1

2

Chairman’s WELCOmEChairman’s messageChairman of TAPA Asia Pacific shares his views on supply chain resilience among supply chain professionals. By Tony Lugg

UPDaTEsa new standard for Fsr & TsrRealigned standards to better Supply Chain Risk Management.By Hedial Singh

TAPA Asia Pacific (APAC) Kicks off the New FSR & Tsr standards Training EventsTraining sessions aim to educate the greater mass in the security requirements of facilities and trucks. The great number of trainings held this year had showed us that people are now getting more aware of the security issues arising. The FSR & TSR trainings has equipped its participants with ample knowledge for practical applications in their establishments. Train the Trainers (TTT) sessions are also held to ensure that trainers have the competency to deliver the new standards.By Hedial Singh

FEaTUrEsTaPa asia Japan Chapter on international Frozen Food Contamination incident with Pesticides malathion There is need to rectify the inadequacy of security in food industries to prevent food poisoning incidents from happening. As you read more about this incident, take a chance to reflect about the security measures/plans in your organization. Are they adequate? By Narihiko Asou & Hiroaki Ogami

a Course with a Cause for humanitarian actionsEddie’s joint effort with various organisations to present the Certificate In Applied Humanitarian Logistics Management Training in ManilaBy Eddie Tan

TaPa asia PaCiFiC TraininGResilience against Supply Chain Risks with TAPA Facility and Trucking Requirements The TSR & FSR trainings equipped buyer and supplier companies with ample knowledge for practical applications for daily operations.

3

8

11

13

15

4

CONTENTSTaPa

EditorialMunIES PILLAI, Editoreditor@tapa-apac.org

LEO WAn LInGwanling@tapa-apac.org

MarketingDERICk DInG

derick.ding@tapa-apac.org

Secretariat TeamDERICk DInG

derick.ding@tapa-apac.org

TAnG LEItang.lei@tapa-apac.org

COnTACT uSTAPA Asia Pacific Secretariat Office

c/o Global E2C Pte Ltd

Address : 25 Bukit Batok Crescent, The Elitist #04-02, Singapore 658065

Telephone : (65) 66844687

Email : tang.lei@tapa-apac.org

If you have any ideas for future reports in the

next issues of TAPA Asia Pacific Lookout, we welcome you to email to:

INFO@TAPA-APAC.ORG

2

3

CHAIRMAN’S WELCOMEThe LAuNCh oF The New STANdARdS mAKe A siGniFiCanT aDvanCEmEnT TO sUPPLy Chain rEsiLiEnCE

In this issue of TAPA Lookout, Chairman Tony Lugg focuses on the efforts made by TAPA Asia Pacific to manage and reduce risks in Supply Chains to efficiently facilitate operations of respective companies.

The focus of Supply Chain Risk Management meets the requirements of every manufacturer as companies look to reduce risks and manage their costs. A recent civil court case in Europe involving a shipper and a logistics provider, highlighted the need for shippers to spell out in their contract their risk management requirements. The case arose after the logistics service provider suffered a loss when parking outside of a secured parking area. The load was stolen from the vehicle. The Danish court ruled that shippers who were concerned about cargo crime at truck parking facilities need to give specific instructions in the contract in order for carriers to be liable for any loss.

In terms of reducing disruption in the supply chain through a structured risk management process, it is advisable for the shipper to use standards like the Freight Security Standards (FSR 2014) and Truck Security Standards (TSR 2014) in their contracts with LSP. not only would the specified parking requirement be stated, it should also be transparent to both buyer and LSP.

The roll out of the new standards across Asia Pacific has been a major achievement with resounding feedbacks from the participants to the training. It has been very encouraging and exciting by the response from our members. Since the launch of our two new standards, over 600 members have been trained, which is an achievement for a voluntary organization.

Last quarter, TAPA Asia Pacific also hosted the TAPA Supply Chain Security Conference (SCSC) in Malaysia in the city of Georgetown in Penang, attracting well over 80 Supply Chain professionals to the conference. An insightful event, which saw experienced supply chain risk practitioners converging to expound the latest supply chain disruption trends and challenges. It was also a great opportunity for the members to network and discuss ongoing issues. The TAPA Asia Pacific secretariat team had also provided excellent management of the conference. The TAPA Asia Pacific membership has expanded over the year and we expect it to grow once again next year.

