web viewunclassified information should now apply a dissemination limiting marker instead of the...

9
DPC/G4.8b Government guideline on cyber security ISMF Guideline 8b New classification scheme for confidentiality of information and associated assets BACKGROUND On 26 July 2011, the Australian Government announced a new confidentiality classification scheme which was subsequently approved by the Government of South Australia for use in ICT systems on 12 October 2011. Notably, the X-IN-CONFIDENCE, HIGHLY PROTECTED and ISMF Guideline 11

Upload: votu

Post on 09-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

DPC/G4.8b Government guideline on cyber security

ISMF Guideline 8bNew classification scheme for confidentiality of information and associated assets

BACKGROUND

On 26 July 2011, the Australian Government announced a new confidentiality classification scheme which was subsequently approved by the Government of South Australia for use in ICT systems on 12 October 2011. Notably, the X-IN-CONFIDENCE, HIGHLY PROTECTED and

ISMF Guideline 11

Page 2: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

ISMF Guideline 4

RESTRICTED classifications have been retired and several ‘dissemination limiting markers1’ [DLMs] were introduced.

ISMF version 3.1, and later editions, describe the new classification scheme and introduces DLMs and ‘caveats’ for use with governmental information and associated assets. Classifications for integrity and availability requirements remain unchanged from earlier editions of the South Australian Government Information Security Management Framework [ISMF ] . This guideline supports implementation of ISMF Policy Statement 8.

GUIDANCE

This guideline assists agencies and suppliers to government in translating earlier classification markings to the revised scheme. The purpose of this guideline is to facilitate agency migration of existing information assets to the new dissemination and/or protective security markings described in the current ISMF.

Rule-setThe majority of translations between the earlier scheme and the new markings are one to one. However the retirement of some classifications (noted above) and the introduction of caveats, coupled with rules for the Sensitive: Cabinet dissemination limiting marker for Australian Government information, creates some unique circumstances whereby a combination of a dissemination limiting marker and a protective security marking or a caveat may be required. The matrix contained in this guideline is not intended as an absolute rule-set and agencies are advised to consult their Information Security Technology Adviser [ITSA] for further guidance.

Migration matrixThe table on the following page lists commonly used classifications from earlier versions of the ISMF (and by association the now retired Australian Government Protective Security Manual or PSM) and aligns these with the revised markings in ISMF v3.1 (and by association the current Australian Government Protective Security Policy Framework). The table commences with the least restrictive category of information and progresses to the most onerous classifications.

1 Dissemination limiting markers (DLMs) are markings for information where disclosure may be limited or prohibited by legislation, or where it may otherwise require special handling.

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 3: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

ISMF

OLD CLASSIFICATION SCHEME

NEW CLASSIFICATION SCHEME

Former classifications defined by the Australian Government PSM

Protective marking (classifications)

Dissemination Limiting Marker Optional Caveat(s)2

PUBLIC3 PUBLIC PUBLIC DO NOT release until

DO NOT release after

UNCLASSIFIED4 For Official Use Only

Sensitive5 may be used in place of ‘For Official Use Only’ with security classified or unclassified information:

where the secrecy provisions of enactments may apply, and/or the disclosure of which may be limited or prohibited under legislation.

Permission required

GOVERNMENT-IN-CONFIDENCE For Official Use Only (FOUO)

AGENCY-IN-CONFIDENCE

COMMITTEE-IN-CONFIDENCE

STAFF-IN-CONFIDENCE

SECURITY-IN-CONFIDENCE

For Official Use Only (FOUO) (audience name) Eyes Onlye.g. Committee EO

When completed

[IC] X-in-Confidence For Official Use Only (FOUO) – if containing no personally identifiable information (i.e. privacy data)

Sensitive: Personal may be used with security classified or unclassified information that is sensitive personal information.

2 Table 4 of the ISMF describes applicable Government of South Australia caveats. 3 Information intended for Public use may now make use of South Australian Government caveats related to the release of this information per ISMF control S19.34 UNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word UNCLASSIFIED5 When applying the Sensitive marking without a pre-defined suffix (such as: Commercial, Medical, Legal, Personal etc.) the section of the relevant Act containing the secrecy or non-disclosure

requirements must be cited. This enables receiving parties to be aware of their obligations and facilitates Freedom of Information Officers in determining what aspects of a record or document may not be disclosed.

