water dornbush (set 1) - uwgb
TRANSCRIPT
11/9/2008
1
1
Dr. Dornbush
LS 464
Soil Water
• A. Critical to plant growth, water quality,
groundwater, rivers, etc.
– Too much problems
– Too little problems
• B. Soil is a leaky water reservoir
– Excess water:
• Runoffs
• Deep percolation (leaching,
groundwater recharge)2
C. Questions to consider:
– Why does soil retain some water yet allow
part to drain deeper?
– What forces hold water in soil?
– What mechanisms are important to water
flow in soil?
– What limits water flow?
– How do soil texture & structure affect
water flow and retention?
– How do plants interact with soil water?3
D. Water is unique
– Polar – uneven charge
• Hydrogen bonds
• High surface tension
(attraction to other water
molecule>attract to air)
4
How does this relate
to soil?
E. Soil water is described by it’s energy state
(Potential; or psi)
• Always moves from high potential low potential
5
1. Matric forces or potentials (or matric
tension) m
• Negative pressure or tension due to Adhesion
and Cohesion (from Hydrogen bonding)
• More surface area more adsorbed water
–Clay vs. sand
• Less water (drier soil) stronger bond to
soil (Q: Why?)
6
F. Forces affecting the potential energy of
water: In other words, what affects where
water moves in soil?
11/9/2008
2
• h = 0.15/r; h = ht water will rise; r =
radius of tube or pores; (units of cm)
• h is inversely proportional to r
• The wider the radius, the less water
directly interacting with glass wall
7
How does capillarity relate to wet vs dry soil
question?2. Gravitational forces (gravitational
potential) g
• negative or positive; depends on ref. point
8
F. Forces acting on water in soil:
9
F. Forces acting on water in soil:
3. Osmotic (Solute) Potential (ψo or ψs):
• Relative to pure water, this has a negative
energy potential
• Diffusion favors water movement from
lower to higher solute concentration, but
only when separated by a semipermeable
membrane
• Not that important within soil but can be
very important at soil-root interface – Saline
soils
4. Submergence potential (saturated soils) p
• Hydrostatic pressure (positive)
10
F. Forces acting on water in soil:
11
G. Soil Water Potential (ψt):
• Just simple addition of the above factors
• ψt is stated relative to a reference
• Reference – the energy state (ability to do work) of pure, free water at a specified elevation (the soil surface); (ψt = 0).
• ψt = ψm + ψg + ψo + ψp
• ψt - amount of energy required to move a quantity of pure water from point A to point B; assumes both points have equal temperatures, pressures, and osmotic potentials.
12
• The units for ψt:
• MPa (SI pressure) or J m-3 (SI energy)
– Mpa = 1000 kPa
• Also see bars (non-SI pressure)
• 1 MPa = 106 J m-3 = 10 bars = 10 atmospheres
Water always moves from areas of higher to lower water potential
• So in practice, you can predict where water will move by comparing the soil water potential at two different locations
G. Soil Water Potential (ψt):
11/9/2008
3
13
• Bench marks:
-0.03 MPa = field capacity (-33 kPa)
-1.5 MPa = permanent wilting point (-1500 kPa)
• Field capacity – tension at which remaining
water cannot be removed by force of gravity
• Permanent wilting point – tension at which
remaining water is held too tightly to be removed
by plants
G. Soil Water Potential (ψt):
14
Plant Available Water:
