wac ronak

Upload: ronak-agarwal

Post on 08-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    1/10

    1

    Praxis Business School

    Assignment No - 01

    Class or Mass?A report

    Submitted to

    Prof. Charanpreet Singh

    In partial fulfillment of the requirements of the course

    Written Analysis and Communication

    On 15/12/2009

    By

    Ronak Agarwal

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    2/10

    2

    LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

    Neptune Gourmet Seafood

    Date: 15/12/2009

    To - Stanley Renser, chairman and CEO

    From Ronak Agarwal

    Subject:

    I am enclosing my report on the future plan of action of Neptune Gourmet

    Seafood with respect to increasing inventory.

    Ronak Agarwal

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    3/10

    3

    Executive Summary

    Neptune Gourmet Seafood is North America's third-largest seafood producer

    offering highest quality products. The new laws along with latest technologytrawlers have contributed to piling up of stock at an alarming rate, and stock is

    expected to pile up in future too. Creating more demand through price cut or

    bringing in a new brand without tarnishing its image is the challenge faced.

    Its recommended to create a new brand and differentiate the old and

    new brands on the basis of packaging and trawlers used to catch fish. This

    would expand the market size to sell the excess inventory and also

    differentiate between the two brands, avoiding cannibalization.

    Word Count: 107

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    4/10

    4

    Table of contents

    SERIAL

    NOCONTENTS

    PAGE

    NUMBER

    1 Situation analysis 5

    2 Problem Statement 5

    3 Options 5

    4 Criteria 6

    5 Evaluation of Options 7

    6Recommendations

    8

    7 Plan of Action 8

    8 Exhibits 9 & 10

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    5/10

    5

    Situational Analysis

    Neptune Gourmet Seafood, an $820 million company is the most upmarket

    player in the $20 billion industry. In the past 40 years, the company has earned

    the reputation for producing the best seafood and the company is doing

    everything it can to preserve its premium image among customers. Neptune

    attained its sales through various channels (exhibit 1). Neptune invested

    heavily to stay ahead of rivals and as a result it was able to charge premium on

    their products (exhibit 3) as compared to their rivals. They recently brought

    state-of-the-art freezer trawlers, whose autopilot mechanisms guided them to

    the best fishing grounds, manipulated fishing gear, landed catches and

    reported data to shore. Fishing equipment ensured only mature fish were

    caught which resulted in only top quality catches. The freezer trawlers

    technology enabled to super freeze fishes to -70 degree F within four hours of

    capture. This avoided formation of ice crystals and along with dry ice and liquidnitrogen packing, increased shelf life by 50%. This new technology along with

    new fishing regulations which reduced access to fish near the coast resulted in

    catches that were bigger than ever. Though demand was at an all-time high,

    the company was still continuously getting piled up with excess inventory

    (exhibit 4) and there was no relief in sight.

    Rita Sanchez (exhibit 2), came up with two strategies of cutting prices or

    launching a new mass-market brand that Hargrove (exhibit 2) felt would

    destroy the companys premium image as well as endanger the ASPD gold sealof approval on every product they sell is possessed only by them. Not many

    executives (exhibit 2) in the company are in favour of cutting prices either, but

    its clear that Sanchez is gaining ground in her bid to launch a low-priced

    brand. Along with reputation worries, Hargrove fears that an inexpensive

    brand would cannibalize the companys premium line. He has to come up with

    a way where the excess inventory problem would be solved without affecting

    the brand image or profits of the company.

    Problem Statement

    To find a market for the finished goods inventory that has piled up and also the

    finished goods inventory that is expected to pile up continuously in future.

    Options

    The following are the options Neptune gourmet seafood could consider

    1)Slash the price of the existing range of products, i.e. Neptune gold2)Bring in a new brand targeting the lower segment3)Entering/ expanding into new markets in other parts of the country

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    6/10

    6

    Criteria

    Brand Image: to maintain or build on the brand image the company has

    earned in the past 40 years in seafood business.

    Long term solution: as the problem of excess stock would be a long term

    phenomenon, the company would want to come up with a solution to not onlysolve the short term objectives, but also have long term sustainability.

    Not eating up Future sales: the company should make sure that a discount

    shouldnt lead to stocking of the product by the consumers. This would lead to

    less demand in the subsequent months to come, hence destabilizing the

    monthly sales figures.

    Company culture: the culture of the company shouldnt be changed because it

    could have a long term impact on the working and handling of the company.