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 3 of 9

ISMF Guideline 8b

Page 4: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

ISMF

OLD CLASSIFICATION SCHEME

NEW CLASSIFICATION SCHEME

Former classifications defined by the Australian Government PSM

Protective marking (classifications)

Dissemination Limiting Marker Optional Caveat(s)

CLIENT-IN-CONFIDENCE Sensitive: Personal may be used with security classified or unclassified information that includes sensitive personal information.

When completed

COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE Sensitive: Commercial is specifically implemented in South Australia to facilitate the rapid reassignment of existing COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE classified materials.

PATIENT-IN-CONFIDENCE

MEDICAL-IN-CONFIDENCE

Sensitive: Medical is a DLM specifically implemented in South Australia and must be used for any information that may be subject to medical practitioner-patient privilege. This DLM must also be applied in place of Sensitive: Personal markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare enactments or other medical industry legislation may apply.

ATTORNEY-IN-CONFIDENCE

LEGAL-IN-CONFIDENCE

Sensitive: Legal may be used for any information that may be subject to legal professional privilege.

SOUTH AUSTRALIANCABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE

Sensitive: SA Cabinet is a DLM specifically implemented in South Australia to facilitate rapid reassignment of existing CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE classified materials. It is considered the most sensitive of DLMs that does not require an accompanying protective marking (i.e. security classification).

AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE

PROTECTED (or higher)

Sensitive: Cabinet is a DLM to be applied to Australian Government (i.e. federal) cabinet information such as:

any document including but not limited to business lists, minutes, submissions, memoranda and matters without submission that is or has been:

— submitted or proposed to be submitted to Cabinet, or official records of Cabinet any other information that would reveal:

— the deliberations or decisions of Cabinet, or — matters submitted, or proposed to be submitted to Cabinet.

Any use of the DLM ‘Sensitive: Cabinet’ is to be accompanied by a security classification protective marker of at least PROTECTED level.

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 4 of 9

ISMF Guideline 8b

Page 5: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

ISMF

OLD CLASSIFICATION SCHEME

NEW CLASSIFICATION SCHEME

Former classifications defined by the Australian Government PSM

Protective marking (classifications)

Dissemination Limiting Marker Optional Caveat(s)

PROTECTED PROTECTED

HIGHLY PROTECTED6 PROTECTED (SA Government)SECRET (Australian Government)

RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL (in limited circumstances as determined by the originating Australian Government agency)

The majority of RESTRICTED information will be marked ‘For Official Use Only’ however such decisions will be made by the document originator in the Australian Government. In limited circumstances, some information may need to be classified as CONFIDENTIAL.

Refer Australian Government Protective Security Policy Framework

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL As above

SECRET SECRET As above

TOP SECRET TOP SECRET As above

6 Certain elements of the former HIGHLY PROTECTED classification may require elevation to SECRET using the new scheme. The findings of an agency risk assessment including an impact assessment for compromise (loss, damage, theft etc.) of the information should determine if this measure is warranted. Information received by or held on behalf of the Australian Government must be treated as SECRET unless advised otherwise by the originating agency.

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 5 of 9

ISMF Guideline 8b

Page 6: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

Protected

Official Information

Public Information Non-Public Information

Security Classified Information

Protective Markings

Sensitive: SA Cabinet

Sensitive: Legal, Commercial or Medical

Sensitive or Sensitive: Personal

For Official Use OnlyProtected (Sensitive: Cabinet)

Unclassified Information

Top secret

Secret

Confidential

Dissemination Limiting Markers

SA government or National Security caveats (optional)

ISMF

REVISED SOUTH AUSTRALIAN CONFIDENTIALITY CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE

The image below details the structure of the revised South Australian classification structure in alignment with the Australian Government Protective Security Policy Framework. Classifications to describe availability and integrity requirements for information assets remain unchanged from earlier versions of the ISMF.

