water or sc organic solvents - wordpress.com · liquefaction of celluloses of different features in...
TRANSCRIPT
“Solid acid catalyzed Lignocellulosic Biomass conversion in Water or SC organic solvents”
Understanding and overcoming limitations
Nadine ESSAYEM
Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l’environnement de Lyon,
IRCELYON-CNRS
VII BRAZILIAN SCHOOL OF GREEN CHEMISTRY MEETING
Novel processes for the renewable industry
9th and 10th – October 2017-INT-Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse et l ’Environnement
de Lyon
100 permanent staff ~150 non permanent staff (60 PhD-25-35 post-doc)
Team Sustainable Chemistry : from fundamental to applications
Design of nanomaterials-Molecular precursors, hybrids- acido-basic catalysts- metallic catalysts- Organometallic complexes
Sustainable chemistry:
- heterogeneous catalysis
metallic, acido-basic….
- catalysis in water
- Catalysis in SC organic media
Catalysis for lignocellulose
- Sugars, carboxylicacids, polyols- wood, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin
Axe 2
Team : Sustainable Chemistry: from fundamental to applications
Thanks
Doctorants : Flora Chambon, Chuc Nguyen, Amar Dandach, Alexandre Demolis,Post-doc: Quynh Nguyen, Youssef SwessiColleagues: Franck Rataboul, Pascal Fongarland, Marion Eternot,
Catalysis for Lignocellulosic biomass
Lignocellulose
Hemicellulose
Cellulose
Lignine
GlucosePhénols,
biooils
Pentose
Propylène
Glycol
Levulinic(ate) acid
Sorbitol
Diols, lactone, 2 MTHF, 3 MTHF
(hemi)celluloses
functionalizedisosorbide diméthylisosorbide
Furfural
Diacides
FDCA
Plateform
molecules,
biooils
lactate
fructose
polyols
Lactic acid
Aconitic acid
HMF
Xylitol
WO2014096305
WO2004007560
WO2011 107712WO2012085362WO2014097040
WO2013030131
WO2012022853WO2012085362
WO2014023902
WO2012156479
WO2014122319
FR3008970
WO2011107712
Br
WO2014122319
The team Patent Porfolio
WO2013030132
Team : Sustainable Chemistry : from fundametal to applications
HMF FDCA
Hexoses
6
Lignocellulosicbiomass
Cellulose
Hemicelluloses
Lignin
Chemicals from raw biomass liquefaction assisted byheterogeneous catalysts
Biomass deconstruction
Fractions transformations Large variety of
valuable coumpounds
GlucoseHMF
FurfuralLevulinic acid
Etc …
Drawbacks:- modifications of the native components- Difficult isolation of hemicellulose- Low carbon efficiency and sustainability
Advantages:- Accessibility to isolated fractions - Pure component-> Se - Avoid possible catalysts poisoning with lignin or
hemicellulose fragments
Usual approach
7
Hemicelluloses
Lignin
Large variety of valuable coumpounds
GlucoseHMF
FurfuralLevulinic acid
Etc …
Lignocellulosicbiomass
Direct un-pretreated wood fractionation/conversion
Chemicals from raw biomass liquefaction assisted by heterogeneous catalysts
Our approach:
Liquid water // SC organic solvents
solid acid catalysts
Chemicals
Next Challenge ?
Outline
Cellulose vs wood in Water
• Understanding limitations and overcoming:
• Analytic tools development
• Uncatalyzed vs catalyzed cellulose liquefaction: kinetics
• Improvement of solid Lewis acid catalyst efficiency
• Cellulose vs wood conversion into Lactic acid: Kinetics, mechanism
SC organic solvents
• Potential of SC organic fluids
• Usual approaches
• New challenges
9
Direct conversion of wood components into chemicalsin organic solvents: recent advances
[1] C.Chesi, I.B.D. deCastro, M.T.Clough, P.Ferrini, R.Rinaldi ChemCatChem 8(2016) 2079-2088.
[2] M.V.Galkin, A.T.Smit, E.Subbotina, K.A.Artemenkon, J.Bergquist, W.J.J.Huijgen, J.S.M.Samec ChemSusChem9(2016)3280-3287.
[3] B.F.Sels et al. Green Chem 7(2015)5035.
Y.Wang, 2016 [5]Pt/NbP, cyC628% alkanes
[5] Y. Wang, Nature Communication 2016, DOI:10.1038
Reductive catalytic Fractionation, Lignin first
Phenolics Y~50% + Solvents, H2O, MeOH, EG, THF..
