webster groves school district student success data area ...€¦ · student success report...

Webster Groves School DistrictStudent Success Report

2017-2018 SCHOOL YEAR DATA

PRESENTED ON FEBRUARY 25, 2019

Goals and Critical Issues•Improved performance on MAP, ACT, and other standardized measures for all students, especially students of color and students living in poverty

•Focus on improving Reading/Writing Workshop and Phonics/Phonemic Awareness instruction

•Continue implementation of Professional Learning Communities to improve use of data-driven decision making throughout the district

•Continue implementation and use of Northwest Evaluation Association Benchmark assessments to benchmark and progress monitor student progress and learning

•Develop the revised Response to Intervention process throughout the district

•Continue auditing current curriculum to ensure diversity is present and represented

•Tracking longitudinal academic achievement for students in support classes (reading/math)

•Continue to build development and support around Personalized Learning and Innovative Practices

•Finalize Gifted/Health/LMS program evaluation/curriculum revisions

•Finalize K-12 Social Studies course alignment

THE WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY IS COMMITTED TO ACADEMIC AND PERSONAL SUCCESS FOR EVERY STUDENT.

2

Professional Development to Focus on Goals and Critical Issues•Columbia Teacher’s College – Units of Reading K-2, 6-8

•Professional Development around data driven decision-making-Professional Learning Communities

•Secondary Literacy Conference

•Units of Phonics summer training

•Words Their Way summer training

•Units of Writing summer training

•EdCamp Professional Learning

•Adding It Up Math Conference

•Social Justice Cohort and other like district training

•Analyzing and Dismantling Systemic Racism Workshops

•Washington University STEM TQ Cohort

•Social Studies summer training- “Lies My Teacher Told Me”, “The Pruitt-Igoe Myth”, Standing Up for Civil Rights in St. Louis


3

APR Changes and Supporting Data

Assessments and MSIP5 2018 and 2019 APRNew ELA and Math assessments Post hoc analysis and level setting

Delayed calculation of APR

Science Field Test – No Data

Field Test Impact 2018

No data or points for Science

APR denominator reduced by 20

2019

No data or points for Social Studies

APR denominator reduced by 10

MSIP5 Performance Standards, With and Without Science

With Science Without Science

Standard K-8 K-12 K-8 K-12

1-Academic Achievement 48 56 32 40

2-Supersubgroup Achievement 12 14 8 10

Academic Subtotal 60 70 40 50

3-CCR/HSR 10 30 10 30

4-Attendance 10 10 10 10

5-Graduation Rate - 30 - 30

Readiness Performance Subtotal 20 70 20 70

Total 80 140 60 120

This YearPrevious Years

Need for Status Target RecalculationDifference in scores due to rigor of assessments – Impact of change in cut scores

17 to 18 Change in Percent Top Two

(Proficient/Advanced)

17 to 18 Change in MPI

ELA -14% -13

Math -7% -19

Status Targets (Appendix A of the Comprehensive Guide) are recalculated for Standards 1 and 2 in ELA and Math.

Districts did not suddenly get worse due to

new, more rigorous

assessments.

2018 is a new baseline year.

QUESTIONHow to adjust?

Recognizing there needs to be

a nuanced approach.

ANSWERAdjusted status

targets so results are equated to

the last period of consistent

standards and assessments.

hhh

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/PR_and_NCE.gif

Probability

Values

MeasuresAchievement Levels

MPIs

Zs

NCEs

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/PR_and_NCE.gif

What is the relationship between MPI and NCE?Need to know the NCE for three MPIs, which are all transitions: Floor to Approaching (299 – 300) Approaching to On Track (363 – 364) On Track to Target (385 – 386)

Example of OLD Targets from 2017 Comprehensive Guide

The question is, “What were the NCEs of these MPIs in 2013?”