INFORMATION SECURITY TECHNOLOGY ADVISERS

Agency personnel and suppliers to government agencies should initially consult and confer on classification migration matters with ITSA for the relevant agency.

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 6 of 9

ISMF Guideline 8b

Page 7: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

ISMF

HOW TO SELECT AN APPROPRIATE CONFIDENTIALITY MARKING

Double-click the embedded object below (DOCX format version of this guideline only) for a flowchart to assist agency personnel in determining an appropriate DLM and/or classification:

APPLY A SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT INFORMATION CAVEAT (OPTIONAL)

A caveat is a warning that the information has special requirements in addition to those indicated by the DLM or protective marking. Caveats are not classifications in their own right and are not to appear without the appropriate DLM or protective marking.

Caveat Description

Eyes only (EO)

The Eyes Only marking indicates that access to information is restricted to select individuals, functions or workgroups for instance:

Committee EO: Only Committee members Agency EO: Only Agency personnel

Information must only be shared on a strict need-to-know basis and membership to a given agency and/or committee does not convey an automatic entitlement.

Permission required

Express written consent is required by the originator of the information prior to it being republished or communicated to any other party.

When completed

Predominately used for forms and templates, this conditional caveat indicates that an accompanying DLM or protective marking takes effect only when the form/template has been completed.

DO NOT release until

Information may only be released AFTER a specific date, time or specified event. (This caveat may also be used with Public Information, particularly with respect to major announcements or initiatives.)

DO NOT release after

Information must only be released PRIOR to a specific date, time or specified event.(This caveat may also be used with Public Information, particularly with respect to emergency management information.)

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Information in aggregate may trigger an elevation of the information classification. For example, a database or application that runs many instances of formerly X-IN-CONFIDENCE materials may need an aggregated classification to the PROTECTED level. Similarly many instances of PROTECTED information may need to be treated as SECRET when aggregated.

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 7 of 9

ISMF Guideline 8b

Page 8: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

ISMF

All Official Information and information assets not in the public domain must be considered to be for “official use only” and the ‘need-to-know’ principle must be applied. This principle means a person must have a legitimate need to access the classified information assets to carry out their official duties. Other justifications, such as position of authority, or the desire to enter controlled areas or access information for the sake of convenience, are not valid. (ISMF control S19.4)

Collaboration and sharing of non-public information still retains the ‘need-to-know’ principle in that information is for retention within the public sector. It is not intended for public dissemination to the community or private sector organisations, as an example.

The use of the ‘Eyes Only’ caveat may be used to limit dissemination of information across the Government of South Australia and to indicate it is not for use within other jurisdictions. (e.g. ‘SA Government Eyes Only’)

Unclassified information must use at least one DLM, Security Classified Information may also use or contain (several) DLMs.

Several tools and guidelines have been published at the primary ISMF landing page

This guideline does not aim to provide the reader with all of the responsibilities and obligations associated with information confidentiality classification. It is merely an overview of the information provided in applicable government cyber security policy, governance frameworks and associated standards. It is highly recommended that agencies review these documents in their entirety. The individual requirements of agencies will have direct bearing on what measures are implemented to mitigate identified risk(s).

Government guideline on cyber securityNew classification scheme for confidentiality v1.3

Page 8 of 9

ISMF Guideline 8b

Page 9: Web viewUNCLASSIFIED information should now apply a Dissemination Limiting Marker instead of the word ... markings where secrecy provisions of healthcare ... (DOCX format

Initial draft [UNCLASSIFIED]

REFERENCES, LINKS & ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

DPC/F4.1 Government of South Australia Information Security Management Framework [ISMF]

PC030 Government of South Australia Protective Security Management Framework [PSMF]

Australian Government Protective Security Policy Framework [PSPF]

Document Control

ID DPC/G4.8bVersion 1.3Classification/DLM PUBLIC-I2-A1Compliance DiscretionaryOriginal authorisation date March 2013Last approval date September 2017Review date September 2018

Licence

With the exception of the Government of South Australia brand, logos and any images, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 Licence . To attribute this material, cite the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Government of South Australia, 2017.

ISMF Guideline 8b