The good work of the Board of Directors continues with Government Agencies and it is important that we continue to lobby them on behalf of the members.

You will see more networking forums, awareness seminars and roundtable discussions among the members and members to be as TAPA Asia Pacific embarks on more activities to address the issues on Risk Management. These issues had greatly impacted the Supply Chain, therefore TAPA Asia Pacific will be engaging with International Risk Management associations/societies and participating in meetings with government enforcement agencies across the region.

In early november, we had an extremely positive World Wide Council meeting and made significant progress in the development of a global strategy for TAPA. The alignment of our regional programs encompass a web portal, a global IIS and the continuous review of the TAPA standards.

One of the proposals put forward at this meeting was to make FSR Level 3 and TSR Level C a certified program by members’ self certification, which will be updated further in the next issue.

This is an exciting time for TAPA as an Association and we are on the verge of stepping up to new heights, alongside our influential partners. I would like to thank the Board of Directors for their handwork in rolling out the standards as well as the large number of training session across the region. The quality of delivery was extremely high and our members were very happy with the output.

Tony LuggChairman 2014 -2015TAPA Asia Pacific

3

4

a nEW sTanDarD FOr Fsr & Tsr-rEaLiGnED

sTanDarDs TO bETTEr SuPPLy ChAiN RiSK

manaGEmEnTOur members also have an important role to play as they are our eyes and ears. TAPA Asia Pacific appreciates and takes feedbacks seriously for

realignment of available information to improve the overall effectiveness and relevancy of the

standards.

“”

updATES

5

of the TAPA Worldwide Change Control Board (WWCCB) making huge progress in the compilation of members’ feedbacks to ensure a comprehensive coverage of issues concerning them was addressed and made inclusive in the FSR 2014 standards.

According to the feedbacks from our members, they have experienced confusion when using the standards due to the ambiguity of it. The members also commented on the lack of clarity in the standards. Suggestions contributed were carefully reviewed, and where possible and if applicable, they were introduced into the standards.

The new FSR standards have now used the same format (look and appearance) and terminologies as the TSR standards when possible. This should effectively eliminate the issue on ambiguity faced by our members who are confused with the different terminologies used in the standards. There would also be a revision in the content of the standards as only mandatory items and requirements for each performance level is listed.

HediaL SingHBoard of Director,TAPA Asia Pacific

nevertheless, there were circumstances that some suggestions were not incorporated. A number of reasons may substantially explain this as we felt the matter already covered adequately in the standards while others may be a huge cost impact to the members.

The WWCCB under the direction of the World Wide council (WWC) were mindful to strike a balance between improving security and the cost impact of it. Whilst every effort has been made to minimize this, some members may face some additional costs in the long term. However, the WWCCB believe that those members who are already adopting the FSR and TSR standards should face no cost impact at all.

With an updated version of the FSR & TSR standards, the reduced ambiguity and increased clarity allows security personnel to better understand and apply the knowledge when applicable in their context.

“

”

Members, you were informed earlier that the Regional TAPA Management Boards and the TAPA Regional Chairs, together with the TAPA Worldwide Council had announced the postponing of the new FSR 2014 standards, to July 2014 to accommodate the requests of our members.

Well, it is now in full gear and TAPA Asia Pacific Training Committee is at high speed to ensure this reaching out to members at many cities as possible.

The process of reviewing which started as early as the 4th quarter of 2012, saw the relentless efforts

updATES

6

ThE rEvisED sTanDarDs OF ThE Fsr 2014

The FSR 2014 and TSR 2014 have been aligned to• Reduce duplication • Provide more clarity • Ensure the terminologies of these standards are now similar.

The trucking section has now been removed from the FSR

2014 standards as it is already adequately addressed in the TSR 2014 standards.

Both the standards have a new section, the “Freight Handover Process” that addresses the handshake between the facility and the transportation to eliminate any gaps.

The TSR self-assessment has been made more robust in the area with the addition of the new section on “LSP Self-Assessment”, where the LSP has to ensure that the entire fleet has been assessed to be meeting the practice section of the TSR.

please turn to next page

updATES

6

7

TAPA Asia Pacific would like to take the opportunity to congratulate our members in attaining the New TAPA’s FSR 2014.

The tables below show the new FSR 2014 & TSR 2014 requirements

Company name CouNTRy/ RegioN LoCaTionEvergreen Air Cargo Service Corp.

