watershed and stream network delineation – geomorphological considerations

60
Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations David G. Tarboton [email protected] u p://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb

Upload: ahmed-carson

Post on 15-Mar-2016

75 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations. David G. Tarboton [email protected]. http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb. Overview. Review of flow direction, accumulation and watershed delineation Topographic texture and drainage density - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

David G. [email protected]

http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb

Page 2: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Overview Review of flow direction, accumulation and

watershed delineation Topographic texture and drainage density Channel network geomorphology and Hortons

Laws Stream drop test to objectively oelect channel

delineation threshold Curvature and slope based methods to

represent variable drainage density The D approach Specialized grid accumulation functions TauDEM software

Page 3: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Elevation Surface — the ground surface elevation at each point

Digital Elevation Model — A digital representation of an elevation surface. Examples include a (square) digital elevation grid, triangular irregular network, set of digital line graph contours or random points.

Page 4: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Digital Elevation Grid — a grid of cells (square or rectangular) in some coordinate system having land surface elevation as the value stored in each cell.

Square Digital Elevation Grid — a common special case of the digital elevation grid

Page 5: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

67 56 49

52 48 37

58 55 22

30

67 56 49

52 48 37

58 55 22

30

45.02304867

50.030

5267

Slope:

Direction of Steepest Descent

Page 6: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

32

16

8

64

4

128

1

2

Eight Direction Pour Point Model

ESRI Direction encoding

Page 7: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

4

5

6

3

7

2

1

8

Eight Direction Pour Point Model D8

Band/GRASS/TARDEM Direction encoding

Page 8: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Grid Network

Page 9: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

1 1 111

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

14 3 3

12 2

2 163 6

25 2

1 1 11 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4 3 3

12 1

2

23

16

256

Contributing Area Grid

TauDEM convention includes the area of the grid cell itself.

Page 10: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Programming the calculation of contributing

area

5 1

8 7 6

3 2

4

5 6

5 6

7 7 6

7

7

Direction encoding

2

2

6

3 1

1

1

2

3

1 2 3

Contributing area

Page 11: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

1 1 11 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4 3 3

12 2

2

23

16

256

Contributing Area > 10 Cell Threshold

Page 12: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Watershed Draining to This Outlet

Page 13: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

100 grid cell constant support area threshold stream delineation

1 0 1 KilometersConstant support area threshold100 grid cell9 x 10E4 m^2

Page 14: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

200 grid cell constant support area based stream delineation

1 0 1 Kilometersconstant support area threshold200 grid cell18 x 10E4 m^2

Page 15: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

How to decide on support area threshold ?

AREA 1AREA 1

AREA 2AREA 2

3

12

Why is it important?

Page 16: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Hydrologic processes are different on hillslopes and in channels. It is important to recognize this and account for this in models.

Drainage area can be concentrated or dispersed (specific catchment area) representing concentrated or dispersed flow.

Page 17: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Delineation of Channel Networks and Subwatersheds

500 cell theshold

1000 cell theshold

Page 18: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Examples of differently textured topography

Badlands in Death Valley.from Easterbrook, 1993, p 140.

Coos Bay, Oregon Coast Range. from W. E. Dietrich

Page 19: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Logged Pacific Redwood Forest near Humboldt, California

Page 20: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Canyon Creek, Trinity Alps, Northern California.

Photo D K Hagans

Page 21: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Gently Sloping Convex Landscape

From W. E. Dietrich

Page 22: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Mancos Shale badlands, Utah. From Howard, 1994.

Page 23: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

0 1 Kilometers 0 1 KilometersDriftwood, PA Sunland, CA

Topographic Texture and Drainage DensitySame scale, 20 m contour interval Sunland, CADriftwood, PA

Page 24: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Lets look at some geomorphology.• Drainage Density• Horton’s Laws• Slope – Area scaling• Stream Drops

“landscape dissection into distinct valleys is limited by a threshold of channelization that sets a finite scale to the landscape.” (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science, vol. 255 p. 826.)

Suggestion: One contributing area threshold does not fit all watersheds.

