wayne mcmillan architectural portfolio_2014

W A Y N E M c M I L L A NMArch I I , Hon. B.A., Dipl. Arch.

W

W

address:165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2L4

mobile:647.389.5153

email:[email protected]

OBJECT IVE

To secure a summer internship in an innovative, engaging environment that challenges the limits ofmyabilities,andencouragesthedevelopmentofnewskillsformutualbenefit.

EDUCAT ION

Master of Architecture Candidate University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sept. 2012 - Dec. 2015 Hon. Bachelor of Arts with High Distinction Architectural Design Major, Urban Studies Minor, Visual Studies Minor University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sept. 2007 - Apr. 2011

Architectural Technology Diploma with Honours Northern Alberta Institute of Technology Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Sept. 2003 - Apr. 2005

WORK EXPER IENCE

Junior Designer / Architectural Technologist Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic Bengert 10315- 109 St. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada July 2011-August 2012; October 2005 - July 2007; Summers 2008, 2009, 2010, 2013.

+ Contributed as part of a collaborative design team to the schematic and design development processes onmid-tohigh-densityresidential,commercial/retail,office,andcommunityrecreationcenterprojects. +Correspondeddirectlywithclientsandconsultantstocoordinateandrefineproject-specificdesign strategies and maximize project momentum. + Utilized Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign in the preparation of competition proposals and municipal project presentation documents. + Developed AutoCAD drawings according to the requirements of design and presentation, development permit, tender, and construction documents.

Teaching Assistant John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, University of Toronto 230 College Street,Toronto, Ontario, Canada January - April 2014

+ Responsible for the administration of course assignments and examinations, reviewing and evaluating student work, and meeting with students to discuss issues of academic development and grading

W A Y N E M c M I L L A NMArch I I , Hon. B.A., Dipl. Arch.

W

W

address:165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2L4

mobile:647.389.5153

email:[email protected]

softwareproficiencies:

AutoCADRhino 5.0V-Ray for Rhino3ds MaxSketchUp Adobe PhotoshopAdobe IllustratorAdobe InDesignMicrosoftOfficeSuite

professional skills:

Proven LeadershipCreative Problem SolvingEffective CollaboratorArticulate Communicator

CO-CURR ICULAR EXPER IENCE

Innis Residence Don Hiring Panel Member Innis Residence, University of Toronto 2010, 2011

+ Reviewed Residence Don application packages, conducted interviews, and assisted in the selection of successful applicants. Innis College Council Member Innis College, University of Toronto 2009 - 2010

+ Represented the interests and concerns of the Innis College student community in planning and policy- making agendas relating to Academic, College, Community, and Student affairs. + Served as a member of the College Affairs Board contributing to decisions concerning College facilities and services. + Contributed as a member of the Student Affairs Board to the resolution of issues relating to the student experience at Innis College. + Directed the schematic design of the Innis College Quad Improvement Plan as a member of the Innis Green Design Committee

Parkdale Elementary After School Tutor St. Christopher House Jan.-Apr. 2010

+ Provided one-on-one assistance to help students develop their learning skills by encouraging them to complete assignments independently, by creating challenges, and by asking questions that test their understanding.

Orientation Week Team Captain Innis College, University of Toronto 2008, 2009

+Actedasaliaisonbetweencoordinators,leadersandfirstyearstudents. + Ensured the coordination and safety of a group of approximately 60 students and leaders. +Resolvedandmediatedinterpersonalconflictsandlogisticalcomplications.

SCHOLARSH IPS AND AWARDS

+ Received the Adrian DiCastri Graduate Student Endowment Fund for excellence in design (2013). + Received the Eberhard Zeidler Scholarship for academic achievement in design (2013). + Awarded an Ontario Graduate Scholarship for academic excellence in graduate studies (2013). + Granted an admissions scholarship to the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design Master of Architecture program (2012). + Awarded the Larry Wayne Richards Admissions Fellowship for UofT Architectural Studies Graduates (2012). + Received the Wasser Leadership Scholarship (2011) in recognition of sustained leadership contributions over several years, and academic excellence. + Awarded the Innis College Exceptional Achievement Award (2008, 2009, 2010) for superior academic achievement. + Received the Later Life Learning OSOTF Award (2008, 2009, 2010) for superior academic achievement. + Received the Taddle Creek Residence Life Award (2008-2009) for residence community involvement and demonstrated leadership abilities.

