wage-employment subsidy report sept 2012
TRANSCRIPT
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsides for employment creation
Page 2 of 22
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
1.BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.EMPLOYMENT PROFILE ......................................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 CAUSES OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE SOUTH AFRICA’S LABOUR MARKET ..................................... 4
2.2 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS ........................................................................................................................................ 6
FIGURE: 1 SOUTH AFRICA REAL GDP RATE Q2: 2002-2012 ...................................................................................... 6
2.2.1 PROVINCIAL EMPLOYMENT TRENDS .......................................................................................................... 8
3. DEFINITION OF WAGE SUBSIDY ........................................................................................................................ 10
3.1 THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF WAGE SUBSIDIES ............................................................................................ 11
3.2 SELECTION CRITERIA FOR POLICY MAKERS ............................................................................................ 12
4. ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF EMPLOYMENT SUBSIDY PROGRAMS ............................................................. 12
4.1 POSITIVE IMPACT OF WAGE SUBSIDY AS FOLLOWS: ............................................................................. 13
4.2 DISADVANTAGE EFFECTS REGARDING WAGE SUBSIDIES .................................................................... 14
4.3 CONCERNING QUESTIONS ON EMPLOYMENT SUBSIDY IMPLEMENTATION .................................. 15
5. INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES ON WAGE/EMPLOYMENT SUBSIDIES .............................................. 15
6. SOUTH AFRICA PROPOSED YOUTH WAGE SUBSIDY .................................................................................. 17
7.RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................................................. 18
8.CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................ 19
9.REFERENCE LIST ..................................................................................................................................................... 20
10. APPENDIX 1 ............................................................................................................................................................. 21
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
3 | P a g e
1. Background
The high unemployment in both developing economies and developed economies remains a major
concern for all governments. Most governments endeavour to device means to curb the
unacceptably high levels of unemployment and many have tended to allocate considerable
amounts of funds to active labour market programs that would support the integration of
unemployed persons into the labour market. In the past developed and developing countries used
wage or employment subsidies program to increase employment levels especially in countries
which struggle with high unemployment levels. For a country to become more inclusive, its people
need to be provided with the opportunity to work and make a productive contribution to the
economy and society. Unemployment not only represents foregone output today and a waste of
potentially productive resources, but it can also have a negative effect on future output. The
unemployed do not acquire the skills or experience needed to drive the economy forward, which in
turn inhibits the country’s economic development and imposes a larger burden on the state to
provide social assistance. In addition, unemployment is associated with social problems such as
poverty, crime, violence, a loss of morale, social degradation and political disengagement (Kingdon
& Knight, 2000; Levinsohn, 2008). Employment promotes dignity, independence, achievement and
innovation and grows the economy.
The growing income inequality in South Africa has raised concern among governments and policy
makers; this gap has been partly explained by the rising unemployment levels which are facing the
country. Recently the South African government has endorsed wage subsidies as a policy
measure to deal with the country’s substantial youth unemployment problem. This was received
with mixed sentiments from some groups. To support or not to support a policy there is a need for
a general understanding within the public on the pro’s and concerns of such a policy being
implemented in a country like South Africa which has huge income inequalities and it’s still in a
developmental state. The purpose of this report is to review literature of the international literature
and conducts further analyses on (1) the country’s employment profile (2) obtain insights into wage
subsidy development and implementation issues facing developing countries; (3) determine the
potential impact of such a policy on employment, income, and poverty in South Africa; and (4)
critically assess the appropriateness of such a policy, given the various sources of unemployment
in South Africa.(5) Finally draws conclusions.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
4 | P a g e
2. Employment profile
High unemployment rates are amongst the greatest challenges facing South Africa and its
provinces and the recent global crises have exacerbated the problem. The unemployment in
South Africa is still high, at 24.9 in the 2nd quarter of 2012 reported by quarterly labour survey, this
was despite the economy having grown at 2.7% in 1st quarter 2012 and 3.2% in the second
quarter. Historically the unemployment rate has averaged at 25-40% in the year 2008-2009, the
financial crises also led to massive spikes in global unemployment. The unemployment rate among
working-age youth below 25 years of age is about 50 per cent at national level. In 2010, 55% of 15-
24 year olds were unemployed in Gauteng, as compared to 51% nationally. It is worth noting that
the majority of the unemployed youth are black and that approximately 40% of all unemployed are
matric graduates under the age of 24. This is a great concern when it’s noted that some of the
young people without jobs have completed their tertiary qualification. If not addressed urgently and
effectively, the problem will lead to exceptionally negative consequences for the province.