Taiwan Taiwan Taoyuan (CKS Int'l) International Airport, Taoyuan Hsien

S.F. Express Co.,Ltd China Freight (Huoyun) Road, Beijing Capital International Airport, Beijing

S.F. Express Co.,Ltd China Sanlu Road, Pujiang Town, Minhang District, Shanghai

DB Schenker Australia Trade Cost - Brisbane AustraliaS.F. EXPRESS CO., LTD China Pudong Hub, Minhang District, ShanghaiS.F. EXPRESS CO., LTD HangZhou HUB

China Hangzhou International Airport, Hangzhou

TAPA Asia Pacific would also like to thank our members for the continuous support. We will not stop evolving with the world and remain up to date to better the standards for

FACiliTy SeCuRiTy RequiRemeNT (FSR) SeCTioNS

1. Perimeter Security2. Access Control, Office Areas, Office

Entrances3. Facility Dock/Warehouse, Access

Control between Office and Dock/Warehouse

4. Security Systems5. Security Procedures6. Background Checks Vetting

Workforce Integrity

TRuCkiNg SeCuRiTy RequiRemeNT SeCTionS

1. Requirements Practice level i. Physical Security ii. Tracking Technology iii. Security Procedures iv. Employment Criteria - Vetting and Termination Protocols v. Drivers/Security Training vi. Freight Handover Process vii. LSP Self-Assessment viii. Buyer Optional - Cargo Track And Trace Requirements (Not Mandatory)

2. Policy And Protocols i. Section A - Management Support and Responsibilities ii. Section B - Vetting and Termination Protocols iii. Section C - Training Protocols iv. Section D - Tracking & Tracing Protocols

updATES

7

8

TAPA Asia Pacific leads the release of the new standard by organizing trainings throughout the Asia Pacific regions. TAPA Asia Pacific has released two new standards, namely the Facility Security requirement (FSR) and the Trucking Security requirements (TSR) in July 2014.

TAPA Asia Pacific has outlined training programs throughout Asia Pacific region enabling

HediaL SingHBoard of Director,TAPA Asia Pacific

TAPA KiCKS oFF FSR & Tsr 2014 WiTh TraininG ThrOUGhOUT asia PaCiFiCTraining sessions aim to educate the greater mass in the security requirements offacilities and trucks. The great number of trainings held this year had showed usthat people are now getting more aware of the security issues arising. The FSR& TSR trainings to equip its fellow members with ample knowledge for practical applications in their establishments. Train the trainers (TTT) sessions are also held to ensure that trainers have the competency to deliver the new standards.

members to better understand these new auditable standards, which had replaced the FSR 2011 and TSR 2012.

By November 2014, 19 FSR training sessions has been conducted in over 12 cities in 9 of the Asia Pacific countries.

• Singapore • Malaysia – Kuala Lumpur, Penang

• Hong Kong • China – Shanghai, Beijing • Australia – Melbourne, Sydney • Philippines – Manila • Japan - Tokyo • India – New Delhi • Thailand - Bangkok

“ There are 545 members trained as TAPA FSR 2014 Auditors since June 2014 ”

please turn to next page

updATES

8

9

TAPA Asia Pacific takes pride in ensuring the competency of our trainers on the new standards and as part of the quality assurance on its training sessions, several Train the Trainer (TTT) Sessions were held in the following countries

• China – Shanghai• Japan – Tokyo• Singapore

No. location Date Participants evaluation - Satisfaction Rate1 Singapore 05-06 Jun 31 100.00%2 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 18-19 Jun 38 100.00%3 Hong Kong 12-13 Jun 20 97.10%4 Shanghai, China 24-25 Jul 56 96.67%5 Melbourne, Australia 24-25 Jul 13 70.00%6 Manila, Philippines 30-31 Jul 44 95.30%7 Penang, Malaysia 11-12 Aug 32 100.00%8 Hong Kong 12-13 Aug 30 97.10%9 Singapore 04-05 Sep 33 88.80%

10 Shanghai, China 18-19 Sep 41 97.00%11 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 29-30 Sep 30 96.67%12 Manila, Philippines 09-10 Oct 11 100.00%13 Sydney, Australia 15-16 Oct 11 100.00%14 Japan 22-23 Oct 23 95.60%15 Shanghai, China 27-28 Oct 17 100.00%16 Beijing, China 30-31 Oct 22 90.90%17 Singapore 06-07 Nov 30 100.000%18 New Delhi, India 10-11 Nov 24 95 %19 Bangkok, Thailand 25-26 Nov 39 91.67%

