we are one chicago - base fact sheet - final
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: We Are One Chicago - Base Fact Sheet - Final](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022021318/577cd14f1a28ab9e78941db3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
8/13/2019 We Are One Chicago - Base Fact Sheet - Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/we-are-one-chicago-base-fact-sheet-final 1/2
CHICAGO PENSION FACT SHEET
STATISTICS ON CHICAGO’S PENSION SYSTEMS
All total, the five funds below hold the retirement life savings of 81,323 active city
employees and 56,843 retirees – a total of 138,166 people, none of whom receive
Social Security. The city estimates that the average retiree pension is just over $40,000.
retirement systemactive
workersretirees
average
annuity
funded
ratio
Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund 30,366 22,636 $46,440 53.9%
Firemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund 4,740 2,821 $64,860 24.4%
Policemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund 12,026 9,035 $56,892 31.3%
Municipal Employees’ Annuity and Benefit
Fund (e.g., health care workers, food/water
safety inspectors, library workers)
31,326 19,614 $33,423 37.2%
Laborers’ Annuity & Benefit Fund (e.g., street
and sanitation workers) 2,865 2,737 $42,688 55.4%
WHY ARE SYSTEMS UNDERFUNDED?
Chicago’s pension systems are diverse, but all suffer from essentially the same core problems.
• Deliberate, Drastic Underfunding by Politicians: All systems have been deliberately
underfunded by politicians through inadequate employer contributions. This has led to
large, upcoming cliff payments for the teachers, police, and fire systems, meant to pay
off the pension debt accumulated from underfunding. In some cases, politicians
purposefully made little to no contributions to the system for the better part of a decade.
As an example, this unwise underfunding drove down the Chicago Teachers’ Pension
Fund’s previously healthy funded ratio of 100% in 2001 to 54% in 2012.
• Employer Contributions Not Based on Actuarial Science: The municipal and laborers
funds still feature an artificial employer funding formula based on a “multiplier.” The
multiplier has no relation to actuarial science that governs normal pension funding. The
other three funds also used this multiplier method for decades. This leads to
underfunding by design.
![Page 2: We Are One Chicago - Base Fact Sheet - Final](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022021318/577cd14f1a28ab9e78941db3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
8/13/2019 We Are One Chicago - Base Fact Sheet - Final
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/we-are-one-chicago-base-fact-sheet-final 2/2
• The Great Recession Brought on by Wall Street : Big banks and corporate CEOs on Wall
Street crashed the economy in the mid-to-late 2000s, hurting already-weak pension
funding levels. Now, many of these same big business leaders want to slash modest citypensions averaging around $40,000 -- even as the corporate elite plan to retire on six-
and seven-figure pensions.
• Benefits Are Not the Problem: A commission assembled under the former Daley
Administration found that the City of Chicago’s pension benefit levels “are comparable
to those of other cities, with the public safety funds at the low end and public service
funds near the average.” It also fund that “current benefits are not, in themselves,
unaffordable” and did not recommend cutting benefits for current employees because of
“uncertain legality and fairness.” Slashing pension benefits alone is unfair,
unconstitutional pension theft and will not fix the problem.
WHO STANDS TO BENEFIT FROM PENSION “REFORM”?
• Wall Street : Wall Street is angling to further benefit on the backs of public sector
workers. The same bankers and billionaires now rallying to destroy defined-benefit
plans and push all workers into 401(k) plans also charged millions in fees for managing
investments for public pensions. In Rhode Island’s recent attack on pensions, the money
saved from gutting retiree income went to fees for Wall Street to manage the pension
investments in high-risk hedge funds; Wall Street won, but retirement security is
jeopardized.
HOW CAN UNDERFUNDING BE ADDRESSED FAIRLY AND LEGALLY?
• New Revenue Must Be Part of the Solution: Even the Daley commission admitted that
the City of Chicago will have to increase the amount it contributes. It states that “the
City of Chicago will have to contribute more,” implying that new, enhanced revenues are
necessary. It will take a serious commitment of new revenue to pay down the pension
debt owed to teachers, police, nurses, fire fighters, and other public employees and
retirees.
• We Stand Ready to Work Together: The voices of working and retired men and womenshould be at the table when decisions are made about their retirement life-savings. We
stand ready to work constructively toward a solution that is fair, constitutional, and fixes
the real problem – a lack of revenue and chronically underfunded pension payments.