webinar 5: translating science into policy (2nd set)
TRANSCRIPT
Addressing Environmental Health Policy: Reproductive Health and Chemical Exposures:
Lessons for Energy Development
Rachel Morello‐Frosch, PhD, MPHUC Berkeley, School of Public Health & Department of
Environmental Science, Policy and ManagementUCSF Program on Reproductive Health and the
Environment
Center for Environmental HealthWebinar 5: Translating Science into Policy
CEH Webinar Series: What’s Energy Development Doing to Our
Reproductive Health?
5/11/2015
Federal reserve data on chemical production is only offered as relative production, which is unit‐less. A specific reference year is chosen and values are calculated relative to that year’s production. In this particular data set 2007 is the reference year and is assigned a value of 100.
Data from: U.S. Federal Reserve Board, Division of Research and Statistics
↑15 fold
Links between natural gas development and birth outcomes
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Neurotube Defects Congenital HeartDefect
Odd
s Ratio and
95%
CI
Birth Defect
McKenzie et al. 2014. Environ Health Perspect 122:412–417. Odds rations adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol use, education, and elevation of residence, as well as infant parity and sex
Association between natural gas development well count within 10‐mile radius of maternal residence (highest versus lowest tertile of exposure)
Researchers and regulators pushed by EH advocates to better address cumulative impactsConsider social inequality, segregation, and links to environmental health disparities:
◦ Multiple hazards where communities live, work, and play
◦ Vulnerability due to chronic social stressors ◦ poverty, malnutrition, discrimination
chronic health problems
Morello-Frosch et al. Health Affairs, 2011Hicken et al. , Health Affairs, 2011
Disparities in Exposures
Hazardous OccupationsPoor Ambient Air Quality
High Traffic DensityWater Contamination
Social Vulnerability (Extrinsic Factors)
PovertyFood Insecurity
Psycho-social StressorsLess Health Care Access
Race/RacismGender Roles
Health Disparities
MortalityMorbidity
Triple Jeopardy
Morello-Frosch et al., 2006, 2011, 2013Gee and Payne-Sturges, 2004O’Neill et al. 2003IOM, 1999
Biological Susceptibility (Intrinsic Factors)
AgeUnderlying Disease
MalnutritionSex
Interaction/Additive Effects
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
∑PBDE BDE‐47 BDE‐99 BDE‐153
med
ian concen
tration in serum
(ng
/g lipid)
Madrid, Spain, 2003‐2004 (n=61)
Salinas Valley, California, 1999‐2000 (n=270)
United States (NHANES), 2003‐2004 (n=75)
Northern and Central California, 2008‐2009 (n=25)
Comparison of flame retardants in pregnant women worldwide
Zota A. et al. 2008 Environmental Science & Technology; Quirós‐Alcalá L. et al. 2011 Environment International; Yuang et al. 2010 Chemosphere; Whitehead T. et al. 2012 13th Workshop on Brominated Flame Retardants
PBDEs Highest Exposure in California
18
Actions Matter – Policy
Zota A.R., et al. 2013 ES&T
June 2006, California State bans PBDEs
65% ↓PBDEs levels in California pregnant women
2007 – 2012
"California is curbing toxic chemicals found in everything from high chairs to sofas….. These new standards will keep the furniture in our homes fire‐safe and limit unnecessary exposure to toxic flame retardants.“
‐ Gov. Jerry Brown
“… we must shift …burdenof proof from the individual health care provider and the consumer to the manufacturers before … chemicals are ….released into the environment.” Dr. Jeanne Conry, President ACOG 2013
Linda C. Giudice, MD, PhD, President American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Jeanne C. Conry, MD, PhD, President, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – October 2013, Washington, DC
..modernize and strengthen …TSCA to increase confidence that chemicals … are safe…
Congress must modernize TSCA to ensure product safety
By updating TSCA, Congress can create … chemicals policy that protects public health and the environment,
Safer Chemicals Healthy Families
Everyone agrees – chemicals policy needs to be modernized
Exposure Assessment as Prevention Evidence
Existing human and animal evidence of health concern
Human ExposureEvidence
EducateRegulateReformulate
Basis for ActionStrength of
evidence, not “proof”
Household Exposure Study:Northern California
50 Homes ◦ Richmond, CA (N=40)◦ Bolinas, CA (N=10)
Methods◦ Indoor/outdoor air & dust collected from each home◦ 155 analytes ‐‐ industry, transportation sources and consumer products
Goals◦ Compare pollutant levels in communities with and without major industry
◦ Assess cumulative impact and highlight local sources of concern◦ E.g. refinery activities
Vanadium
• Sources: key marker for petroleum refining
• Richmond higher than Bolinas
• Outdoor air is the major indoor source
Comparison of the Vanadium – Nickel relationship across three cities
Cities with heavy oil combustion (refineries and shipping) have a similar chemical signature in the air
Community – engaged Science Promotes the 3 R’s:
Rigor: Community involvement promotes good science
In research design, data collection, ground-truthing, interpretation, etc
Relevance: Asking the right questionsEmphasizes causes of exposure & opportunities for action
CollectiveIndividual
Reach: Leverage knowledge to drive policy change
Photo: Communities for a Better Environment
Thank [email protected]