    Avoid Cannibalization: if a new product segment is brought in, it shouldnt eat

    up the market of the existing product or let the competitor cannibalize.

    Not to get into a nasty price-cut war: there should not be a situation where

    the company is trying to contest against the competitors on the basis of price

    as this would ruin the image of a premium product and hence erode the

    chance to charge premium for quality.

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    7/10

    7

    Evaluation of options

    Option Pros Cons

    Slash the price of the

    existing range of

    products, i.e. Neptune

    gold

    Immediate solutionIts better than not selling

    at all

    Competitors might beslashing prices anyways in

    future because there is an

    industry wide increase in

    inventory

    Attract new consumers

    Consumers mightperceive that there is

    something wrong with

    the productErode the brand

    equity of the company

    Lead to competitorsreducing prices

    Reduce profit marginsConsumers would feel

    they were

    overcharged earlierPosition itself close to

    competitors

    Increase sales at theexpense of future

    sales

    Bring in a new brand

    targeting the lower

    segment

    Exposure to new and massmarket

    Educated consumerswould trade up toNeptune gold

    Both short and long termsolutions

    Use of old trawlers/technology

    Increased profitsSandwich strategy -

    compete againstcompetitors on the basis

    of price

    Highly riskyErode brand imageCannibalizing Neptunegold rangeWinning shelf space in

    supermarkets and

    stores

    Lead to Price war

    Entering/ expanding

    into new market in

    other parts of the

    country

    Increasing the market sizeCreating a new brand of

    price cuts wouldnt be

    required

    Long term sustainabilityMaximum utilization ofasset ( goodwill)

    High initial costNo guarantee of

    success

    Competition fromexisting players

    Inadequate capital

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    8/10

    8

    Recommendation

    Its recommended to create a new brand and differentiate the old and new

    brands on the basis of packaging and trawlers (technology) used to catch fish.

    This would expand the market size to sell the excess inventory.This would also differentiate between the two brands, avoiding

    cannibalization of the premium brand.

    Action plan

    Discontinue the production of seafood using old trawlers for about amonth.

    Start selling the new trawlers catches to get existing consumers

    (exhibit -1) accustomed to the improved quality.After about a month, using the old trawlers and technology, come up

    with a new brand with a new look, feel and packaging at lower prices

    compared to Neptune gold range of products.

    Smart messaging appealing to the right consumers.Not to compete on the basis of price, instead position it as another

    quality product at a cheaper price.

    Leave the ASPD seal to differentiate between the new brand and thepremium one.

    Distribution channels should be retail stores, local supermarket wherethe mass can be tapped.

    Word Count - 1033

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    9/10

    9

    Exhibits 1

    Exhibit -2

    Key persons and their designation

    Name Designation

    Stanley Renser Chairman and CEO, Neptune gourmet seafood

    Jim Hargrove Managing Director, Neptune gourmet seafood

    Rita Sanchez Sales department head, Neptune gourmet seafood

    Nelson Stowe Legal Counsel, Neptune gourmet seafoodPat Gilman Head of institutional business, Neptune gourmet

    seafood

    Sandy McKain Head of consumer business, Neptune gourmet

    seafood

    Dan Sculman (Expert Advisor) CEO, Warren (New Jersey based Virgin mobile USA)

    Dipak C. Jain (Expert Advisor) Dean of Kellogg school of management

    Oscar de la Renta (Expert advisor) Chairman, Oscar de la Renta Limited

    Thomas T. Nagle ( Expert Advisor) Founder and chairman, Strategic Pricing Group

    33

    33

    30

    4

    Sales of Neptune gourmet seafood

    Resturants within 250 kms of

    Fort lauderdale and cruiselines

    wholesalers distributing to

    resturants all over USA

    U.S. grocery chains and organic

    food retailers

    fish market outside Fort

    Lauderdale

  • 8/7/2019 WAC Ronak

    10/10

    10

    Exhibit 3

    Premium charged over competitors, product wise

    Product name % premium charged over rivals

    1.Canned salmon2.Tuna3.Sardines4.Mackerel5.Herring6.Pilchard

    30%

    1.Lump crabmeat2.Anchovies3.

    Clams

    4.Lobster meat5.Mussels6.Oysters7.Shrimp

    25%

    Exhibit 4

    Level of inventory as compared to the level of sales in that month

    Time period Level of inventory

    One year back 110 days equivalent of sales

    3 months back 120 days equivalent of sales

    Current 150 days equivalent of sales