water resources management- a serious issue water quality modeling- a useful tool

1
Water Resources Management-A serious issue Water Quality Modeling-A useful tool Pick the right model-Complicated models or simple Model Calculation Model Description Introduction Hydraulic Model – HEC-RAS model Case I--S-P & Qual2K Simulation with HEC-RAS Dilution Correction 題題River Water Quality Modeling 題題Ming Chi University of Technology 題題題 Ph. D. 題題題題 101 題 5 題 2 題 Key - pollution loadings BOD is the major pollution loading. A simple model may be as helpful as complicated one. Combined utilization of the water quality and hydraulic models may be an alternative to assess water quality accurately for a tidal river. 指指指指 指指指 指指 指指指指 指指指 :、 Graduate Institute of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering Conclusion Case II--Modified SP Simulation Simple and popular Limited water quality data Pollution loadings analysis - BOD River hydraulic characteristic constants --Atmospheric re-areation constants Tidal Effect Dilution --Water surface profile variation among different tidal situations --Water quality correction R eaeration BOD DO CO 2 RXNs Consum ption O 2 OtherRX N s Consum ption Sedim entation Loadingsinput Boundary Condition calculation CrossSection Segm ent 4 Segm ent 3 Segm ent 2 Segm ent 1 Com pletely m ixing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 D O m g/L 0 2 4 6 8 10 BOD+NH 3 -N +SO D +TP BOD+NH 3 -N +SO D BOD+NH 3 -N BOD SP eq O bserved 00~04 5yrave. 2003/09/05 Distance from RiverM outh(km ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 B O D m g/L 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2003/0903 DO (m g/L) 0 2 4 6 8 10 SP SP 2nd SP O I 2003/09/03 observed 00~04 D O ave. D istance from RiverM outh (km ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 BO D (m g/L) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 SP SP 2nd SP O I 2003/09/03 observed 00~04 D O ave. 2003/0903 D O (m g/L) 0 2 4 6 8 10 SP SP 2nd SP O I 2003/09/03 observed 00~04 D O ave. D istance from RiverM outh (km ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 BO D (m g/L) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 SP SP 2nd SP O I 2003/09/03 observed 00~04 D O ave. The availability of water quality data and hydraulic characteristics are critical as well.

Upload: liv

Post on 22-Feb-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Graduate Institute of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering . 題目 : River Water Quality Modeling 講 者 : Ming Chi University of Technology 范 致 豪 Ph . D . 時間 : 民國 101 年 5 月 2 日. Case I- - S-P & Qual2K Simulation with HEC-RAS Dilution Correction. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Water  Resources  Management- A serious issue  Water  Quality  Modeling- A useful tool

Water Resources Management-A serious issue

Water Quality Modeling-A useful tool

Pick the right model-Complicated models or simple

Model Calculation

Model Description

Introduction

Hydraulic Model – HEC-RAS model

Case I--S-P & Qual2K Simulation with HEC-RAS Dilution Correction

題目: River Water Quality Modeling講者: Ming Chi University of Technology 范致豪 Ph. D.時間:民國 101 年 5 月 2 日

Key - pollution loadings BOD is the major pollution loading. A simple model may be as helpful as complicated one. Combined utilization of the water quality and hydraulic models may be an alternative to assess water quality accurately for a tidal river.

指導教授:陳彥璋學生:林威再、曾明義 製

Graduate Institute of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering

Conclusion

Case II--Modified SP Simulation

Simple and popular

Limited water quality data

Pollution loadings analysis - BOD

River hydraulic characteristic constants--Atmospheric re-areation constants

Tidal Effect Dilution--Water surface profile variation among different tidal situations--Water quality correction

DO BOD

Reaeration

BODDO

CO2

RXNsConsumption

O2

Other RXNsConsumption

Sedimentation

Loadings input

Boundary Condition

calculation

Cross Section

Segment 4 Segment 3 Segment 2 Segment 1Completely mixing

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

DO

mg/

L

0

2

4

6

8

10BOD+NH3-N+SOD+TPBOD+NH3-N+SODBOD+NH3-NBODSP eqObserved 00~04 5yr ave.

2003/09/05

Distance from River Mouth(km)0 10 20 30 40 50 60

BO

D m

g/L

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2003/0903

DO

(mg/

L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.

Distance from River Mouth (km)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

BO

D (m

g/L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.

2003/0903

DO

(mg/

L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.

Distance from River Mouth (km)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

BO

D (m

g/L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.

The availability of water quality data and hydraulic characteristics are critical as well.