‘we are at pain to notice that the role of prosecuting agency during the trial along with the...

8/11/2019 We Are at Pain to Notice That the Role of Prosecuting Agency During the Trial Along With the Trial Judgeappears t

1/20Page 1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 1973-1974 OF 2008

Patel Maheshbhai Ranchodbhaiand others !! A""ellants

#ers$s

State o% &$'arat !Res"ondent

JUDGMENT

M.Y. EQBAL J.

This is an e(ce"tional case )here this Co$rt has ta*en

serio$s note+ the )a, the Sessions J$d-e dis"osed o% the

Sessions case )ithin a "eriod o% nine da,s+ )hich can be

brie%l, narrated herein.belo)/

01!20!0334/ Char-es )ere %ra5ed and the case )as

ad'o$rned to 2!2!0336!

2!2!0336/ Prosec$tion "rod$ced list o% 20 )itnesses7!2!0336/ The "rosec$tion "rod$ced 6 )itnesses+

)ho )ere e(a5ined+ and re5ainin-

2


2/20Page 2

dro""ed! On the sa5e da,+ acc$sed

)ere e(a5ined $nder Section 828+

Cr!P!C!+ ar-$5ents heard and '$d-5ent

)as deli9ered ac:$ittin- all the acc$sed!

All acc$sed )ere ac:$itted+ e(ce"t the 5ain acc$sed

;h$sband


3/20Page 3

o%%ence "$nishable $nder Section 41=A o% Indian Penal Code!

The a""ellants ha9e been directed b, the Hi-h Co$rt to

$nder-o ri-oro$s i5"rison5ent o% se9en ,ears )ith total %ine

o% Rs! 26+333@.! The trial co$rt had ac:$itted all the acc$sed

e(ce"t acc$sed no!2 ;h$sband


4/20Page 4

5ental cr$elt,+ and the deceased )as also constantl,

beaten b, her h$sband! Prosec$tion case is that "recedin-

three da,s o% the incident+ all the three acc$sed "ersons+

)ho are a""ellants be%ore $s+ )ere e(tre5el, harassin- the

deceased and $"on insti-ation o% a""ellant nos!0 and 8+

h$sband.a""ellant no!2 had been beatin- deceased

Ren$*aben+ )hich contin$ed %or three da,s! On acco$nt o%

this and co5"ellin- circ$5stances+ on 2>!20!2117+ at abo$t

28!83 ho$rs+ Ren$*aben+ at her in.la)s ho$se+ "o$red

*erosene o% the :$antit, o% %i9e litres $"on her and i-nited

hersel% and conse:$entl, she started b$rnin- in %la5es! Her

h$sband ;2st a""ellant< i55ediatel, tried to sa9e the

deceased and it has co5e to the e9idence that )hile 5a*in-

s$ch an atte5"t+ the 2st a""ellant also s$%%ered in'$ries!

Therea%ter+ she )as ta*en to &eneral Hos"ital o% Mehsana in

a5b$lance and )as treated b, Dr! A!! a"adia and he

%o$nd b$rns on all o9er her bod,+ dee" in nat$re!

