week #2 anchor chapter - using levels of inquiry in the classroom (1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
1/20
Using Levels
of lnquiry
Using
Levels
of
lnquiry
in
the
Classroom
1
in
the
Classroom
Chapter
I
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The
clet,elrltmertt
of
mujor
concepl,s
itt u :;cience
clu:;,srurnt
is axplorecl lhrough
lhe
in.slrucliottul,fi"umeworkof
vuryingllte
level
rl'sluclent
iurluiry. An explorotion
eq)e-
rience,
inlerctct
ive elemort:;trutitn,
di,;ctlvery
erterinertl,
uncl
uppliccttion
chullenge
.\erve
os
llti,sfrernev,ork.fbr
increusing
the
let,al in
y,ltich
the :;ttrclents
usk
question,s,
det,ise netlrccls
lo uttswer
tha,s'e
que,stiott,y,
uncl
tlevelop
ut't,\v)ers b lhe
question.s'.
In,strttclionetl
technolog,
tool,s
such os
clttssrocttn response
system,\,
Google Docs,
lhe
ttse o.[blogs,
untl IlebA,r.sign
erre
inlegrulecl
into
the inquirt
experience
to.tltpport
the
leurning proce.\.t.
7-hi,s
intluiry
moclcl shifi,s the
locu.s
o.[utntrolJi'om
rhe
teucher
to llte
slttclettt,
as the
stuclentis,/nilicrrity
v,ith
neyt, concept.t cleepen,s.
Jcfi'cy
llylarrtlcr
Glenbrrok South High Scluol,
USA
INTRODUCTION
lf you
are a
teacher
olscience.
yoLr
and
youl
colleagues rnay
have
grappled
with
the
level
of
inqLrily
that you
build
into youl
classroorns. You
rnay lrave
heald
a
colleagtte
say,
"lf
I
present
an activity with
'cookbook'type
clirections. I arl
not
l'ostclirtg the
inquiry
that
Idesire
irt rny students.
On
the
other
hancl,
if'I
leave all
activity
operr-ettcled. try
students
eithel
flounder with
a
lack
of
directiolr
or heacl
dowll
a
patlr
that
does
not necessarily
leacl
to the
constl'uctiolt
of
ideas
that
ale
the
goal
of lny
instrtrctiolr."
You tnay
have even
hcr'cl
these
wolds
in
youl
or,vn
head.
lX) I
:
I
0.40 I 819'7 8-
|
-4666-00(rt-3.ch00
I
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
2/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
3/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
4/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
5/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
6/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
7/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
8/20
-
8/10/2019 Week #2 Anchor Chapter - Using Levels of Inquiry in the Classroom (1)
9/20
Using
Levels of
lnquiry
in
the
Classroom
Figure
I.
Incluiry aclittities
grow
/rom
o lower
level
to
ct
the
developrnent of the
concepl
lnquiry
Experiences
Used
to Develop
Big
ldea
@
l-t"t*=.ti* I
I
Demonstration
I
@
@
have shifted
our
focus
from
breadth
to
depth
ancl
fi'onr
iustrLrctioual stlategies that
support coverage
to
those
that
support
inquiry
(Nelson,
1999). However, nrany
of
us still
feel we
have a
long way to
go in
bLrilcling
inquiry activities
that support
this
ultirnate
goal.
Regard
less
of exactly
what
you
believe a
scientifically literate student
looks like,
nrost agree
that
inquiry
nrust
play
a
signifcant
role in
producing young
adults that
can study the
world
around them
as
scientists
do.
Just as
inquiry
is
fundanrental
in
supporting science
literacy
skills,
varying
the
levels
of inquiry
is essential
in
the developnrerrt
of
the
continuurn
of
these
skills.
Wenning supports
this
by suggesting that the level
of
the science
litelacy
skillthat
can be
addressed
will grow
as the level
of
inqu iry-oriented
experience
grows
(2005).
While
Table
5
is
not
rnearrt
to be
comprehensive,
it does illustrate the scientific
literacy
skills associated
with
each
type of
irrquiry
activity
outlined
in Table
4.
As
we
seek
to develop this
scope
of literacy
skills
in
stuclents,
each
level
of
inquiry is
necessary
to acconrplish
this
task.
Although scientific literacy cloes involve
arr
understarrding
of
important corrcepts
such
as
cell functions, chernical boncling, plate tectonics,
and
Newton's
second
law,
scientific
literacy is
much nrore. lt is also a
way
of
thirrking,
of
asking
questious
and of
knowing how to fincl-answers to those
questions.
Our
charge
as teachers is
to develop in
students
these
intellectual
processes
by helping
thern
to
uncover
the
ideas
ancl
principles
that
govenr this world.
For
sure, the
developnlent
of
scientifi-
cally
literate
yourg
adults
is
no snrall task,
yet
we
are
able to srppofi the develop-
nlent
of science
litelacy skills by
varying
the
level
of
inquiry
that
we
use in the
c lassloorn.
9
higher
leteI
througltout
tv
-
t;
t
l.
lr
l
lr
lo
l