination(angle0o,
45oand90o)onsuperficialvelocitiesofairandwateratpoint z,c,ab,ac,andad
areshowninFig.7(a).TheflowpatternmapofMandhane[10]andBaker[11]in
Fig.7(b)showstheexperimentalconditionsinwhichtheyareindicatedthepoints
withcirclemark.In theseconditions,thedistributionof two-phaseflowthrough
Annularflow
Annularmistflow
Annulardispersedflow
Dispersedbubblyflow
Annulardispersedflow
Dispersedbubblyflow
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
13/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor53
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
distributor tends unevenly flow distribution on horizontal position and tends
evenlyflowdistributionontheverticalpositionasshowninFig.7(a)andTable6.
ThedeviationratiosRareapproachingzerobothforairandwaterwithchanging
inclination form horizontal (0o) to vertical (90
o). It can be concluded that the
equal fluid distribution both air and water, it is achieved by changing the
inclinationanglefromhorizontalpositiontoverticalposition.
(a)DistributorInclinationonDeviationRatio.
(b)SekoguchiMap[12]forVerticalFlow.
Fig.7.ExperimentalConditionsinCircleMarkonDeviationRatio
andFlowPatternMapsforDifferentInclination.
Theobservedflowpatternatpointz,c,ab,ac,andadatdistributorposition90o(vertical)showninTable6anditwasplottedonMandhaneBakermap[10,
11]andSekoguchimap[12]withcirclemarkfortestresults.Theexperimental
resultscoverslugflowwithsmallbubble,dispersedbubbleflow,frothflowandannular flow. It can be confirmed with Sekoguchi flow pattern map [12] for
verticalpipewithgoodagreementasshowninFig.4(b).
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
14/15
54A.Azizetal.
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
Table6.ObservedFlowPatternforPointofz,c,ab,ac,andad
atDistributorPosition90o.
FlowPatternImage PointSuperficial
Velocity
Deviation
Ratio
z UG=0.37m/sUL=0.31m/sRG=0.268RL=-0.169
cUG=0.95m/sUL=3.7m/s
RG=-0.173RL=0.029
abUG=1.62m/s
UL=0.17m/s
RG=-0.062
RL=0.029
acUG=3.46m/s
UL=0.83m/s
RG=-0.029
RL=0.04
adUG=4.71m/s
UL=0.02m/sRG=-0.002
RL=-0.077
4.Conclusions
Theexperimental studywas carried out to characterize the flowconfigurations
and to clarify the distribution characteristics of air and water two-phase flow
throughthedistributor.Theobservedflowpatternand thedistributiondeviation
of two-phase flow were explained and the conclusions of this study could be
drawnasfollow:
Attheinletofthedistributor, theobservedflowpatternsofhorizontal andverticaltwo-phaseflowsagreedwellwiththeMandhane-Bakerflowmapfor
horizontalflowandtheSekoguchimapforverticalflow,respectively.
Forhorizontalandinclinedconditions,theevendistributionoftwo-phaseflowinadistributorachievedonlyathighsuperficialvelocitiesofbothairandwater.
ThedeviationratiosRareapproachingzero(evendistribution)withincreasingairandwatersuperficialvelocitiesandbychangingtheinclinationanglefrom
horizontal toverticalposition.However, thereis someinexplicablebehavior
andcriteriaoftheevendistributionhavenotbeenfullyclarified.
Slugflow
Dispersedbubbleflow
Slugflowwithsmallbubble
Frothflow
Annularflow
-
7/28/2019 Vol 7-1-041 055 Azridjal Aziz, DISTRIBUTION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A DISTRIBUTOR
15/15
DistributionofTwo-phaseFlowinaDistributor55
JournalofEngineeringScienceandTechnologyFebruary2012,Vol.7(1)
References
1. Lee, J.K.;andLee,S.Y. (2004).Distributionof two-phase annular flowatheader-channeljunctions.ExperimentalThermalandFluidScience,28(2-3),217-222.
2. Vist, S.; and Pettersen, J. (2004). Two-phase flowdistribution in compactheatexchangermanifolds.ExperimentalThermalandFluidScience,28(2-3),
209-215.
3. Marchitto, A.; Devia, F.; Fossa, M.; Guglielmini, G.; and Schenone, C.(2008).Experimentson two-phaseflowdistribution insideparallelchannelsof compact heat exchangers. International Journal of Multiphase Flow,
34(2),128-144.
4. Yoshioka,S.; Kim,H.; and Kasai, K. (2008). Performance evaluation andoptimization of a refrigerant distributor for air conditioner. Journal of
ThermalScienceandTechnology,3(1),68-77.
5. Tae, S.J.; and Cho, K. (2003). Two-phase flow distribution and Phaseseparation through both horizontal and vertical branches. KSME
InternationalJournal,17(8),1211-1218.
6. Wen, M.Y.; Lee, C.H.; and Tasi, J.C. (2008). Improving two-phaserefrigerantdistribution in themanifoldof therefrigerationsystem.Applied
ThermalEngineering,28(17-18),2126-2135.
7. Kim,N.-H.;andSin,T.-R.(2006).Two-phaseflowdistributionofair-waterannular flow in a parallel flow heat exchanger.International Journal of
MultiphaseFlow,32(12),1340-1353.
8. Bell,Stephanie. (2001).ABeginnersguide to uncertaintyof measurement(Issue2).UK:NationalPhysicalLaboratory.
9. Moffat, R.J. (1988). Describing the uncertainties in experimental results.ExperimentalThermalandFluidScience,1(1),3-17.
10. Mandhane,J.M.;Gregory,G.A.;andAziz,K.(1974).Aflowpatternmapforgas-liquid flow in horizontal pipes. International Journal of MultiphaseFlow,1(4),537-553.
11. Baker,O.(1954).Designofpipelinesforsimultaneousflowofoilandgas.Oil&GasJournal,53,185-195.
12. JSME.(2006).Handbookof gas-liquidtwo-phaseflowtechnology(2ndEd.).Japan:CoronaPublishingCo.Ltd.(inJapanese).
13. Massoud, M. (2005).Engineering thermo fluids (Thermodynamics, FluidMechanics, and HeatTransfer) (1
st Ed.).Germany:Springer-VerlagBerlin
Heidelberg.
14. Ghiaasiaan, S. M. (2008). Two-phase flow, boiling and condensation (InConventionalandMiniatureSystems) (1stEd.).UK:CambridgeUniversityPress.