The unemployment problem currently facing South Africa is largely structural in nature. This type of
unemployment is explained as unemployment that results from a mismatch between skills required
for the available jobs and skills possessed by workers seeking work. The country historical
background has resulted in a labour market which has a large supply of low-skilled workers in the
upper echelon of the economically active age groups which is a cause for great concern in.
Improved access to education and training has reduced the supply of low-skilled worker on the
balance. However, the labour market position of low skilled workers has worsened partly due to
technological developments which have widened the gap between jobs that can be provided for
the low-skilled and those for higher skilled jobs. This would imply that the labour force has
insufficient skills to take up all the types of employment opportunities created by industry.
Additionally the skills acquired by the labour force are those which is not readily demanded by the
current labour market this further exacerbate the unemployment challenge. Mismatch between the
geographical location of available jobs and job seekers can also result in structural unemployment.
According to International Labour Office (ILO) greatest challenge with this type of unemployment
from the perspective of individual workers is not only having jobs but also the grave danger that
they may remain out of work for a long time.
2.1 Causes of unemployment in the South Africa’s labour market
Numerous policy measures have been put in place to ensure that this level of unemployment is
brought under control, but this challenge still persists. Although the skill mismatch has been
acknowledged some of the causes of unemployment in South Africa has been defined as:
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
5 | P a g e
Weak economic growth.
The growth of non-tradable sectors such as business and financial services which are
skilled labour-intensive, leaving the low-skilled workers unemployed
Increases in long-term real wages discourage labour demand, a major factor in the lack of
employment growth of among unskilled and semi-skilled workers.
Minimum wage and other labour policies which business view as increased cost of doing
business.
Economic growth is critical for employment creation and its clearly outlined in the theory that the
economy is self-regulating and is always capable of achieving the natural level of real GDP or
output, which is the level of real GDP that is obtained when the economy's resources are fully
employed. While circumstances arise from time to time that cause the economy to fall below or to
exceed the natural level of real GDP, self-adjustment mechanisms exist within the market system
that work to bring the economy back to the natural level of real GDP. This theory clearly articulates
the relationship of employment and real GDP.
Simple elasticity of employment in South Africa
Annual % change in
Total Employment in all
non agricultural sectors
Annual % change
in GDP
Employment elasticity
2001-2011 3.49 0.66 0.19
Source: South Africa Reserve Bank, 2012
Employment elasticity measures the percentage change in employment induced by changes in
GDP.A simple employment elasticity for the period 2001-2011 shows that employment elasticity
was 0.19.That is a percentage increase in economic growth is associated with 0.19 percentage
increase in total employment in all the non-agricultural sectors. This indicates that employment in
South Africa is less responsive to changes in economic growth, this means economic growth will
have to grow at a higher rate in order to reduce unemployment. Therefore South Africa needs
more than high economic growth to significantly eradicate the unemployment problem.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
6 | P a g e
2.2 Employment trends
Figure: 1 South Africa Real GDP Rate Q2: 2002-2012
Source: Statistics South Africa 2nd Quarter 2012 GDP
The economic performance on quarter-on-quarter was roaming around 5% from 2005 until 2007,
the decline in Real GDP growth was a result of the impact of financial crisis. The economy in
recent years has been consistent growing at 3%, only in the year 2009 they was a significant
decline in growth rate of -1.5% as the full impact of the global financial crisis was felt.