Page 25: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Drainage Density• Dd = L/A

• Hillslope length 1/2Dd

L

BB

Hillslope length = B

A = 2B L

Dd = L/A = 1/2B

B= 1/2Dd

Page 26: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Drainage Density for Different Support Area ThresholdsEPA Reach Files 100 grid cell threshold 1000 grid cell threshold

Page 27: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Drainage Density Versus Contributing Area Threshold

Support Area km^2

Dd

km

^-1

0.05 0.10 0.50 1.00

0.8

2.0

3.0

Dd=0.792 A^(-0.434)

Page 28: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Hortons Laws: Strahler system for stream ordering

1

1

1

1

11

111

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

3

Page 29: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Bifurcation Ratio

Order

Num

ber o

f Stre

ams

1 2 3 4 5

15

1050Rb = 3.58

Page 30: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Area Ratio

Order

Mea

n S

tream

Are

a

1 2 3 4 5

10^6

5*10

^65*

10^7 Ra = 4.65

Page 31: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Length Ratio

Order

Mea

n S

tream

Len

gth

1 2 3 4 5

900

2000

4000

Rl = 1.91

Page 32: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Slope Ratio

Order

Mea

n S

tream

Slo

pe

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0.05

0.10

Rs = 1.7

Page 33: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Slope-Area scaling

Link Contributing Area

Link

Slo

pe

5*10^4 5*10^5 5*10^6 5*10^7

0.00

50.

050

0.50

0S ~ A^-0.35

Data from Reynolds Creek 30 m DEM, 50 grid cell threshold, points, individual links, big dots, bins of size 100

Page 34: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Constant Stream Drops Law

Order

Mea

n S

tream

Dro

p

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

5010

050

0Rd = 0.944

Broscoe, A. J., (1959), "Quantitative analysis of longitudinal stream profiles of small watersheds," Office of Naval Research, Project NR 389-042, Technical Report No. 18, Department of Geology, Columbia University, New York.

Page 35: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Stream DropElevation difference between ends of stream

Note that a “Strahler stream” comprises a sequence of links (reaches or segments) of the same order

NodesLinks

Single Stream

Page 36: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Suggestion: Map channel networks from the DEM at the finest resolution consistent with observed channel

network geomorphology ‘laws’.

• Look for statistically significant break in constant stream drop property

• Break in slope versus contributing area relationship

• Physical basis in the form instability theory of Smith and Bretherton (1972), see Tarboton et al. 1992

Page 37: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Statistical Analysis of Stream Drops

Elevation Drop for Streams

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Strahler Order

Dro

p (m

eter

s)

DropMean Drop

Page 38: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

T-Test for Difference in Mean Values

72 130

Order 1 Order 2-4Mean X 72.2 Mean Y 130.3Std X 68.8 Std Y 120.8Var X 4740.0 Var Y 14594.5Nx 268 Ny 81

0

T-test checks whether difference in means is large (> 2)when compared to the spread of the data around the mean values

Page 39: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Constant Support Area Threshold

Strahler Stream Order

Stra

hler

Stre

am D

rop

(m)

050

100

150

200

250

1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5

Support Area threshold (30 m grid cells) 50 100 200 300 500

Drainage Density (km-1) 3.3 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.2

t statistic for difference between lowest order and higher order drops

-8.8 -5 -1.8 -1.1 -0.72

Page 40: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

200 grid cell constant support area based stream delineation

1 0 1 Kilometersconstant support area threshold200 grid cell18 x 10E4 m^2

Page 41: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Local Curvature Computation(Peuker and Douglas, 1975, Comput. Graphics Image Proc. 4:375)

43

41

48

47

48

47 54

51

54

51 56

58

Page 42: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Contributing area of upwards curved grid cells only

Topsrc01 - 55-2020-5050-30000No Data

50mcont.shp 1 0 1 2 Kilometers

Page 43: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Upward Curved Contributing Area Threshold

Strahler Stream Order

Stra

hler

Stre

am D

rop

(m)

050

100

150

200

250

1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5

Upward curved support area threshold (30 m grid cells) 10 15 20 30

Drainage Density (km-1) 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.4

t statistic for difference between lowest order and higher order drops

-4.1 -2.2 -1.3 -1.2

Page 44: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

1 0 1 KilometersCurvature basedStream delineation

Curvature based stream delineation

Page 45: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Channel network delineation, other options

4

5

6

3

7

2

1

8

1 1 11 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4 3 3

12 2

2

23

16

256

Contributing Area

1 1 11 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2 2 2

3 1

1

12

3

32

Grid Order

Page 46: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

1 0 1 Kilometers Grid networkpruned to 4thorder

Grid network pruned to order 4 stream delineation

Page 47: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Slope area threshold (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992).

Page 48: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Addressing the limitations imposed by 8 grid directions

Page 49: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Topographic Slope

?

Topographic Definition Drop/Distance

Limitation imposed by 8 grid directions.