Bert Sels, 2015 [3]Pd/C, H2,
M.M.Abu-Omar, 2015 [4]Zn-Pd/C, H2,
R.Rinaldi,2016 [1]Ni Raney, isoPrOH
J.S.Samec,2016 [2]Pd/C, ethanol
Phenolics Y~40-50% +
Carbohydrate residue
[4] M.M.Abu-Omar et al. Green Chem 17(2015) 1492
Carbohydrate residue
10
Direct catalytic conversion of wood carbohydrates into chemicals in hot water: recent advances
Ethylene glycol
Propylene glycolT.Zhang, 2012 [1]
WC, H2,50% EG+PG
+
H.Kobayashi,A.Fukuoka,2016 [2]
Pyrolized wood +HCl~80 % G+X
[2] H.Kobayashi et al., Catal. Commun. 2014, 54, 22
[1] T. Zhang et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6383-6390.
[3] A. Fukuoka et al., Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 692-696
Lactic acid 2017 [5]
ZrW
[5] N.Essayem et al, ChemCatChem 9 (2017) 1-7
SorbitolPt/C,H260% X+S
ZrP-Ru/C, H2
Xylitol
+
H.Kobayashi,A.Fukuoka2014 [3]
T.Zhang2017 [5]
[4] Q.Liu, T.Zhang, Y.Liao, C.Cai, J.Tan, T.Wang, S.Qiu, M.He, L.Ma ACS Sustainable
Chemistry &Engineering 5(2017)5940-5950
+ solid lignin as residue
Objectives: deeper understanding the phenomenon
the role of solid Lewis acid catalyst on the mechanism ofcellulose/wood hydrothermal liquefaction.
Solid Lewis acid
11
Solid Lewis acid catalyzed lactic acid formation from biomass :
Cellulose vs wood
A stepwise approach
Limitations understanding Cellulose vs wood into Lactic acid:- Analytic tools development - Kinetic studies of uncatalyzed and ZrW catalyzed celluloses liquefaction- Improvement of Solid Lewis acid catalyst efficiency: key parameters?
12
Homogeneous catalysts in water
Production of lactic acid from biomass (sugars, cellulose, lignocellulose)
Up to 91% lactic acid yield from cellulose with ErCl3
13
Heterogeneous catalysts in water
Up to 32% lactic acid yield from cellulose with Pb(OH)2/rGO, no direct conversion of wood
Production of lactic acid from biomass (sugars, cellulose, lignocellulose)
Rôle of water self protolysis:
2H2O OH- + H3O+ Ke= [H3O+][OH-]
[H+]=f(T)
Difficulties/advantages: Hot water = reactive solvent
OO
OH
HOO
O HO
OH
OH
OH
Cellulosen
H+
OO
OH
HOO
O HO
OH
OH
n
H+
(homogeneous
Bronsted acids)H2O
H+
- 3H2OO
CH2OH
O
+ 2 H2O
O
HO
Olevulinic acid
HO
O
HO OH
OH
OH
+ H OH
O
formic acidglucose5-HMF
HO
O
HO OH
OH
OH
glucose
0
10
20
30
40
50
150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195
0
10
20
30
40
50
150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195
Dis
solu
tion d
e la c
ellulo
se (%
)
Température °C
F.Chambon, F.Rataboul, A.Cabiac, C.Pinel, E.Guillon, N.Essayem, Green Chem 2009
M. Chaplin, Water Structure and Science, 2009
Promotion of cellulose liquefaction(24h)
Cellulose liquefaction in hydrothermal conditions
Lactic acid synthesis from cellulose
Cellulose hydrolysis in hot water
Conditions: 1.6g cellulose, 0.68g catalyst, 65g H2O, 190°C, 24h, 50 bar He
Lactic acid formation:Cooperation betwee H3O+ (water self protolysis) and solid Lewis acid sites.
N. Essayem, F.Chamcon, F.Rataboul, A.Cabiac, E.Guillon WO 2011 098683, WO2012 085361
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
H-U
SY
Cs2
.5H0.
