water resources management- a serious issue water quality modeling- a useful tool
DESCRIPTION
Graduate Institute of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering . 題目 : River Water Quality Modeling 講 者 : Ming Chi University of Technology 范 致 豪 Ph . D . 時間 : 民國 101 年 5 月 2 日. Case I- - S-P & Qual2K Simulation with HEC-RAS Dilution Correction. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Water Resources Management-A serious issue
Water Quality Modeling-A useful tool
Pick the right model-Complicated models or simple
Model Calculation
Model Description
Introduction
Hydraulic Model – HEC-RAS model
Case I--S-P & Qual2K Simulation with HEC-RAS Dilution Correction
題目: River Water Quality Modeling講者: Ming Chi University of Technology 范致豪 Ph. D.時間:民國 101 年 5 月 2 日
Key - pollution loadings BOD is the major pollution loading. A simple model may be as helpful as complicated one. Combined utilization of the water quality and hydraulic models may be an alternative to assess water quality accurately for a tidal river.
指導教授:陳彥璋學生:林威再、曾明義 製
Graduate Institute of Civil and Disaster Prevention Engineering
Conclusion
Case II--Modified SP Simulation
Simple and popular
Limited water quality data
Pollution loadings analysis - BOD
River hydraulic characteristic constants--Atmospheric re-areation constants
Tidal Effect Dilution--Water surface profile variation among different tidal situations--Water quality correction
DO BOD
Reaeration
BODDO
CO2
RXNsConsumption
O2
Other RXNsConsumption
Sedimentation
Loadings input
Boundary Condition
calculation
Cross Section
Segment 4 Segment 3 Segment 2 Segment 1Completely mixing
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DO
mg/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10BOD+NH3-N+SOD+TPBOD+NH3-N+SODBOD+NH3-NBODSP eqObserved 00~04 5yr ave.
2003/09/05
Distance from River Mouth(km)0 10 20 30 40 50 60
BO
D m
g/L
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2003/0903
DO
(mg/
L)
0
2
4
6
8
10
SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.
Distance from River Mouth (km)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
BO
D (m
g/L)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.
2003/0903
DO
(mg/
L)
0
2
4
6
8
10
SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.
Distance from River Mouth (km)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
BO
D (m
g/L)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
SP SP 2nd SP OI 2003/09/03 observed00~04 DO ave.
The availability of water quality data and hydraulic characteristics are critical as well.