15
I. How do we measure soil moisture?
1. Soil Moisture Content: (Water Amount)
a. Gravimetric Moisture (θw):
– (g H2O/ g 105oC soil)*100
– Soil Dry Mass - drying to constant mass at
105oC (24 to 48 hrs)
– Easiest to measure, very common, but
destructive
θw = 100*(Soil Wet wt. – 105oC wt.)/ (105oC wt)
16
1. Soil Moisture Content con’t.
b. Volumetric Content (θv):
• (cm3 H2O/ cm3 soil)
– (recall 1 g H2O = 1 cm3 H2O)
• Very common method, preferred over θw
because it reports H2O quantity/soil volume
• Can be measured directly or using Time
Domain Reflectometry (TDR)
17
TDR Basics
18
TDR Basics
• Basically the machine sends a high-frequency
electromagnetic pulse down the probe
• The speed at which the wave propagates
along the probe depends on the soil moisture
• This rate is calibrated with θw to determine
θv
11/9/2008
4
19
Pro’s:
• Easy to measure
• Allows for site water budgets (quantity of water per unit soil volume )
Con’s:
• They don’t tell us squat about how available the water actually is for plants or drainage!
• Cross site comparisons are difficult because soil composition differs (recall the plant available water figure)
1. Soil Moisture Content
20
Plant Available Water:
21
Soil Moisture Content (with Soil Properties):
c. Water Filled Pore Space (WFPS):
Also called percent saturation
• (cm3 H2O/ cm3 soil pore space)*100
• Common and easy to measure
• Use θv with soil bulk density (g/cm3 soil
volume) and particle density (g/cm3 particles)
– Particle density is ~ constant at 2.65 g/cm3
22
c. Water Filled Pore Space con’t.
• Bulk density – mass of dry soil per unit bulk
soil volume (volume includes both soil
particles and pores)
• Particle density – mass of soil particle
divided by volume of soil particles
23
• Soil Pore Space (%) =
100 * [1 – (Bulk Density/ Particle Density)]
~ 50% for good loamy soils
• Sample WFPS (%) =
100 * [(cm3 H2O/ cm3 soil) / (cm3 pore/ cm3 soil)]
OR simplified
100 * [(θv) / Soil Pore Space]
c. Water Filled Pore Space con’t.
24
What additional information is provided by
WFPS?
• Provides more biologically relevant
information about soil environment
– gas and nutrient diffusion or microbial
movement
• For example, 60% WFPS is ideal for microbial
activity (Linn and Doran 1984)
• Aids in cross-soil comparisons, i.e. 60% WFPS
is the 60% WFPS
11/9/2008
5
25
What additional information is provided by
WFPS?
• Problems:
– Still not a good measure of water
availability (see slide 20)
– NEED A MEASURE OF WATER
ENERGY STATUS!
26
Soil H2O Potential: (Energy State)
• To get soil water potential (ψt), just like our
equation (i.e. in pressure or energy units)
you need to apply a tension (suction) to a
volume of soil.
• Field measurement is often done with a
tensiometer
27
Why is a tension measure the best?
• Measure of work needed:
• Convertible into units of photosynthesis (C)
• Convertible into solar energy, oil, etc
28
But wasn’t WFPS just as good? Isn’t 1 cm3
H2O per 1 cm3 pore space equal for all soils?
• Not for water availability - soil tension
varies
1. Differences in surface area (SA)
2. Differences in pore width
Soil Particles Diameter (mm)
Clay < 0.002
Silt 0.002 to 0.05
Sand 0.05 to 2.0
29
Q1: Does a bucket of clay or a bucket of
marbles have a greater SA?
Q2: How does pore distribution differ?
Lambers et al. 1998
30
Q3: Does a sandy or clay rich soil have a more negative ψt
potential at the same water content?
Q4: Which would retain more of its water two days
following a saturating rain?
11/9/2008
6
Figure 5.24 Water content–matric potential curve of a loam soil as related to different terms used to describe
water in soils. The wavy lines in the diagram to the right suggest that measurements such as field capacity are
only approximations. The gradual change in potential with soil moisture change discourages the concept of
different “forms” of water in soils. At the same time, such terms as gravitational and available assist in the
qualitative description of moisture utilization in soils.
32
Conclusion
• Water quantity is useful for budgets, and some
biology, but energy is the unit of the universe.
• With the quantity of water set equal, ψt is
primarily a function of soil particle size (and
soil organic matter content)
• The same basic factors also apply to water
movement through the soil