GREENHOUSE GAS GLOBAL WARMING A CONVENIENT LITANY OF LIES ABSTRACT

NOTE Well. This paper is written not to deny that we need to do something about cleaning up our atmosphere, our rivers and our oceans - it is to point out that the CO2 global warming movement is a worldwide conspiracy that will consume resources that are needed for proper restoration of our planet.The Greens and environmentalists are crying out “global warming proven and real” and at the same time allowing major forests to be cleared, sewage to run into rivers and oceans, chemical and industrial dusts to pollute the air, water and oceans. The essential importance of trees is not the CO2 usage or O2 production but rests with a bacterium that grows in the stomatal cavity of plants in a synergistic relationship in which the plant supplies the bacteria with water and in exchange the mature bacterium, Aerobacter aerogenes is released into the atmosphere as the primary coalescent focus for the formation of water droplets, clouds, rain and snow from gaseous water vapour, that the trees utilise. Fine particles (nanoparticles) formed in fires, power production and vehicle and industrial exhausts block the coalescent drop formation, preventing water precipitation. It is the West Australian combination of loss of trees and the regular production of nanoparticles due farming, fires and fuels that continues the slow reduction of rainfall and saltation in central Australia. Similar deforestation worldwide has or will cause expanding desert formation and saltation. It is not the CO2 we need to remove but the particles released in farming, power generation and automobile fuel use. Worldwide, water precipitation should have a high priority. Saudi Arabia is proving every day deserts only need water.The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is greatly exaggerates the CO2 warming effect. Mankind’s (anthropogenic) GHGs output is so miniscule relative to the geographic masses involved it makes the anthropogenic warming story a farce. The IPCC, unfortunately, has no sense of the ridiculous. For example everyone knows if the sun shines all day and then the sky clouds over the temperature in the morning will be warmer than if the sky stayed clear. If atmospheric GHGs are heating everything so much why doesn’t this stop the night temperature falling? The CO2 is still there and the earth still radiates heat. Cloud cover to a large extent keeps that heat in, why can’t GHG’s do the same?

The IPCC gives the total anthropogenic output in three forms 1) by mass in gigatonnes per annum = 38 gig. 2) by radiation energy in Joules = 1.6 J/m2/sec. 3) by atmospheric parts per million = 80ppm. All three are just measuring the same thing in different ways. Based on these tiny numbers the IPCC claims are as follows.

1. Mass - 38 gigatonnes of CO2 per annum are released into the atmosphere and the IPCC claim this amount will trap enough heat to warm 51,000 gigatonnes of atmosphere, start melting 250 million gigatonnes of ice and heat 14 billion gigatonnes of ocean. Ridiculous rubbish!

2. Radiation – IPCC gives man’s induced GHG radiation as 1.6 J/m2/sec, (about the amount of continuous heat we can get from a 1.5 volt torch battery ). IPCC claim this increment added to the sun’s radiation will warm 51,000 gigs of atmosphere, melt 250 million gigs of ice and heat 14 billion gigs of ocean. No way

3. Parts - CO2 Green House Gases at 82 parts per million of atmosphere will warm 51,000 gigs of air, melt 250 million gigs of ice and heat 14 billion gigs of ocean. Yawn.

Oceanic Acidity - The IPCC states that some part of this 38gig of anthropogenic CO2 is dissolving in the oceans making them acidic - IPCC maximum CO2 = 38gigs - oceans to be acidified = 14 billion gigs. The stated change is 0.1pH - from pH 8.5 to pH 8.4, an insignificant amount however IPCC claims GHG driven oceanic acidity is dissolving coral formations, affecting crustacea shells and zooplankton skeletons and this damage will continue for 2 – 300 years! Ridiculous! - the oceans are and will remain alkaline.

Global temperatures have been coming down over the past 10 years. “A drop of 0.70C over 2007 was the fastest ever recorded and put us back to 1930 levels”. IPCC head has publicly acknowledged warming cycle has stopped. He doesn’t know why but wants the world to sacrifice just in case it starts again.

Fraudulent Data were used to make the IPCC warming case. Pseudo scientists have been clearly shown to have faked, cherry picked and distorted historical research data and statistical records and used the resultant figures to create their mathematical global warming forecast model. See page 12 frauds.

1

If we go down the Carbon trading, offset, de-industrialisation biofuel production path the consequences will be a tragedy for all except those who benefit by theft of the productive capacity that would allow us to concentrate on the reality that our planet could do with more than a little tender, loving care and world populations could do with more food, energy, medicines, education and infrastructure.First we must protect and replant forests they are the prime driver of cloud formation, rain and snow and second, clean the atmosphere and the waterways of toxic chemical and other organic pollutants.

IPCC final reports are pure global warming politics. After each major scientific conference brings down its findings these are taken through political/governmental pruning and modifying with all negative information eliminated or carefully concealed with weasel words, not accepted scientific terminology.

Biofuels do not reduce carbon emissions as growing, transport, refining and distributing all produce CO2. and utilise a lot of water to manufacture. However biofuel production is a perfect tool for continuation of Al Gore’s Vice Presidential program of African genocide first implemented in1998-99. see Who is Al Gore page 14.

GHG GLOBAL WARMING - A CONVENIENT LITANY OF LIES

The IPCC states “Warming of the Global system is Unequivocal; the science is absolutely proven.” “No further discussion is needed”. ‘Dissent is unacceptable.’ “Is that so? - well read on”.

Before we can talk about the energy cycles of the earth we need to review a few accepted facts.

The AtmosphereThree gases, nitrogen, oxygen and argon make up some 99.95% of the dry air atmosphere by volume and the rest of the inclusions - carbon dioxide (CO2) Methane, Nitrous Oxide, neon, krypton, helium, hydrogen and ozone make up 0.04% and induced miscellaneous inclusions 0.01% (- dust, pollen etc). Water occupies some 3% of the atmosphere. Amounts are: CO2 380parts per million, Methane 1.78ppm, Nitrous Oxide 0.319ppm.

The troposphere is the zone that contains the visible weather – clouds, storms, rain, snow, hail. It extends from the ground to 16 kilometres at the equator and 10 km at the poles. Jet aircraft that always fly within the top 15% of the troposphere and constantly monitor outside air temperature report no temperature increases.

Rising warm tropical air displaces upper cooler air, pushing it outwards in streams to finally sink down over the poles. This circulation pattern is a major part of the heat/CO2 circulation system that feeds the oceanic nutrition and weather energy cycles. Weather is governed by the function of polar/tropical ocean currents and tropical/polar airflows, tradewinds and jet streams. Air movements, earth and ocean temperatures, and ocean currents are directly related and all weather events we experience result from their interaction.

Atmospheric temperature decreases with height at a fairly steady rate (lapse rate). The range is taken from ground level as 200c and assumes a constant atmospheric temperature decrease of 6.40 C per kilometre down to 600C at the top of the troposphere – the tropopause. Atmospheric temperature inversions occur preventing warm air with its load of CO2, GHG’s (Green House Gases) and water rising past the inversion layer. This has a great effect on cloud formation and rain, hail and snow showers. Note: coarse particles also have a significant favourable effect on precipitation while ultra fine particles inhibit rain formation.

CO2 and Other Gases:- Generally units are given as millions of tons (gigatons) or molecules per million.

A molecule is a tiny central particle with one or more tiny energy balls flying so fast around it that it makes a sphere of energy. Further energy can be added by electromagnetic waves such as heat, light (ultra violet UV, Infra Red IR), cosmic shorter waves and other radiation waves colliding with air molecules. Added energy is generally turned into motion or heat. Heated gases rise and cool gases sink.

Gases all respond to certain laws and one of those is that heat flows from the hottest molecules to the cooler ones until they are at equal temperatures. That is, if one gets hot it has to share that heat with the others

2

around it. Carbon dioxide (CO2)is a molecule made up of one carbon atom joined to two oxygen atoms. It is heavier than any of the three main atmospheric gases whose relative weights are: N = 14, O= 16, Ar = 40 and

CO2 = 42 . The fact that CO2 is the heaviest means that it is found in higher concentrations in the surface atmosphere than in the higher atmosphere.

CO2 has two free electrons that can take part in reactions and so it is able to form a whole family of chemicals and ions by joining forces with other chemicals. Almost every living thing on earth must have some CO2 to live. If the amount in the air fell to below 200 parts per million (ppm) plant life would ultimately end. Above about 1000ppm CO2 starts to have adverse effects on various life forms. To protect life, the earth has a self correcting program that for millions of years has kept the CO2 levels between approximately 250 ppm and 560 ppm, essentially - a dynamic equilibrium.

