WHAPM Unit 6 Modified DBQ #1Created by Caleb Lagerwey - clagerwey@hollandchristian.org

2020 AP History Rubric here.

Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which reactions to overseas imperialism by industrialized powers differed between 1830 and 1914.

Document 1

Source: A letter by Lin Zexu, Chinese Commissioner in Canton, to Queen Victoria of Great Britain, 1839.

The purpose of your ships in coming to China is to realize a large profit. Since this profit is realized in China and is in fact taken away from the Chinese people, how can foreigners return injury for the benefit they have received by sending this poison to harm their benefactors? You do not wish opium to harm your own country, but you choose to bring that harm to other countries such as China. Why?...

The products that originate from China are all useful items. They are good for food and other purposes and are easy to sell...Were China to concern herself only with her own advantage without showing any regard for other people's welfare, how could foreigners continue to live?...

This is the rationale behind the new law which says that any foreigner who brings opium to China will be sentenced to death by hanging or beheading. Our purpose is to eliminate this poison once and for all and to the benefit of all mankind.

Document 2

Source: Dadabhai Naoroji, Essays, Speeches, Addresses and Writings, 1871.

The Benefits of British Rule for India:

In the Cause of Humanity: Abolition of suttee[sati] and infanticide...Allowing remarriage of Hindu widows, and charitable aid in time of famine. Glorious work all this, of which any nation may well be proud, and such as has not fallen to the lot of any people in the history of mankind…

Politically: Peace and order. Freedom of speech and liberty of the press. Higher political knowledge and aspirations. Improvement of government in the native states. Security of life and property. Freedom from oppression caused by the caprice or greed of despotic rulers, and from devastation by war...

To sum up the whole, the British rule has been: morally, a great blessing; politically, peace and order on one hand, blunders on the other; materially, impoverishment, relieved as far as the railway and other loans go. The natives call the British system “Sakar ki Churi,” the knife of sugar. That is to say, there is no oppression, it is all smooth and sweet, but it is the knife, notwithstanding. I mention this that you should know these feelings. Our great misfortune is that you do not know our wants. When you will know our real wishes, I have not the least doubt that you would do justice. The genius and spirit of the British people is fair play and justice.

Document 3

Source: Letter from Menelik II, emperor of Ethiopia, addressed to the rulers of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia, 1891.

While tracing today the actual boundaries of my Empire, I shall endeavour, if God gives me life and strength, to re-establish the ancient frontiers (tributaries) of Ethiopia...

Ethiopia has been for fourteen centuries a Christian island in a sea of pagans. If powers at a distance come forward to partition Africa between them, I do not intend to be an indifferent spectator. As the Almighty has protected Ethiopia up to this day, I have confidence He will continue to protect her, and increase her borders in the future. I am certain He will not suffer her to be divided among other Powers.

Formerly the boundary of Ethiopia was the sea. Having lacked strength sufficient, and having received no help from Christian Powers, our frontier on the sea coast fell into the power of the Muslim-man. At present we do not intend to regain our sea frontier by force, but we trust that the Christian Power, guided by our Saviour, will restore to us our sea-coast line, at any rate, certain points on the coast.

Document 4

Source: Ndansi Kumalo, a survivor of the failed Ndebele uprising against the British in southern Africa, 1896.

So we surrendered to the white people and were told to go back to our homes and live our usual lives and attend to our crops. But the white men sent native police who did abominable things; they were cruel and assaulted a lot of our people and helped themselves to our cattle and goats...We were treated like slaves...In fact, the treatment we received was intolerable. We thought it best to fight and die rather than bear it. How the rebellion started I do not know; there was no organization, it was like a fire that suddenly flames up....We said, “It is no good living under such conditions; death would be better—let us fight.”...We knew that we had very little chance because their weapons were so much superior to ours. But we meant to fight to the last, feeling that even if we could not beat them we might at least kill a few of them and so have some sort of revenge.

I fought in the rebellion...I had a gun, a breech-loader. They—the white men—fought us with big guns and Maxims and rifles...We charged them at close quarters: we thought we had a good chance to kill them but the Maxims were too much for us...We made many charges but each time we were beaten off, until at last the white men packed up and retreated. But for the Maxims, it would have been different...

Document 5

Source: “A Lesson for Anti-Imperialists,” a cartoon published in Judge magazine by Victor Gillam, 1899.

[The outstretched hands on the right are labeled (top to bottom): “Russia, Germany, Italy, Austria-Hungary, England, France, & China”]