3.7
2.9
4.6
5.3 5.6 5.5
3.6
-1.5
2.9 3.1
2.7
3.2
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
7 | P a g e
Figure: 2 South Africa employment figures
Source: Statistics South Africa 2nd Quarter 2012 GDP ( E-View graph)
The diagram above (figure: 2) illustrate employment numbers in the country. The highest
employment numbers were recorded in the year 2008Q:4 at 14 027. There was a significant
decline in the 2009Q:1 as the economy was only able to employ only 13 843 which correlate with
the decline of the Real GDP in figure: 1 of -1.5% in the year 2009. The employment numbers have
been improving in recent years but there have not been able to achieve the 2008:Q4 numbers as
growth rates remain consistent with 3% growth. The slow growth rate is as a result of a decrease in
demand for exports from developed countries as their economies slow down due to debt crisis.
The employment losses are far more severe and persistent in percentage terms than the declines
in economic growth.
12,800
13,000
13,200
13,400
13,600
13,800
14,000
14,200
2008Q:1
2008Q:2
2008Q:3
2008Q:4
2009Q:1
2009Q:2
2009Q:3
2009Q:4
2010Q:1
2010Q:2
2010Q:3
2010Q:4
2011Q:1
2011Q:2
2011Q:3
2011Q:4
2012Q:1
2012:Q2
EMPLOYMENT
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
8 | P a g e
Figure: 3 Employment by sector for South Africa
Source: Statistics South Africa 2nd Quarter 2012 GDP
Figure: 3 indicates that between Q1:2012 and Q2:2012, the increase in total employment was
mainly driven by the increase in the number of employed persons in the Community and social
services (121 000) jobs, Construction (26 000) and Mining (21 000) jobs. Employment losses were
observed in Trade (91 000), Manufacturing (44 000) and Agriculture (18 000). Job losses in the
Manufacturing sector continues, as 67 000 jobs were lost in Q1:2012, while job losses in the trade
sector also accelerated from 3 000 jobs lost in the first quarter of this year. The Agricultural sector
reversed job gains of 26 000 in Q1:2012. Both the Community and social services and
Construction industries reflected better employment gains compared to the same period last year.
2.2.1 Provincial employment trends
The province unemployment stands at 25.4% making it the fourth lowest level compared to other
provinces Gauteng past economic growth has attracted job seekers faster than it is able to absorb
them into the formal and informal labour market and the province also receives more migrants than
any other province in the country. This has result in the absorption rate (employment-to-population
ratio) to just remain steady, even if there is an increase in employment. In order for the absorption
rate to increase, employment has to grow faster than the population.
638 357
1678
98
1012
2966
791
1737
3012
1153
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2011:Q4
2012Q:1
2012Q:2
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
9 | P a g e
Figure: 4 Employment by province
Source: Statistics South Africa 2nd Quarter 2012 GDP
Figure: 4 shows employment by province, between Q1:2012 and Q2:2012, employment gains were
recorded in five of the nine provinces, with the highest increase in jobs observed in Mpumalanga
(40 0000), Limpopo (22 000) and Eastern Cape (19 000). Job losses were reported in Western
Cape (32 000), Gauteng (15 000) and Free State (9 000) over the same period. The Gauteng
province is the largest employer when comparing provinces on average, KwaZulu-Natal takes
second place and Northern Cape is least employer.
13
10
2
5
19
5
31
7 8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2011:Q4
2012Q:1
2012Q:2
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
10 | P a g e
Figure: 5 Human development index of provinces
Source: Global Insight 2012
Figure: 5 indicate the HDI1 for provinces and Gauteng province ranks second place. This is an
indication that the majority of the Gauteng province population has high life expectancy and
education and that there have been some improvement in the standard of living of the inhabitants
of the province.
The analysis above indicate that the number of employed workers has increased but the
unemployment rates have increased which indicate that more jobs are needed in order to address
the current unemployment levels.