545 95.36 %

The cumulative satisfaction rate is as follows:

As part of TAPA Asia Pacific’s overall approach of continual improvement, to always provide the best and ensure that each initiative is better than last, it carries out evaluation, seeking feedback from all participants on the training. The feedback focuses on: • The trainers - Competency, Presentation,

Practicality, Openness to feedbacks

• The meeting Participants’ Objectives• The structure, the course material, etc.• The training environment• Other feedback

The satisfaction rate of the FSR training held to date is very positive with a high percentage of participants expressing their satisfaction that the training met their expectations.

9

10

The overall feedback from participants have been positive with most of them expressing that there is now more clarity, less ambiguity and less duplications if a LSP wishes to certify to both the FSR and the TSR.

The training material has also received compliments for the examples, photos and video clips in each section to provide the

We extend our invitation to our fellow members in joining us for the upcoming training in kuala lumpur, malaysia on the 22-23 December 2014.

TAPA Asia Pacific would like to take this opportunity to introduce our Training Working Committee:

Further information and registration for the training courses can be found on the TAPA Asia Pacific website: www.tapa-apac.org

TAPA Asia Pacific extends our invitation for sponsors in training venues and physical site visits in all the identified training locations. Interested members may contact: tang.lei@tapa-apac.org.

For more details about hosting a training session, please visit the region’s website.

participants more realistic visuals of the requirements.

Over 90 % agreed or strongly agreed that the trainers had high competency and knowledge in providing practical examples to facilitate their learning. The high levels of energy and openness to feedbacks had also motivated them in the sessions.

TAPA Asia Pacific has also organized and completed a series of Trucking Security Requirement Training in Asia Pacific, however with a lower than expected responses,

TAPA Asia Pacific has consolidated the training sessions into 3 and is as follows:

No. location Date language1 Hong Kong 14-15 Aug (Thu-Fri) English2 Singapore 02-03 Sep (Tue-Wed) English3 Kuala Lumpur 22-23 Dec (Mon-Tue) English

10

TRAiNiNg WoRkiNg CommiTTee

Herdial Singh

Tom Kane

Jason Teo

Lina Li

Eddie Tan

Cindy Lee

fEATuRES

11

used as a pesticide, it might have been introduced intentionally. A police investigation followed.

Eventually, the police identified the alleged culprit - an unhappy and angry worker who intentionally contaminated some of the food before the final processing prior to shipment from the factory. This criminal incident was carried out by only one person although 80% of their 300 workers were on temporary or contract basis.

The ISO registration organization immediately revoked the factory’s ISO-22000 certification and the certificate on the front wall of the factory was removed.

As of January 2014, approximately 2,700 people had reported probable

NARihiko ASouChairman,TAPA Asia Japan Chapter

hiRoAki ogAmiBoard Member,TAPA Asia Japan Chapter

health problems due to this contamination. They claimed that they were sickened and nauseated from the fishy smell on the prepared frozen food items or claimed to have developed digestive disorders.

The remaining 864 pieces of frozen food were tested. According to the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, no Malathion was detected in the tests to levels that would confirm a definitive causal relationship. no evidence was found relating the consumers’ complaints and the specific food items they claimed to have consumed.

By January 21, 2014, about 5.5 million out of 6.4 million food packages (86% of total shipments) had been recalled. The loss to the manufacturer (recall

Mr. narihiko Asou, Chairman of the TAPA Asia Japan Chapter, appeared on nationwide television news broadcast earlier this year where he shared a commentary about a recent food contamination incident from the perspective of food security expert.

oveRvieW oF The iNCiDeNT

In the first quarter of 2014,the Maebashi District Public Prosecutor’s Office indicted a 49-year old contract worker from the AQLI Foods Corporation factory for property damage. The factory is located at Ooizumi-cho, Gunnma Prefecture north East of Tokyo.

The indictment accused the worker for nine instances of contaminating frozen food products with pesticide, Malathion, prior to shipping between October 3, 2013 and november 5, 2013, rendering twelve products unsuitable for consumption. The consumers reported the first case in november.