Once those NCEs are known, then go to 2018 and find the MPIs for the known NCEs, “What is the MPI for the NCEs of interest identified from 2013?” NCE at transition points in 2013

MPIs of those NCEs in 2018

Hold Harmless Transition Off for Standards 1 and 2, ELA & Math

IF 2018 points are greater than 2017 then OFF Hold Harmless

IF 2018 points are less than 2017, then (2017 pts earned) * (2/3) + (2018 pts

earned)* (1/3)

IF 2019 points are less than the 2018 adjusted, then (2018 adj) * (1/3) + (2019 pts earned) *

(2/3)

ALL OFF Hold Harmless by 2020

Score Comparison 2018 2019 2020

2017< 2018 < 2019 Actual Actual Actual

2017 > 2018 < 2019 2/3 + 1/3 Actual Actual

2017 > 2018 > 2019 2/3 + 1/3 1/3 + 2/3 Actual

Takeaways for District LeadersNo Science results Total points down from 140 to 120

Status targets recalculated for Standards 1 & 2 in ELA & Math Distributions of districts across status levels are comparable to 2013

Hold Harmless Transition Off for Standards 1 & 2 If 2018% of points earned is better than 2017, district is out of Hold Harmless

If 2018% of points earned is less than 2017, then: (2017 points earned) * (2/3) + (2018 points earned) * (1/3)

2017-2018 APR

15

• In the 2016-2017 school year, the Webster Groves APR was 97.5%

•The 2017-2018 APR is 97.2%

•Point reduction was found in:• District-wide math achievement• ELA super sub-group achievement• Math super sub-group achievement• Social Studies super sub-group achievement

•Webster Groves maintains their modified hold harmless status for all four areas for the 2018-2019 school year

Questions on APR changes?


16

Supporting Data

2018 ELA and Math DataContent Group MPI %Advanced/Proficient

ELA Total (2378) 379.4 64.7

ELA Super Subgroup (738) 303.7 35.8

ELA African-American (326) 273.9 27.0

ELA Students in poverty (366) 278.7 28.1

Math Total (2194) 363.9 60.9

Math Super Subgroup (652) 273.3 31.1

Math African-American (276) 234.8 19.9

Math Students in poverty (318) 253.8 24.8


18

It is important to note that the 2018 MAP/EOC exams in ELA and math were the fourth different state assessments in the past five years. The four different assessments also covered two different sets of learning standards. For this reason, past years cannot be compared. Data from 2018 will be considered baseline assessment data moving forward.

Science MAP Data


19

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Total 366.5 367.2 372.4 386.4 377.7 384.6 369.1 372.9

Super Subgroup 308.3 316 312.9 325.6 321.7 314.5 302.4 294.6

African-American 291.2 297.7 288.8 299.6 298.6 301.6 265.2 270.6

Poverty 286.6 304.2 301.8 307.9 304.8 292.1 291.8 283.2

240

260

280

300

320

340

360

380

400

MP

I

Social Studies MAP Data

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018**

Total (709) 376.1 377.3 370.8 369.8 365.6 392.3 378.5 389.7 381.4

Super Subgroup (269) 323.8 326 315.2 310.7 305.5 330 316.8 347.2 327.1

African-American (136) 301.1 290.1 299.4 287.8 287.3 351.9 281 347.7 308.1

Poverty (151) 303.2 314.8 302.6 292.5 292.8 327.1 310.3 329.9 313.2

240

260

280

300

320

340

360

380

400

MP

I

THE WEBSTER GROVES SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY IS COMMITTED TO ACADEMIC AND PERSONAL SUCCESS FOR EVERY STUDENT. 20

** WG is in the process of realigning when the American Government EOC is given, therefore very few students took the assessment during 2017-2018. When this happens, the state pools the previous three years of data to determine the MPI score.

Graduation Rate: % of students graduating

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

% Total Graduation (306) 92.0 95.3 97.2 97.8 97.8 97.2 98.1 98.1

% African-American (67) 86.9 93.8 94.6 97.3 97.3 96.3 95.7 95.7

% Poverty (45) 75 87.3 94.4 98.1 98.1 91.7 97.7 97.8

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

90.0

95.0

100.0

Perc

ent


21

Attendance: % of students attending school at least 85% of the time

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Total % Attendance 92.3 93.9 94.1 94.7 93.9 95.1 94.2 92.8

African-American % Attendance 86.8 88.5 88.6 89.6 89.1 89.9 88.9 87.7

Poverty % Attendance 83.1 85.4 86.2 87.2 86.2 89 86.4 84.5

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

% A

tten

dan

ce

Total % Attendance African-American % Attendance Poverty % Attendance


22

CCR 1-3: % of graduates scoring above state standards on ACT, SAT, COMPASS, or ASVAB

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

% at or above state average (348) 75.4 75.3 78.4 82.1 81.4 94.7 93.4 90.9

% of African-Americans (63) 42.8 37.2 45.2 43.2 49.7 61.2 63.3 62.3

% of Students in Poverty (51) 41.9 34.9 39.6 45.6 52.9 67.1 67.8 66.2

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Perc

ent


23

CCR 4: % of graduates who earn qualifying score on the AP exam, IRC, or a qualifying grade in AP, dual credit, and/or dual enrollment course