Water - Acidity and CO2 Water SolubilityAcidity and alkalinity are measured on a pH scale 1 to 14. Level 1 is extremely acid and 14 extremely alkaline; seven is neutral. Pure water is pH 7.0. The oceans are alkaline pH8.5 (Chemistry 3rd edit Therald Moeller et al)

CO2 is different from almost all other chemicals in that it dissolves better in cold water than it does in warm water. So much so, from the Merck Index 12th edition we find at 760mbs pressure “100 volumes of water at 00C, will hold 170 volumes of CO2 and at 200C it will hold 88 volumes of CO2. It will hold more CO2 at standard atmospheric pressures. At atmospheric pressure and 250C water holds 4.4grams/litre of CO2 and of this only one part in 400 is able to form carbonic acid. (Chemistry 3rd edit). Soft drinks have 2.5 atmospheres

It is the unusually high solubility of CO2 in the waters of the oceans that governs the day to day level of CO2 in the air. When ocean surfaces warm they give up CO2 and when they cool they take up CO2.

Latent HeatTo melt ice to water, make water to steam and ice directly to vapour (evaporation) without changing its temperature takes heat. This is called latent heat and is measured in Joules/gram. To turn ice at 00 to water at 00 takes 340 Joules/gram of latent heat, water at 1000 to steam at 1000C takes 2,255 J/cc and to turn ice at 00C to vapour at 00C takes 2,828 J/cc.. This heat must be applied or extracted from its surroundings. Conversely; latent heat is given out when ice melts and steam or water vapour is condensed. The same amount of latent heat is given back to the surroundings as was taken out above. The IPCC uses energy units of both watts and Joules. 1 Watt per second = 1 Joule per second.

One cubic centimetre of air only needs 0.1013 joules to raise its temperature 10C. As it cools 10C it gives up 0.1013 J/cc. Again to turn ice at 00 to water at 00 takes 340 Joules/gram of latent heat. This means a tremendous amount of hot air is needed to melt 1gram of ice to water at 10C.

Oceanic and Polar Cooling and /or Warming and Salt Concentration Changes.As water cools it gradually becomes denser until it reaches 40C. At this point it begins to expand becoming less dense. Ice floats with approx 9% above water and 91% below. Remember from above - ice has to take in heat from its surroundings to melt. Water released from a melting iceberg is colder and denser than the surrounding water and so sinks.

Icebergs are fresh water ice blocks - when oceans turn to ice salt is excluded. Released salt makes surrounding water heavier so it sinks to the bottom In the tropics surface evaporation makes the salt concentration higher and again some sinking of the surface water occurs. As salt concentration is increased, it takes in heat, cooling its surroundings. Remember adding salt to ice used to cool a keg, make ice cream? The reverse occurs when salt concentration decreases - the water warms.

The Sun and Electro Magnetic Wave Output into the Earth Environmental Envelope. The primary driving force of climate and life on earth is energy from the sun. This arrives as electromagnetic radiation waves of different lengths from long radio waves down through short waves, microwaves, infrared waves (IR), ultraviolet (UV) waves to x-rays and gamma rays. Sensible heat is held in the infrared range.

3

Everything with a temperature above absolute zero radiates energy waves. A number of these waves are dangerous to life. Fortunately they are intercepted by the earth’s protective envelope and reflected back, scattered or transformed into a safer form; for example, ozone gas forms a layer roughly 15 k above the tropopause and traps incoming UV, reducing the hazard from these rays.

With radio waves the exception, almost all incoming electromagnetic waves collide with and are modified in some way by gas particles in the air or finally by the earth surfaces. Radiation that actually strikes the earth may be reflected straight back by ice, snow and deserts with the angle of the sun’s rays playing a moderating role in the amounts. The reflected energy - usually heat - may escape into space, be reflected by clouds, scattered or trapped by water or other greenhouse gases. Scattered ultra violet radiation makes the sky blue. If so much infra red heat is being produced in the upper atmosphere, why don’t we have a neat little infra red tinge in our blue spectrum?

We have all noticed cloud cover makes the day cooler by reflecting sun energy back to space and the night warmer by reflecting earth heat radiation back to the earth again. This is the greenhouse effect. It is accepted by scientists that water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas due to its ability to modify both atmospheric and earth temperatures. It is responsible for 98% of the greenhouse effect

While its multiple identities – vapour, ice, snow, cloud, rain etc - make atmospheric water hard to quantify it is reasonable to assume that a 3% content, would be at least 30,000 parts of water per million parts of air.

Let’s ignore ozone as it is in the stratosphere. This is above the tropopause and the IPCC states the stratosphere is cooling anyway so ozone’s heat or otherwise is irrelevant in this discussion.

At the same time let’s accept the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) 98% water effect as stated, as no one is suggesting we are increasing atmospheric water vapour. That leaves us free to concentrate on the greenhouse gases so dear to Al Gore and the IPCC – the 380ppm total of CO2, 1.78 ppm of Methane and 0.319 ppm of Nitrous Oxide, that is a 382ppm total.

To function as a greenhouse gas a molecule must trap incoming radiation and convert it to heat (infra red) and send some of that to the earth and then trap outgoing heat radiation from the earth and again return some of that to the earth. With each step radiation is scattered and heat is lost so there is a diminishing effect. The captured heat added to the sun’s radiant heat by this accumulative action is called radiative forcing.

CO2 Is Not a Major Greenhouse Gas.The greenhouse role of CO2 is incidental and minimal. Water supplies 98% of the greenhouse effect, CO2 and other greenhouse gases supply less than 2%. Ozone (O3), a short wave radiation shield, has no heat return capacity. The slow global warming of the last 10,000 years has nothing to do with CO2 levels. Carbon dioxide’s most important roles are its function in all plant and animal metabolism and its high cold water solubility. 100 volumes of water at 00C water will absorb 170volumes of CO2 at 200C only 88volumes (Merk Index).

IPCC Green House Gases (GHG’s) in Action as Parts Per Million of Air (ppm).CO2 = 380ppm Methane = 1.78ppm Nitrous Oxide is 0.319 ppm.- ( IPCC Fourth Assessment Report )

The IPCC claims very high radiation forcing from incredibly miniscule levels of Methane and Nitrous Oxide. Even, giving the Svensmark factor, the totals claimed for this miracle far exceeds the historic ‘loaves and fishes.’

The anthropogenic portion of these (the part mankind contributes) is presently given as 3.0 - 3.4% - that is, we make 14ppm and the IPCC claims this amount is already harming the earth! We must halve this amount by 2020 (to 7ppm) or the world will be in a permanent decline to total destruction or some such. If the amount doubles - that is to 28ppm – unstoppable warming and catastrophe is certain! See Fraud 3 pg12.

The drivers of the phenomena we label as weather are the +350C to -500C temperature gradients between the earth and the tropopause, temperature differential driven air movements from the equator to the poles and the high level air streams that flow out of this. So it is that our 14 anthropogenic molecules of CO2, Methane and Nitrous Oxides are going to spend their aerial lives tumbling about in the troposphere, where there is intense mixing due to the sun’s radiation, storms, heat, lightning, rain, hail, snow etc all the time bumping around with 30,000 ppm of water that will readily attract and absorb them and return them to the earth and oceans.

4

The sun’s magnetic radiation waves entering the atmosphere collide with atmospheric molecules including GHG’s and are randomly scattered, some into space and some down to earth; all with their newly increased energy being converted to particle motion or to infra red heat.

IPCC Theory is that these incoming radiation energies will heat the total 382 GHG molecules and they will radiate, bump into and/or cuddle up etc to the other 999,618 molecules that share their million cohort. The resultant collective heat will continuously radiate as infra red from the upper troposphere to heat the earth. Remember our share is only 14 parts of the 382 ppm or to put it another way only 0.0014% of the million parts of air.

The IPCC using a little slight of hand have declared the starting percentage of anthropogenic GHG’s mankind is responsible for is the difference between their claimed pre - industrial maximum and the present level - 300 to 382ppm = 82 ppm not the amount of 14ppm if the historic data was used. The IPCC claims that this amount has already generated and continues to generate enough heat to expand the oceans, melt glaciers, raise ocean levels and cause worldwide catastrophic weather events. 82ppm is still only 0.0082%

NOTE that at present the day by day average air content of CO2 remains at 382ppm while massive CO2 transfers are taking place daily. In spite of IPCC scaremongering - changes are slow and irregular but levels constantly remain within the earths CO2 /carbon safety envelope – a dynamic equilibrium that is a free and a fully established perfect Carbon Trading Scheme. The latest air measurements seem to show a falling CO2 content – yet to be called a trend.