3. Definition of Wage Subsidy
Wage/Employment subsidy is a policy measures that is implemented through labour market
programs aimed at improving the labour market position of the unemployed in the short run
through the creation of jobs by providing wage subsidies to employers in the private sector. The
Wage subsidies can be classified in two categories which is either as worker side or the firm side
1 *The HDI is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education, and standards of living of a country. It is a standard means of measuring
well-being, especially child welfare. Also to measure the impact of economic policies on quality of life
0.70
0.53 0.60 0.57
0.52 0.53
0.67
0.53 0.54
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
2008
2009
2010
2011
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
11 | P a g e
programs. The worker side wage subsidy gives workers a subsidy upon successfully obtaining
employment. The primary objective of these policies has been to increase participation in the labor
market. Examples of these policies include the Working Families Tax Credit program in the United
Kingdom and the Self-Sufficiency Program in Canada, which targets parents with children (Smith
2006). The firm-side wage subsidy is given to the firm to encourage it to employ more workers. The
wage subsidies lower firms’ costs of employment without affecting workers’ take-home income and
it enables the firms to increase employment and production output.
Worker side subsidy would be offered to employees in countries that faces labour supply
constraints due to stipulated wages or in cases where labour market failure is characterized by
unemployment (usually in developing countries).Literature notes that firm-side subsidy that
promotes demand for labour is more appropriate in cases where unemployment levels are very
high. Additionally, when poverty is closely associated with unemployment, a wage subsidy may be
useful as an antipoverty measure. In this regard, wage subsidies can be classified either as
worker-side or firm-side programs and their primary objective is to increase participation in the
labor market.
3.1 The different types of Wage subsidies
1. General wage subsidy
This type of wage subsidy is paid to all low-wage workers to ensure better wages at no extra cost
to the employer by lowering labour cost.
2. Targeted wage subsidies
Targeted wage subsidies are subsidies which are tailored for particular groups of unemployed
people and are typically granted for a limited period of time. The targeted wage subsidy can be
used to address high rate of unskilled and semi-skilled workers which is attributed to various
factors, including past political decisions, educational inequalities, and poor economic growth.
Three types of targeting subsidy include:
Sector targeted subsidy -Subsidy which is paid for workers in pre-defined sectors such as
the manufacturing sector.
Size-targeted subsidy-Subsidy paid to small-scale firms or/and newly established forms.
Group-targeted subsidy is paid for each worker in pre-defined groups such as race, age,
gender and long-term unemployed.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
12 | P a g e
3.2 Marginal employment subsidy
This is a subsidy paid by the government to employers for the extra employee hired regardless of
their experience or expertise for a pre-determined time period.
Although wage subsidy schemes can take a variety forms, it should be noted that they can be paid
either to employers or to employees. The subsidy itself can be paid as a tax credit or a reduction in
social security contribution or as a direct payment. Although wage subsidy programs have much
difference in how they are structured, their ultimate goal is to increase employment through
lowered labour costs.
3.3 Selection Criteria for policy makers
There are various factors policymaker have take into account when selecting wage subsidy and
which industry to target.
The value-added structure: Measures an industry’s contribution to GDP and employment
structure which measures the relative size of the industry in terms of employment levels.
This is use as an indication of the size of the industry and its employment capabilities
The capital-labour ratio which measures the labour intensity of industries. This are
Industries with high labour-output coefficients for semi- and unskilled labour are usually a
sensible choice for targeting.
The wage elasticity of demand for labour refers to employment elasticity and it is the
most important targeting criterion. The employment elasticity measures the responsiveness
of employment to a change relative to changes in wages. The employment effect of a wage
subsidy will be higher in industries with high employment elasticity and typically such
industries should be selected in attempt to reduce unemployment.
Employment multipliers which calculate the interdependence between industries
changes, as changes in one industry will have an impact on the employment levels of
another industry.
