water quality impairment and manure management

50
Water Quality impairment and manure management Ohio EPA February 6, 2007

Upload: mateo

Post on 16-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Water Quality impairment and manure management. Ohio EPA February 6, 2007. Mandate to Restore Polluted Waters. FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT [As Amended Through P.L. 107–303, November 27, 2002]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Water Quality impairment and manure management

Ohio EPA

February 6, 2007

Page 2: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Mandate to Restore Polluted Waters

FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT[As Amended Through P.L. 107–303, November 27, 2002]

SEC. 101. (a) The objective of this Act is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.

Page 3: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Leading Causes of Impairment2000 Ohio Water Resources Inventory

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Habitat Alterations

Siltation

Organic Enrichment

Nutrients

Flow Alteration

Metals

2000

1998

1996

1222

932.7

783.2

575.9

537.3

413.5

922.1

547.4

762.7

305.6

313.3

379

847.2

754.2

931.2

228

314.8

226.1

Miles Impaired By Cause

AssessmentCycle

Page 4: Water Quality impairment and manure management
Page 5: Water Quality impairment and manure management

What is Nutrient Impairment?• Effects of Nutrients on Aquatic Life

Nutrients, except under unusual circumstances, rarely approach concentrations in the ambient environment that are toxic to aquatic life. However, nutrients, while essential to the functioning of healthy aquatic ecosystems, can exert negative effects at much lower concentrations by altering trophic dynamics, increasing algal and macrophyte production (Sharpely et al. 1994), increasing turbidity, decreasing average dissolved oxygen (D.O.) concentrations, and increasing fluctuations in diel D.O. and pH. Such changes are caused by excessive nutrient concentrations resulting in shifts in species composition away from functional assemblages of intolerant species, benthic insectivores and top carnivores typical of high quality warmwater streams towards less desirable assemblages of tolerant species, niche generalists, omnivores, and detritivores typical of degraded warmwater streams.

Page 6: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Habitat Destruction and Nutrient EnrichmentEffects on Stream Fish Community

Healthy Fishery Degraded Fishery

Page 7: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Good Habitat(Shading, Better Nutrient Processing, More Living Places)

Page 8: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Poor Habitat(Full Sunlight, Boom and Bust Production, Fewer Living Spaces)

Page 9: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Historic Range of Smallmouth BassTrautman’s Fishes of Ohio

Page 10: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Viable Smallmouth Bass Fisheries

Page 11: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Nutrient StudySampling Locations 2004 & 2005

2004

2005

USGS ‘05

2006 Basins

Page 12: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Findings from Nutrient Study2004 & 2005

0.0100.100

1.000

PHOSPHORUS

0

5

10

15

20

25

D.O

. S

win

g

0 60 120 180Canopy

0

5

10

15

20

25

D.O

. S

win

g

Page 13: Water Quality impairment and manure management

D.O. Swings As Related to TP and Canopy

Page 14: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Gross Nutrient EnrichmentStillwater River

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time

D.O

. m

g/l

9/12–14/05

Page 15: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Buffers and Habitat Quality

Nothing here to filter pollution Bank erosion

Page 16: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Landuse and Nutrient Enrichment

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Percent Agricultural

0.010

0.100

1.000

Ph

osp

ho

rus

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Percent Agricultural

0

5

10

15

20

25

D.O

. Sw

ing

Page 17: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Managing the Landscape to Manage Nutrient Loads

• Streams need wide buffers– provide shading

• cooler temperature• limit algae growth

– filter pollutants• allow sediment to drop out• vegetation take up nutrients• accidents do happen, need margin of safety

• Good Physical Habitat– increase processing of nutrients– where drainage needed, consider natural channel design

• Wetlands or Riparian for Tile Drainage– tiles by-pass riparian zone

Page 18: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Average Phosphorus Concentrations Around Ohio

Little or No DataBackgroundNormalEnrichedPolluted

Page 19: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Stream Quality and Density of CAFOs

Darke

MercerAuglaize

Very Poor

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Stream Quality

Page 20: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Nutrient Guidelines for Ecosystem Protection

For Ohio:

Total Phosphorus (mg/L) Total Nitrogen (mg/L)