D U F F E R I N R E D U X

University of TorontoMaster of Architecture ProgramArchitectural Design Studio II _ Superstudio

Studio Advisor:Drew Adams

Timeline:September - December, 2013

In this project, a 275,000 m2 site comprised of an existing mall and community park served as a testing ground for how inherited ideas about architecture, landscape architecture and urban design could be reconceived and reconfigured toaccommodate an urban density nearly twice the City of Toronto average.

Within the existing residential fabric, the Dufferin Mall acts as an obstacle to east-west traffic, creating several dead-endstreets and awkward interstitial spaces where loading docks and bicycle paths share the same space. Dufferin Park, by contrast, is one of the most well-used and well-loved parks I have ever visited, offering a wide range of programs and amenities that reveal an active and engaged community. There is a distinct binary condition between both sides of Dufferin Street, so my objective in this project was to introduce a more porous block structure to the Dufferin Mall site, and to amplify and extend the domain of Dufferin Park, creating a more integrated venue for the social functions of the Dufferin Grove Community.

Due to the scale of the Dufferin Mall site, this project also offered the opportunity to leverage the City of Toronto’s recent green roof bylaw requirement, and to imagine a terraced network of landscaped roofs that serve as an extension of the publicly accessible park space. The redevelopment proposal incorporates a mix ofretail,residential,commercialoffice,andcommunity/institutional programs to create and advocate for a richer and more diverse form of urban life than what currently exists in the Dufferin Grove neighbourhood.

UPPER FLOORS

FOURTH FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

GROUND FLOOR

PEDESTRIAN STREETS:-seasonal farmers’ market venue-seasonal retail space-street performers’ festivals-craft fairs

EXPANDED PARK SPACE:-firepits-skating rink-splash park-athleticfields-basketball court-picnic sites-dog park

PUBLIC ROOFSCAPE:- urban gardening educational centre- food share pavilion- community garden expansion- orchards- test crop / hardy vegetable gardens- herb / microgreens gardens- chicken coops / apiaries

SEMI-PUBLIC ROOFSCAPE:

- resident allotment gardens-seasonalflowergardens- commercial plant nursery- public greenhouses- seed exchange- orchards

PRIVATE RESIDENT ROOFSCAPE:

- resident allotment gardens- native species preserve- leisure park- extensive green roof

DUFFERIN PARK AVENUE

MUIR AVENUE

COBOURG AVENUE

“CHESLEY AVENUE PROMENADE”

01

“ARCHER STREET PROMENADE”

NEW BROCKTON SCHOOL

COMMUNITY LIBRARY

RECREATION CENTRE

FAMILY RESOURCE CENTRE

PLAYGROUND

AFTER SCHOOL CARE

DAYCARE

COLLEGE STREET

LINDSEY AVENUE

LINDSEY AVENUE

SYLVAN AVENUE

CROATIA STREET

BLOOR STREET

SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

BRO

CK

ST

REE

T

SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

DU

FFER

IN S

TR

EET

BRO

CK

ST

REE

T

DU

FFER

IN S

TR

EET

GLA

DST

ON

E AV

ENU

EG

LAD

STO

NE

AVEN

UE

HAV

ELO

CK

ST

REE

TH

AVEL

OC

K S

TR

EET


01 02

02

03

04

03

04

STREET HIERARCHYIMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATIONPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS


MUIR AVENUE

BLOOR STREET

CROATIA STREET

PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE




SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

DU

FFER

IN S

TREE

T

BRO

CK

STR

EET

PRIMARY STREETS

SHARED WOONERFS

PEDESTRIAN PROMENADES

LANEWAYS

STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITYSTREET HIERARCHYIMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATIONPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS


MUIR AVENUE

BLOOR STREET

CROATIA STREET





SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

DU

FFER

IN S

TREE

T

BRO

CK

STR

EET

PRIMARY STREETS

SHARED WOONERFS


LANEWAYS



MUIR AVENUE

BLOOR STREET

CROATIA STREET





SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

DU

FFER

IN S

TREE

T

BRO

CK

STR

EET

PRIMARY STREETS

SHARED WOONERFS


LANEWAYS



MUIR AVENUE

BLOOR STREET

CROATIA STREET





SHER

IDA

N A

VEN

UE

DU

FFER

IN S

TREE

T

BRO

CK

STR

EET

PRIMARY STREETS

SHARED WOONERFS


LANEWAYS

STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITYPENETRATION OF EXISTING STREETS IMPROVE CROSS-SITE CIRCULATION STREET HIERARCHY STREET-LEVEL ACCESSIBILITY