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

% Total earning qualifying score (273/348) 16.4 16.6 54.6 60.5 66.7 66.5 66.7 69.1 68.7 68.2

% of African-Americans earning qualifying score (23/63) 2.8 1.5 23.3 18.6 29.8 24.3 31.7 35.4 29.6 36.1

% of students in poverty earning qualifying score (15/51) 2 1.9 29.7 15.1 31.6 30.3 36.7 31.1 41.1 29.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Perc

ent


24

CCR 5-6: % of graduates who attend post secondary education or training, are in the military, or who complete a Department-approved Career Education program and are placed in an occupation directly to their training

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

% of graduates (312/323) 93.8 92.7 89.0 93.6 94.6 96.2 97.7 99.0 98.0 96.6

% of African-Americans (56/60) 92.7 96.6 90.5 94.4 87.8 96.2 94.5 100 95.4 93.3

% students in poverty (44/45) 92.7 95.7 90 95.7 83 97 95.7 100 97.6 97.8

82

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

100

Perc

ent


25

Additional Achievement Measures: ACT - Highest Average Composite for Graduating Seniors

23.8

23.123.7 23.5

23.1 23.323.9

23.6 23.8

19.7

21.3 21.3 21.3 21.4 21.4

20 20.2 20

21.0 21.0 21.1 20.9 21.0 21.0 20.8 21.0 20.8

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

WGHS (331) Missouri (68,000+) Nation


26

Additional Achievement Measures: SAT

649640

538

627 631

533

654

633

536

642

629

531

500

525

550

575

600

625

650

675

Reading/Writing WGHS Reading/Writing State Reading/WritingNational

Math WGHS Math State Math National

Sco

res

Year

2017 (35) 2018 (25)


27

Additional Achievement Measures: AP Scores AP Subject # Tested

(2017/2018) Tested (enrolled)

Average Score(2017/2018)

Scoring 3 or Higher(2017/2018)

English Language 17 (65) / 32(65) 3.2 / 4.1 88% / 96.8%

English Literature 28 (56) / 28(41) 3.7 / 3.5 85% / 92%

Psychology 75 (98) / 56(123) 4.1 / 4.3 96% / 96%

US History 14 (196) / 10(200) 3.2 / 3.6 71% / 90%

Calculus AB 57 (63) / 53(68) 4.4 / 4.1 100% / 92%

Chemistry 10 (17) / 8(10) 3.5 / 2.5 90% / 50%

Physics 1 30 (37) / 21(27) 3.5 / 3.38 90% / 80.5%

Physics 2 27 (29) / 1(12) 3.7 / 4 88% / 100%

German 4 (9) / 5(10) 3.5 / 4 100% / 100%

Spanish 8 (19) / 6(21) 4.1 / 3.6 100% / 83%

World History 42 (44) / 33(38) 3.8 / 3.6 93% / 90%

Computer Science A N/A / 3(4) N/A / 3.3 N/A / 66%

Statistics N/A / 13(18) N/A / 4.0 N/A / 92%

Environmental Science N/A / 5(38) N/A / 4.8 N/A / 100%28

Additional Achievement Measures: % of Students in Dual Credit Courses

17.416.5

18.517.5 17.8

22.523.3 23.8

6.7

3.6

6.7

5.4

3.5

7.8

4.8

7.6

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (575) 2018 (592)

Perc

ent

% Students in Dual Credit % of AA Students in Dual Credit


29

Additional Achievement Measures: Early College Partnership• 6 students participating during the 2018-2019 school year

• 27 college classes taken 1st semester for a total of 83 college credits

• Cumulative GPA for all participants is 3.42

• All 6 returned for their second full semester

• Currently accepting applications for the five slots available for the 2019-2020 school year


30

Additional Achievement Measures: % of Students in Weighted Classes

44.6 4546.4

49.2 49.7

54.452.5

54.2

19.4 20.4 19.822.3

28.3 29.6

25.6

29.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

% All students (716/1322) % AA students (69/236)