4. Economic effects of employment subsidy programs
Employment subsidy programs do not only affect the targeted group, but they also have an impact
on the whole labour market generally. Although the overall aim of employment subsidies is to
increase the employment, these subsidies come with various direct, indirect effects which either
could be positive or negative or both. The labour market theory identifies several important effects
of these programs on the labour market (Pissarides, 1990):
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
13 | P a g e
4.1 Positive impact of wage subsidy as follows:
a) The objective of a wage subsidy is to improve the employment prospects and opportunities
for a particular group of people. It does this by reducing the cost of employing the targeted
group relative to other groups, making them more attractive for firms to hire them. The
employment wage subsidy would lower the cost to employers of hiring targeted workers,
stimulating employment creation and improve the people's access to decent jobs in
important, well regulated and potentially rapidly growing sectors of the economy.
b) Higher employment raises the aggregate income, while the subsidy causes unit production
costs, hence consumer prices to decline in a competitive product market and this will in turn
boost consumption and savings. Wage subsidies may therefore ultimately stimulate
consumption demand which in turn leads to indirect increases in the labour demand as
firms increase production (Heintz and Bowles 1996).
c) The employment wage subsides may also compel firms to change into being more labour
absorbing. Wage subsidies may in the long run induce greater investments in industries via
an accumulation effect, which would further amplify the wage subsidy program' scale
effects.
d) Wage subsidies may also have the added macroeconomic advantage of reducing inflation
to the extent which unemployment decreases or a country's balance of payments improves
due to reduced cost of production to domestic firms. This can have important effects on the
domestic currency. An added macroeconomic objective is resource allocation as well as
income inequality. When used effectively wage subsidies are a tool to reduce poverty.
e) The hiring unemployed of persons within the wage subsidy program allow the employer to
select, at little risk, suitable candidates for permanent jobs. This effect is relevant only if the
placement within the program is temporary.
f) Matching supply and demand on the labour market becomes more efficient, thereby
reducing unemployment.
g) Lower product prices and lower cost of production improve export competitiveness and this
may have important effects on the domestic currency.
h) Finally, this programme make those that are already working less fearful of losing their jobs
assuming that they prefer participating in the program over being unemployed. This
strengthens the position of employees in wage bargaining, thereby boosting wage costs
and reducing employment.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
14 | P a g e
4.2 Disadvantage effects regarding wage subsidies
Due regard should be placed on potential unintended consequences, especially the negative ones
of introducing wage subsidies:
a. Substitution effect: occurs when an employer replaces an unsubsidized worker with a
subsidies one or when firms use subsidies workers to increases output but displaces
output among firms who do not have subsidies workers. This relates to where program
participants take jobs from people who do not benefit from the program. However such a
substitution effect depends on the elasticity of the demand.
b. Displacement/Crowding out effect is the possible reduction of jobs elsewhere in the
economy because of competition in the goods market. This effect occurs when a firm with
subsidised workers increases output, but displaces output among firms who do not have
subsidies workers and, as a result, the subsidy crowds-out employment.
c. Deadweight loss effect: Wage subsidies can be efficient in creating employment, but they
could also create wasteful spending if jobs that would have existed without a subsidy are
also subsidized. This means funding employees who would have found work without the
program. The combination of the substitution and Deadweight loss effects is called the
“efficiency loss meaning the participants in this program do not represent additional
employment.
d. Waste: wage subsidies can be efficient in creating employment, but they could also create
wasteful spending if jobs that would have existed without a subsidy are also subsidized.
e. Program misuse: may occur when employers or employees try to skim off the subsidy
without either creating the employment or working in the jobs. Also, employers can
deliberately maintain low wage levels in order to qualify for the highest benefit under the
subsidy scheme. This also includes the ‘auntie effect’: this is whereby relatives and others
are likely to be added to payroll and used to increase the subsidy claim. Also, those who
have left the jobs in unfortunate circumstances may be retained on payroll for as long as
possible to ensure increase in subsidy claim.
f. Market distortions: occurs because of wage subsidies hold up wages and so bypass the
necessary wage adjustment that must occur to balance labour markets.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
15 | P a g e
g. Administrative burden effect: Low take-up rates may occur if firms do not know about
the subsidy, or if they find the administrative work attach to it time consuming.
h. Opportunity costs: funds dedicated to a wage subsidy might be effectively used for other
government service delivery purposes.
i. Increased public expenditure effect: the fiscal cost involved as it appears to increase
public expenditure and ‘deficit’ the administrative costs of employment subsidies are
generally borne by the government, so there is no cost in this regard to the
firms/employers.