It is essential to remember anthropogenic amounts are annual accumulations whereas the earths cycle daily turns over in excess of 100 gigatons while maintaining a relatively constant level of parts per million –now 382ppm- in a slow ever changing cycle of carbon reactions – always in the life supporting safety zone. CO2 does not accumulate for long periods in the atmosphere but is continually turned over.

The Carbon Cycle– Natures Carbon Trading Scheme and Our PPM ContributionLet us look at the actual life of CO2 in the earth’s processing and use of these molecules from birth to death. This is part of a multi million cycle of events called the ‘carbon cycle’, a cycle in which we play a very small part. Carbon starts its atmospheric existence from volcanoes, ocean vents, all fire - involving organic materials, life form metabolites, breakdown of organic materials, release from the upper level of oceans, weathering of some rocks, upwellings from deep - oceans and numerous miscellaneous chemical reactions.

Once born, CO2 is initially circulated in the surface air, by winds and temperature drifts. At this point some 15% of the total that is made is removed by plants as feedstock for growth and chlorophyll formation. A further 15% is being absorbed into the earth and its waters by contact with damp land surfaces and the surfaces of lakes and oceans. Those molecules that have not yet been captured are picked up to join the turbulent atmosphere where they become tangled up in storms, rain and snow – constantly on the move.

This tumbling air has at least 30,000 ppm of water that grab CO2 molecules in large quantities and so each time water returns to earth, it carries a large percentage of CO2 with it. The IPCC claims that CO2 lasts for 100 -150 years in the atmosphere, the textbook, ‘The Blue Planet’ gives 4.5 years atmospheric life. However the statistical possibility that any part of the 382ppm of CO2 with its high solubility in very cold water could survive more than 10 to 30 days of being cranked up and down is absurd. Any CO2 molecule that survived removal for long would be picked up by the polar air streams and dumped out onto the poles. On arrival at the poles CO2 is absorbed into the oceans and into the snow covering ice fields. Once in the ocean high levels of alkaline calcium ions in the water grab incoming CO2 molecules, incorporating them into calcium carbonate and bicarbonate compounds for making shells and skeletons of krill and other crustacea and for plants that the crustaceans use for foodHigh oceanic CO2 levels at the change of season are responsible for the immense quantities of krill that attract whales, seals and other sea dwellers for a seasonal feast.The upper surface waters - the zone governed by penetration of light and wave churning - carry and circulate CO2 marine nutrients. This zone also releases CO2 to the atmosphere when the surface water warms and takes CO2 in again as the waters cool.

5

This is the principal daily, weekly, monthly and seasonal control/feedback loop that helps maintain the atmospheric CO2 life support equilibrium.In polar waters dissolved CO2 is carried down by the heavier high salt water from iceberg formation or super cold water formed during the periods of freezing and thawing of ice. A percentage of the sinking CO2 - concentrated by increasing pressure - survives the carbonate transfer chemistry to be caught up in deep ocean currents.Other CO2 molecules incorporated as calcium carbonate in skeletal remains of sea life, settle down through massive changing pressures and temperatures ending life on the bottom as sludges to be reabsorbed by the earth before being released back to the atmosphere in some future millennium.As denser water continues to sink, pressure changes the composition of the chemical ions and the structure of the deep water oceans. The water gets saltier, (32.5 g/cc to 35g/cc), denser, and colder from 140C down to between 10C/ 20 C in the bottom waters. As pressure increases with depth so more CO2 is dissolved, the amount doubling at roughly 10 metres. Sinking polar water starts currents that join in with the network of circulating ocean currents and in this way dissolved CO2 is delivered from cold polar areas to the temperate and tropic zones.In the tropics heat evaporates the surface waters, increasing their salt content, and some sinking occurs causing circulation displacement of local waters. This assists marine feeding and CO2 cycling.Caught up in the global pattern transfer currents ( eg El Nino/La Nina southern oscillator) and further distributed by circular current flows (gyres) in the seas and oceans, deep water CO2 is lifted by mountainous ocean bottom projections, by coastal geography, by earth’s magma temperature triggered convection and smoky vent up welling. In addition a specific wind driven water event (the Elkman transport) drives shallower warm water away from the coast bringing an upwelling of cooler water to provide marine nutrients to some coastal surface waters.Cycle - The IPCC Carbon Gives Current Anthropogenic CO2 Output As 38 Gigatonnes. - greatly exaggerated as it assumes an annual residual accumulation of CO2 that does not occur.

Constant CO2 transfers are essential to the maintenance of oceanic food chains. Surface temperature governed atmospheric CO2 and deep cold water CO2 are drivers of the CO2 dynamic equilibrium system.

CO2 production, recycling, short and long term storage, total locking away of CO2 as carbonates and sludges and various carbon feedback loops occur throughout the carbon cycle. However these stages need to be divided into time governed accessibility zones The following amounts are involved in these transfers.

Rapid transfers of CO2 Air 750 Gig, Plants 750 Gigatonnes, Ocean surfaces 750 Gig , Animals 3 Gig, total = 2,253 Gig,

Slower but continuous Soils 1,500 Gig, Deep oceans 36,000 Gig = 37,500 Gig Total 39,703 Gigs

Rock, particularly limestone - 75 million Gig - is also intimately involved but much more slowly.

Within the vast Carbon Cycle turnovers of 39,703 gigatonnes the IPCC’s stated anthropogenic CO2 load of 38 gigatonnes is totally lost. At 0.096% it is essentially an undetectable amount. Doubling the amount from 38gig to 76 gigatonnes would have virtually no effect, good or bad, on the carbon cycle.

Note – The IPCC does tend to exaggerate a little e.g. IPCC figures show from 1960 to 1970 anthropogenic CO2 output must have risen from 6.5 gig to 19gig (New Scientist Nov 1961 and IPCC report) then increased further from 19 gigatonnes to 38gig between 1970 and 2004. All due to man’s industry? This cannot be true.

Even some IPCC apologists are stating various figures between 10 and 20 gig..

The following points are taken from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report IPCC and AR4 SYR Summary for policymakers. Report entries are in italics, if verbatim are also within quotation marks.“As defined in the IPCC Procedures, the SYR synthesises and integrates material contained within IPCC Assessment Reports and Special Reports. The scope of the SYR of the Fourth Assessment Report includes material contained in the three Working Group contributions to the AR4, and it draws on information

6

contained in other IPCC Reports as required. The SYR is based exclusively on assessments by the IPCC Working Groups, it does not refer to or assess the primary scientific literature itself”.

Translation- the IPCC Fourth Assessment report and the Summary for Policymakers are political statements; loosely based on technical group inputs edited to produce a document free of any genuinely independent scientific scrutiny, drawing on spurious mathematical models to predict doomsday scenarios.

“Radiative forcing from carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide combined is very likely (>90%) increasing during the current era than at any other time in the last 10,000 years”. Current era is given as 1750 to the present date.

The figures IPPC uses as past CO2 and GHG temperature records do not agree with the last 10,000 year historic records available in encyclopaedia, text books, university papers and from current highly respected scientists who are not nurtured by the IPCC. The IPCC radiative forcing heat transfer capacity figures are not supported by scientific proof. They are greatly distorted and therefore scientifically useless.

The earths total CO2 atmospheric load is approximately 1250 gig. So the total quantity of manmade CO2 on the earth due to this extra load is an absolutely insignificant increase of 0.03%.

If we take IPCC CO2 claim that the pre industrial average CO2 level was 180 to 300ppm and has since then increased to say 380 in 2007, that makes the anthropogenic share of the 380 ppm amount 82 ppm; that is 0.0082% or only 1 part in 12,200 parts of air.

1 part in 12,200 ? – The IPCC GHG Heating Ability is Totally Unbelievable

Does anyone really think one molecule of GHG heated by radiation in the upper troposphere environment - average temperature less than -300C - would be able to heat the surrounding 12,500 molecules of air so that the resulting infra red radiation could be in sufficient quantity to heat the earth and then in addition catch enough of the earth’s outbound infra red radiation to create a tropospheric radiator that would not only heat the earth but provide enough heat to initiate all the IPCC reported global warming events? Ridiculous!

