wake forest’s experience with ubiquitous laptop computing and its possible relevance for notre...

17
Wake Forest’s Experience with Ubiquitous Laptop Computing and Its Possible Relevance for Notre Dame David G. Brown, VP & Dean Wake Forest University [email protected] http://www.wfu.edu/~brown neral Session for TLTR, Faculty & Staff---May 16, 2 David G. Brown, Professor of Economics, Wake Fores

Upload: milton-chapman

Post on 12-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Wake Forest’s Experience with Ubiquitous Laptop Computing and Its Possible Relevance for Notre Dame

David G. Brown, VP & DeanWake Forest [email protected]://www.wfu.edu/~brown

General Session for TLTR, Faculty & Staff---May 16, 2003David G. Brown, Professor of Economics, Wake Forest

Outline of Introductory Remarks

• Set scene: The Wake Forest Experience– Technology at Wake Forest– How has Teaching & Learning Changed?

• Will address Current Notre Dame Issues---– Required computer ownership?– Standard Load for All Students?– Required Portability?– Gains from Wireless?– Video to Residence Halls?

• Future: Where is Teaching-Learning Headed?– What we’ve learned so far– The Millenium Context

• IBM Laptops for all• Printers for all• New Every 2 Years• Own @ Graduation• 31.000 Connections• Standard Software• 99% E-Mail• Start 1995, 4 Year Phase In• +15% Tuition for 37 Items• +40 Faculty and 30 Staff

THE WAKE FOREST PLANIBM A21m, Pentium III, 700 Mhz, 20GB, 14”ActMatrix, 196MB, Re-writable CD

56k modem, 8MB Video Ram, 10/100 Ethernet, Floppy, USB&Serial&Parellel&Infrared Ports

CONCEPTS BEHIND PLAN

• Students First (nomadic)

• 2 Layers: Threshold +

• Communicate/Access (Not Present/Analyze)

• Dominant Use After College

• Equity of Access

What’s Happened Since Laptops

• Mentality shifts-- like from public phone to personal phone.

• Teaching Assumptions shift-- like from readings are on reserve to everyone owns a copy of his/her own.

• Timelines shift-- like from “our class meets MWF” to “we

see each other all the time and MWF we meet together”• Students’ sense of access shifts-- like from “I can get

that book in the library” to “I have that book in my library.”

• Relationships shift-- like from a family living in many different states to all family members living in the same town

Computers Enhance My Teaching and/or Learning Via--

PresentationsBetter--20%More Opportunities toPractice & Analyze--35%

More Access to SourceMaterials via Internet--43%

More Communication with Faculty Colleagues, Classmates,and Between Faculty and Students--87%

The Conclusion: Computers Increase Learning By Improving Communication!

Computers allow people----

• to belong to more communities

• to be more actively engaged in each

community

• with more people

• over more miles

• for more months and years

• TO BE MORE COLLABORATIVE

ICCEL -- Wake Forest University, 2002ICCEL -- Wake Forest University, 2002

• To understand a liberal arts education as an opportunity to study with professors who think by their own set of concepts

• To learn how to apply economic concepts

• To learn how to work collaboratively

• To learn computer skills

• To improve writing and speaking

FIRST YEAR SEMINARThe Economists’ Way of Thinking:

Students = 15All FreshmenRequired Course

Before Class

During Class.

After Class

WHY STANDARD?

• Communication Utility! (George Gilder)

• 99% Reliability A Must in Classroom

• Buddies Share Hardware & Knowledge

• Better, Cheaper Support Systems

• Marketing Advantages

• Faculty “Trusts” Equality of Access

WHY PORTABLE?Academic Reasons

• Continuous Contact

• More Collaboration

• Greater Faculty Availability

• Greater Sense of Ownership

• More Flexibility: On site data collection & essay writing. In class use.

• Study at best location, not limited to dorm

Academic Opportunities[Growing from Mobility & Standardization]

• Redesigned Courses (Gardening Metaphor)

• Faculty Teamwork, Interdisciplinary Coop

• Collaborative Assignments & Study Groups

• Active Sub-Communities (centers, disciplines. Student organizations, databases)

• Student-Faculty Partnerships

• Study Abroad & Internships

• Student Self Confidence re Information Fluency

• Marketing to Grad Schools & Employers

Usefulness of Wireless

• Like @ UND, all classes have Internet access at the podium & a mounted SGA projector.

• 60% of our classrooms are wired to each student. Another 20% are wireless. 25% of our undergrads have wireless cards. Less faculty.

• Wireless is a technology in search of educational uses! Yes, med school rounds. Yes, convenience.

• Someday, not yet. When our backbone can be wireless, it will be cost effective. Until then, we’re going slow.

• Pittsburgh + WF + American University

Usefulness of Video to Dorms

• 30 Second Videos of Physics Demos

• Large Auditorium Lectures

• Concern: Copyright & Academic Freedom

• At WF capacities are largely unused

• Future: Chunks should & will be available

Assuming that 90% of the Notre Dame students have computers, where do we go next?

• If all students have laptops, will use in class be signficantly increased? [Our experience is “no.” But the use outside class skyrockets!]

• Are all faculty comfortable with the equity of access & teaching accordingly? If not, how about a faculty motion?

• Could “friends teaching friends.” “helpdesk & other service,” & time-savings from greater compatability be increased by articulating a preferred hardware/software?

If so, how about recommending a standard computer & software load to all students?

• Would communication in the community be enhanced if students had email during the summer and when abroad, faculty at night and at meetings, students in study groups? If so, why not suggest laptops?

What We’ve Learned So FarAbout Technology and Teaching

1. More Learning results From Better Communication!

2. Students relish Buffets!

3. Blended Courses are Best!

4. Ubiquitous Access is Essential!

5. Simpler is Better!

6. Professor becomes Personal Trainer!

The Millennium Context

• Personal. Customized. Interactive.

• Student-Centered Curriculum

• Teams of Professionals to Support Learning

• “Houses” instead of Disciplines

• Hybrid Courses (80-20 and 20-80)

• Loose-leaf Collections of Course Components, instead of Textbooks

If you want to hear more about Wake Forest’s

initiative, tune to live broadcast at 3PM this afternoon!

“Mobile Computing

for Teaching and Learning at Wake Forest”CREN Tech Talk hosted by Howard Strauss (Princeton)

Jay Dominick, CIO, Wake Forest

David G. Brown, VP and Dean, Wake Forest

http://www.cren.net/know/techtalk/events/mobile2.html