4


5/20Page 5

8! In the 5eanti5e+ Mehsana Tal$*a Police Station )as

in%or5ed and ASI PB4 reached at the E5er-enc, o% the

Hos"ital )here Ren$*aben )as ad5itted and her treat5ent

)as -oin- on! The Doctor )ho )as attendin- Ren$*aben

re:$ested ASI Har-o9anbhai to record her state5ent! The

said "olice o%%icial+ there%ore+ thro$-h his )riter recorded the

state5ent o% 9icti5 Ren$*aben in a 5anner that he as*ed

:$estions+ )hich she ans)ered and he -ot it noted thro$-h

his )riter! The deceased had stated in her d,in- declaration

that her 5arria-e )as sole5nied t)o ,ears be%ore the

incident ;i!e! in the ,ear 2116< and o$t o% that )edloc* she

had a %e5ale child! She stated that her h$sband had

ret$rned to 9illa-e Panchot %ro5 A%rica abo$t three da,s

be%ore the incident! In the state5ent+ she narrated the stor,

that she )as harassed b, the a""ellants on acco$nt o%

s$s"icion on her character and d$e to 5ental as )ell as

"h,sical cr$elt,+ she co55itted s$icide! Accordin- to

a%oresaid "olice o%%icial ;PB4


6/20Page 6

condition to -i9e ans)ers and in to*en o% it+ Doctor.in.char-e

"$t his si-nat$re on the state5ent and therea%ter th$5b

i5"ression o% her le- )as obtained since %in-ers o% both o%

her hands )ere distorted b, b$rnin-! U"on this+ a cri5e

ca5e to be re-istered a-ainst %o$r "ersons incl$din-

a""ellants herein! The %o$rth acc$sed )as sister.in.la)!

Therea%ter+ in the e9enin-+ on the ad9ice o% the Doctor+

Ren$*aben )as shi%ted to Ci9il Hos"ital o% Ah5edabad %or

%$rther treat5ent+ )here she died d$rin- treat5ent at abo$t

21!23 ho$rs!

4! Therea%ter+ char-e.sheet ca5e to be s$b5itted a-ainst

all the %o$r acc$sed in the Co$rt o% Chie% J$dicial Ma-istrate+

Mehsana+ )ho co55itted the case to the Co$rt o% Sessions

at Mehsana! Sessions J$d-e+ Mehsana %ra5ed char-es

a-ainst all the acc$sed on 01!20!0334 %or the o%%ences

"$nishable $nder Sections 41=A+ 83>+ 032 and 224 o% the

Indian Penal Code! On 2!2!0336+ the "rosec$tion s$b5itted

a list o% abo$t 20 )itnesses to be e(a5ined on behal% o% the

>


7/20Page 7

"rosec$tion and Sessions J$d-e iss$ed )itness s$55ons!

On 7!2!0336+ in all+ %i9e )itnesses ca5e to be e(a5ined b,

the Sessions Co$rt and the rest o% the )itnesses ca5e to be

dro""ed b, the "rosec$tion! O$t o% the %i9e )itnesses+ t)o

5ain )itnesses i!e! 5aternal $ncle and 5aternal a$nt o% the

deceased t$rned hostile! Des"ite this+ the "rosec$tion

s$b5itted closin- purshis on the 9er, sa5e da, and the

re5ainin- )itnesses a-ainst )ho5 )itness s$55ons )ere

alread, iss$ed+ ca5e to be dro""ed! On 7!2!0336+

A""lication E(hibit.7 )as s$b5itted on behal% o% the

"rosec$tion b, )hich the "rosec$tion s$b5itted a list o% 27

doc$5ents to be "rod$ced alon- )ith the necessar,

doc$5ents! Ho)e9er+ Sessions J$d-e e(hibited onl, %o$r

doc$5ents! On 7!2!0336 itsel%+ %$rther state5ents o% the

acc$sed $nder Section 828 o% the Code o% Cri5inal

Proced$re ca5e to be recorded! On the 9er, sa5e da,+ the

ar-$5ents on behal% o% the "rosec$tion as )ell as the

de%ence ca5e to be heard b, the Sessions J$d-e and on that

7


8/20Page 8

da, itsel%+ Sessions J$d-e+ Mehsana ac:$itted all the acc$sed

%or the o%%ences "$nishable $nder Section 83> read )ith

Sections 224 and 032 o% the Indian Penal Code and also

ac:$itted acc$sed nos!0 to 4 %or the o%%ence "$nishable

$nder Section 41=A+ IPC and con9icted the acc$sed no!2.

h$sband %or the o%%ence "$nishable $nder Section 41=A+ IPC

b, i5"osin- "$nish5ent o% three da,s si5"le i5"rison5ent

and %ine o% Rs!8+333@.! At this sta-e+ it is "ertinent to note

that since acc$sed no!2 )as in c$stod, as $ndertrial "risoner

%or three da,s+ he )as not re:$ired to s$rrender to 'ail %or

"$nish5ent on de"ositin- the a5o$nt o% %ine i5"osed!