Total radiative forcing from the sum of all human activities is a warming force of about +1.6 W/m2 (1.6J/m2).

The sun’s total radiation on the earth is given as 1370 Joules/m2. IPCC 1.6 j/m2 is only a 0.0012% addition to the sun’s heating ability. This is another IPCC completely insignificant amount.

The IPCC claim “ Most of the observed increase in globally-averaged temperatures since the mid - 20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations”. A preposterous statement when the amount of additional heat is a mere 1.6 Joules/m2 of GHG heat added to the normal sun’s heat of 1370 J/m2.

From the IPCC Summary for Policy makers. Eleven of the twelve years in the period (1995 -2006) rank among the top 12 warmest years in the instrumental record (since 1850, towards the end of the Little Ice Age).

Not true according to NASA. See addendum 2 notes from an interview with Jennifer Marohasy stating temperatures 1998 to 2002 plateaued and the earth is now cooling. The chairman of the IPCC acknowledges this but it is still ignored in IPCC latest position papers.

“Climate sensitivity is defined as the amount of global average surface warming following a doubling of carbon dioxide concentrations. It is likely to be in the range of 2 to 4.50C, with a best estimate of about 30C. This range of values is not a projection of the temperature rise we will see in the 21st century, since the future change in carbon dioxide concentrations is unknown, and factors besides carbon dioxide concentrations affect temperature”

Doubling IPCC 1.6 joules of sun-heat is an increase from 0.0012 % to 0.0024%.three times is 0.0036%. These figures alone show anthropogenic CO2 induced output level of heat could not possibly raise global temperature to between 20C - 4.50C. Twice or three times almost nothing is still almost nothing.

IPCC FORECASTING IPCC nominate scenarios B1 and B2 to be the most likely of the projected scenarios of temperature and sea level rises (AR4 2-4-1)

7

Scenario B1Best estimate - temperature rise of 1.80C with a likely range of 1.10C to 2.90C ( 3.20F) with a likely range of 2.0 to 5.20F Sea level rise likely to range 18 to 38cm (7 to 15 inches).

Scenario B2Best estimate temperature rise of 2.40C with a likely range of 1.40C to 3.80C (4.30F with a likely range of 2.6 to 6.80F). Sea level rise likely range 20 to 43 cm (8 to 17 inches).

Just think for a moment. To melt one gram of ice without raising its temperature requires 336 joules per cubic centimetre. To melt a cubic metre block of ice would require 336,000,000 Joules of latent heat. To melt a cubic kilometre of ice at 00C requires 1,000 x 1,000 x 1000 x 336,000,000 – that is 336,000,000,000,000,000 = 336 million billion Joules (336x1015 J). The volume of the Greenland land glacial sheet ice is roughly 5,500,000 cubic kilometres.

Tripling or quadrupling atmospheric GHG’s could still have no measurable effect on Arctic Polar ice.

Yet the above IPCC scenarios B1 and B2 have ice melting in amounts that would submerge many low lying islands and coastal communities.

“There has been an increase in hurricane intensity in the North Atlantic since the 1970s and that increase correlates with increases in sea surface temperature”.

William Gray, New Orleans hurricane forecaster, branded this quote as grossly alarmist. - “There is no sign that hurricane intensity or events are not compatible with historic records.”

“Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid- 20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations”

“The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in 2005 (379ppm) exceeds by far the natural range of the last 650,000 thousand years (180 to 300ppm).”

The CO2 statement is followed by methane in 2005 (1.774 parts per million) up from between 0.0032ppm to 0.0079ppm and nitrous oxide has risen from 0.017ppm to 0.0319ppm, both exceeding by far the natural range of the last 650,000 years. Yes those decimal points are in the right places.

Only the IPCC literature makes that claim. All other previous science data gathered over last 200 years disagrees, showing much greater range and volatility in atmospheric GHG’s and global temperatures. e.g. CO2 level in 1943 was 472ppm. See attached graph pg 10 showing the CO2 data and names of scientists responsible for its recording and the IPCC CO2 graph - the falsified basis of the computer modelled predictions. IPCC acknowledges that both Methane and Nitrous Oxide levels are now falling.

IPCC claim- “Observations since 1961 show that the ocean has been absorbing more than 80% of the heat added to the climate system, and that ocean temperatures have increased to depths of at least 3000m (9800ft).”

Heat in the lower oceans is a function of geophysical heat rising through the thin – 5k - 7k ocean floor crust and also through smoky vents. This temperature is relatively constant. It is not possible for surface water heated by air contact and solar radiation to heat the depths at 3km. Heat cannot be transferred from surface ocean waters to 3,000 metres depth. Ocean temperatures decrease rapidly from surface down to 500metres (the thermocline) and then continue to fall to 2500 metre level and from there, remain roughly between 10C and 30C to 3,500m.

Ocean Acidification“The uptake of anthropogenic carbon since 1750 has led to the ocean becoming more acidic with an average decrease in pH of 0.1 units. Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations lead to further acidification. IPCC SRES scenarios give a reduction in average global surface ocean pH of between 0.14 and 0.35 units over the 21st century. While the effects of observed ocean acidification on the marine biosphere are as yet undocumented, the progressive acidification of oceans is expected to have negative impacts on marine biosphere l-forming organisms (e.g. corals) and their dependent species”. Acidity is measured on a scale of pH 1 to 14 – one being maximum acidity, seven being neutral and 14 being maximum alkalinity.

8

With the exception of some coastal zones the acidity of the Oceans is relatively constant at pH 8.5; the addition of an acid quantity of 0.1 or IPCC worst case scenario 0.35 results in a reduction of alkalinity to levels of pH 8.4 or worst case pH 8.15. The ocean is alkaline - if the IPCC doomsday scenario eventuated in its totality the oceans would still be alkaline.

Total ocean volume is some 1300 billion cubic kilometres – carbonic acid pH is limited by its low saturation limit. The IPCC ocean acidification story is rubbish. For the same reason so is their coral bleaching story. Any coastal shallows acidity is due to sulphation from rivers, estuaries and sewage outfalls.

The Public Has the Right to KnowThe truth is, you cannot have a democracy without an informed public and the public is no longer informed but is subject to dictatorial edicts settled secretly in international agreements and trade agreements signed by governments.

Democracy no longer exists as government heads aided by media barons become dictators. Unless the people as a whole take action there is little chance of redressing these problems for the foreseeable future. If international compulsory carbon trading is established it will get worse, not better.

This is the end game of the hedge fund, banking, and global business cartel’s drive to establish control of the finances and assets of all nations and all populations. Water, food and energy are their primary targets.

Results Global Warming - Global Conspiracy Conspiracy: “a Secret Plan to Commit a Crime or Do Harm By Parties Who Will Benefit.” – Oxford Dictionary. Winners Those who benefit from the Global Warming Scam?1. The scientists who are given virtually unlimited resources to create pseudo science to push the scare campaign. They either know that it is a lie or are totally lazy and/or incompetent.2. The globalisers who want to cripple worldwide national assets, to destroy or subjugate governments and populations, to bring about world government controlled by obscenely wealthy asset plunderers. The companies that benefit from the proceeds of carbon trading by transferring money from poor to super rich via increased fuel, transport, agriculture, electricity, water and home building - all that supports families.3. Hedge funds and private equity pirates whose unsecured debt burden is so high that a world recession is inevitable and need a new scam to continue their ruthless plundering indefinitely.4. Smart companies can organise government funding and CO2 exemptions and still offset losses by owning large sections of the carbon trade companies. B.P. is an example of a British company using technology foresight to be the first good looking vulture.5. The countries/companies that want to control the world food and natural assets - for example, setting up biofuels manufacture in the third world under conditions that ensure subsistence wages and minimum benefits while accruing carbon credits and enormous profits from government subsidised retail supply.6. Those who believe in world overpopulation and the accompanying Eugenic preaching that world populations should be reduced from 6.6 billion to 2.5 billion by any means fair or foul. Those to be reduced are defined as the poor, handicapped, coloured and third world non exporters. The Gatt trade rule that prevents food storage as anti competitive, the loss of land to biofuel production, the genetic capturing of food staples, the high cost of fertiliser dominated agriculture, the agro destructive monocultures and the enforced high anti epidemic medicine prices drug companies enforce added together indicate genocide is a primary target. Mexico, South America, Africa and Asia are the prime targets. Be assured any country with a compliant government will also receive attention from the World Trade Organisation, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund – then only God can help them. 7. There are international food companies foisting genetically modified and patented crops onto populations in a bid to control the food chain - from fertiliser, seed, plant and pesticides to table. Such companies love chaos in governments and markets. This allows them to operate and grow unnoticed, with corrupt and illegal activity hidden from the public gaze. Genome patents investment scams are the primary weapons.8.Payment for carbon offsets are immediate while the actual offsetting mechanism is long term, e.g. planting trees, closing down industries etc. Virtually un-auditable, this system has already been the source of major fraud and this will continue to grow hidden in the, uncertainty and doubt created by IPCCet al.