In mid-December 2013, Maruha nichiro Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiary AQLI Foods Corporation, held an independent scientific food inspection and found high levels of Malathion in some of their frozen food products, specifically croquets, pizza and a deep-fried product. The manufacturers said they planned to recall all the products produced and shipped after the first reported incident. As Malathion is a toxic organophosphate compound, typically please turn to next page

TaPa asia JaPan ChaPTEr-inTErnaTiOnaL FrOzEn FOOD COnTaminaTiOn inCiDEnT WiTh PEsTiCiDEs maLaThiOn in JaPanLooking at the food industries from a perspective of a food security expert.

11

12

cost and economic loss due to operation stoppage) due to this “harmful foreign object incident” was estimated to be $50 million u.S, with direct losses totaling $35 million u.S.

under Japan’s law, the term “harmful foreign objects” in food items describes any object, which is not a food item and has the potential to cause some harmful effect to human health. Examples include pathogens, poisonous harmful substances, or foreign objects placed inside food products. Foreign objects such broken needles, fishing hooks, pieces of glass and pieces of broken metal may cause obstructions and punctures in the digestive tracts.

Although no one died as a result of this incident, the nation’s consumers and the entire food industry was shaken over the possibility of a much unfortunate outcome. The corporation was dissolved by the parent company later and was reestablished as a part of another company in the group with a totally restructured outfit.

iNveST iN SeCuRiTy oR RiSk DeTRimeNTAl DAmAge

Was there a way to stop this at an earlier time before the product was shipped? Or more importantly, is it feasible to prevent such incidents? What can we, as consumers and businessmen, do to protect ourselves from a repeat such incidents?

In his television appearance, TAPA Asia Japan Chapter Chairman Mr. Asou explained the benefits of having the TAPA-standard certified security system to the panel members and nationwide viewers.

“The TAPA security system costs roughly $200,000 for an average-sized food factory in Japan. But, once an incident such as this occurs, the loss of credibility and the recall cost are enormous.”

The cost paid out of this incident is estimated to be $40 to 50 million u.S. Mr. Asou pointed out that this showed the importance of food security and the high cost in a failure to implement it. His statement, “Any wise top manager would know how he/she should invest company’s money without hesitation,” had greatly impacted the viewers.

ANAlySiS oF ThiS iNCiDeNT AND hoW iT mighT hAve beeN PReveNTeD

The TAPA Asia Japan Chapter’s analysis of this incident is that the factory had inadequate security measures in place. The defense against intentional contamination of food items with foreign objects such as pesticides, poisons or microorganisms requires a two-pronged security response.

The first requirement is to provide sufficient security education to all the employees so that the possibility of such incidents may be prevented. There was apparent inadequacy of security education and security awareness among the workers. Security screenings were not conducted on the workers before they gain entrance into the manufacturing lines. The manuals completed with thorough checklists, which are provided by TAPA, could also aid in the prevention. Workers need to be trained by TAPA’s instructors, who are certified with Facility Security Requirements (FSR) and trained in internal security audit to ensure good education and training received so that good procedures and practices can be put in place.

The second requirement is to provide high-standard physical security for the facility and its perimeter with the use of high-quality equipment and well-trained security personnel. The lack of appropriate physical security equipment such as CCTV, camera and alarms may also have led to this incident. If this factory had been equipped with TAPA-standard certified CCTV cameras

to monitor each of the work processes, it might not have taken more than a month to isolate the problem and identify the culprit.

The Japanese national police have stated that CCTV monitors have been effective in helping to identify culprits in many burglary and theft incidents. This measure might have even prevented the incident from mushrooming, as it could have been possible to prevent any harmful outcome in the first occurrence through early containment before shipping.

eFFoRTS iN FooD DeFeNSe by The TAPA ASiA JAPAN ChAPTeR

Since the release of TAPA Food Defense Security Requirement (TAPA-FDSR) by TAPA Asia’s Japan Chapter in 2009, knowledge on incident and accident prevention for storage facilities and transportation from the food companies and factories were taught and aggressively addressed.

In June 2010, several factories, including a factory in China, where contaminated pot-sticker products were imported to Japan, were examined as they escalated to become a major Japanese news story. In China, TAPA Asia Japan Chapter had also held meetings with the national food testing and inspection bureaus in Fujian and Liaoning Provinces to discuss response counter measures for such incidents.