6! Dissatis%ied and a--rie9ed b, the decision o% the trial

co$rt+ the State "re%erred Cri5inal A""eal No!284> o% 0336

a-ainst all the %o$r acc$sed+ )hich )as ad5itted and the

Hi-h Co$rt iss$ed suo motunotice %or re9isin- the sentence

a)arded to acc$sed no!2 ;h$sband< and the sa5e )as

re-istered as Cri5inal Re9ision A""lication No!>40 o% 0337!

=


9/20Page 9

A%ter thoro$-hl, a""reciatin- entire e9idence on record )ith

re%erence to a""eal a-ainst ac:$ittal+ enhance5ent %or

re9ision a""lication and also )ith re%erence to the

a""lication %iled b, the acc$sed %or add$cin- additional

e9idence+ the Hi-h Co$rt too* into consideration the broad

and reasonable "robabilities o% the case arisin- o$t o% the re.

a""reciation o% the e9idence on record and other 9ital

circ$5stances s$rro$ndin- the essence o% the trial! A%ter

hearin- learned co$nsel on either side and re.a""reciatin-

the e9idence+ the Di9ision ench o% the Hi-h Co$rt allo)ed

the a""eal o% the State and held a""ellants herein -$ilt, and

con9icted the5 o% the char-es $nder Section 83> read )ith

Section 224+ IPC and also con9icted acc$sed no!0 and 8 %or

the o%%ence "$nishable $nder Section 41=A+ IPC! The Hi-h

Co$rt+ allo)in- a%oresaid suo motu re9ision a""lication+

enhanced the i5"rison5ent o% a""ellant@acc$sed no!2

;h$sband< to RI o% se9en ,ears!

1


10/20Page 10

>! Hence "resent a""eals b, s"ecial lea9e b, the acc$sed

"ersons+ 9i!+ h$sband+ %ather.in.la) and 5other.in.la) o%

the deceased!

7! Mr! Ni*hil &oel+ learned co$nsel a""earin- %or the

a""ellants stron-l, s$b5itted that the Hi-h Co$rt %elt

an-$ished b, the %act that the "rosec$tion had dro""ed

9ario$s )itnesses and the trial co$rt e(a5ined these 6

)itnesses and co5"leted the trial )ithin one da,! Learned

co$nsel 9ehe5entl, contended that instead o% re5andin-

the 5atter bac* and )itho$t allo)in- an, %$rther e9idence+

the Di9ision ench o% the Hi-h Co$rt $"t$rned the ac:$ittal

based solel, on E(hibit 24+ the d,in- declaration! It is

%$rther contended that the deceased )as ta*en to the Ci9il

Hos"ital o% Mehsana at or abo$t 8!33 PM and )as shi%ted at

>!33 PM to Ah5edabad at a distance o% abo$t 63 *5s! In a

s5all "lace li*e Mehsana+ it )o$ld not ha9e been di%%ic$lt %or

an,bod, to in%or5 the E(ec$ti9e Ma-istrate )ithin this -a"

o% %o$r ho$rs! Neither the Doctor nor the )riter )as

23


11/20Page 11

e(a5ined! In %act+ the ASI ;PB4!

In the d,in- declaration itsel%+ the deceased had 5entioned

that )hen she tried to b$rn hersel%+ it )as the 2sta""ellant

)ho i55ediatel, tried to sa9e her! The e9idence o% PB6

sho)s that the 2st a""ellant s$%%ered b$rn in'$ries )hile

5a*in- an atte5"t to sa9e the deceased! It is %$rther

contended that the e9idence o% PB0 and PB8 also s"ea*

22


12/20Page 12

abo$t the 5ental %ra5e o% the deceased as also a "ossible

reason %or )hich she 5ade an atte5"t to co55it s$icide!

PB0 and PB8+ 5aternal $ncle and 5aternal a$nt+ ha9e

raised the deceased as their o)n child in an e9ent$alit,

)here the "arents o% the deceased )ere 5entall, $nstable!

It )as s$b5itted that d,in- declaration 5a, be s$%%icient to

con9ict the h$sband b$t 5a, not be s$%%icient %or con9iction

o% other acc$sed $nder Section 83> IPC!