31

NWEA Mathematics Instructional Growth2017-2018 FALL TO WINTER

Kdg. 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th

Observed Growth 9.2 12.7 9.1 7.1 4.4 4.3 2.1

Projected Growth 9.9 10.5 8.7 7.3 6.5 5.7 4.3

Stud. Cond. Growth %ile 48 61 58 49 40 40 34

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Observed Growth Projected Growth Stud. Cond. Growth %ile

2018-2019 FALL TO WINTER


Observed Growth 10.5 12.6 9.2 7.2 5.3 5.2 3.6

Projected Growth 10 10.6 8.8 7.3 6.6 5.7 4.3


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



32

NWEA Reading Instructional Growth2017-2018 FALL TO WINTER


Observed Growth 8.5 10.6 6 5.5 3.8 2.1 2.6



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70




Observed Growth 10.7 12.3 5.7 6.6 4.3 3.3 1.7



0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



33

NWEA Mathematics Instructional Growth-Race/Ethnicity2017-2018 FALL TO WINTER

Grad

e

Black/A

A

Ob

s.Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Pro

. Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Gro

w. %

ile

Mu

ltiracial O

bs. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial P

ro. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial G

row

. %ile

Wh

ite O

bs. G

row

th

Wh

ite Pro

. G

row

th

Wh

iteG

row

.%ile

Kdg 6.0 11.2 9 7.5 10.1 42 9.8 9.8 54

1st 10.4 10.6 39 27.8 10.5 98 12.6 10.5 62

2nd 10.8 8.7 62 8.0 8.7 55 9.0 8.7 59

3rd 6.5 7.0 33 7.5 7.5 48 7.2 7.3 50

4th 5.1 5.8 46 4.7 6.3 45 4.2 6.7 39

5th 2.7 4.9 24 2.7 5.5 24 4.5 5.9 42

6th 1.2 3.7 33 1.1 4.0 26 2.4 4.5 35


Grad

e

Black/A

A

Ob

s.Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Pro

. Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Gro

w. %

ile

Mu

ltiracial O

bs. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial P

ro. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial G

row

. %ile

Wh

ite O

bs. G

row

th

Wh

ite Pro

. G

row

th

Wh

iteG

row

.%ile

Kdg 4.2 10.6 20 10.7 10.4 53 11.4 9.9 67

1st 10.1 10.7 54 + 11.4 10.6 46 + 12.9 10.6 64 +

2nd 4.0 8.9 30 7.5 8.8 50 9.6 8.8 65 +

3rd 5.8 7.1 33 7.6 7.3 50 7.4 7.4 49

4th 3.1 5.8 14 5.4 6.7 47 5.7 6.7 49

5th 3.8 4.9 28 6.0 5.6 53 + 5.3 5.9 48 +

6th 3.0 3.8 39 + 4.4 4.2 50 + 3.8 4.4 50 +


34

NWEA Reading Instructional Growth-Race/Ethnicity2017-2018 FALL TO WINTER

Grad

e

Black/A

A

Ob

s.Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Pro

. Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Gro

w. %

ile

Mu

ltiracial O

bs. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial P

ro. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial G

row

. %ile

Wh

ite O

bs. G

row

th

Wh

ite Pro

. G

row

th

Wh

iteG

row

.%ile

Kdg 7.2 9.8 36 8.2 9.3 62 8.9 9.0 58

1st 9.7 9.6 34 13.7 9.9 85 10.7 10.1 56

2nd 7.5 8.5 43 5.9 8.5 49 6.0 8.5 36

3rd 2.4 6.7 21 4.6 6.3 46 6.0 6.3 51

4th 2.9 5.0 37 2.5 4.8 23 3.9 4.7 50

5th 2.5 3.8 38 1.5 3.7 27 2.2 3.6 50

6th 3.4 3.0 45 3.6 2.9 62 2.5 2.8 53


Grad

e

Black/A

A

Ob

s.Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Pro

. Gro

wth

Black/A

A

Gro

w. %

ile

Mu

ltiracial O

bs. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial P

ro. G

row

th

Mu

ltiracial G

row

. %ile

Wh

ite O

bs. G

row

th

Wh

ite Pro

. G

row

th

Wh

iteG

row

.%ile

Kdg 5.5 9.5 14 8.6 9.2 46 11.6 9.1 72

1st 9.2 9.8 56 + 11.9 10.2 64 + 12.6 10.2 69 +

2nd 5.3 8.8 37 + 8.4 8.7 35 5.6 8.6 36

3rd 8.6 7.0 48 + 7.4 6.7 56 + 6.4 6.6 51 +

4th 3.0 5.1 29 + 6.2 4.9 79 + 4.4 4.9 51

5th 3.1 4.0 38 + 2.8 3.8 62 + 3.5 3.7 55 +

6th 0.0 3.0 26 0.1 2.9 23 2.1 2.9 51 +


35

NWEA Mathematics Instructional Growth-Special Programs2017-2018 FALL TO WINTER

Grad

e

FRL O

bs.