9

Losers 1. The already starving third world as food prices are already rising and staple foods becoming short, and

medicines prohibitively expensive. This is already happening as biofuel substitution cuts into grain production. Death rates are already rising. UN food aid is already reduced due to food price increases.

2. The land in desperately poor third world countries is the only cheap land/labour combination that can produce ethanol at a competitive price. Growing and producing biomass fuels diverts farm cash to land owners and reduces food production. Forests are being sacrificed to plant biofuel/biodeisel crops. Biodiversity of food species is being lost to both genetically engineered and monoculture crops. Use of saved seed is not permitted - seed must be purchased for every planting. The monoculture effect is already seen in new wheat rust, soybean blight, and rice fungus dramatically reducing crops and all spreading out of control. The survival and welfare of farmers and dependants and their place in the food chain is no longer assured. Factory farmed foodless food will soon supplant them.

3. The companies lost to production through carbon reduction laws, the workers who have no jobs and the families that have no future. The reduction in living standards as cost/wage equation leads to the intended neo - feudal system of master and serf.

4. The already starving, the dispossessed, the physically and mentally handicapped, the aged and the poorly paid as falling living standards and escalating costs leave them with no place to go.

5. With such massive diversion of resources, national infrastructure already neglected worldwide will be allowed to fall further into disrepair or fail. Previously efficient services such as education, hospitals, medical and other support services will all be further limited by shortage of power, people and equipment due to lack of funds as populations wait for wind mills and solar cells and atomic energy take up the power slack. Demand for alternative sources will increase their price as shortages will occur for at least 50yrs. We are talking about millions of windmills, trillions of solar cells, thousands of atomic plants!

6. The consumers who finish up being the sole carriers of the cost of the global warming solution. All costs arrive at the consumer regardless of how and when they start or how they are calculated.

7. All the investors who have put money into global warming trades of any sort will be left with absolutely nothing when normal climate evidence is too strong for the farce to continue and the house of cards is demolished in a shower of worthless paper.

8. All the farmers who have planted trees for trading credits, and crops for making biofuels, companies making factories for processing biofuels. Power stations, miners, factories shutting down unable to afford development capital for CO2 modification technologies. Insurance and superannuation companies are now looking after themselves, who looks after their erstwhile customers? The money of the general public will take another hit from the buccaneers in the same way as is occurring with the hedge funds and private bankers.

History repeatedly shows when a fraud is consummated (as was the ENRON fraud) the perpetrators walk away and the peasants pay and pay and pay. Uninvolved scapegoats are frequently blamed and arraigned.

9. The further loss of independence and personal freedom. Citizens have already lost control of their politicians, resulting in loss of public assets, loss of freedoms, loss of informed media and sources of unbiased information.

Under the twin cloaks of terrorism and global warming we have lost transparency in government and public service dealings (secrecy mantra –‘commercial in confidence’) and - most worrying – is the loss of fair and just police and judicial systems. Trojan gifts from leaders capitalising on our past 40 years of trust and neglect. Citizens, you built it, you owned it and you trusted them. They stole it, they sold it and they didn’t ask. Welcome to our new totalitarian democracies, and democratic dictatorships.

IPCC Admits Climate Change Science and Data Has Never Been TestedDr. Vincent Gray has a worldwide reputation for scientific integrity in his job. As a UN official Climate Change reviewer, he challenged the IPCC paper ‘Validation of Climate Models’, noting that “no climate model has ever been properly tested.” When this was pointed out there was no attempt to properly test or use other sources to support the CO2 global warming contention -the IPCC just altered their report in fifty places to read “evaluate” instead of “validated”. They and their supporters continue to this day to use the unscientific weasel words “likely”, “very likely”, “extremely likely”, “with high confidence” and “unequivocal”To support these unscientific statements they have given their weasel words representative percentages as follows:-

10

Scientific Terms According to IPCC.Terminology Likelihood of Occurrence/Outcome.Virtually certain >99% probability of occurrenceVery likely >90% probabilityLikely >66% probabilityMore likely than not >50% probabilityAbout as likely as not 33 to 66% probabilityUnlikely < 33% probabilityVery unlikely < 10% probability

Confidence Degree of confidence in being correctVery high confidence At least 9 out of ten chances of being correctHigh confidence About 8 out of ten chances of being correctMedium confidence About 5 out of ten chances of being correctLow confidence About 2 out of ten chances of being correctVery low confidence Less than 1 out of ten chance

Rigorous Assessment of IPCC Hypothesis on Green House Gas Induced Global Warming.“Confidence very low Less than one out of ten chance”“Outcome exceptionally unlikely < 1% probability. Final Assessment Unscientific, implausible rubbish.

The IPCC no longer uses the word proven, IPCC 2007, but its tame publicists and scientists keep adding to the dramatic lies – ‘it’s scientific’, while unqualified supporters still continually chant “proven” and “real”.

Cost of Carbon Trading, The IPCC and supporting governments fail to point out that the costs of a carbon credit scheme applies to every item - transport, all foods ( particularly fresh foods), household power, all catered meals, industry costs in small business etc. For example: a ten dollars a tonne carbon price raises the cost of a litre of petrol by 10 cents. The big investors are talking not about US $50 (the IPCC figure for 2009), but a figure of up to US $300per tonne and they will control it, not the IPCC or the governments. The same people setting up carbon trading schemes are the ones that set up the failing hedge funds and private bank larcenous investment schemes. They are using the money they stole from you to finance the schemes that will steal more from you.

Gore’s Film Frauds. See also court judgement (addendum 1). Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” shows Antarctic ice shelves falling into the ocean. Caught out ! these film images were stolen from a 2004 fictional movie “The Day After Tomorrow”and the visual effects supervisor says the images taken in a studio are of modelled styrofoam “ice”.

After an emotion grabbing brief on his wife’s tragedy and his son’s tragedy and finding himself short of baby polar bears and disappearing icebergs, he employed an animated bear cub to fill the bill but Gore and the IPCC still insist that polar bears are threatened by global warming. Polar experts point out that eleven of the thirteen bear groups are reproducing rapidly and are very healthy. Warming supporters still lament the passing of the poor little bears.

Gore's CO2 graph, shown with the aid of a scissor lift, purported to show CO2 increasing dramatically with rapid global warming a direct consequence. Oops another blooper - it actually finishes up showing that global warming comes first and CO2 increases follow, some time later. This is a bit more logical as warmer oceans give off more CO2.

The whole fraud should have stopped at this point but with Gore touting and IPCC money and clout the film was given an Oscar backed up by an Ignoble Piece Prize. Gore has since traipsed the world training Global Warming Ambassadors – some 140 in Australia.Press and critics are excluded from these lectures.

11

Note the irregularity and measurement range of the historic graph 287ppm to 476ppmCompare this with the neat line of the IPCC graph and the 300ppm to 320ppm

Model Making - Model FakingIce cores are used for testing ice temperatures, contained plant materials and accumulated gases. For the later millennia comparison of isotopes from released carbons give accurate time scales. Glaciologists now regard measurement of ice core CO2 levels as grossly inaccurate. CO2 is subject to high pressures, inward diffusion and molecular streaming effects. They are useless for computer modelling. Jaworowski99. Faked climate data and associated forecast model were the start point and basis for the Global Warming Fraud. In all their Computer models its the same story Garbage in = Garbage out.

Fraud 1The global warming scam came from papers by Callender (1958) and Keeling (1986) that atmospheric CO2 governed global heat accumulation. The IPCC to validate that theory altered centuries of data on pre-industrial concentrations of CO2 by subtracting all the highs to give a bogus low figure of 180ppm (actual figure 270ppm) Beck Graph 2007. Associated with other falsified data 180ppm maximum became part of the IPCC computer forecasting model, (Kurschner96/Wagner02, Jaworowski99, Royer01). The data and its models are rejected by most of the gagged scientific community but still the basis of IPCC claimed ‘science’.