5PW
12O
40
ss c
atal
yseu
r
Cs2
SnPW
12O
40
C-S
O3H ZrS
ZrWSnA
lAlW
% m
ol
OPS
Produits non identifiés
5-HMF
Acétol
Acide acétique
Acide lévulinique
Acide formique
Acide lactique
Glucose
Earlier objectives:LA yield increase via catalysts design and experimental conditions optimization
F.Chambon, F.Rataboul, A. Cabiac, C.Pinel, E.Guillon and N.Essayem Appl. Catal. B:Environnemental 105(1-2) (2011) 171-181
Conditions: 2 g cellulose, 60 mL water, 190 °C)
Celluloses DP CI (%) Particules sizes ()
microcrystalline 155 80 20
Sigmacell 560 70 fibers
Avicel 155 80 50
Liquefaction of celluloses of different featuresin hot water
Pathway for celluloses liquefaction
Celluloses features
Sigmacell: DP 560 , CI=70%
Avicel: DP 155, CI=80%
Kinetic constant (h-1)* Activation energy (kJ.mol-1)
Sigmacell Avicel Sigmacell Avicel
0.687 0.140 57.8 88.0
*T=200°C, Pseudo first order for each step
Kinetic Constant -Activation Energy
P.Fongarland, N.Essayem, F.Rataboul Ind.Eng.Chem.Res.56(2017) 126-134
Kinetic of uncatalyzed Cellulose liquefaction: influence of cellulose features
17
Analytical methods
Cellulose fibers
Solid phase(cellulose + catalyst+residue)
DRX/13C-NMR/
Solid catalyst
Oligosaccharides(IC-amperometric detector)
Soluble polymers
Organic acids/sugars/diolsOther products detected by HPLC
HPLC with RID
H2O
Liquid phase TOC (mgC/l)= solubility of cellulose
Rdti= 100 x (nCi/6) x (ni/nglucose unit)
Solubility (%)=100 x (mgCsolubility/mgCinitial)
Rdt OPS= solubility (%) – Ʃrdti
IR:cellulose conversion
Solid carbon residue (%)= conversion of cellulose - solubility
Appl. Catal. B:Environnemental 105 (2011) 171-181
ChemSusChem 6 (2013) 500 – 507
Appl. Catal. A:General, 504(2015), 664-671
F.Chambon, F.Rataboul, A. Cabiac, C.Pinel, E.Guillon and N.Essayem
Proposed mechanism
Efficient solid Lewis acid for Lactic acid formation from cellulose:….Identification of limiting parameters
Statement: saccharides conversion in water: high catalyst/substrate ratio are usual
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5%NbOH 10%NbOH 15%NbOH 50%NbOH100%NbOH
Conversion
HMF yield
fructose yield
otehrs yield
Rodrigo Lopes de Souza, Franck Rataboul, Nadine Essayem
Challenges 3(2) (2012) 212-232 doi:10.3390/challe3020212
0
10
20
30
40
50
20% 42% 53%
Yie
ld o
f p
rod
uc
ts, %
catalyst / cellulose (%)
Conditions: T=190°C, t=24h, mcellulose MN 301= 1,6g, m
H2O=65g, Ar purge
LA
How to improve the control of the selectivity?
Outline
Cellulose vs wood in Water
• Understanding limitations and overcoming:
• Analytic tools development
• Uncatalyzed vs catalyzed cellulose liquefaction: kinetics
• Enhancement of solid Lewis acid catalyst efficiency
• Cellulose vs wood conversion into Lactic acid: Kinetics, mechanism
SC organic solvents
• Potential of SC organic fluids
• Usual approaches
• New challenges
Bioresource Technology 149 (2013) 216–224
Acid catalyzed hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to levulinic acid
Chemical Engineering Journal 217 (2013) 61–70
Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse
LvA + FA
21
Chain value:LCB Glucose HMF LvA + FA
Direct wood conversion into chemicals catalyzed by soluble Brnsted acids:
Kinetic models in literature:
Autoclave V = 100 ml
Masse de cellulose = 1,6 g Mass d'eau distille = 65 gMasse de catalyseur = 0,68 g
(cellulose MN 301(DP: 400-500; ∅ 2-20 μm))
Autoclave V = 2,5 L
Conditions:wood= 38.4gcatalyst = 16,3 gwater = 1,56 kgT = 190 ° CP = 11 atm
(∅<500 microns)
% H2O 8.70
% C 48.60
% Cellulose 37.20
% Hémicellulose 19.10
% Lignine 30.60
Direct solid Lewis acid catalyzed wood liquefaction into lactic acid: a kinetic approach