▲ Overall Site Redevelopment Plan

▲ S i t e Axonomet r i c

▼ Transve r se S i t e Sec t i on

BR

OC

K S

TREE

T

SH

ERID

AN

STR

EET

WO

ON

ERF

STR

EET

▲ Pedes t r i an S t ree t Pe r spec t i ve

WO

ON

ERF

STR

EET

SH

ERID

AN

STR

EET

DU

FFER

IN S

TREE

T

S I T E C O N T E X T P L A NSCALE 1:1000

N

S I T E P L A N SCALE 1:100

N

N

A

D D

A

M A I N F L O O R P L A N

L E G E N D

DR

OP

-O

FF

A

RE

A

01

01 Relaxat ion Room 02 Kitchen Area 03 Welcome / Si t t ing Area 04 Mechanica l Room

05 Storage Room 06 Director’s O�ce 07 Fundrai ser’s O�ce08 Indiv idual Counse l ing Room

09 Washroom 10 Quiet Room 11 Group Counse l ing Room 12 Garden Area

03

05

06 07 11

12

11

04

02

08

09

09

09

10

SCALE 1: 50

UN

IVE

RS

ITY

AV

EN

UE

MU

RR

AY

ST

RE

ET

MCC

AU

L S

TR

EE

T

HE

NR

Y S

TR

EE

T

B A L D W I N S T R E E T

O R D E S T R E E T

BE

VE

RL

EY

ST

RE

ET

RO

SS

ST

RE

ET

B

B

C

C

EMOTIONAL / PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT

INFORMATION RELAXATION / STRESS MANAGEMENT



ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S

EXISTING RESIDENTIALSCALE

MAGGIE’S CENTREPROGRAM

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

DROP-OFF ENTRYMAIN ENTRY

PRINCESS MARGARETHOSPITAL

TORONTO CENTRE FORPHENOGENOMICS

ORDE PARK SITEEXISTING RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALLOW DENSITYARTICULATED

INSITUTIONALHIGH DENSITYMONOLITHIC

01 OTHROGONAL BUILT ENVIRONMENT

02 CURVILINEAR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

03 HYBRIDIZED ENVIRONMENT

S I T E M O R P H O L O G Y06

A D D I T I O N / S U B T R A C T I O N10

P R OT E C T E D E N C L O S U R E09

P R O G R A M R E - O R G A N I Z AT I O N03

S I T E A N A LY S I S01

M A S S I N G 04 H I E R A R C H Y 05

O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L L O G I C02

EIGG SMA

N AT U R A L L I G H T07

C I R C U L AT I O N08

01 LOST PARK SPACE 02 SITE INCISION 03 ELEVATED PARK SPACE 04 PROGRAM INTEGRATION

SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE

M A G G I E ’ S C A N C E R C A R E C E N T R E TO R O N TO

University of TorontoMaster of Architecture ProgramArchitectural Design Studio I

Studio Advisor:Francesco Martire

Timeline:January - April, 2013

Proposed as a satellite location for the Maggie’s Cancer Caring Centres founded in the U.K., this project encouraged students to develop an architecture that recognizes the institution as both an extension of the city and as a social space that confronts the unique challenge of helping people to cope with the pain and uncertainty that can follow a cancer diagnosis.

The guiding principle of the Maggie’s Centre insists that people may choose to participate in any of their programs, or none of them, as a way of reinforcing that there are no better or worse ways of dealing with cancer. As such, the building was designed to offer its users a calm, friendly space where each individual can decide what strategy they want to adopt to support their medical treatment and their overall welfare. They will be able, if they so wish, to have a private conversation with the program director or the clinical psychologist about their particular situation, or participate in a range of free programs, including group support, family and friends support, relaxation sessions, information accessandbenefitsadvice.

Regardless of how patrons choose to engage with the Toronto Maggie’s Centre, the program spaces are organized around an open, social space that invites visitors to integrate themselves within a supportive community of individuals, families and friends dealing with cancer.





ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S



REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

















EIGG SMA




SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE





ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S



REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

















EIGG SMA




SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE





ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S



REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

















EIGG SMA




SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE





ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S



REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

















EIGG SMA




SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE





ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S



REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

















EIGG SMA




SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE





ENTRY

ENTRYENTRY

SOCIALSPACE CHOICE

ENT

RA

NC

E

WEL

CO

ME

/ SIT

TIN

G /

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

OFF

ICE

SPA

CE

VID

EO /

CO

MPU

TER

AR

EA

KIT

CH

EN

REL

AX

ATIO

N R

OO

M

GRO

UP

CO

UN

SELI

NG

IND

IVID

UA

L C

OU

NSE

LIN

G

LAVA

TOR

IES

QU

IET

SPA

CE

MEC

HA

NIC

AL

/ ELE

CT

RIC

AL

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

REL

AX

ATIO

N P

ROG

RA

MS

INFO

RM

ATIO

N S

ERV

ICES

SUPP

ORT

SER

VIC

ES

PUBL

IC F

AC

E TO

PA

RK

PRIV

ATE

FAC

E TO

HO

SPIT

AL

EXTROVERTEDSPACES

INTROVERTEDSPACES

MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S



REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

REL

AX

ATIO

N

INFO

RM

ATIO

N

SUPP

ORT

PARKENTRY

















EIGG SMA




SUM

MER

SO

LSTI

CE

WINTER SOLSTICE

VIEW TO SKYLINE

▲ Nigh t Rende r i ng

P r o c e s s D i a g r a m s

0 1 Column Con�guration 0 2 Fold Pattern Generation 0 3 O�set Curve 0 4 Eliminate Extraneous Surface 0 5 Surface Boundary De�nition 0 6 Minimize Span Length

T h i r d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”

S e c o n d F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”

M a i n F l o o r P l a nScale: 1/4” = 1’-0”


























F O L D / P A V I L I O N

University of TorontoMaster of Architecture ProgramArchitectural Design Studio I

Studio Advisor:Robert Levit

Timeline:September - December, 2012

columnconfiguration

delete extraneous surface

fold pattern generation

surfaceboundarydefinition

offset curve

minimize span length

This project asked students to design a multi-level pavilion exploring the structural properties of folded plate structures. Considering that the spanning form was to be supported by as few columns as possible, I approached the assignment by reverse-engineering the geometry of the folded spanning structure according to the locations of the column arrangement. According to this logic, the intersections of the valley folds in each bay of the folded slab structure occur above each column to ensure that the load of the slab is directed to the columns that support it. Curvature is introduced to the column configurationin order to improve the lateral stability of the pavilion, and to mitigate the overturning action that would otherwise occur in an alignedcolumnconfiguration.

▼ Ground-level Perspective Rendering

5.1

9A5.1

13

A5.2

25

A5.1

2

A5.1

11

A5.2

23

A5.2

19

A5.2

17

A5.2

16

A5.2

20

A1.7

2

A5.1

1

A5.1

3

A5.1

4

A5.2

15

A5.2

18

A5.2

22

A5.2

14

A1.7

2

A5.1

8A5.1

6

A5.1

10

A5.2

21

A5.2

24

A5.4

48

A5.4

51

OPPOSITE

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

UPDN

UP 3R

UP

DN

LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE. TYPICAL.

2% SLOPE

RAMP UP @ 0.5%

RAM

P D

N @

6%

LINE OF MEZZANINE ABOVE

LINE OF PARKADE WALL BELOW

FD

UP 2R

UP 2R

UP 4R

UP 4R

UP 2R

UP 2R

UP 1R

GAS LINE TO MECHANICAL

ROOM

8" C.I.P. CONCRETE WALL TO 8"

ABOVE MAIN FLOOR SLAB

FURR OUT WALL AT MECHANICAL LOCATIONS. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS

6" Ø BOLLARD

6" Ø BOLLARDS

LINE OF SOFFIT ABOVE

CONTINUOUS 6" CHANNEL BUMPER REFER TO DETAIL 22/A4.2

RAM

P D

N @

15

%

8" Ø BOLLARDS BOLTED TO STRUCTURAL SLAB

HEAVY DUTY GRATE. SEE

DETAIL 66/A4.7

PROVIDE 2 1/2" STEEL STUD FRAMING W/ 1/2" GYPSUM WALLBOARD TO U/S OF SECOND FLOOR SLAB

SIAMESE CONNECTION. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.