Fraud 2The IPCC used ice cores from Taylor dome in Antarctica for their computer model. These have an unusually even (260-264 ppm) CO2 ppm time line that allows the IPCC to claim that over the last 650,000 years the natural range of CO2 was 180ppm to 300ppm. Other more acceptable methods of ice core analysis show wider variations in CO2 levels (270 -326 ppm) for the same period.Kurschner96/Wagner02,Jaworowski92a A second Antarctic core deposited in 1890 registered 328 ppm. This CO2 level did not support the IPCC model; they needed a level of 290ppm. This discrepancy was removed by declaring that the CO2 in the ice was 83 years younger than the ice itself and recalculating the number to fit - 290ppm. Jaworowski, Z.1999.

Fraud 3The IPCC upper figure 300ppm was subtracted from the 2005 current figure and the answer 80ppm became the claimed level of anthropogenic atmospheric loading that created the present level of global warming.

Fraud 4The faked ice data were joined with air CO2 ppm measurements from Mauna Loa and adjusted to smooth the result and support forecasts extrapolated from the resulting computer model. Beck07, Jaworowski1999.

12

Real CO 2 Measurements vs. Global Warmers’ Fabrication

Fraud 5 On the final IPCC warming graph the time line of carbon dioxide levels was manipulated to make the CO2 ppm increase gradient appear much steeper – result the hockey stick curve- a more frightening scene. Jaworowski1999.

Fraud 6IPCC:- “The uptake of anthropogenic carbon since 1750 has led to the ocean becoming more acidic with an average decrease in pH of 0.1 units. Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations lead to further acidification. Projections based on SRES scenarios give a reduction in average global surface ocean pH of between 0.14 and 0.35 units over the 21st century. While the effects of observed ocean acidification on the marine biosphere are as yet undocumented, the progressive acidification of oceans is expected to have negative impacts on marine shell-forming organisms (e.g. corals) and their dependent species”.

Acidity is measured on a scale of pH 1 to 14 – one being maximum acidity, seven being neutral and 14 being maximum alkalinity. With the exception of some coastal zones the acidity of the Oceans is relatively constant at pH 8.5 (CHEMISTRY 1989) the addition of an acid quantity of pH 0.1 or pH 0.35 results in an reduction of alkalinity level of 8.4 to 8.15, figures still well above neutral. The ocean is alkaline, and as shown even if the IPCC doomsday scenario occurred, the ocean would still be alkaline.

Fraud 7The apparent rise in ocean levels is due to anthropogenic CO2 heat induced expansion. This rising will continue for some centuries.

Warmed air can’t possibly heat the deeper oceans so the claimed ocean heating has to come directly from the GHG radiation effect. 38gigatonnes greenhouse warming CO2 output of 1.6J/m2 cannot possibly be a thermal threat to an ocean mass of 13 billion tonnes considering surface evaporation takes 2250 Joules of latent heat per gram out of the water whenever there is a breeze on the surface and the heat to raise 1gram of water 10C is 1 Joule and the and GHG’s at best only supply 1.6 Joules/m2/sec.

Fraud 8The historic climate records in the years 1000 to 1900 a warm period and a little ice age. These have never been in dispute. The IPCC’s own 1996 report included a graph agreeing with the historic record. After this the IPCC realised if this was the case then their whole edifice would collapse. IPCC climate modelling scientists (reported in Nature 1998 and in Geophysical Research Letters 1999 Mann et al) presented a revised graph eliminating the warming and cooling periods and showing a hockey stick curve of rapidly rising global temperatures. This was duly reported in the IPCC 2001 report – perfect fodder for the Gore/IPCC global disaster campaign. From 1998 to 2003 no one thought to check Mann’s research or his mathematical model

Two researchers, Stephen McIntyre and Douglas Keenan 1993 and 1995, found that the Mann data were flawed and the corresponding computer model was incorrect. Confirmed by other scientists this remained unpublished until 1995 by Geophysical Research Letters. This is now the agreed position amongst all real scientists, the only standouts being the IPCC cabal. The US Academy of Sciences, the US Senate Report 2005 both rejected the IPCC version of history. Mann was forced by Nature Magazine to publish a correction but the IPCC still use his numbers

The IPCC understands that:-

The opinion of the majority is the line of least resistance for the greatest number of people. The majority rules. Frighten the majority, attack the dissenter not his argument and the game is over.

From this understanding the IPCC and their followers formulated the following rules of engagement.

13

1. A lie becomes the truth if told often enough, loudly enough, steadfastly enough and if all dissenting voices are silenced and all negative information and publication suppressed.

2.The opinion of the majority can be changed by a noisy group of aggressive volunteers - ‘rent a crowd’ agitator provocateurs recruited to suppress opposing views – chanting “It’s proven, it’s real it needs no discussion”.

3. It is useful to hire a Pied Piper with appropriate status, experience and the right FUD tunes - to keep the bunnies in order while the wolves feed. FUD factor – fear, uncertainty and doubt.

4.Bully, bribe, blackmail or buy scientific dissent to obtain compliance or backing for the IPCC doctrine. Al Gore the Anointed Pied Piper - Who is Al Gore?

US Vice - President to President Bill Clinton. Gore as VP attained extra powers due to Clinton’s forced continuous involvement in a minor indiscretion. Gore threatened South African nations with aid and funds boycotts if they did not cease using generic (cheaper sourced) drugs on their AIDs, malaria, tuberculosis and hepatitis epidemics. He made a follow up executive order to bomb the only Africa based pharmaceutical company available to provide cheap drugs to same nations. As an excuse he claimed the company was a terrorist base used for the unrelated Al Qaeda terrorist attack on an American Embassy. Throughout his Vice Presidency Gore refused to comply with or apply a presidential edict to allow Africa to buy and/or manufacture generic medicines.

These two acts were essentially murder and genocide carried out to support US pharmaceutical industry prices – unaffordable in third world countries. In 1998 Gore made the same embargo threat to Thailand. The Thais withdrew from the sale of generics. They have now reinstated their use.

Al Gore was partner in a hedge fund operating since 2001. In 2004, with partner David Blood he opened the “Generation Investment Fund” operating in Europe as a carbon trader. Gore made a film and a book on Global Warming long on emotional triggers and rigged ‘evidence’ pictures and totally devoid of acceptable science. He was given an Oscar and a Nobel Prize by the establishment to increase his status as appointed global warming salesman. He also currently has large financial interests in ethanol production.

Invested - by George Brown (now prime minister) - as the British Government’s Special Adviser on Climate Change, Gore has traipsed the world with his propaganda to fulfil George Brown’s ambition to make London the centre of “a new global carbon market.” Brown has also stated that UK bullying of other European countries to join the scam is a testament to the UK’s leadership in Europe.

So world wide global warming indoctrinated helpers keep an uninformed world in fear, uncertainty and doubt, as old British Empire ambition rises once again to lead by subterfuge, fraud, and the destruction of self ruled democracies to establish, not an empire, but a financial global hegemony, not for the people, but the historic old and new buccaneer global company aristocracy that virtually all western governments and public officials fawn over.

The spreading of starvation, disease, pestilence, poverty, civil conflicts and war are the tools being used to bring about a new world where ultimately a wealthy and ultra-powerful minority will own the assets of life – water, minerals, food, land and energy and can control and limit a servile working population.

Welcome to the new/old/feudal system, with globalization rules destroying nations, public infrastructure and assets. Companies out there, operating in total obscurity, fomenting and promoting war, buying selling and distributing weapons, training armies with equipment and leadership intended for use against their own populations.

Dissent is subverted by anti terror security laws while every political move exaggerates, accelerates and fosters terrorism and religious and racial tensions.

Overarching all this is a global warming scam designed to destroy assets while government sponsored pirates steal (sorry privatise) our public assets, our retirement funds and our future.

14

This is not the future - it has already happened, and will continue to happen tomorrow and the day after tightening the screws until the breaking point unless people fix it. Now or someday determines our future.

Gore will not publicly defend his claimed science nor will any of the public representatives of IPCC or it’s tame supporters agree to a broadcast neutrally agreed scientific debate. It’s all a fraud.

A) He refuses all public challenges to debate global warming theory. B ) He rejected a papal invitation to attend the Vatican held Conference on Climate Change where IPCC apparatchiks and scientists assessed IPCC global warming predictions were unlikely to eventuate. C) He refuses to let media representatives into his talks on Global Warming.