WWH EWH WWH EWH

Headwaters0.08 0.05 1.0 0.5

Wadable0.10 0.05 1.0 0.5

Small Rivers0.17 0.10 1.5 1.0

Large Rivers0.30 0.15 2.0 1.5

Page 21: Water Quality impairment and manure management
Page 22: Water Quality impairment and manure management

NH3-N (mg/L) Total P (mg/L)

Nitrate (mg/L)

Average of 15 samples from GLSM and Wabash watershed

0.603 0.573 19.03

“Control” from Loramie Creek (i.e., less density of livestock)

0.246 0.333 6.75

% Difference 59% less 42% less 65% less

Summary of thaw related runoff (12-27-05)

Page 23: Water Quality impairment and manure management

High Versus Low Flow Measurements of Nutrients(“Associations” report--1999)

• The concentration of nutrients lotic (i.e., moving water) ecosystems increases significantly with increased flow.

• The assimilation and removal of nutrients by an intact and healthy riparian buffer is significant, although the magnitude varies seasonally.

• Evidence of negative short term effects of elevated nutrient concentration on resident aquatic assemblages is lacking. It is the residual effects of nutrient loadings that are likely of most consequence to aquatic community performance.

Page 24: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Ag Stormwater Exemption & BMPs

• Regardless of whether a Livestock or poultry facility or individual (i.e., manure applicator) is regulated under Permit (ODA, or OEPA). The provisions of Ohio’s Water Quality Standards (WQS) apply across the board. Where water quality standards are exceeded due manure handling, the Agricultural Storm water exemption is the means by which the responsible individual(s) can avoid potential enforcement of the violation(s) of WQS.

• In order to claim Agricultural Stormwater Exemption applies, the responsible party must provide and/or demonstrate that they have followed Best Management Practices.

• In general those BMPs are listed in ODA’s Permit to Operate and Ohio EPA’s NPDES permit for CAFOs, and they are listed in NRCS Standard 633 and 590. BMPs include: demonstration that proper rate, timing, method, and form are implemented. Keeping records that demonstrate BMP implementation are a BMP, and so is checking the forecast.

Page 25: Water Quality impairment and manure management

BMPs and the permits that Require them to be implemented.

• Setbacks!• Tile Outlet checks!• Evaluate field for Soil Cracks!• Site specific areas of concern

(concentrated flow paths)• Agronomic Utilization! (Keep Soil test P

levels from skyrocketing)• Forecast!• Record keeping!

Page 26: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Site Specific Nutrient Planning:Recognize where the risks are, and address it

through planning. (Beegle webcast)

Page 27: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Evaluate and determine Proper Setbacks

Page 28: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Know where your land application field drains, and monitor there.

Page 29: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Know where your land application field drains, and monitor there.

Page 30: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Evaluate field for cracks

Page 31: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Surface Drains are conduits to waters of the State.

Page 32: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Forecast-Kenton OH 6-28-06www.noaa.gov (Hourly Weather Graph)

Page 33: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Sample Record Form

Blank Form Provided in packetHard Copy can be mailed anytime

upon request from Ohio EPA. I can also forward electronically.

Date: Time Start: Time Stop: Gal or tons/load:

Manure source: Applicator name: Acres manure applied upon today: (not total field acreage)

Method of Application: Spreader capacity/load

Date of Incorporation (if applicable):

Date and time of most recent forecast check (attach forecast document): Calculated Rate (gal/ac or

tons/acre):

Load Count (e.g: )

Current or next crop:

Residue type and % cover:

Soil Saturation (AWC):

Soil Cracks:

Tile Checks –time/condition

Comments/problems:

Most recent Soil Test Values (provide units) N P K

Most recent Manure analysis (provide units):

Day 1 (manure application day) Day 2 Date: Day 3 Date: Day 4 Date: Day 5 Date: Actual precipitation

in inches

Be sure to attach at least one print out of forecast to this record form.

http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/cafo/monitor.html

Page 34: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Circa 1922

• “The latest and most efficient method of fixing Nitrogen was invented by a scientist named Haber. In his process hydrogen gas is mixed with Nitrogen (air)and subjected to great pressure. They unite to form Ammonia, which is easily changed into good nitrogen fertilizer.

Page 35: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Circa 1922 cont.