4.3 Concerning questions on employment subsidy implementation
Sustainable jobs: will employment created by a subsidy be sustainable without the
subsidy?
Will the wage subsidy be able to address a current regime which contributes to increasing
employment costs of unskilled and inexperienced workers such as minimum wage policy?
Cost and sustainability: Jobs created by a wage subsidy depends on the size of the
subsidy and larger subsidies could cause problems of affordability and sustainability
5. International experiences on wage/employment subsidies
There are various developing countries which have implemented different forms of employment
subsidy programs, but these experiences should be taken in light that different labour market
conditions prevail in the different countries.
In the years 1999-2000, Argentina implemented a wage subsidy targeted at poor
households and low-income workers. This policy raised employment by 6.1%, while the
substitution effect was low due to cost of severance pay if regular worker was to be fired.
The United States have adopted various subsidies to increase demand for low-skilled
workers and workers from disadvantaged groups. Between 1979 and 1994, United States
implemented a tax credit policy to companies that employed economically disadvantaged
youths. This policy reduced about 15% of the employers wage cost as a result having a
positive employment effects on the targeted group. However it should also be noted that it
has also been found that there is a lack of accountability in many job subsidies that are
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
16 | P a g e
given to employers. Companies who receive subsidies would not create jobs at all, some
companies have lost jobs after receiving subsidies.
Singapore implemented two kinds of wage subsidies. In 2007 it introduced a Workfare
Income Supplement (WIS), which the government increased the income of 20 percent of
lower-income workers by up to 20 percent if they get employed for at least six months a
year. The subsidy’s purpose was to boost labor supply. In response to 2008/09 global
recession, Singapore provided firms who did not retrench low-wage workers with a subsidy
of up to 12 percent of the payroll. This was meant to encourage labour demand. This
subsidy resulted in job losses being low despite the country experiencing negative growth
in 2009.
Australia provided wage subsidy through to employers who offered jobs to disadvantaged
workers through its Employment Pathway Fund (EPF) between 1 October 2009 and 31
October 2011. This subsidy was intended to encourage the employment of disadvantaged
job seekers (low-skilled workers). About 68% of wage subsidies created new jobs and
better working conditions that would not have existed without being subsidies. Job seekers
who have been unemployed for more than two years were found to be three percentage
points more likely to find a job due to the implementation of a wage subsidy.
Sweden implemented employment subsidies which were required by structural change
caused by various international and domestic economic challenges in the 1970s. The
subsidies were in the form of specific subsidies to selected companies which were in
distressed sectors and/or regions.
Turkey also implemented employment subsidy called Law 5084 and 5350 during the 2004
and 2005 period. This subsidy was implemented to target all low income provinces with per
capita GDP of less than $ 1 500 (2001 prices). As a result, the targeted regions
experienced about 5%-13% employment increases during the period.
Chile implemented two training-related subsidy schemes. The one called Chile Joven was
targeted at the unemployed youth and had four sub-programmes: training and work in
firms, work training to become self-employed, training for young workers and a form of
apprenticeship programme. The other scheme offers a tax rebate to employers who provide
on-the-job training to workers aged 20 years or younger. Chile Joven was created because
unemployment in Chile continued to rise despite economic growth, leading to the
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
17 | P a g e
conclusion that there was a lack of or mismatch of skills in the economy. There is also a
separate wage subsidy programme for the disabled.
There are countries from the SADC region that have also implemented the wage subsidy
policy. Botswana provides a wage subsidy for employment of unskilled/ low-skill workers.
The state covers 80%, 60%, 40% and 20% of the wages for years 1&2, 3, 4, and 5
respectively. Namibia's government offers training cost deduction at 125% tax deductible to
companies that train unskilled workers.
Evidence from countries suggests that the success of a wage subsidy can be context specific and
depends on the nature of the intervention and the structure of the labour market among other
things.
