webinar beyond patents: managing ip risk & protecting ...€¦ · webinar beyond patents:...
TRANSCRIPT
WEBINAR
Beyond Patents: Managing IP Risk & Protecting Trade Secrets
Webinar Participants:
David BeckoffVP, Product Development and InsightsMAPI
Michael StankardManaging Director, Manufacturing Industry Practice Leader Aon
Jesus GonzalezDeputy Global Practice Leader for Intangible AssetsAon
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
2
Webinar Overview
• Intellectual Property (IP) Defined
• Intellectual Property (IP) Risk Management
• Intellectual Property (IP) Risk Transfer
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
3
Historical Risk Management Focus = Tangible Property Damage & Bodily Injury
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
4
Industrial Evolution
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
SOURCE: https://www.tritoninnovation.com/industry40/
5
Evolution of Global Economy to Intangible Assets
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
$5T in value driven from trade secrets1
[1] U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The Case for Enhanced Protection of Trade Secrets in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,
available at (https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/legacy/international/files/Final%20TPP%20Trade%20Secrets%208_0.pdf)
1975
1. IBM
2. Exxon Mobil
3. Proctor & Gamble
4. GE
5. 3M
$715 B
$122B $594B
1985
1. IBM
2. Exxon Mobil
3. GE
4. Schlumberger
5. Chevron
$1.5T
$482B $1.02T
1995
1. GE
2. Exxon Mobil
3. Coca-Cola
4. Altria
5. Walmart
$4.59T
$3.12T $1.47T
2005
1. GE
2. Exxon Mobil
3. Microsoft
4. Citigroup
5. Walmart
$11.6T
$9.28T $2.32T
2018
1. Microsoft
2. Apple
3. Amazon
4. Alphabet
5. Facebook
$23.6T
$19.82T $3.78T
6
Evolution of Intangible Assets Top Five S&P 500 Companies
Types of Intellectual Property
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
[1] U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The Case for Enhanced Protection of Trade Secrets in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,
available at (https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/legacy/international/files/Final%20TPP%20Trade%20Secrets%208_0.pdf)
Design
Trade Secrets
Patents
Copyrights ©
Trademarks™TM
Patent name =
“electronic device”
Patent Name: "Omni-
directional, vertical-lift,
helicopter drone"
7
Why does Intellectual Property (IP) matter to the balance sheet?
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
IP encourages innovation, thereby
furthering human progress and
fostering economic growth
Industries deemed IP-intensive by the Property
and Trademark Office accounted for 45.5 million
jobs (30% of the U.S. workforce) in 2014
52% of US merchandise exports
(~$840 billion) are attributable to IP
The number of patents applied for and issued has
grown exponentially in the last several years, and the
amount of patent litigation has risen correspondingly
0
200
400
600
800
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152007 2016
Ca
se
s F
ile
d
Patent Violation Cases Filed
2015 through Nov
30.
Pa
ten
ts I
ssu
ed
per
Ye
ar
Issued Patents
0
2000
4000
6000
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
0
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
300,000
INNOVATION
JOBS
EXPORTS
8
Trade Secrets Theft as the Primary Cybercrime Issue
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Sources: Lex Machina, McAfee, Baker MacKenzie, Locke and Lord, FTC, IP Commission, Insurance Information Institute, Lloyd’s,
Herjavec Group, Cybersecurity Ventures, FBI; analysis by Aon Benfield Analytics
• Trade Secrets are intellectual property assets that a company chooses to keep confidential, as opposed to protecting with public legal filings such as patents or copyrights
• Famous examples include the “Coca Cola Secret Formula,” the “KFC Blend of Herbs and Spices,” and Google Search’s algorithm
• Trade secrets play an essential role in companies’ brand value and corporate strategy. In a Baker McKenzie report, 82% of respondents said their trade secrets are an important, if not essential, part of their business
• Per commerce.gov, theft of these trade secrets costs domestic industries an estimated $200 to $250 billion a year
• The implementation of the DTSA lead to an increase in trade secret litigation
• There are currently limited to no solutions available in the insurance market for the theft of intellectual property
Estimated Costs of Cybercrime
Theft of Intellectual Property - $200-250b
Business Interruption - $60-85b
Data Breach - $40-60b
Incident Response - $35-45b
Privacy Violations - $12-17b
FI Fraud - $15-30b
Other Fraud - $13-19b
9
Patents Versus Trade Secrets
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Patent Protection Trade Secret Protection (EU & US)
Process and Cost Requires application process and official fees Arises automatically, no official fees. Can be costly to maintain
secrecy.