• “The machinery used can be driven by steam engines (Editorial remark: and now fossil fuels such as Natural Gas). The Haber invention gives promise of increased fertilizer supply, and therefore and increased food supply to the world.”

• So what’s happened since the Haber Invention?

Page 36: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Something to think about.

Population of Human Species.

Source: U.N.

Page 37: Water Quality impairment and manure management
Page 38: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Lake Erie-Western Basinper research from Heidelberg College (Baker et al)

• Despite increased focus on conservation efforts, Phosphorus load is increasing in Lake Erie.

• Excessive phosphorus loading identified as cause for increases in Blue-green algae (Microcystis).

• Decreases in Phosphorus Load from Sediment noted, but increases in Dissolved reactive Phosphorus, which is 100% available to support algal growth. Photo by: Thomas Bridgeman,

University of Toledo

Page 39: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Rainor

snowmelt

Surface Runoff

Particulate phosphorusassociated with eroded

soil particles.

Dissolved phosphoruspicked up from soil

solution.

Infiltration and percolation

Tile flow with nitrate

Zone of runoff interaction - 1-5 cm.

How does phosphorus move from fields to streams?

Under conservation tillagephosphorus accumulatesat the soil surface.

From Heidelberg Baker et al.

Page 40: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Maumee River 7/1/2003 - 8/22/2003

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

7/1/03 7/11/03 7/21/03 7/31/03 8/10/03 8/20/03

Date

Flo

w

(cfs

)

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

0.700

0.800

TP

(m

g/l

)

Flow, CFS TP, mg/L as P

Detroit River

24.3 km3 water

287 mtons TP

15x more water

Maumee River

1.56 km3 water

587 mtons TP

2x more phosphorus

Baker et al, 2007

Page 41: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Agricultural Phosphorus and Eutrophication, Second EditionA.N. Sharpley, T. Daniel, T. Sims, J. Lemunyon, R. Stevens, and R. Parry

United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, ARS–149, September 2003

Page 42: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Phosphorus Stratification After 20 Years of No-till, Sandusky County, OH

020406080

100120140

Depth below Soil Surface

lbs/

ac B

ray

P1

Glenford silt loam

Hoytville silty cl lm

Jerry Cunningham, CCA, Country Spring Farmers Co-op.

Page 43: Water Quality impairment and manure management

From Doug Beegle LPES Webcast:http://lpe.unl.edu/pdfs/07janPPbeegle.pdf

The Squeeze

Page 44: Water Quality impairment and manure management

National Water-Quality Assessment Program

• Last comment from “Nutrients and Suspended Sediment in Snowmelt Runoff from part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin, Minnesota and Wisconsin, 1997-Fallon and McNellis” report…

• “In agricultural and forested streams, the snowmelt period can deliver greater proportions of annual loads of nutrients and suspended sediment than other equivalent periods, and occasionally, the majority of the annual load. Consequently, the snowmelt period should be considered in strategies aimed at reducing loads of nutrients and suspended sediments to streams.”

Page 45: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Incorporated manure …

Page 46: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Injected manure

• Soil saturation checked and recorded?

• Rate based in consideration of all variables.

• Remember manure application in these conditions, leaves is still not considered a good practice. It’s marginal at best with regard to true nutrient utilization.

Page 47: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Evaluate each field for site specific issues (e.g. concentrated flow paths)

Page 48: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Snow water equivalent 02-05-07

• Snow water equivalent is a consideration prior to placement. Recognize that additional show cover can increase the liklihood of losses during thaw event.

Page 49: Water Quality impairment and manure management

Current Soil TemperaturesOARDC Weather Stations

http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/centernet/weather.htm

• Hoytville (Northwest Ohio) at noon Friday 02-02-07:• 2”= 32.17 degrees F • 4” = 29.78 degrees F

• Hoytville (Northwest Ohio) at 8:00 a.m. Monday 02-05-07:• 2” = 23.96 degrees F • 4” = 26.70 degrees F

• Wooster at 8:00 a.m. Monday 02-05-07:• 2” = 26.13 degrees F • 4” = 31.60 degrees F

Page 50: Water Quality impairment and manure management

For Questions or More Info Call:

[email protected] (614) [email protected] (614) [email protected] (614) 728-1357• Information on Ohio EPA Water Quality Information:

http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dsw/index.html