LINE OF DOOR TRACK ABOVE. TYPICAL.

LINE OF DOOR TRACK ABOVE.

TYPICAL.

LINE OF MEZZANINE ABOVE. SEE A1.1a FOR COMPRESSOR LAYOUT AND EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS.

CONTINUOUS 6" CHANNEL BUMPER

REFER TO DETAIL 22/A4.2

UP 20 R

PROVIDE STEEL HANDRAIL. TYPICAL TO ALL STAIR LOCATIONS.

PROVIDE 3" RIGID INSULATION AND AIR/VAPOUR BARRIER TO EXTERIOR FACE

LIFT PUMP PLATFORM

REFER TO A6.1 FOR WINDOW

ELEVATIONS

8" CONCRETE CURB BELOW

WINDOW SILL

EXTENT OF 6" CONCRETE BLOCK TO

UPPER WALL.

6" VENT DUCT THRU SLAB INTO PARKADE. MOUNT GRILLE AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE

PROVIDE ELEVATOR SHAFT

ONLY. NO CAB.

CONCRETE BLOCK WALL ON 10"

CONCRETE UPSTAND @ ELEV. 100'-8".

HATCH INDICATES EXTENT OF LIFT PIT

DUCTDUCT

BELOW

6" PRESSURIZATION DUCT C/W P12 SURROUNDING WALLS TO U/S OF SECOND FLOOR SLAB - TYPICAL

7/8" FURRING CHANNEL C/W 1/2" GYPSUM TO COVER

CONCRETE WALL REFER TO DETAIL 85/ A4.9 LINE OF SLAB

DROP FOR FREEZER

STAIR101

VEST.102

FUTUREELEVATOR

103

VESTIBULE104

ELEV.105

STAIR106

LOADING BAY107

SOBEYS108

102101

105 106 107

109

110

111

112

114

115

118

119120

121

123

108

122

116

104

103

113

A3.6

20

A4.6

52

A3.6

24

A4.6

50

A4.8

77

A4.8

76

A4.9

85

A4.2

22

A4.10

89

A3.4

13

A3.3

11

A3.1

4 A3.2

5

A3.3

10

A3.2

9

A3.4

15

A3.1

2A3.1

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

H

G

F

E

D

C

B

A

21'-2" 15'-8" 31'-2" 32'-0" 28'-2" 16'-11 1/4"

145'-1 1/4"

15'-4

"13

'-8"

25'-5

"26

'-6"

26'-6

"17

'-0"

149'

-5"

25'-0

"

A3.3

12

A3.2

8

A3.2

7

A3.1

3

BB

A2.3

BB

A2.3

AA

A2.3

AA

A2.3

A3.4

14 A3.5

19

A3.2

6

CC

A2.4

CC

A2.4

W1

W6

P10SIM.

P10

P11

W8

W8

W8

W8

W8

W8

W8

ABOVE

W8 W8

W8

W8

ABOVE

W8

W8

P11W8

P11

P11

W8

W1

W6 W2 W2 W6W6W3W6

W7

W5

W8

W6

W5

W8W1ABOVE

W8

P5

P2

W8ABOVE

P5SIM.

P2

ABOVE

P12

P9

W4

SIM.

W4 SIM.

W3W2W3W2

W3

W2

W3

W2

W1

W1

W6

W6

W6

100'-8"T.O. WALL

W-1

ABOVE

W-4

ABOVE

W-4

ABOVEW-1

ABOVE

W-1

ABOVEW-1

ABOVE

W-5

ABOVE

W-5

ABOVE

W-5

ABOVE

W-11 W-11 W-11

W-4ABOVE

W-4ABOVE

W-4ABOVE

W-4ABOVE

W-3ABOVE

W-9

W-3ABOVE

W-9

W-3ABOVE W-9

SIM.