Term 20 years maximum duration Potentially unlimited in duration
Requirements Must be novel, sufficient and inventive No novelty, inventive step or sufficiency requirements. Must
have commercial value and not be readily ascertainable
Maintenance Only requires renewal fee payments once
granted
Requires lifetime maintenance to keep secrecy, can be complex
Enforceability Typically more straightforward to enforce if
infringed
Need to show adequate maintenance of secrecy. Can be
unclear
Scope of Protection Clearly defined by the claims Defined by what the trade secret is purported, not restricted by
jurisdiction
Geographical Protection Patents are only enforceable in the
jurisdictions they are granted in
No exclusions
Remedies Damages (can be enhanced), injunctions,
costs, royalties
Damages, injunctions, costs, royalties
Licensing Patentee is free to license Licensing must be done under a confidentiality agreement
Risks Can be opposed/invalidated. If not granted,
the technology will still have been disclosed.
Other parties can still rely on secret prior use
provisions
Can be reverse engineered.
Can be patented by another party.
Can be disclosed by sale/public use
10
Polling question # 1:Has your company experienced a material IP event over the last 24 months (e.g., a challenge to its IP assets, third-party infringement of its IP assets, or allegation that it is infringing third-party IP rights)?
A. YesB. NoC. Don’t Know
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
11
Survey ResultsHas your company experienced a material IP event over the last 24 months (e.g., a challenge to its IP assets, third-party infringement of its IP assets, or allegation that it is infringing third-party IP rights)?
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Yes58%
No31%
Don't know12%
12
Financial Losses from IP Infringement Can Be Substantial
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Large Financial Losses Incurred Through IP Litigation
Subject Matter Loss Company Paid To Type of IP
Acid Reflux medication, Protonix $2.2B Teva Pharmaceuticals Pfizer Patent
Hepatitis C drug $1.8B Abbott Labs Centocor, Inc Patent
Intravascular stents $1.7B Boston Scientific Cordis Corp. Patent
Karaoke recordings $1.2B 1729172 Ontario, Inc Sony Copyright
Prosthetic valve for aortic stenosis $1.1B Medtronic, Inc Edwards Lifesciences Patent
Glypohsate-tolerant plants $1.0B DuPont Monsanto Patent
Kevlar $919M Kolon Industries DuPont Trade Secret
Instant cameras $925M Kodak Polaroid Patent
Designer handbags $864M Xiang Ding Ai Chanel Trademark
Hard disk drive magnetic materials $750M Marvell Semiconductor Polaroid Patent
Vacuum wound therapy units $645M Healthcare Essentials KCI USA Patent
Email, wireless communication $613M Research in Motion NTP Trademark
13
The Changing Trade Secret & Patent Equilibrium
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
• The combination of technology and market trends and recent court decisions on patent eligibility
has altered the trade secret and patent equilibrium
• Enhancement of trade secret protection via the DTSA helps offset patent system contraction for
innovators, and is likely to lead to increased focus on protecting innovation through trade secrets
• The accelerated pace of innovation in many industries is conducive to trade secret protection
• Rising employee mobility (and strategic poaching of talent)
• Patenting can be unpredictable & take years
• More and more innovation is behind the “firewall” or in the “cloud”
• IP theft is pervasive
Schecter, M., (2016, June 20). The changing trade secret and patent equilibrium. Retrieved from
https://techcrunch.com/2016/06/20/the-changing-trade-secret-and-patent-equilibrium/
14
Polling question # 2:Has an independent third party conducted a valuation of your company’s IP assets (including trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how)?
A. YesB. NoC. Don’t Know
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
15
Survey Results Has an independent third party conducted a valuation of your company’s IP assets (including trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how)?