Flow Direction Field — if the elevation surface is differentiable (except perhaps for countable discontinuities) the horizontal component of the surface normal defines a flow direction field.

Page 50: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Flowdirection.

Steepest directiondownslope

1

2

1

234

5

67

8

Proportion flowing toneighboring grid cell 3is 2/(1+

2)

Proportionflowing toneighboringgrid cell 4 is

1/(1+2)

The D Algorithm

Tarboton, D. G., (1997), "A New Method for the Determination of Flow Directions and Contributing Areas in Grid Digital Elevation Models," Water Resources Research, 33(2): 309-319.) (http://www.engineering.usu.edu/cee/faculty/dtarb/dinf.pdf)

Page 51: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Specific catchment area a is the upslope area per unit contour length [m2/m m]

Upslope contributing area a

Stream line

Contour line

Unit contourlength b

Contributing area A

Specific Catchment Area a = A/b

Page 52: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Contributing Area using D8

Contributing Area using D

Page 53: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Downslope Influence The contributing area only of points in a target set y. I(x;y) says what the contribution from points y are at each mapped point x.

Useful for example to track where sediment or contaminant moves

1

0

Influence function of grid cell y

0.5 0.5

1 0

0.6 0.4

0

0 0

0

0 0.6 0.4

Grid cell y

Page 54: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Upslope Dependence. Quantifies the amount a point x contributes to the point or zone y. The inverse of the influence function D(x;y) = I(y;x)

Dependence function of grid cells y

0 1 0

0 1 0

0 0.6 0

0.3 0.3 0

0.6 0 0

Grid cells y

Useful for example to track where a contaminant may come from

Page 55: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Decayed Accumulation A decayed accumulation operator DA[.] takes as input a mass loading field m(x) expressed at each grid location as m(i, j) that is assumed to move with the flow field but is subject to first order decay in moving from cell to cell. The output is the accumulated mass at each location DA(x). The accumulation of m at each grid cell can be numerically evaluated

DA[m(x)] = DA(i, j) = m(i, j)2 +

neighborsngcontributikkkkkk )j,i(DA)j,i(dp

Here d(x) = d(i ,j) is a decay multiplier giving the fractional (first order) reduction in mass in moving from grid cell x to the next downslope cell. If travel (or residence) times t(x) associated with flow between cells are available d(x) may be evaluated as ))x(texp( where is a first order decay parameter.

Useful for a tracking contaminant or compound

subject to decay or attenuation

Page 56: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Transport limited accumulationErodability

e.g. E = a0.7 S0.6 Transport Capacity e.g. Tcap = a2 S2

Transport Flux, T

Deposition, D

)T,TEmin(T capinout outin TTEDUseful for modeling erosion and sediment delivery, the spatial

dependence of sediment delivery ratio and contaminant that adheres to sediment

Page 57: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Reverse Accumulation

Reverse accumulation of field weights indicated in red

0 0.8 0.6

0 0.4

0.6

0 1.8 0

0.9 0.9 0

1.8 0 0

1.2

0.8 0.6

Useful for destabilization sensitivity in landslide

hazard assessmentwith Bob Pack

Page 58: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

TauDEM Software Functionality Pit removal (standard flooding approach) Flow directions and slope

D8 (standard) D (Tarboton, 1997, WRR 33(2):309) Flat routing (Garbrecht and Martz, 1997, JOH 193:204)

Drainage area (D8 and D) Network and watershed delineation

Support area threshold/channel maintenance coefficient (Standard)

Combined area-slope threshold (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science, 255:826)

Local curvature based (using Peuker and Douglas, 1975, Comput. Graphics Image Proc. 4:375)

Threshold/drainage density selection by stream drop analysis (Tarboton et al., 1991, Hyd. Proc. 5(1):81)

Wetness index and distance to streams Specialized grid analysis functions (Upslope influence, Downslope

dependence, Decaying accumulation, Concentration limited accumulation, Downslope accumulation, Transport limited accumulation)

Page 59: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

TauDEM in ArcGIS

ESRI binarygrid

ASCII text grid

ESRI gridio API (Spatial analyst)

USU TMDLtoolkit modules(grid, shape, image, dbf, map, mapwin)

TauDEM C++ library Fortran (legacy)components

Standalone command line

applications

C++ COM DLL interface

Visual Basic GUI

application

Visual Basic ESRI ArcGIS 8.1

Toolbar

Vector shape files

Data formats

Available from http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb/

Binary direct access grid

Page 60: Watershed and Stream Network Delineation – Geomorphological Considerations

Demonstration