1! Lastl,+ learned co$nsel s$b5itted that once ha9in-

%o$nd that the e9idence )as not "ro"erl, lead b, the

"rosec$tion+ the Hi-h Co$rt o$-ht to ha9e balanced the

ri-hts o% the acc$sed and the Hi-h Co$rt has erred in not

re5andin- the 5atter bac* to the trial co$rt! The

a9ailabilit, o% other e9idence )o$ld ha9e also en$red to the

bene%it o% the a""ellants! Learned co$nsel %$rther

s$b5itted that s$ch an o""ort$nit, )as denied to the

20


13/20Page 13

"resent a""ellants and the con9iction )as ret$rned "$rel,

on con'ect$res and s$r5ises!

23! Learned co$nsel relied $"on the '$d-5ent "rono$nced

b, this Co$rt in Govindaraju vs. State, (2012) 4 SCC 722

!"#$%&'# (")*# +. !,*,' /*#*%*;0322< 23 SCC 278

and R*)'s (")*# +.!*,,' C*,,$s*# ;0332< 1

SCC >2=!

22! Per contra+ learned co$nsel a""earin- %or the State

contended that PB0 and PB8+ both 5aternal $ncle and

5aternal a$nt o% the deceased+ did not s$""ort the

"rosec$tion case+ b$t the "rosec$tion case )as a5"l,

"ro9ed b, the d,in- declaration+ )hich is the correct

de"iction o% the incident+ strai-ht)a, %ro5 the 5o$th o% the

deceased soon a%ter the incident! It is %$rther contended

that in the "resent case+ )hen there is an o9er)hel5in-

e9idence b, )hich the "rosec$tion case is a5"l, "ro9ed+ the

:$estion o% additional e9idence+ and that too+ necessar,

28


14/20Page 14

additional e9idence )o$ld not arise at all! Bhat had been

a9erred in the a""lication a""ears to be an a%tertho$-ht

de%ence o% the acc$sed+ )hich co$ld not be "laced d$rin-

trial!

20! The learned co$nsel dre) o$r attention to "ara-ra"h 82

o% the i5"$-ned '$d-5ent statin- that this is a %it case to

in9o*e Section 228.A o% the Indian E9idence Act+ 2=70! The

acc$sed ha9e %ailed to dischar-e the b$rden $"on the5 to

e("lain the death o% the deceased! On the contrar,+ the,

ad5itted that the death o% the deceased )as a s$icidal one!

In ordinar, circ$5stances+ the lad, ha9in- a %e5ale child o%

t)o ,ears+ )o$ld not resort to s$icide onl, beca$se her

h$sband stated to her that it )o$ld ta*e little ti5e to ta*e

her to A%rica alon- )ith hi5! It has been contended b, the

learned co$nsel that the Hi-h Co$rt+ there%ore+ ri-htl, ca5e

to the concl$sion that the a""ellants co55itted not onl, the

24


15/20Page 15

o%%ence $nder Section 41=A b$t also $nder Section 83> o%

the Indian Penal Code!

28! A%ter hearin- learned co$nsel %or the "arties and

"er$sin- the "a"ers incl$din- the i5"$-ned order+ )e are in

con%or5it, )ith the o"inion and concl$sion o% the Di9ison

ench o% the Hi-h Co$rt! The co$rts are e("ected to

"er%or5 its d$ties and %$nctions e%%ecti9el, and tr$e to the

s"irit )ith )hich the co$rts are sacredl, entr$sted )ith the

di-nit, and a$thorit, and an alert '$d-e acti9el,

"artici"atin- in co$rt "roceedin-s )ith a %ir5 -ri" on oars

enables the trial s5oothl, to reach at tr$th! In the "resent

case+ the trial co$rt has %ailed to "er%or5 its d$ties to reach

to the real tr$th and to con9ict the acc$sed! As obser9ed b,

the Hi-h Co$rt+ )e are also at "ain to notice that the role o%

"rosec$tin- a-enc, d$rin- the trial alon- )ith the trial '$d-e

a""ears to be d$bio$s! esides d,in- declaration+ there )as

a9ailable e9idence on record to "ro9e the %act$5 o% cr$elt,

and death o% Ren$*aben+ b$t it )as not bro$-ht on record b,

26


16/20Page 16

the "rosec$tin- a-enc,! Instead+ all concerned )ere in

h$rr, to %inish the case in a da,! Prosec$tion s$b5itted a list

o% 27 doc$5ents to be "rod$ced and e(hibited+ b$t the trial

J$d-e e(hibited onl, %o$r doc$5ents and "rosec$tion also

did not raise an, ob'ection!