In Australia the Global Warming case is pushed by the Australian Broadcasting Commission, the CSIRO and the Australian Government. Debate has focused solely on the finance and legislation to fulfil the desires of our pseudo green groups, environmentalists and a bevy of very tame academics who are placing their long term fame and future in a lottery. Selective deafness means thousands of proven and real scientists are ignored e.g. 400 travelled to Bali to express their views and were refused entry and had publicity of their visit prevented by press blackout. Their names and credentials are listed on the internet.

Addendum 1News Items to hand since writing. British High Court Rules on Gore Film – ‘An Inconvenient Truth’.

High Court Judge Michael Burton held an extensive examination of the validity of the Gore film “An Inconvenient Truth” The following is the essence of the judgement. - Errors found in Gore Film in both fact and interpretation of presented CO2 warming data are as follows.

1. The evidence presented in the Gore film showing ice core CO2 levels over the last 650,000 years prove that CO2 caused temperature increases was deemed to be wrong in that temperature increases preceded CO2 level increases by between 800 to 200years.

2. The proposition that sea levels could rise by seven metres, displacing millions of people was rejected. The evidence showed that sea levels were expected to rise by 40mms over the next 100 years, there is no threat of massive migration.

3. The claim that rising sea levels have caused the evacuation of certain Pacific Islanders to New Zealand appeared to be false and no supporting evidence was presented or obtainable.

4. The government expert witness had to accept that Lake Chad drying up had nothing to do with Global Warming.

5. Claims polar bears had drowned due to disappearing Arctic Ice was false.6. The government expert had to accept that loss of snows from Mt Kilimanjaro due to Global Warming was

false.7. The threat that Global Warming could stop the Gulf Stream, causing a European ice age was found to be

impossible.8. The global warming induced loss of various species including coral bleaching was negated as the

Government could not find any evidence to support this contention.9. Global Warming had nothing to do with the initiation of Cyclone Katrina and the damage it caused. The

Government expert had to accept a one off event could not be attributed to Global Warming. The Court ruled that – The film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument.If teachers

present the film without making this plain, they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1966 and guilty of political indoctrination. Children must be briefed before display. ‘Australian schools ran the film!’

Addendum 2 Notes from reputable sources presenting recent observations negating various IPCC claims.

1 Website late August 07 - NASA Released Latest Climate Update revealing previous temperature rise information was in error by a factor of 0.15OC - corrected results are as follows - 1934 was the hottest year this century not 1998 as the IPCC states, similarly the 1930’s and not the 1990’s was the hottest decade. These changes confirm that the data used by the IPCC makes all their predictions invalid..

15

2 From the National Snow and Ice Data Centre Webpage.The arctic sea ice melting catastrophe that ‘proved’ the global warming case has let the side down by reforming the ice cap at an almost unprecedented rate. Down to 3 million square kilometres this disastrous thaw - was the largest since satellite monitoring started in 1978. The loss of ice has reversed with refreezing starting three weeks early and is currently rebuilding the ice pack at an unprecedented rate. On the 4th of December 07 it reached the 9 million square mile mark well inside the average normal range of 6 million to10 million square kilometres.

3 The IPCC claim the 2007 opening of the North West Passage was unprecedented and proof of global warming.The first recorded traverse of the North West Passage took place in 1906. The passage was open and traversed again in both 1940 and 1944. The inferences made that the large melt somehow raised sea levels are just false propaganda. Melting sea ice does not raise sea levels. See Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps at: (seaicemonitor.cgi)

London Daily Express report 4 Feb 18th

The Daily notes that scientists are saying the Northern Hemisphere has experienced its coldest temperatures since 1966 – pointing out Libya, Iran, Saudi Arabia, China, Tajikistan all had coldest winters for the last 50 – 100years. Also there is nearly a third more ice in Antarctica than is usual for this time of year.

5 IPCC claim increasing sea levels are flooding low lying island and people should be evacuated.Dr Nils Morner (see references) et al 2004 research combining satellite, geomorphological and sedimentological data on sea levels in the Maldives show that over the last 4,000yrs the populations have continued to prosper through sea level changes of -0.6metres to +1.0 metres. Dr Morner has confirmed the Islands of Tuvulu, Fiji, Vanuatu and Tegua all show no signs of rising oceans. Satellite observations since 2000 appear to confirm there is a cessation of any rising tendency and that an actual reduction in levels is starting. Dr Morner can be reached on - morner@pog.nu.

Dr Vincent Gray (see references) agrees, confirming the sea level in Auckland has been the same since 1960.

6 Dr. Jennifer Marohasy (biologist; Senior Fellow Institute of Public Affairs Think Tank), in an interview on Australian ABC Radio Counterpoint program in answering questions made the following points. Global temperatures have “actually been coming down over the past 10 years and “the head of the IPCC has actually acknowledged it.”

7 The IPCC mathematical model uses ice core data to represent CO2 levels as opposed to readily available historic data. Graphically depicted from 1920 -1960 the IPCC data gives a neat straight line from 300ppm to 320ppm the corresponding historic line gives an highly irregular line in a range from 287ppm to 472ppm. An unchanging forty year straight line record of any aspect of nature is ‘ridiculous.’ (See attached graph).

8 Dr Phil Chapman geophysicist and astronaut was reported in an article Australian 23rd April 08 that four major climate monitoring stations had reported that global temperatures had been stationary or slowly declined over the last ten years and that it cooled by 0.70C in 2007. Chapman postulated that lack of sun spot activity allied to that fast drop in temperature could be the entry into the next Global Cold Period.

Prof David Caroly, Australian April 29th, replied to this statement with his own acceptance of cooling but attributing it to the cold currant La Nina cycle. Unfortunately for Prof Caroly El Nino and La Nina influence weather events along the path of the associated global currents but they have absolutely no net effect on global temperature. In the oceans heating and cooling of water due to ice melt only transfers nutrition and allows the transfer of heating and cooling events to other areas of the oceans. There is no net loss or gain of heat energy. Caroly states that the cooling doesn’t change anything. In this he is right, there was never anything to change, CO2 induced global warming always was and still is a fraud.The hockey stick curve of accelerated atmospheric CO2 content is obviously a function of the fake 300ppm catching up with the actual measured air content. This rapid catch up curve was allied to an unsubstantiated forecast model embodying the theory that 18% of the anthropogenic CO2 produced is accumulating in the atmosphere and will continue to do so for centuries unless we get our carbon dioxide levels down to almost zero levels.

16

Recently on ABC radio Dr Flannery hysterically announced that, due to the incredibly fast climate changes starting to be recognised, the government had to immediately institute a program of generating sulphur dioxide so that within five years massive amounts can be released into the atmosphere to block out some of the sun’s heat to prevent unstoppable disastrous Global Warming.

This is proof positive of the idiocy of the whole group concept. Sulphur dioxide is a poisonous gas. It is heavier that carbon dioxide it is partially soluble in water to form an acid. It is the source of acid rain. This is the material, according to this highly regarded global warming advocate should be pushed continuously into our atmosphere in huge volumes. Not genocide but globacide.

The atmospheric CO2 accumulation theory is based on ancient CO2 found in the atmosphere. As glaciers formed in the last ice age are continuing to melt, and pressure released glacial water is also being released, it is rather obvious that from these there will be a continuous flow of “ancient” CO2 molecules into the atmosphere. So the molecule a scientist is examining may be a 20,000 year old molecule released last week.

The last word on the hockey stick curve is that the CO2 rise ceased in 1998 and is probably on its way down.

The hockey match is about to end. The IPCC will hang on as long as it can as a lot more investor sheep will come in to be shorn. This is the golden fleece of legends past.

The CO2 global warming story has been thirty years in the faking. They wasted thirty years organising the world’s anti warming program, why the doomsday urgency now? Gore’s latest - (August 07) “We only have ten years!” Could it be they have already seen the walls of their campaign crumbling.

“In terms of electricity generation, the IPCC envisage that renewable energy can provide 30 to 35% of electricity by 2030 (up from18% in 2005) at a carbon price of up to US $50/ton and that nuclear power can rise from 16% to18%. They also warn that higher oil prices might lead to the exploitation of high-carbon alternatives such as oil sands, oil shales, heavy oils and synthetic fuels from coal and gas, leading to increasing emissions, unless carbon capture and storage technologies are employed.

They do not tell of the incredible suffering and chaos that will occur while new power and food sources are put in place.