Cellulose Pine Wood sawdust
Substrate: cellulose MN301 Substrate: wood sawdust
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
3,00
3,50
Cellulosesubstrate
without ZrW
Cellulosesubstrate with
ZrW
woodsubstrate with
ZrW
Init
ial p
rod
uct
ion
rat
e (
g.L-1
.h-1
)
Lactic acid Formic acid Acetic acid
…..wood pretreatment would not be required
Modeling: comparison between wood and cellulose
Reaction rate equations were considered as pseudo-first-order kinetic (approach by Semans)
Good agreement between experimental and predicted data
High initial production rates of carboxylic acids using wood as substrate:
- Faster conversion of native cellulose- contribution of hemicellulose
- No negative effect of lignin on catalyst activity
Y.Swesi, C.Nguyen, T.T.H.Vu, F.Rataboul, M.Eternot, P.Fongarland, N.Essayem ChemCatChem 9 (2017) 1-7
solid lignin in the residue
Direct solid Lewis acid catalyzed wood liquefaction into lactic acid: a kinetic and
mechanism a approach
Two parallel pathways
Y.Swesi, C.Nguyen, T.T.H.Vu, F.Rataboul, M.Eternot, P.Fongarland, N.Essayem ChemCatChem 9 (2017) 1-7
Outline
Cellulose vs wood in Water
• Understanding limitations and overcoming:
• Analytic tools development
• Uncatalyzed vs catalyzed cellulose liquefaction: kinetics
• Improvement of solid Lewis acid catalyst efficiency
• Cellulose vs wood conversion into Lactic acid: Kinetics, mechanism
SC organic solvents
• Potential of SC organic fluids
• Usual approaches
• New challenges – analytical tools development
Supercritical Fluid properties
Unique Phase
Principal physical properties
T>Tc: the increase of P can not liquefy the fluid
Clustering effect:
Clusters Formation:
- Local increase of the concentration solute /solvent
- Dependence with T and P
Tunable Dielectric Constant of FSC
Broad variations for the most polar SCFs:
NH3, H2O, CFC, N2O
solvents Tc(°C)
Pc(Bars)
solvent Tc(°C)
Pc(Bar)
water 374 220 2-butanol 263.0 41.0
CO2 31.1 73.9 n-butane 156.9 74.3
NH3 132.8 112.8 diethylether 192.6 36.1
acetone 235.5 47.6 n-pentane 196.6 33.7
methanol 240.0 79.5 ethylene 93.3 50.4
ethanol 243.0 63.8 N2O 36.5 72.4
1-propanol 263.6 51.7 CH3-NH2 156.9 74.3
Ligno Cellulosic Biomass (LCB) Liquefaction with SC organic solvents
Advantages of SC organic solvents :- Low critical coordinates- Large choice of SC solvents - Reactive solvent - Tunable solvent properties ….
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
…..insolublein conventional solvents
LCB SC organic Fluids
Solubility issues
Catalysis
Selectivity
0100 501500100 50150 0100 50150
/ppm /ppm /ppm
(a) (b) (c)*
*
*
**
*
0100 501500100 50150 0100 50150
/ppm /ppm /ppm
(a) (b) (c)*
*
*
**
*
8
SC MeOH
SC MeOH 90%: 249 °C / 9.5 MPa
0
20
40
60
80
100
MeOH 100%
1 min2 hours
Solu
bili
sati
on
/ %
300 °C / 10 MPasuper-critical 240 °C / 6.5 MPa
sub-critical
MeOH 90%
2 hours
MeOH 90%
2 hours
1 min
250 °C / 8 MPanear-critical
MeOH 90%
2 hours
1 min
F.Ratabou, N.Essayem, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 799-805
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Liq
uéfa
ctio
n d
e la
cellu
lose
(%
) 300°C, 1 min50 bars 52 bars 60 bars
n-Butanol iso-Butanol sec-Butanol
SC BuOH isomers,
n-BuOH Tc=290°C, Pc=44bar
A.Demolis, M.Eternot, N.Essayem,F.Rataboul
New Journal of Chemistry 40 (2016) 3747-3754
Usual approach LCB liquefaction into bio-oils.
LCB liquefaction into bio-oils.
Liquefaction of LCB in SC ethanol: Mass balances
FeedstockP (bar)
solid residue(wt%)
light products yield (wt%)
Gasesyield(wt%)
Bio Oil yield(wt %)
Massbalance (wt%)
Pine wood 102 60 10 1.6 33 105
Lignin (CIMV) 111 48 5 2.7 40 96
Cellulose
(microcryst.)