6. South Africa proposed youth wage subsidy
National Treasury (2007) lists the principal aim of a wage subsidy as being the reduction of the
cost of labour. Governments have utilised wage subsidies to increase labour demand and/or
supply or merely to increase the wages of low-income employees. In case of targeted employer-
side wage subsidies, the aim is to provide employment opportunities to the targeted worker group
by increasing labour demand for disadvantaged groups such as the long-term unemployed, the
unemployed youth, low-skilled workers. They also provide opportunities for these disadvantaged
groups to obtain work experience that can be transferable to ‘real’ jobs in the labour market. The
South African government proposed a youth wage subsidy for workers under the age of 30 whose
salaries are below the personal income tax threshold. The subsidy will be paid for a maximum of
two years and have a maximum value of R12 000.
The introduction of a youth wage subsidy has been widely criticised by labour unions and below
are some of the concerns which were raised regarding the implementation of the Youth Wage
Subsidy:
There is a concern that wage subsidies may be effective in allowing young people to
access the labour market for the first time, because the subsidies compensate firms for the
risk associated with being unable to identify the productive capacity of prospective
employees. However, a wage subsidy alone may not be adequate. For example, firms may
continue to be unwilling to employ new labour market entrants, even with the subsidy, if the
costs associated with retrenchment are high.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
18 | P a g e
A wage subsidy, however, still does not address the most important source of youth
unemployment namely, that of inadequate or inappropriate educational qualifications. There
is a need to evaluate academic qualifications in South Africa and to align them to the needs
of the market.
Professor C. Malikane an associate professor of economics at Wits University and a policy
adviser to Cosatu wrote a document which discredited most of the positive experience of
other countries in term so implementation of the wage subsidy see Appendix 1. He noted
that treasury did not understand the findings that were presented in the report.
7. Recommendations
Employment subsidies may be successful at creating jobs but they should not be seen as the main
policy instrument for dealing with the broader unemployment problem. Employment subsidies are
short term as such countries thinking long term in addressing unemployment require policies that
improve economic growth and the economy’s employment absorption capacity, raise skills of new
labour market entrants, reduce labour market rigidities, and promote effective job search,
especially among the groups that face the highest levels of unemployment. Also to enhance the
effectiveness of wage subsidies, they should preferably be linked to structured workplace training,
be targeted to industries where employment will be responsive to changes in labour costs, and be
focused on the addressing the general unemployment. To deal with the skill shortage or mismatch
at school level proper career advice should enable young people to choose relevant courses; if
young people do not meet the entry requirements for courses with good career prospects,
educational institutions should provide bridging courses. The effective monitoring of the wage
subsidy would be the tool to counter the negative consequence, and this should include putting
restrictions to limit potential misuse of the programme. Importantly, the programme should be
designed to make it in the interest of employers and employees to use the programme as it is
intended.
Ultimately, however, wage subsidies should not be regarded as permanent solutions to
unemployment, nor are they necessarily the first best solution to the true underlying sources of
unemployment. These subsidies do not overcome the various constraints to economic growth and
job creation, which are best addressed through long-run initiatives that enhance the absorptive
capacity of firms and that improve workers’ skills and education.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
19 | P a g e
8. Conclusion
It is important to bear in mind the objective of the introduction of the wage subsidy, which is to deal
with high levels of unemployment. However, the labour market conditions prevailing in a country
should be taken into account. The conditions have to be identified to underscore and reflect the
labour market such that the development of a wage subsidy avoids negative side effects. Careful
consideration should be given to mechanisms which will have to implement and manage the
process. The successful implementation of a wage subsidy depends on effective and efficient
administrative and the institutional structure. The challenges facing the introduction of a wage
subsidy is whether it could realistically address unemployment crisis of the country as
unemployment has reached extremely high levels during the last decade in the country especially
among the youth. It is argued that high unemployment levels have negative social externalities and
are very costly to society.