W-1a W-1a W-10BELOWBELOW

W-1aBELOW

W-6a

C E C I L P L A C E

Firm:Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic Bengert

Partner in Charge:Joe Tkalcic

Timeline:January - December 2006

Cecil Place is a development featuring two floors of office space above a main floorgrocery store and one level of underground parking. My involvement on the Cecil Place Commercial Development enabled me to experience the full scope of project delivery. As part of the schematic design team I was involved in the preparation of conceptual and analytical drawings, client presentations, and development permit application drawings.

During the construction documents phase of the project, I was responsible for the drafting of plans, sections, elevations; developing plan and section details, and coordinating door and window schedules.

Street-level Perspective Rendering ▼

Main Floor Plan ►

F a m i l i e s

S t u d i o s

C o u p l e s /

F a m i l i e s

70

20

60

Singles

COMMUNITIES:

• Often dealing with: substance abuse issues, peer pressure, abusive relationships

• Higher level of transience

• Require: integration environment, support, motivation, social assistance opportunities

Couples and Famil ies• Often single parent with children or parents with single child

• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants)

• Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary/protected

shelter, mutual support

Famil ies• Often families with multiple children (including new immigrant families), or roommates

• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrant

families)


shelter, mutual support in family friendly environment

F a m i l i e s

S t u d i o s

C o u p l e s /

F a m i l i e s

70

20

60

Singles

COMMUNITIES:

• Often dealing with: substance abuse issues, peer pressure, abusive relationships

• Higher level of transience

• Require: integration environment, support, motivation, social assistance opportunities

Couples and Famil ies• Often single parent with children or parents with single child

• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants)


shelter, mutual support

Famil ies• Often families with multiple children (including new immigrant families), or roommates

• Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrant

families)


shelter, mutual support in family friendly environment

S t u d i o

O n e B e d r o o m

Tw o B e d r o o m

B O Y L E R E N A I S S A N C E T R A N S I T I O N A L H O U S I N G B U I L D I N G

Firm:Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic BengertPartner in Charge:Joe Tkalcic Timeline:May - August, 2010

Singles:+ Higher level of transience+ Often dealing with: substance abuse issues, peer pressure, abusive relationships+ Require: integration environment, support, motivation, social assistance opportunities

Couples & Families:+ Often single parent with children or parents with single child+ Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants) + Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary / protected shelter, mutual support

Families:+ Often families with multiple children (including new immigrant families), or roommates+ Often dealing with: abusive relationships or new culture (particularly new immigrants)+ Require: integration environment, social assistance opportunities, temporary / protected shelter, mutual support in family friendly environment

The Boyle Renaissance Master Plan pioneers a more extensive area structure plan that proposes a regeneration and densificationof Edmonton’s Downtown East Side, with the firstphaseofthemasterplanfocusingontheprovision of social resources. As a member of thedesignteamforthefirstphaseoftheBoyleRenaissance plan, I was actively engaged with the stakeholders to understand and defineproject priorities, identify potential synergies between user groups, and to produce early conceptual diagrams to help formulate a designresponsethatreflectedtheseintentions.Following this initial visioning of phase one, my scope of involvement shifted primarily to the schematic design of the Transitional Housing Building, and to a more detailed analysis of its unique objectives.

P re l im ina r y Concep t Ske tch ▲

ADJACENTBUILDING

RETAIL

LEGEND

OFFICE

RESTAURANT

PARKING

ADJACENTBUILDING

ADJACENTBUILDING

ADJACENTBUILDING

RELOCATERESTAURANT

RE-ORGANIZE OFFICE PROGRAM

INTEGRATEPARKING

STRUCTURE

ADJACENTBUILDING

RETAIL

LEGEND

OFFICE

RESTAURANT

PARKING

ADJACENTBUILDING

ADJACENTBUILDING

ADJACENTBUILDING

RELOCATERESTAURANT

RE-ORGANIZE OFFICE PROGRAM

INTEGRATEPARKING

STRUCTURE

Reorganization Diagrams ▼

Preliminary Concept Sketch ▲

WEST EDMONTON MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

Firm:Architecture | Arndt Tkalcic BengertPartner in Charge:Joe Tkalcic Timeline:May - August, 2010

As part of a larger mixed use development proposal in West Edmonton, this building provides over 200,000 s.f. of leasable officeand retail space. Presented with a provisional design for the entire site, my involvement in this project included an evaluation of the relationship between the constituent parts of the development, both within the boundaries of the site, as well as the consideration of potential impacts to the surrounding neighbourhood. Given the responsibility of advancing the designof theofficebuildingpresentedhere, Iproposed a reorganization of the building mass toaddressthespecificchallengesitpresented,while incorporating outdoor amenity spaces requested by the client. Ultimately, I produced the concept sketch and diagrams shown in order to discuss the potential benefits of thisreorganization with the client.