24! As obser9ed b, this Co$rt in the case o% Zahira

Habibulla Sheikh & anr. vs. State of Gujarat & ors. ,

;0334< 4 SCC 26=+ the "rosec$tor )ho does not act %airl, and

acts 5ore li*e a co$nsel %or the de%ence is a liabilit, to the

%air '$dicial s,ste5+ and Co$rts co$ld not also "la, into the

hands o% s$ch "rosec$tin- a-enc, sho)in- indi%%erence or

ado"tin- an attit$de o% total aloo%ness! Co$rt has a -reater

d$t, and res"onsibilit, i!e! to render '$stice+ in a case )here

the role o% the "rosec$tin- a-enc, itsel% is "$t in iss$e and is

said to be hand in -lo9e )ith the acc$sed+ "aradin- a 5oc*

%i-ht and 5a*in- a 5oc*er, o% the cri5inal '$stice

ad5inistration itsel%! As s$ccinctl, stated in Jennison vs.

2>


17/20Page 17

Baker;All ER "! 233>d< The la) sho$ld not be seen to sit

b, li5"l,+ )hile those )ho de%, it -o %ree+ and those )ho

see* its "rotection lose ho"e! Co$rts ha9e to ens$re that

acc$sed "ersons are "$nished and that the 5i-ht or

a$thorit, o% the State is not $sed to shield the5sel9es or

their 5en! It sho$ld be ens$red that the, do not )ield s$ch

"o)ers )hich $nder the Constit$tion ha9e to be held onl, in

tr$st %or the "$blic and societ, at lar-e! I% de%icienc, in

in9esti-ation or "rosec$tion is 9isible or can be "ercei9ed b,

li%tin- the 9eil tr,in- to hide the realities or co9erin- the

ob9io$s de%iciencies+ co$rts ha9e to deal )ith the sa5e )ith

an iron hand a""ro"riatel, )ithin the %ra5e)or* o% la)! It is

as 5$ch the d$t, o% the "rosec$tor as o% the co$rt to ens$re

that %$ll and 5aterial %acts are bro$-ht on record so that

there 5i-ht not be 5iscarria-e o% '$stice!

26! Be are o% the o"inion that the Di9ision ench o% the

Hi-h Co$rt has correctl, re.a""reciated the e9idence on

27


18/20Page 18

record and re9ersed the ac:$ittal decision o% the trial co$rt!

Be conc$r )ith the %indin-s o% the Hi-h Co$rt that in the

"resent case+ "ri5e d$t, o% the trial co$rt to a""reciate the

e9idence %or search o% tr$th is abandoned and in a h$rr, to

dis"ose o% the case or %or so5e other reason+ the Sessions

J$d-e had dis"osed o% the trial and ac:$itted the acc$sed!

2>! In 9ie) o% the abo9e+ )e do not %ind an, reason to

inter%ere )ith the i5"$-ned decision o% the Hi-h Co$rt! The

Cri5inal A""eals are accordin-l, dis5issed and the bail

bonds o% the acc$sed.a""ellants stand cancelled! The, shall

s$rrender %orth)ith to ser9e o$t the re5ainin- "eriod o% the

sentence+ %ailin- )hich+ the trial co$rt is directed to ta*e

a""ro"riate ste"s %or sendin- the5 to "rison to $nder-o the

re5ainin- "eriod o% sentence!

.J.

M.Y. E56*

2=


19/20Page 19

.J.A6* M*%*# !*#'

Ne) Delhi+Se"te5ber 0>+ 0324!

21


20/20

03

‘we are at pain to notice that the role of prosecuting agency during the trial along with the...

Documents