wdswfc

Upload: samuel-butler

Post on 04-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 wdswfc

    1/2

    Soldiers of South Sudan's SPLA

    army: The two Sudans are close to

    igniting a civil war and it may be time

    for the U.S. or China to step in as

    peacemaker. Photo:

    REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic

    http://theweek.com/article/index/227328/3-ways-to-defuse-the-deadly-sudan-conflict

    WORLD OPINION

    3 ways to defuse the deadly Sudan conflictTensions continue to flare along the disputed oil-rich border dividing Sudan andSouth Sudan. What will it take to avoid an immensely painful civil war?

    PUBLISHED APRIL 27, 2012, AT 10:44 AM

    Sudan and South Sudan continued inching closer to all-

    out war on Thursday, as the longtime rivals traded

    accusations designed to paint each other as the

    aggressor. South Sudan said its northern neighbor had

    bombed a village in the oil-rich Unity state along the

    two nations' contested border. In response, Khartoumaccused South Sudan of beating captured soldiers. Can

    anything stop the sister nations from renewing a civil

    war that killed two million people over two decades?

    Here, three crucial steps to restore peace:

    1. The U.S. must stand by South Sudan

    It would be a mistake to treat both sides equally, as

    Sudan is the true aggressor, says Jendayi Frazer at the

    Council on Foreign Relations. South Sudan has nomeans to defend itself from the north's constant

    bombing. "We need to give [South Sudan] a security

    blanket," and tell the north, "If you mess with the South,

    you mess with the United States." That's the only way

    to stop the fighting long enough to get both sides back

    to the negotiating table to settle disputes over border

    lines and sharing oil revenue that should have been

    resolved before South Sudan seceded last year.

    2. China has to step up, too

    China, the biggest oil customer at Port Sudan, is in a unique position to play peacemaker, says

    Daniel Howden at Britain's The Independent. During the 20-year Sudanese civil war, China acted

    like a "comic book villain," protecting its commercial interests by blocking any attempt by the

    United Nations Security Council to punish the Sudanese regime for "war crimes against its own

    population." The Sudanese divorce "has divided that oil between two countries," so now China has

    a stake in restoring peace. If Beijing commits itself, it can surely help get both sides to work out

    their differences.

    3. The world should pay Sudan for peace

    The South's secession was a bitter pill for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir to swallow, says

    Mark Tran at Britain's Guardian. South Sudan got two-thirds of Sudanese oil reserves, and "the

    loss of oil revenues has left Khartoum with a financial black hole of about $7 billion." That's why

  • 7/29/2019 wdswfc

    2/2

    diplomats are floating a "grand plan" to make up for the shortfall through a mix of belt-tightening in

    Khartoum, cash from China and Gulf states, and higher fees for transferring oil from landlocked

    South Sudan to Sudan's port. Really, the world ought to just pay off Sudan: "$7 billion to buy

    peace looks like a bargain."