Gro

wth

FRL P

ro.

Gro

wth

FRL G

row

. %

ile

SpEd

Ob

s. G

row

th

SpEd

Pro

. G

row

th

SpEd

Gro

w.

%ile

Gifted

O

bs. G

row

th

Gifted

P

ro. G

row

th

Gifted

Gro

w.%

ile

Kdg 7.5 10.8 17 6.8 10.3 18 * * *

1st 8.3 10.5 32 15.1 10.5 58 * * *

2nd 11.0 8.7 59 9.2 8.7 50 9.3 8.7 78

3rd 6.3 7.1 46 6.7 7.2 39 8.9 7.6 69

4th 4.9 6.0 42 5.1 6.2 40 5.0 7.1 41

5th 3.5 4.9 25 3.4 5.2 36 4.8 6.5 42

6th 1.4 3.8 33 1.1 3.6 27 3.4 4.9 50


Grad

e

FRL O

bs.

Gro

wth

FRL P

ro.

Gro

wth

FRL G

row

. %

ile

SpEd

Ob

s. G

row

th

SpEd

Pro

. G

row

th

SpEd

Gro

w.

%ile

Gifted

O

bs. G

row

th

Gifted

P

ro. G

row

th

Gifted

Gro

w.%

ile

Kdg 6.6 10.6 27 5.2 10.3 11 * * *

1st 10.2 10.7 55 + 13.5 10.7 73 + * * *

2nd 8.7 8.9 42 + 11.4 8.8 64 + 9.1 8.8 72

3rd 6.3 7.1 40 6.6 7.2 35 7.3 7.6 51

4th 5.0 6.1 32 4.4 6.2 34 5.0 7.2 49

5th 3.9 5.0 32 4.9 5.3 51 + 4.8 6.3 49 +

6th 2.2 3.8 33 + 2.9 4.0 39 + 5.1 4.8 59 +


36

NWEA Reading Instructional Growth-Special Programs2017-2018 FALL TO WINTER

Grad

e

FRL O

bs.

Gro

wth

FRL P

ro.

Gro

wth

FRL G

row

. %

ile

SpEd

Ob

s. G

row

th

SpEd

Pro

. G

row

th

SpEd

Gro

w.

%ile

Gifted

O

bs. G

row

th

Gifted

P

ro. G

row

th

Gifted

Gro

w.%

ile

Kdg 8.5 9.8 34 4.4 9.3 25 * * *

1st 9.5 9.7 37 11.4 9.7 59 * * *

2nd 6.8 8.5 42 6.4 8.5 29 5.8 8.4 39

3rd 3.5 6.7 24 5.9 6.6 44 4.3 6.0 55

4th 2.1 4.9 36 2.9 4.8 47 3.0 4.6 54

5th 1.5 3.8 31 1.6 3.7 38 2.3 3.4 57

6th 2.4 3.0 40 6.7 3.0 62 2.6 2.7 63


Grad

e

FRL O

bs.

Gro

wth

FRL P

ro.

Gro

wth

FRL G

row

. %

ile

SpEd

Ob

s. G

row

th

SpEd

Pro

. G

row

th

SpEd

Gro

w.

%ile

Gifted

O

bs. G

row

th

Gifted

P

ro. G

row

th

Gifted

Gro

w.%

ile

Kdg 8.2 9.5 43 11.3 9.5 51 * * *

1st 9.8 10.0 57 + 10.4 10.0 60 + * * *

2nd 6.6 8.8 39 + 5.0 8.7 31 4.1 8.6 36

3rd 8.2 7.0 47 + 7.3 6.9 43 + 5.9 6.2 49 +

4th 4.3 5.1 49 + 3.0 5.1 28 3.9 4.7 60 +

5th 3.0 3.9 53 + 4.4 3.8 56 + 1.6 3.5 43

6th 0.2 3.0 26 1.8 3.0 47 + 1.9 2.8 60 +


37

Questions?


38

webster groves school district student success data area ...€¦ · student success report...

Documents