volunteer crossing guard program marin county office of education superintendents meeting february...

12
Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Upload: valerie-murphy

Post on 19-Jan-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Marin County Crossing Guard Program Program has provided additional one-year guards on a mostly reimbursed basis – five currently Current program budget approximately $1.4 million annually TAM hires a professional contractor that trains, provides equipment, supervises, and provides insurance

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Volunteer Crossing Guard Program

Marin County Office of EducationSuperintendents Meeting

February 3, 2016

Page 2: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Marin County Crossing Guard Program

• Approved as part of Strategy 4.2 of the Measure A (Trans. Sales Tax) Expenditure Plan

• Guards first deployed for the 2006/2007 School Year

• Initial Program paid for 54 guards• Vehicle Registration Fee and Federal Safe Routes

Program have grown program to 77 guards. • 141 sites have been identified as requesting guards

Page 3: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Marin County Crossing Guard Program

• Program has provided additional one-year guards on a mostly reimbursed basis – five currently

• Current program budget approximately $1.4 million annually

• TAM hires a professional contractor that trains, provides equipment, supervises, and provides insurance

Page 4: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Location Selection

Page 5: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Location Selection

• Criteria is based on the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CMUTCD).

• Ranking system recommended by TAM TAC, MPWA, TAM Staff and approved by the Board in 2009. Using adopted standards for assessing sites and assigning guards provides a degree of protection from liability

• Previous selection criteria was less objective.• Pedestrians for scoring are aged 5-13.

Page 6: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Location Selection

• System based on individual scoring of each crosswalk.

• Highest scoring crosswalk is the score for that intersection.

• Current list has over 140 locations evaluated every four years

• Last performed in 2014 for 2014/2015 School Year. Performed on four year intervals

Page 7: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Location Selection# Criteria Scoring

Max.Score Weight

WeightedScore

1 Actual vehicular volume crossing guarded crosswalk as percent of qualifying volume (use highest hourly volume a.m. or p.m.)

One point, rounded to the nearest whole number, for each ten percentage points of maximum hourly volume (a.m. or p.m.) to "qualifying volume" up to a maximum of 20 points.

20 2 40

2 Actual school-aged pedestrian volume as percent of qualifying volume (use highest hourly volume a.m. or p.m.)

One point, rounded to the nearest whole number, for each ten percentage points of maximum hourly volume (a.m. or p.m.) to "qualifying volume" up to a maximum of 20 points.

20 5 100

3 Intersection Skew Angle Maximum skew from 0 to 5 degrees = 0Maximum skew from 6 to 15 degrees = 1 pointMaximum skew from 16 to 25 degrees = 2 pointsMaximum skew from 26 to 35 degrees = 3 pointsMaximum skew from 36 to 45 degrees = 4 pointsMaximum skew greater than 45 degrees = 5 points

5 1 5

4 Stopping Sight Distance at Intersection Stopping sight distance not impaired = 0Stopping sight distance slightly impaired = 1 pointStopping sight distance significantly impaired = 2 points

2 10 20

5 Location of intersection on a horizontal curve with posted warning or speed reduction sign(s)

No = 0Yes = 1 point

1 5 5

6 Posted speed limit (highest on any approach to pedestrian crossing)

Posted Speed Limit 25 mph or less = 0Posted Speed Limit 30 mph = 1 pointPosted Speed Limit 35 mph = 2 pointsPosted Speed Limit 40 mph = 3 pointsPosted Speed Limit 45 mph = 4 pointsPosted Speed Limit 50 mph or greater = 5 points

5 2 10

7 Other factors Use cumulative score (i.e. total for all factors below - 4 max.) Ped-Vehicular accident history documented = 1 point Multiple ingress-egress within 50 feet of crosswalk = 1 point Crossing more than 4 lanes total (i.e. both directions) = 1 point Other factor documented/concurred by Public Works = 1 point ea.

4 5 20

200Total

TAM Crossing Guard Program Location Scoring Criteria

Page 8: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Current Need

Page 9: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Current Need

• TAM is only able to fund 77 locations• Feedback from users, schools, and police have

indicated that the next 30 sites on the list are well deserving of a crossing guard

• Current cost of a funded location is $16,000 annually

• TAM’s liability increases if sites are skipped on the approved list

Page 10: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Potential Solution

• Volunteer Program would allow for program expansion and for sites to be bypassed if not interested in participating

• TAM is willing to manage guards under current contractor. This includes background check, training, equipment, supervision, discipline, and liability insurance

• Annual cost of a volunteer position would be $4,000 to $4,500 depending on total volunteers required

Page 11: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Potential Solution

• School Districts have indicated interest in providing volunteers, issues remain with funding sources

• TAM’s current policy is not to discontinue service except at winter and summer breaks

• TAM would require an interagency agreement for the full cost of guard if a volunteer does not work out and a replacement cannot be located

Page 12: Volunteer Crossing Guard Program Marin County Office of Education Superintendents Meeting February 3, 2016

Volunteer Crossing Guard Program

Marin County Office of EducationSuperintendents Meeting

February 3, 2016