111 44 13 2.0 50 109
Conditions: m solid biomass=2.5g, m ethanol=27.0g, T=280°C, Treatment time=1h
N. Q. Bui, P. Fongarland F. Rataboul, C. Dartiguelongue, N. Charon, , C. Vallée, N. EssayemFuel Processing Technology, 134 (2015) 378-386
Usual approach
Liquefaction of LCB in SC ethanol: Pine wood and models : lignin (CIMV), microcrystalline cellulose
32
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Retention time (min)
EtOH after blank test
Absolute EtOH
Lignin
Cellulose
Pine
EtOH
EtOH – blank test
Lignin
Cellulose
Pine-wood
GC MS Analysis of liquid products
N. Q. Bui, P. Fongarland F. Rataboul, C. Dartiguelongue, N. Charon, , C. Vallée, N. EssayemFuel Processing Technology, 134 (2015) 378-386
33
GC
retention
time (min)
Identified compounds Yields
( %)
proposed origin
1.9 Diethyl ether - C4H10O 0.29 solvent
2.0 Ethyl vinyl ether - C4H8O 0.03 solvent
2.1 Acetaldehyde - C2H4O 0.97 carbohydrate/lignin
2.9 Ethyl formate - HCOOC2H5 0.03 carbohydrate/lignin
3.4 2-Methylfuran - C5H6O 0.02 carbohydrate
3.6 Ethyl Acetate - C4H8O2 3.31 hemicellulose/lignin
6.0 Ethyl acrylate - CH2=CHCOOC2H5 0.03 cellulose
7.2 2-Ethoxytetrahydrofuran - C6H12O2 0.17 carbohydrate
12.9 Ethyl orthoformate - C7H16O3 0.01 carbohydrate
13.3 2,5-Diethoxytetrahydrofuran - C8H16O3 0.05 cellulose
14.8 Acetol - CH3C(O)CH2OH 0.01 cellulose
15.2 Ethyl-lactate - C5H10O3 0.86 cellulose
16.2 1-Hydroxy-2-butanone – C4H8O2 0.08 carbohydrates
17.1 Butanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ethyl ester - C6H12O3 0.36 carbohydrate
17.7 Ethyl glycolate - C4H8O3 1.86 cellulose
18.8 1-Hydroxy-2-pentanone - C5H10O2 0.19 hemicelluloses
19.2 Furfural - C5H4O2 0.07 hemicelluloses
21.7 Tetrahydrofurfuryl alcool - C8H14O3 0.09 hemicelluloses
23.7 2-Hydroxy-3-methylsuccinic acid - C5H8O5 0.07 cellulose
25.2 Diethyl methylsuccinate - C9H16O4 0.04 carbohydrate
26.0 2-Furanmethanol - C5H6O2 0.28 cellulose
26.8 Succinic acid, diethyl ester - C8H14O4 0.06 carbohydrate
30.7 2-Propanol, 1-(2-methoxy-1-methylethoxy)- - C7H16O3 0.07
31.2 Ethyl hydrogen glutarate - C7H12O4 0.04
33.0 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl- C6H8O2 0.10
33.8 o-Guaiacol - C7H8O2 0.11 lignin
GC MSidentification and quantification of
of detected liquid products
Total yield lightliquid products < 15 wt%
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
LCB liquefaction into chemicals combining a reactive SC fluid and a solid catalyst
[1] F.Ratabou, N.Essayem, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 799-805
[2] N.Essayem, G.Sapaly, M.Eternot, F.Rataboul WO 2014/001486
[3] L. Yang, X. Yang, E. Tian, H. Lin ChemSusChem 9 (2016) 36-41
An approach attracting more and more interest:
[1bis] A.Demolis, M.Eternot, N.Essayem,F.Rataboul
New Journal of Chemistry 40 (2016) 3747-3754
Methyl-levulinate yield (%)
0.3
12.5
17.5
19.5
16
20
350 mg cellulose, 150 mg catalyst
12
O
O
O
methyl-levulinate
MeOH 90%, 300 °C / 10 MPa / 1 minute
Catalyst
none
HZSM-5 (Si/Al = 28)
HY (Si/Al = 15)
Sulfated zirconia
Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40
Cs2HPW12O40
F.Ratabou, N.Essayem, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 799-805
Cellulose reactivity in SC MeOH medium in the presence of solid acid catalysts :methyl-levulinate formation
Entry AcidTemp.