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
No50%
Don't know36%
Yes, within the last 24 months
10%
Yes, some time ago 4%
16
Value of Corporate Intangible Assets
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Regulatory & PCI
Actions
Credit Monitoring
ForensicsPublic Relations
Notification Extortion
Payments
Dependent
Business
Interruption
Systems Failure
Business Interruption
PIIPCI
PHI
Customer
Insights
Trade Secret
17
IP Risk Management – Adopting a Risk-Based Strategy
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Business
Strategy and
Governance
IP Strategy
and
Management
Risk Retention
and Transfer
Risk
Identification
and Triage
Other
Mitigation
Tools
Resolution of
Specific
Scenarios
I. Quantitative Risk Analysis (Using “Exposure” and “Experience” Data)
II. Qualitative Risk Analysis (Leveraging Analytic Tools)
Litigation
Support
Other
Deterrent
Portfolio
Conflict
Review
Acquisition /
Licensing
(Un)Known
Companies
Other
Relationships
(Un)Known
Patents
Aggregate
Risk
Segmented
Risk
Transfer
Availability
Transfer
Terms
Transfer
Advisability
Transfer
(see right)
Mitigation
(see right)
Cli
en
t
Ob
jec
tive
s
An
aly
se
sO
utp
uts
/
Ou
tco
me
s
Lan
dscap
e
III. Screening Analysis (Model Based)
IV. Detailed Analysis (3rd Party and Client Patents)Asset
18
Trade Secret Governance
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
Trade Secret Protection Review: Cataloging, Prioritizing, Managing, Protecting
▪ Access control
▪ Periodic review
▪ Third-party access
▪ Third party external disclosure
▪ Least privilege
▪ Storage locations
▪ Remote access
▪ Encryption
▪ Secure file transfer
▪ Data loss prevention tools
▪ Physical security
▪ On-boarding & off-boarding
▪ NDAs and contractual agreements
▪ Policy agreement
▪ Security training
▪ Approval for sharing/transfers
▪ Risk analysis and management
▪ Incident response planning and readiness
▪ Security assessments, metrics, and testing
▪ Security policies and procedures
▪ Logging, monitoring, triage capabilities & coverage
▪ Investigation procedures & forensic procedures
▪ Ability to detect potential loss
▪ Different types of IP will warrant unique security considerations
▪ Data formats and methods of accessTargets &
Threats
Sharing
Protection
Processes
Governance
Logging &Detection
19
Survey Results: What approach was used in your company’s most recent IP valuation?
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
2% 2%4%
9% 9%
74%
Cost-based method Income-basedmethod
Market-basedmethod
Qualitative approach Other Don't know
20
Polling question # 3:IP Insurance: Has your organization (or you in your role) purchased/placed standalone IP insurance that covers patent infringement and/or trade secrets theft?
A. YesB. NoC. Don’t Know
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
21
Survey Results IP Insurance: Has your organization (or you in your role) purchased/placed standalone IP insurance that covers patent infringement and/or trade secrets theft?
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
50%
48%
26%
24%
24%
15%
2%
Property and Casualty insurance
Network Security and Privacy Policy
Trade Secret Theft Policy
IP Liability Policy
None of the above
Technology Errors and Omissions Policy
Don't know
22
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
2019 Ponemon Study: Tangibles vs Intangibles% of Property, Plant & Equipment and information assets
covered by insurance
60%
16%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
The percentage of potential loss to PP&E assetscovered by insurance
The percentage of potential loss to information assetscovered by insurance
• Respondents estimated the value of Tangibles
at 1.032bn vs. $1.155bn in intangibles
• 81% of respondents state that Intellectual
Property risk is a Top 10 risk for their
organization
• 43% of Enterprise Risk Management Activities
do NOT include IP
• 28% of respondents say their company
experienced a material IP event
•Article I, Section 8, Clause 8, of the United
States Constitution grants Congress the
enumerated power "To promote the progress of
science and useful arts, by securing for limited
times to authors and inventors the exclusive
right to their respective writings and
discoveries.”
Financial Statement Impact Comparison Study & Report
conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC, Sponsored by Aonhttps://www.aon.com/thought-leadership/ponemoninstitutereport.jsp
23
IP Liability Insurance Matrix
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
24
Key Findings
• Foundations in place to build upon
• Uneven IP engagement
• A business case remains paramount
• Risk is significant and rising
• Room to learn from leaders
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
25
IP Risk in Your Risk Maturity Score
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
26
Q &A
B e y o n d P a t e n t s : M a n a g i n g I P R i s k & P r o t e c t i n g T r a d e S e c r e t s
27