Also as indicated above, economic growth is imperative to all countries as its impact on the level of
employment in the country. Arguably the weak performance of the export-oriented manufacturing
sector, in particular, has also deprived South Africa of growth opportunities and job creation at the
relatively low end of the skill distribution. The structural shifts in the economy have thus not only
lowered the growth rate, but the general shift toward the services sector has been at the
disadvantage of less-skilled labour and the overall employment intensity in the economy. South
Africa has in the past experienced high economic growth rates which have not been sufficient to be
translated into job creation. Hence policies that enhance employment like wage subsidies and
skills development should be considered in programs that aims to accelerate job creation and
address unemployment rate and the plague of poverty.
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
20 | P a g e
9. REFERENCE LIST
1. Burns, J. , Edwards, L. and Pauw, K. (2010) Wage subsidies to combat unemployment and
poverty : Assessing South Africa's Options.
2. Edwards, L. and Pauw, K. (2007) Evaluating the general equilibrium effect of a wage subsidy
scheme for South Africa.
3. Heintz, J and Bowles, S (1996) Subsidising employment: Wage subsides and job creation.
4. Katz, F (1996) Wage subsidies for the disadvantaged.
5. Levinsohn, J. (2008) Two policies to alleviate unemployment in South Africa. CID Working
6. National Treasury (2011) Confronting youth unemployment: Policy Options for South Africa.
7. National Treasury Wage Subsidy: Draft Discussion Paper (IDTT Working Paper (2007)) 48.
8. Paper No. 166 Harvard University Centre of International Development.
9. Pissarides, C., 1998, Equilibrium unemployment theory, Basil Blackwell.
10. International Labour Organisation Into the Twenty-First Century: The Development of Social
Security (1984) 115.
11. “Government grants new wage subsidies for shipping” accessed at
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/
Last Accessed 28 Oct 2012
12. http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/cs/sp/hrsd/prc/publications/research/1998-000026/page06.shtml
Last Accessed 28 Oct 2012
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
21 | P a g e
10. Appendix 1
Malikane C notes that a paper written by Katz concluded that the US employment subsidy
"has no impact on the earnings or employment prospects of out-of-school disadvantaged
youth like other non-intensive strategies that have been evaluated, it does not appear very
effective for out-of-school youth from poor families". Even though the youth wage subsidies
in the US may have had "modestly positive employment results" as Katz also reports, such
results have been statistically insignificant and they have been ineffective for out-of-school
youth, who are more than 95% of the South African unemployed youth.
In the case of the UK, the paper by Van Reenen (2003) shows that the "New Deal" for
young people consists of a range of options for young people to pursue their development.
The youth wage subsidy option is therefore one among a number of options, and it is the
least preferred by young people because of its potential career-limiting effect. The UK's
Department of Business, Innovation and Skills is opposed to youth wage subsidies. In 2009
it submitted: "Our conclusion is that this is not a feasible, cost-effective or sustainable
option for us. We also know, based on our experiences of the 1970s, that these schemes
can create distortions and prevent companies taking necessary action to restructure or
retrain to ensure their survival and success in the future, leading to failure and
redundancies when the subsidy is removed."
In Turkey, the paper by Betcherman and Daysal (2009) shows that the subsidies were not
for young people. Nevertheless it reports: "The evidence suggests that the dominant effect
of subsidies was to increase social security registration of firms and workers rather than
boosting total employment and economic activity. The gains in employment and number of
firms correspond to a surge in formalisation, rather than to real gains in economic activity.
Their results also suggest that implementing the subsidies can be a costly way to increase
employment the government ended up paying for nearly the full cost of employment
created."
In relation to Argentina, the paper by Galasso, Ravallion and Salvia (2001) concludes that
"the impact of the voucher (or subsidy) was clearly not through access to the wage subsidy
by firms. The voucher may well have encouraged workers to make more effort to find work.
By this interpretation, the voucher had an 'empowerment' effect, in making these workers -
notably young and female workers - more confident in approaching employers clearly, (the
subsidy) did not succeed in achieving a major transition to private sector jobs among
Analysis: Wage/Employment Subsidies for employment creation
22 | P a g e
workfare recipients in the study area". It must be noted that in Argentina, because
employers had to register workers to claim the subsidy and at the same time were reluctant
to formalise their businesses, they did not hire subsidised workers.