wages | state of working america · wages wages and salaries constitute nearly three-fourths of...

43
Office of Superintendent of Schools January 4, 2012 Board Meeting of January 18, 2012 Financial Services Richard H. Hinds, Chief Financial Officer COMMITTEE: FACILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION REFORM ITEM BID NO. SUBJECT F-60 035-LL03 FIRE-SUPPRESSION SYSTEM RETROFIT AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES F-61 044-LL10 CORRECT ITEM 6 ON BID NO. 044-LL10 – RELOCATION OF FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT F-62 008-MM06 PLASTIC CAN LINERS (PARTIAL) COMMITTEE: INNOVATION, EFFICIENCY & GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS ITEM BID NO. SUBJECT E-141 052-LL08 BUS FIELD TRIPS WITHIN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY – SITE SPECIFIC E-142 003-MM03 MOBILE CAFETERIA TABLES

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wages | State of Working America · Wages Wages and salaries constitute nearly three-fourths of total family income—a share that is even greater for the middle class. Thus, analyses

0.5%

17%

11%

6%

>200-to-1

4x

T H E S T A T E O F W O R K I N G A M E R I C A K E Y N U M B E R S

Wages

Wages and salaries constitute nearly three-fourths of total family income—a share that iseven greater for the middle class. Thus, analyses of wage and compensation trends are centralto understanding the living standards of American families. Here are some key findings:

Pay/productivity disconnect

Wage growth occurs when productivity (growth of output of goods and services per hourworked) increases. Since 2000, while productivity has increased nearly 23 percent, the hourlywage of the median worker (the worker who makes more than half of workers but less than theother half ) rose just 0.5 percent. Median hourly compensation (all wages and benefits) rose only4.0 percent.

Non-wage compensation, including benefits such as health and pensions, grew sharply (up 17percent) from 2000–2007, but still at a rate below the growth in productivity. In addition, non-wage compensation has been flat since the start of the Great Recession.

The long-term trend has been dramatic: Since 1973, productivity has grown roughly 80 percentwhile median hourly compensation improved by roughly 11 percent.

Disparate growth

Americans earning the lowest wages (those at the 10th percentile) actually earned less in 2011than the lowest earners in 1979. Over 1979–2011, the wages of the median worker grew only 6percent, with all the growth occurring in the late 1990s wage boom. Over this same period, highearners’ (95th percentile) wages rose by more than 37 percent, while the wages of the highest-earning 1 percent rose 131 percent.

These disparities are especially pronounced in the explosion of CEO pay, which in the late 1970swas about 30 times that of a typical worker. Today, it is more than 200 times that of a typicalworker. Fast wage growth among executives and those in the financial sector is the primaryreason why incomes of the top 1 percent have exploded since 1979.

The highest wage earners are four times more likely than the poorest Americans to receive paidsick days, nearly twice as likely to have paid vacation days, and five times as likely to have accessto paid family leave.

E C O N O M I C P O L I C Y I N S T I T U T E | W W W . S T A T E O F W O R K I N G A M E R I C A . O R G | W W W . E P I . O R G

Page 2: Wages | State of Working America · Wages Wages and salaries constitute nearly three-fourths of total family income—a share that is even greater for the middle class. Thus, analyses

Spotlight

THE MINIMUMWAGE

84%

32%

43.3%

10 years

70%

33%

The federal minimum wage was 50 percent the wage earned by non-supervisory workers in the late 1960s. Despite the recent three-stepincrease, the minimum wage in 2011 was 37 percent of the wage earned bynon-supervisory workers.

Demographic disparities

The gender wage gap has improved, with the typical woman earning 84 percent of that of thetypical man. This is partly due to the decline of the typical male’s wage. As incomes rise,however, the gender pay disparity increases.

Nearly one-third of women, compared to nearly a quarter of men, earned poverty-level wages in2011.

Hispanics are the racial and ethnic group most likely to receive poverty-level wages (43.3percent), followed by African Americans (36 percent) and whites (23.4 percent).

Broad-based decline

Both high school– and college-educated workers have seen no growth in their hourlycompensation in the last 10 years, starting in 2002.

College graduates up to the 70th percentile have had stagnant or falling wages since 2000, andwages have failed to improve for college graduates in nearly every occupation, includingbusiness occupations.

The decline in unionization accounts for one-third and one-fifth, respectively, of the growth inwage inequality among men and women from 1973–2007.

BESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswy

E C O N O M I C P O L I C Y I N S T I T U T E | W W W . S T A T E O F W O R K I N G A M E R I C A . O R G | W W W . E P I . O R G