w2v india - ifat 2015 mumbai: unlocking the potential of swachh bharat mission
TRANSCRIPT
Unlocking the potential ofSwachh Bharat Mission
Waste to Value Consortium
MSWM Technologies
Case Study : Incineration
Case Study : Composting
Policy Impact
Indian Focus Solution
Contents
Waste Composition : Indian Vs Western
MSWM Solution Matrix
Waste2Value Consortium
Hanjer plant, Gurgaon
Bio methanisation systems
Waste to Value Consortium
Consultancy and engineering in a
broad spectrum of waste
management topics
Currency, Service Solutions and
Recycling Solutions
Waste segregation equipment, biogas installations and
electricity generation
Gas Treatment, Gas Conversion and Enclosed Flares
Leachate treatment and
Biogas upgrading
Trisoplast Landfill lining and
Multriwell landfill gas extraction
Engineering of Waste
Management Infrastructural
projects and soil remediation
Private members in the W2V Consortium
• For IAS officers and senior bureaucrats• Master classes in waste2value technology,
policy and management• Certification program ideally to be supported
by Ministry of UD• Nijenrode University to take lead in setting-up
this program• Constitute an Advisory Board with both Dutch
and Indian experts; the Board could counsel the Indian Government in the area of waste management policy design and implementation (MSW 2013 and beyond)
• For stakeholders responsible for waste management in state governments, pollution control boards, municipalities
• Netherlands can provide a comprehensive course
• Make these courses available online. E.g. YouTube lessons
• Localization of content• NSWAI could have a key role in
dissemination/promotion of knowledge modules (could also become an online training program/e-learning). Further discussion needed with Dr. Sahu
Knowledge2Knowledge
Government2Government
Waste to Value Consortium
Ministry of Infrastructur
e, NL
W2V
MoUD, India
MH HP
MoU
MoU
MoU/FS
Empaneled
Waste to Value Consortium
Waste to Value Consortium
W2V signing MoU with MoUD, HP W2V signing MoU with MoUD, Maharashtra in presence of Dutch Prime Minister
W2V delivering session at a National Workshop, Chandigarh
W2V with officials of Karnal Municipality, Haryana
Waste to Value Consortium
Waste Composition : India vs West
Waste Europe US India
Bio-degradable
Less Less More
Recyclables More More Less
Inerts Less Less More
Moisture Less Less More
MSWM Various Countries
0 1 1 1 1 2 3 3
15
28
4049 49
54 59 59 63 65 67 70 70 7379 79 80 82
88 89 92 9499
5037
5142 38
57 54
34
38
35
2517
124 1
218
18 11 1
11 111
1
51
62
4857 61
41 43
61
4737 35 34
39 40 40
2029
1722
30 28
16 2011
20 1811 12 8 6
1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
trea
tmen
t of M
unic
ipal
Sol
id W
aste
RecyclingIncineration (R1+D10)Landfill
MSWM Technology Comparison
Region Technology Purpose Requirement
Indian Scenario
West
Incineration
Volume Reduction
1000 TPD + Inorganic MSW
60% plus Organic content
Recycling Reuse40-50% recycling materials
Less than 30%
India Composting
Value Creation
Segregated waste
•No segregation at source•Less market value
A case financial case study on why they do not work in India
Incineration
Hanjer plant, Gurgaon
Incineration is Volume Reduction
Country Model Own
er
Support from
Government
Tipping Fee
[INR/t]
Tariff[INR/Unit]
Sustainability
JapanULB ,DBO or PFI
ULB Subsidy Paid by Tax 5.2 ○
China PPP ULB or D
Exemption from Tax 1500 6.5 ○
Sri Lanka PPP D Exemption
from Tax 260 13 ○
India PPP D × 0 3.25 ×
India(proposal)
DBOT or ULB,DBO
ULB Equity or Subsidy 650 13 ○D = Developer, ULB = Urban Local Body, Unit
= kW
Soil Pollution Air Pollution
Incinerating Waste With High Organic and Moisture Content
Incineration is Volume Reduction
Indians Against Incineration
A case financial case study on why they do not work in India
Composting plants
Hanjer plant, Gurgaon
Hanjer plant, Gurgaon
Hanjer plant, Gurgaon
Revenue
Costs
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45CAPEX OPEX VGFTIPPING FEE Compost
MIXED WASTE
COMPOST PLANT
“COMPOST”
Tipping fee is the main revenue
contributor, not compost
MIXED WASTE
COMPOST PLANT
“COMPOST”
Revenue
Costs
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45CAPEX OPEXVGF TIPPING FEEProfitability gap
Tipping fee is the main revenue
contributor, not compost
Problems plaguing composting Underinvestment
(L1) Low re-sale value
for compost Incentive to dump
not process (tipping fee)
Manali plant, HP
Policy Impact
Policy Impact on MSWM
Pay per ton : tipping free vs PPA Incentivizing dumping vs Incentivizing
processing Tipping fee by Municipality vs PPA by State
Collection and Transportation Processing End Product
Tipping Fee PPA
Policy Impact – Hybrid Model
PPATipping
Fees
Quantity of waste Quality of waste
Biogas ElectricityTipping Fee Model
Deciding
FactorPPA Model
Municipality State
Solution for Indian specific waste composition
Indian Focus Solution
Drag picture to placeholder or click icon to add
Hypothetical feasibility curves for techniques
Cost Comparison for Different Technologies
Compost (@Rs. 1500/ton)
Tipping fee (landfill in India) (@Rs. 650/ton)
Waste to bio-energy PPA (@Rs. 8 /kWh) w2e
Incineration TF (Rs. 650) +PPA (Rs. 13)
Tipping fee (West)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
200
650
850
2000
3500
Simplistic overview of solutions
Segregation at source
Mechanical segregation
Waste to energy
Low land requirement
✔ ✔ ✔
Below < 300 TPD 300-1,000 TPD > 1000 TPD
Waste Management Solution Matrix
Thane Kalyan Dombivil Satara. Lonawala. Ahmednagar. Aurungabad Amravati. Malegaon. Degloor. Akola Nagpur Ballarpur.
A knowledge tool kit that will enable the Government of Maharashtra to map solutions for their waste management issues
Comprehensive data will be collected from the select 12 cities
Solutions will be proposed based on the data gathered and analyzed