PLEASE THINK “If I don’t do something myself no one will and then what will happen to me, my family, my friends, my business, my job, my landholding, my country – the one that once we the Australians people owned.

Copyright Carl Dransfield 2007 9 Diamentina Way, Laurieton NSW, Australia, 2443 This document may be reproduced in whole part for public education and discussion purposes

17

Assamatov, HI., 2006. “On long-term variations of the total irradiance and decrease of global temperature of the Earth after a maximum of xxiv cycle of activity and irradiance.” Bulletin of Crimea Observatory, Vol. 103, pp. 122-127.

Beck, E.-G., 2007. “180 Years of CO2 gas analysis by chemical methods.” Energy & Environment, in press, pp. 1-17.

Callendar, G.S., 1958. “On the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.” Tellus, Vol. 10, pp. 243-248.BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE, William T. KeetonCopyright 1967 W.W. Norton & Company SBN 393-09715-317, 717-718

CARBON CYCLE, Scurlock and Hall, – Inside Science – New Scientist Nov 1961.To counter the time lag between publication and present the upper limits of Pool 1 ranges have been used. Pool selection and parts per gigatonne extrapolations are from this papers author.

CHEMISTRY With Inorganic Qualitive Analysis – Third Edition 1989 T. Moeller, J. Bailar, J.Klienberg, C. Guss, M. Castellion, C. Metz. Copyright Harcoourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers ISBN 0-15-506492-4H3CO3.Table 20.5 p509 Seawater pH 8.5 (alkaline).Page 748 “ Only approximately one out of every 400 CO2 molecules in solution reacts with water to give carbonic acidHurd, B., 2006. “Analyses of CO2 and other atmospheric gases.” MG News, No. 86.pp. 10-11

EARTH Second Edition, F. Press, R. SieverCopyright 1978 W.H. Freeman and Company ISBN 0 7167-0289-41. pgs 269 – 274 Ocean Surface Processes CO2

concentrations, carbonate compensation level 3.5k approx.

2. Numerical Data Pertaining to the Earth.3. pgs 283 – 294 Carbonate deposition, Biological

precipitation, Coral reefs, Origin of coral reefs, Carbonate platform.

Idso, S.B., 1988. “Carbon dioxide and climate in the Vostok ice core.” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 22, pp. 2341-2342.

IPCC, 2007. Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. Summary Jdr Policymakers. Fourth Assessment report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change, Geneva, Switzerland.

lndermuhle, A., Monnin, E,, Stauffer, B. and Stocker, T.F., 2000. “Atmospheric CO2 concentration from 60 to 20 kyr BP from the Taylor Dome ice core, Antarctica.” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, pp. 735-738.

www..21stcenturysciencetech.com

ZwaIly, H.J. et al., 2005. “Greenland and Antarctic Vol. 51, pp. 509-527

Indermuhie, A. et al., 1999. “Holocene carbon-cycle dynamics based on CO2 trapped in ice at Taylor Dome,

Jaworowski, Z., 1994a. “Ancient atmosphere: Validity of ice records.” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.161-171.

Jaworowski, Z., 1999. “The Global Warming Folly.” 21st Century Sci EI

Jaworowski, Z., Segalstad, T.V. and Hisdal, V., l992a. “Atmospheric CO2 and global warming: A critical review.” Second revised edition. Meddelelser 119, Norsk Polarinstitutt, Oslo, p. 76.

Jaworowski, Z., Segaistad, TV. and Ono, N., 1992b. “Do glaciers tell a true atmospheric CO2 story?” The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 114, pp. 227-284.

Jaworowski, Z., 1999. “The Global Warming Folly.” 21st Century Sci EI

Zbigniew Jaworowski. M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc. See “Ice Core Data Show No Carbon Dioxide Increase” and other references at http//wwww.21stcenturysciencetech.com under Global Warming.

Keeling, CD., 1986. “Reassessment of late 19th century atmospheric carbon dioxide variations.” Tellus, Vol. 38B, pp. 87-105.

Khilyuk, L.F. and Chilingar, G.V., 2006. “On global forces of nature driving the Earth’s climate. Are humans involved?” Environmental Geology, Vol. 50, pp. 899-910.

Kurschner, W.M., van der Burgh, J., Visscher, H. and Dilcher, D.L., 1996. “Oak leaves as biosensors of late Neogene and early Pleistocene paleoatmospheric CO2 concentrations.” Marine Micropaleontology, Vol. 27, pp. 299-3 12.

Mcintyre, S. and McKitrick, R., 2003. “Corrections to the Mann et al. (1998) proxy data base and Northern hemispheric average temperature series.” Energy & Environment, Vol. 14, No.6, pp.751-771.

Morner, N-A., Tooley, M. and Possnert, G., 2004. “New perspectives for the future of the Maldives.” Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 4O.pp. 177-182.

MERK INDEX 12th edition CO2

Schneider, D.P. et al., 2006. “Antarctic temperatures over the past two centuries from ice cores.” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33:

The Blue Planet – An Inroduction To Earth Science, Brian J Skinner Et Al – John Wiley & Sons 1999

18

19

Global Warming a Convenient Litany of Lies. SUMMARY

Nations sign international carbon agreements at their peril – the Greenhouse Gas Global Warming storyis a total fraud aimed at transferring control of national resources, legislative powers and wealth to globalfinanciers and international bankers.If you do nothing else, open the attachment and read the abstract on page 1This shows how little carbon dioxide humanity makes per year compared to the daily turnover of amounts of carbon dioxide cycled in the planet’s normal functioning and how little heat per square metre this warming creates. This research paper was

written to show that manmade carbon dioxide - Green House Gases - are in such relatively small quantities that at even five times present levels they could not possibly influence global temperatures or weather. Most of the statistical numbers quoted are from the International Panel on Climate Change reports from 2003 to the present. Much of the data in these reports have been exaggerated or falsified and yet still show insufficient heating capacity to make any global changes possible. Even though IPCC global warming pseudo science is pitifully weak and its forecasts useless, the globalpolitical and financial power behind it is enormous. Enthusiastic bankers,

brokers and carbon traders arealready rapidly transferring the wealth of nations to themselves and planning to

grab much more.It is the poor and powerless and developing economies that do all the paying. This is already happening with food and oil traders pushing prices beyond the reach of some twenty percent of the world’s population.

Global Warming is a worldwide financial scam.The Australian Government has chosen to block debate in this country and further to be strong advocates of carbon trading and industrial and agricultural destruction on behalf of UK/USA hedge funds, speculators and monopolistic international resource grabbing schemes.In the interests of the global warmers Australians are about to experience business, mining, power and agriculture sectors being forced to throw more than Three Trillion Dollars into unnecessary plant and process modifications of mines, power stations, vehicles and transport, all in the name of global warming.This is wasting the real future funding money that could rebuild infrastructure, modernise our industry and restore the run down medical and educational systems currently existing. Unless this is stopped, Australians are going to watch massive amounts of our money and assets being funnelled off to international and local carbon traders and massive amounts being spent on unnecessary CO2 sequestration, ethanol, windmills etc.Every developing country that signs an international carbon trading agreement will be signing over control of their precious resource assets and agriculture to faceless international organisations. Regardless of whether it is solely an agreement between countries or a global agreement the international intent is to control all nations with free trade control and carbon agreements. Once entered there will be no redress possible and severe penalties for non compliance have been planned.The global warming story is supported by emotional worshipping believers but never offer proof of the scientific basis of their promotion. Constantly new information is released supposedly

20

This paper agrees there are climatic and pollution problems but CO2 is not one of them and any attempt to limit or control anthropogenic CO2 is a waste of our nation’s wealth, manpower and real correction of the problems to be faced.Has any government

member considered free trade and carbon trading twenty years ahead to visualise our

country when we have sold all our power companies, our mines, our water, out roads, our food supplies to

foreigners? The adoption of carbon

trading will put the power for Australia to improve its total wealth per capita at risk

and when the bills come in it is the poor and powerless that will do all the paying. Diversion of wealth

already accounts for the increasing poverty among average Australians – once and future voters. We are

no longer self sufficient in food – unbelievable but true.The IPCC has never presented any actual research proof of their claims and

their spokesmen never reveal thescience to support increasingly dramatic new findings that make their

campaign much more pressing. The truth of the fraud will be obvious well before 2112 - someone will be

blamed for the losses! From C W Dransfield 9 Diamentina Way

Laurieton NSW 2443 Australia

21