The incident this year had refreshed our conviction about the importance of the TAPA-FDSR and the promotion of it continues at a more accelerated phase.

The Food Defense Working Group of TAPA Asia Japan Chapter is at the same time waiting for the release of the updated version of TAPA-FDSR. The updated version will incorporate the united States Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which is scheduled to become operative this year. The Japan Chapter is also looking ahead to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and expecting TAPA certification to become more desirable to more Asia Pacific food corporations with the growing concern of food security in their respective establishments.

12

13

eddie TanBoard Member,TAPA Asia Pacific

From April 22 to April 25 2014, Eddie Tan, Board Member of TAPA Asia Pacific, jointly conducted a 4-day course on Certificate In Applied Humanitarian Logistics Management in Manila with kuhne Foundation – nuS HumLog Centre Asia Pacific and The university of the Philippines, School of urban & Regional Planning.

The 35 trainees who attended the course were from various non-Governmental Organisations (nGOs) based in the Philippines.

The course was aimed at teaching firm and practical Logistics and Supply Chain Management skills by providing:

• Detailed picture of humanitarian system in emergency relief

• Comprehensive long term development context on

- Types of disasters - Disaster life cycle - Disasters involved actors

Eddie’s joint effort with various organizations to present the Certificate In Applied Humanitarian Logistics Management Training in Manila allows more NGOs to better manage their resources to maximize its beneficiaries.

“”

a COUrsE WiTh a CaUsE FOr hUmaniTarian aCTiOnEffective humanitarian logistic management allows maximization of resources to benefit more victims of disasters.

- Various types of responses to disasters

• Fundamental understanding of logistics and supply chain management practices in humanitarian operations

• Technical knowledge on relevant supply chain processes (assessment and planning to final distribution) to be applied in practical scenarios

The trainees reviewing and sharing on the proposals of a case study with Eddie Tan

fEATuRES

13

14

We are unable to predict every occurrence of natural disaster on our part and many innocents suffer the aftermath of these unfortunate happenings. The application of effective logistics and supply chain management will help to save lives and efficiently manage costs to allow more victims to benefit from the humanitarian responses from all around the world.

“”

Besides the classroom session, there was a half-day tour of a warehouse that was used for the pre-positioning of relief goods to be distributed during a crisis.

14

15

TApA ASIA pACIfIC TRAININGS

S/N oRgANizATioN NAme CouNTRy

1 AAI Worldwide Logistics Philippines2 CEVA Logistics Australia3 CEVA Logistics (Thailand) Limited Thailand4 Ceva Logistics Singapore Pte Ltd Singapore5 China Shipping Cargo Services Co., Ltd. China6 Crane Worldwide Logistics Hong Kong Ltd. Hong Kong7 Crown Honor Logistics (Holdings) Ltd. Hong Kong8 DHL Express - Sydney Airport SSE Australia9 DHL Express - Sydney Gateway Australia

10 DHL Express (Australia) Pty Ltd. Australia11 DHL Express (Australia) Pty Ltd. Australia

rEsiLiEnCE aGainsT sUPPLy ChAiN RiSKS wiTh TAPA FACiLiTy ANd TRuCKiNg rEqUirEmEnTs The TSR & FSR trainings equipped buyer and supplier companies with ample knowledge for practical applications for daily operations.

With the increasing awareness of security issues in the establishments, trainings are important and essential in ensuring that the security measure are up to standards against all Supply Chain Risks.“ ”

below are the organizations which have been certified with the Facility Security Requirements (FSR) as of 1 November 2014:

S/N oRgANizATioN NAme CouNTRy CLaSS

1 Yatfai Integrated Logistics Limited Hong Kong TTSP Level 1 (TSR 2012)2 Yatfai Integrated Logistics Limited Hong Kong TTSP Level 2 (TSR 2012)3 Guangzhou Hayonex Logistics Co Ltd China TSR 2012 Level 2

below are the organizations certified for the Truck Security Requirements (TSR) as of 1 November 2014:

Table continues on the next page

15

16

12 DHL Express (Australia) Pty Ltd. Australia13 DHL Express (Singapore) Pte Ltd Singapore14 DHL Express (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Singapore15 DHL Express (Thailand) Ltd. Thailand16 DHL Express International (Thailand) LIMITED Thailand17 DHL Express International (Thailand) Ltd. Thailand18 DHL EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL (THAILAND) LTD. Thonburi Service Center Thailand19 DHL Global Forwarding China20 DHL Global Forwarding China21 DHL GLOBAL FORWARDING China22 DHL Global Forwarding China23 DHL Global Forwarding (Korea) Ltd Korea24 DHL Global Forwarding (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd Malaysia25 DHL Global Forwarding (New Zealand) Ltd. New Zealand26 DHL Global Forwarding DHL Logistics Shanghai Wai Gao Qiao Logistics

Park BranchChina

27 DHL Korea Ltd Korea28 DHL Korea Ltd Korea29 DHL Logistics (China) Co., Ltd. China30 DHL Sinotrans International air courier Ltd Shanghai Branch,JQN SVC China31 DHL Supply Chain China32 DHL Supply Chain (M) Sdn Bhd Malaysia33 DHL Worldwide Express Bangladesh34 Evergreen Air Cargo Service Corp. Taiwan35 Everhonor Logistics Management Limited Hong Kong36 Fertile Plan International Logistics Company Limited China37 Geodis Wilson Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong38 Hercules Logistics Company Limited China39 Hichain Logistics (Hong Kong) Ltd. Hong Kong40 Ingram Micro India Limited India41 Jiin Yeeh Ding (H.K.) Enterprises Limited Hong Kong42 Kam Sing Transportation Limited/ Kam Sing (China) Transportation

LimitedHong Kong

43 Kunshan Feili Storage Service Co., Ltd. China44 KWE-Kintetsu World Express (S) Pte Ltd Singapore45 Kwong Fat Transport Ltd. Hong Kong46 Logwin Air & Ocean Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong47 MBE International Logistics (Guangzhou) Ltd. China48 Mumbai International Airport India49 Nippon Express (M) Sdn Bhd Malaysia50 Nippon Express (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia51 Nippon Express (Singapore) Pte Ltd Singapore

S/N oRgANizATioN NAme CouNTRy

16

17

52 NNR Global Logistics (HK) Limited Hong Kong53 NNR Global Logistics (M) Sdn Bhd Malaysia54 NNR Global Logistics (S) Pte Ltd (SNG6001147) Singapore55 Panalpina Transport (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd Malaysia56 S.F. Express Co.,Ltd China57 SATS Airport Services Pte Ltd (Airfreight Terminal 1 to 6) Singapore58 Schenker International (HK) Ltd. Hong Kong59 Schenker International (HK) Ltd. - Airfreight Export Site (Chek Lap Kok) Hong Kong60 Schenker International (HK) Ltd. - Tai Po Site Hong Kong61 Schenker Korea Ltd. Korea62 Schenker Logistics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. China63 Schenker Singapore (Pte) Ltd – Tuas View Lane Singapore64 Securiforce Logistic (S) Pte Ltd Singapore65 Shanghai E&T Intl Trans Co., Ltd. China66 Shanghai E&T Intl Trans Co., Ltd. China67 Shanghai EB & SFSC International Logistics Co., Ltd. China68 Shenzhen Jingjietong Logistics Co.,Ltd. China69 Sinotrans Air Transportation Development Eastern Branch China70 Sinotrans Logistics Development Co., Ltd China71 TNT Canberra Depot Australia72 TNT Express - Cairns Deport Australia73 TNT Express Worldwide (China) Ltd. China74 TNT Express Worldwide (M) Sdn Bhd Malaysia75 TNT Express Worldwide (M) Sdn Bhd Malaysia76 TNT Express Worldwide (M) Sdn Bhd Malaysia77 TNT Express Worldwide (M) Sdn Bhd (Warehouse) Malaysia78 TNT Express Worldwide (S) Pte. Ltd. Singapore79 TNT Express Worldwide (S) Pte. Ltd. Singapore80 TNT Express Worldwide (S) Pte. Ltd. Singapore81 TNT Express Worldwide (S) Pte. Ltd. Singapore82 TNT Express Worldwide (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Thailand83 Wuxi CTS Xingqiao Int’l Forwarding Co. Ltd. Shanghai Branch China84 Yusen Logistics Co., Ltd. Narita Logistics Center Japan

S/N oRgANizATioN NAme CouNTRy

TAPA Asia Pacific would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the certified members and we look forward to more organizations joining us.“ ”

17

18