water quality trends across 319 monitoring sites brian e. haggard director, arkansas water resources...

14
across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC

Upload: alice-cain

Post on 26-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Water Quality Trends across 319

Monitoring Sites

Brian E. Haggard

Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center

Funding provided by ANRC

Identifying Water Quality Trends

The objective of this project is to evaluate changes in water quality, where we can… Identify the effects of

management actions (e.g., proper riparian buffers)

Identify the effects of new pollutant sources (e.g., new WWTP)

Upper Illinois River Watershed Ballard Creek Osage Creek Illinois River

Upper White River Basin West Fork White River White River Kings River

The selected sites were from the 319 monitoring program in

northwest Arkansas

But, evaluating change in water quality is not as simple as looking at the increase or

decrease in loads…

Illinois River at Arkansas HWY59

Loads are influenced by precipitation and runoff

patterns over time…

You need to remove the influence of stream discharge on loads to identify true trends in water quality.

Time (1997 THROUGH 2008)

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

LN

MO

NT

HLY

TP

LO

AD

(kg

)

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Concentrations also change with increasing discharge…

You need to remove the influence of stream discharge on loads to identify true trends in water quality.

Time (1997 THROUGH 2008)

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

LN

MO

NT

HLY

TP

LO

AD

(kg

)

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Discharge (m3)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

TP

CO

NC

EN

TR

AT

ION

(m

g L-1

)

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

Removing the influence of discharge…

LN MONTHLY WATER VOLUME (m3)

15 16 17 18 19 20

LN

MO

NT

HLY

TP

LO

AD

(kg

)

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13 A curve is fit to the data that best represents how things

change with discharge…

The next step is to determine the residual.

The residuals represent the flow-adjusted loads or

concentrations…

LN MONTHLY WATER VOLUME (m3)

15 16 17 18 19 20

LN

MO

NT

HLY

TP

LO

AD

(kg

)

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13 Then, we look at how these adjusted values change over

time…

That’s how we identify trends in water quality.

Flow-adjusted loads or concentrations are relative to the line, or expected…

LN MONTHLY WATER VOLUME (m3)

15 16 17 18 19 20

LN

MO

NT

HLY

TP

LO

AD

(kg

)

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

These values a

re less

than the ty

pical v

alue

at a given disc

harge.

These values a

re greate

r

than th

e typica

l value at a

given discharg

e.

The residuals are plotted over time to determine if flow-

adjusted values are increasing or decreasing over

time…

TIME (1997 THROUGH 2008)

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Flo

w-A

dju

sted

Loa

ds

These flow adjusted loads are from the Illinois River at

Arkansas HWY59…

TIME (1997 THROUGH 2008)

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Flo

w-A

dju

sted

Loa

ds

Something happened in 2002…

It’s important to have long term monitoring at sites to know

what’s going on… You need to have a relatively, consistent

monitoring program: Consistency in the number of samples collected Consistency in the parameters analyzed Consistency in the program design

We probably need five years of data with consistency…

Where we are now:

Project extension was granted so that we could include data from 2009.

To date, all databases have been compiled, including sampling date, constituent concentration and respective discharge measurements.

Next, we will flow-adjust concentrations and then look at trends over time…

Take Home Message:

Loads are extremely dependent on the variations in discharge, and you need to

be remove the effects of discharge to evaluate changes in water quality.

Questions?