(°C)
Pressure
(MPa)
Mass of
recovered
liquid
(g)
Mass of
recovered
solid
(g)
Dissolution
(%)
Yield sec-
butyl
levulinate
(%)
1a None 175 10 0 2 0 0
2a H2SO4 150 10 0.8 0.94 53 10
3a H2SO4 175 10 1.1 0.94 53 13
4a H3PO4 175 10 0.22 1.35 32 0.6
5b H2SO4 175 10 1.25 0.7 65 13Pine wood
m= 2g cellulose ou épicéa
Cellulose
Trans-But-2-ene : T c=155,4 °C, Pc= 41,0 Bars
Cellulose and pine wood conversion in SC But-2-ene in semi-continuous reactor
[2] N.Essayem, G.Sapaly, M.Eternot, F.Rataboul WO 2014/001486
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
New objectives
…..insolublein conventional solvents
LCB SC organic Fluids
Solubility issues
Catalysis
Selectivity
Selective liquefaction of one wood fractionHemicellulose/cellulose/lignin, using adequatSC organic solvent
38
Bottleneck: compositional analysis of the solid residue
?Compositional analysis
Fresh Biomass:
- Acid hydrolysis and simplesugars analysis.
- lignin ~ insoluble
Problem:
Formation of chars,insoluble via acid hydrolyses
≠ lignin-
13C CP/ MAS NMR : cellulose and solid residues
unusual solvant
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
New objectives: selective liquefaction/fractionation of wood fractions into chemicals
39
“FTIR as a simple tool to quantify unconverted lignin from chars in biomass liquefaction process: application to SC ethanol liquefaction of Pinewood” N. Q. Bui, P. Fongarland F. Rataboul, C. Dartiguelongue, N. Charon, , C. Vallée, N. EssayemFuel Processing Technology, 134 (2015) 378-386
direct quantification of the lignin content by FTIR: quantification of C=C absorption band at 1514cm-1
Cellulose(wt %)
Hemi-Celluloses
(wt%)
Char*, ≠lignin:(wt%)
Lignin(wt%)
Analyticaltechnic
Compositional analysis by acid hydrolysis
Compositional analysis and
FT-IR
FT-IR
Pine wood 37 0.8 19 0.4 - 31 0.8
Solid residuefrom pinewood
52 1.1 10 0.2 26 1.0 8 0.2
1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Ab
so
rba
nce
(a
.u.)
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Lignin
Lignin-280-1h
1514
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
Bottleneck: compositional analysis of the solid residue
New objectives: selective liquefaction/fractionation of wood fractions into chemicals
40 in SC ethanol : lignin and hemicellulose removal
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Pine-280-1h Lignin-280-1h Cellulose-280-1h
Re
sid
ue
fra
ctio
n (
%)
Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin
Residual fractions, batch conditions:
200 150 100 50 0
(ppm)
Pine wood
Pine wood treatment in SC ethanol
2000 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800
1606
1238
1031
11261269
13291427
15141655
1720
1369
Ab
so
rba
nce
(a
.u.)
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Lignin
Lignin treatment in SC ethanol
1464
0.2
13C CP MAS NMRpine
FTIR lignin
Investigation of SC ethanol
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
New objectives: selective liquefaction/fractionation of wood components into chemicals
Réacteur
Capteur de pression
Manomètre
Réservoir
Manomètre
Thermocouple
41F.Rataboul, N;Essayem Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research 50(2) (2011) 799-805
SolventTc
(°C)Pc
(bar)Critical density
(kg/m3)EtOH 241 61 271
- Experimental conditions:T,P, density> critical values
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
Batch reactor: many disadvantages….
Potential of Semi-Continuous reactor
N.Essayem , G.Sapaly, M.Eternot, F.Rataboul WO 2014001486 “Levulinates from BLC in SC butene”
Coupling Supercritical Organic Solvents and Catalysis in the frame of LCB valorization :
Conclusions:
LignoCellulosic Biomassinto Chemicals
Future developments will depend on
Development of analytic tools
Basic knowledge of Kinetic and mechanism
Understanding superficial properties/initial performances relationship….
Development of lab scale technics to probe solid / liquid interface
Design of robust solid catalyst
4th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CATALYSIS FOR BIOREFINERIES11-15 December 2017, Lyon, France
http://catbior2017.univ-lyon1.fr/en