LIVE

WORK

SLEEP

Fema le C l i en t Pa th

Ma le C l i en t Pa th

Du ra t i on

24

12

AMPM

LIVE

WORK

SLEEP

LEGEND

LEGEND

4

3

7

8

1

1

1

111

1

11

1

1

11 1

23

2

1

0 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24

0 03 06 09

15 18 21 24

12

03

06

09

12

15

18

21

24

LIVE

WORK

SLEEP



Du ra t i on

24

12

AMPM

LIVE

WORK

SLEEP

LEGEND

LEGEND

4

3

7

8

1

1

1

111

1

11

1

1

11 1

23

2

1

0 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24

0 03 06 09

15 18 21 24

12

03

06

09

12

15

18

21

24

M O B I U S H O U S E

University of TorontoBachelor of Arts Architectural StudiesArchitectural Representation Studio II

Studio Advisor:Aziza Chaouni

Timeline:January - April, 2010

“24 Hours of Living” Diagram

This project argued that architectural drawings may be employed as analytical tools capable of exposing complex relationships and characteristics of buildings. Following this argument, the practice of diagramming may be used to distill and abstract the processes and conceptual strategies embedded in a project.

Noting this, the following diagrams were produced to analyze and expose the conceptual framework of UN Studio’s Mobius House. The project’s organizational strategy draws upon the endlessly repeating Mobius strip to show how a husband and wife who both work at home can live together yet apart. The Mobius strip presents a conceptual model which allows for periods of both isolation and interaction along a continuous path of travel. The closed loop of the Mobius House’s circulation system allows this cycle of convergences and divergences to occur several times over the course of a single day, and blurs the boundaries between conventionally distinct programmes into what the architects describe as “24 Hours of Living”.

As such, the drawings shown pay attention to the relationships between time, location and duration of use, moments of shared occupancy, the frequency of use among the three programmatic functions of “Live, Work, and Sleep”, and to the realized circulation infrastructure that permits these dynamic processes to unfold seamlessly over time.

LIVE

WORK

SLEEP



Du ra t i on

24

12

AMPM

LIVE

WORK

SLEEP

LEGEND

LEGEND

4

3

7

8

1

1

1

111

1

11

1

1

11 1

23

2

1

0 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 24

0 03 06 09

15 18 21 24

12

03

06

09

12

15

18

21

24

Realized Mobius Loop

12

11

STUDIO 01 KITCHEN

07 KITCHEN WASHROOM

08 VERANDA

09 STUDIO 01 GARAGE

10 STUDIO 01 STUDIO 02

STUDIO 01 STUDIO 02

06 BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

01

02

03

04

05

24 BEDROOM

19 LIVING

20

VERANDA

VERANDA

21 STUDIO 01

CHILDREN’S

BEDROOMS

STUDIO 02

STUDIO 02

22 STUDIO 01 STUDIO 02

23 STUDIO 01 BEDROOM

18

13

14 LIVING STUDIO 02

15 MEETING STUDIO 02

16 GARAGE STUDIO 02

17 KITCHEN

FEMALE CLIENT PATHMALE CLIENT PATH

Conceptual DiagramsDaily Use Timeline

Realized Circulation Loop

01

01

02

03

04

05

02

Adelaide & SpadinaToronto, Ontario, 2011

Great Court, British MuseumFoster & PartnersLondon, England, 2010

Turbine Hall, Tate Modern MuseumHerzog & de MeuronLondon, England, 2010

Stair Tower detail, Lloyd’s of LondonRichard RogersLondon, England, 2010

Living Room, Seattle Public LibraryOMASeattle, Washington, 2013

T R A V E L S K E T C H B O O K

03 04

05

a. 165 Augusta Avenue, Apt. 205, Toronto, Ontario M5T.2L4 t. 1.647.389.5153 e. [email protected]

W

wayne mcmillan architectural portfolio_2014

Documents

college street

college facilities

college affairs board

innis college quad im

panel member innis residence

schematic design

student work

student affairs board