water quality managementpollution b. estimate pollutant loading and necessary load reductions c....
TRANSCRIPT
Water Quality Management
Adam Laputz Central Valley Water Board
2
Presentation Outline Water Boards background Challenges Management needs Tools
Nine Regional Water Boards
Implement State and federal water quality laws based on region specific conditions
Regulate discharges of waste
Central Valley Region
Water Boards
Mission of the Regional Water Boards
To preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources for the benefit of present and future generations.
4
Program Implementation Regional Water Boards
Federal Clean Water Act – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Permits – regulate pollutant discharges to surface waters only
California Water Code -Porter Cologne Act – Regulate waste discharge to surface and
groundwater of the State – Tools include waste discharge requirements,
conditional waivers, enforcement orders
5
6
Sacramento River Basin Largest Central Valley Basin (>27,000 sq mi)
Much of Central Valley’s surface water supply
Basin drains ~1/3 of total runoff in the state
7
Sacramento River Basin Water Board Regulated activities include
– >2 million acres of irrigated cropland – Major portion of 3 million acres of timber harvest in
Central Valley – Wastewater treatment plants – Industry (e.g., olive processing) – Municipal storm water – Dairies
8
Basin info 13 Subwatersheds
across 21 counties 88 Groundwater
basins/subbasins
9
Management Challenges Water Quality
– Pesticides, mercury, sediment, nitrates, salts
Severe weather and climate concerns – Drought, flooding, less snowpack
Resources and focus Program integration
10
Challenges
Approx. 47, 000 abandoned mines
12
Management Needs Multiple watershed concerns cannot be
considered independently of each other Solutions need to consider the “big
picture” and long-term goals of water management
13
Management Needs - Example
Storm water, recycled wastewater – Resource supply if
managed correctly – Increased infiltration of
storm water could reduce surface water flows
– Increased recycled water use may lead to increased salinity
14
Management Needs - Example
Storm water, recycled wastewater – Resource supply if managed correctly – Increased infiltration of storm water may lead to
less flow in receiving streams – Increased recycled water use may lead to
increased salinity – Overall –strategic implementation of practices
could help to buffer the effects of drought, short duration high intensity storm runoff, and increased demand on surface water supplies
15
Management Needs - Example
Recharge of groundwater – Could be done on irrigated lands areas, or
wetlands/uplands – If managed poorly, could lead to groundwater
problems – If managed properly, could increase high quality
groundwater
16
Management Needs - Example
Recharge of groundwater – Could be done on irrigated lands areas, or
wetlands/uplands – If managed poorly, could lead to groundwater
problems – If managed properly, could increase high quality
groundwater – Overall – could be used in some watersheds to
reduce flood flows, providing a buffer during heavy storm events, reducing erosion, and adding to groundwater storage
17
Management Needs - Need to consider solutions with multiple
benefits instead of a singular purpose – A nutrient treatment device or mechanical sediment device
has a singular benefit; but: – a wetland can reduce sediment, nutrients, increase habitat,
provide groundwater recharge, buffer storm flows, and sequester carbon
18
Tools What tools are available to encourage
integrated and effective solutions? What tools are needed?
19
Tools: Regional Monitoring Collaboration – regulators, industry,
resource agencies, etc. Synthesis and analysis of information Critical to understanding the “big picture” Platform for difficult issues Flexible
20
Sacramento Watershed Monitoring
Collaboration with DWR
Monitors “trends” Quarterly
monitoring since November 2008
56 sites monitored
Safe to Swim Monitoring Monitored swimming
holes on rivers, streams, and lakes
Coordinated with citizen monitoring groups
E. coli used as indicator
104 sites monitored in the Sacramento Watershed
Need for coordinated efforts There is already extensive monitoring conducted by
many agencies in the Sacramento River Basin ILRP NPDES SWAMP Municipal Water Quality Investigations (MWQI) USGS Sacramento Coordinated Monitoring Program State Water Board Division of Drinking Water
Source Water Monitoring Need for more coordinated efforts to consolidate
and assess water quality information, especially for California Integrated Report
23
Delta Regional Monitoring Delta Strategic Plans Sampling started this year (2015) Permit amendments
– Reductions, individual monitoring funding
Monitoring design – Pathogens, nutrients, pesticides, toxicity,
mercury
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Jan-05Jan-06Jan-07Jan-08Jan-09Jan-10Jan-11Jan-12Jan-13Jan-14Jan-15
Individual Receiving Water Data
4
1 2
3
5 6 7 8
9 10
12
11
27
15
13
14
17
19 2
0 21
23 24 25
26
22
28
29
30
32 3
1
33
34
35
36
16
18
27
Delta Regional Monitoring Goals and Challenges
Developing new partners Sustainable funding mechanism Learn from Delta RMP
– Potential for other programs (e.g., source waters)
Watershed-Based Plan
Proactive approach in non-listed watershed No development of a new regulatory program 319(h) eligibility More efficient/effective than 303(d) listing If 303(d) listing were to occur, WBP could be
implementation plan in lieu of TMDL Could be used for protection of “high quality”
waters or in watersheds with other concerns Funding
28
Watershed Based Planning
29
30
Summary of Nine Elements a. Identify causes and sources of
pollution b. Estimate pollutant loading and
necessary load reductions c. Management measures to achieve
load reductions d. Technical and financial assistance
necessary for implementation e. Information/Education component f. Project schedule g. Interim, measurable milestones h. Indicator to measure progress i. Monitoring
31
Watershed Management Local and regional collaboration Understanding of “big picture” Tools: regional monitoring, watershed planning Collaborators Focus of resources to preserve and enhance
water quality – Less focus on individual solutions
Questions?
Contact info: Adam Laputz Assistant Executive Officer Central Valley Water Board [email protected] (916) 464-4726