welcome to saturday physics! brought you to by quarknet the department of physics and astronomy of...
DESCRIPTION
Nature’s Deepest Questions People have wondered about the nature of matter at least since time of the Greeks. Democritis, around 450 BC coined the term atom for what he considered the fundamental particles of nature…the smallest bits of matter that could not be divided further. Atom comes from a Greek word meaning “indivisible”TRANSCRIPT
Welcome to Saturday Physics!
Brought you to by
Quarknet
The Department of Physics and Astronomy of Rice University
The Department of Physics of the University of Houston
The National Science Foundation
The Department of Energy
Please sign in!
The nature of science, the definition almost is this: The test of all scientific questions is experiment. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific truth.
--Richard Feynman
Nature’s Deepest Questions
People have wondered about the nature of matter at least since time of the Greeks.
Democritis , around 450 BC coined the term atom for what he considered the fundamental particles of nature…the smallest bits of matter that could
not be divided further.
Atom comes from a Greek word meaning “indivisible”
Atoms, the building blocks of matter
The Greeks had the idea that there were only a few different types of atoms, and all matter was made
up of different combinations of them.
Mendeleev and the periodic table
Fast forward to the 1800s.
As more and more different kinds of atoms were discovered, Mendeleev noticed a pattern that
led him to arrange the different kinds of atoms into a table that we now call the
periodic chart of the elements
Periodic chart of the elements
But there are over 100 elements! Seems like too many…
The 20th century revolutions
There were many revolutions in physics during the 20th century, but one of the most
important was the realization that atoms were not indivisible…
JJ Thompson discovered the electron in 1897
The constituents of the atom
In 1912 Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus
Oh well, I guess we can tolerate three...
In 1932, Chadwick discovered the neutron, the neutral partner of the proton. It wasn’t really
expected, but didn’t seem to complicate things too much...
Atoms were then understood as made from a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded
by the electrons. The nucleus is 100,000 times smaller than the atom.
But once again the simple picture broke down...
During the 1930s and 40s, cosmic ray experiments and the first accelerators
discovered more particles:
In 1937 another particle, which we now call the muon was discovered in cosmic ray
experiments. I. I. Rabi “Who ordered that?”
In 1946 the pion was discovered the same way
Discovery of the Kaon
In 1947 a new type of particle called “strange” particles was discovered in cosmic rays
Too many fundamental particles !!
By about 1965 there were over 100 fundamental particles…again too many.
Here is an example page from the Particle Data Book…this is one of several hundred pages of particle listings.
Enter the quark
Around 1965 Zweig and Gell-Mann suggested that protons, neutrons, and most of the other particles
were made of constituents which he called quarks.
“Three quarks for Muster Mark…” Finnegan’s Wake
The proton is made of three quarks, and so is the neutron.
But the electron is still fundamental.
The fundamental particles circa 1965:
Three quarks: u, d, s with charges +2/3 and -1/3 in units of the electron charge.
Three leptons: electron (e) and muon ()and a mysterious, neutral, very weakly
interacting particle called the neutrino, .
Six…maybe not too bad
The November revolution
In November of 1974, the world of physics was stunned by the discovery of a fourth quark, the
c or “charm” quark
This is a picture of the decay of a particle containing a c quark and anti-quark pair.
And then there were five.
In 1977 yet another quark was discovered, the b or bottom quark at Fermilab
The detector Leon
Now we know there are six quarks
Are we done yet?
Our current understanding of the fundamental particles:
Six quarks and six leptons! These particles have mass and electric charge but apparently no size!
But wait…where does the proton fit in?
The quarks combine in two (and only two) ways to form particles that we observe in the lab.
Quark-antiquark pairs from mesons:
+ = u anti-d K+=u anti-s
Three quarks from baryons:
Proton=uud neutron=udd
So the proton is not fundamental, but is a composite particle, like a nucleus.
The Importance of Energy
New discoveries often follow the opening of a new energy regime:
Discovery of the electron 1 eVDiscovery of the nucleus 5 MeVDiscovery of pion and muon 100 MeVDiscovery of the kaon 500 MeVDiscovery of the proton substructure 20 GeVDiscovery of the top quark 2 TeVDiscovery of ?? at the LHC 14 TeV
The importance of energy
To achieve ever higher and higher energies, larger and larger machines have been built, with Fermilab and CERN currently being the largest.
Fundamental question #1
Is there another layer of substructure?
We don’t know, but there is no sign of further substructure yet.
The spectrum of masses
Let’s look more closely at the masses of the quarks and leptons:
Units are 1 GeV, an energy unit equal to the mass of the proton
u,d 0.3 GeV e 0.0005 GeV s 0.5 GeV 0.1 GeV c 1.5 GeV 1.8 GeV b 4.5 GeV ? t ?
Let’s look more closely at the masses of the quarks and leptons:
Units are 1 GeV, an energy unit equal to the mass of the proton
u,d 0.3 GeV e 0.0005 GeV s 0.5 GeV 0.1 GeV c 1.5 GeV 1.8 GeV b 4.5 GeV .000000000003 GeV t 175 GeV
The spectrum of masses
Fundamental question #2
How can something with no physical size have mass and charge?
How do these fundamental particles acquire mass, and what determines the values of the masses?
Why is the top quark so massive?
The origin of mass
What we think we understand about the origin of mass is tied up in our understanding of the force carriers.
Force carriers: photons(massless)gluons (massless)W and Zs (80-90 times the proton mass )
The fundamental interactions
We view the interactions as occurring through the exchange of one of the force carriers.
Feynman diagrams showing weak and electromagnetic interactions
The origin of mass
In the theories we can explain the mass of the W and Z, but at the expense of predicting yet another particle which is called the Higgs particle, after Peter Higgs.
Peter Higgs
The origin of mass
The Higgs generates a field, a bit like an electric field, which permeates all space gives mass to all the particles.
The Higgs field is like a roomful of scientists, milling around randomly
A famous scientist walks in
A crowd forms around him, and it is difficult for him to move! He has acquired a large mass!
The Higgs mechanism
But what is the Higgs particle?
If someone shouts a rumor into the room...
The scientists form a cluster as the rumor passes through the room. This cluster is like the Higgs particle!
But even if we find the Higgs particle, we won’t know why particles have the specific masses that they do.
Antimatter
I wasn’t complete when I listed all the particles…I should have
mentioned that all particles have their antiparticles !
When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate each other in a burst
of energy !
Fire up the antimatter drive, Mr. Scott.
Dirac predicted antimatter in 1927
Antimatter
We create antimatter all the time at places like Fermilab, and we can store it for days. But we
always make it as matter-antimatter pairs.
Antiproton accumulator at Fermilab
Fundamental question #3
If we always produce matter and antimatter together, in equal amounts…why is the universe today dominated by matter? This is a 40-year old puzzle that is yet to be solved!
Electron-positron production from a photon
e-
e+
photon
The cosmic connection
There is a very close connection between particle physics and astrophysics.
I’m going to show two examples:
Type II supernovas
Dark matter
SN1994
Particle decay
Heavier particles decay into lighter ones, which is why the world is made of up and down quarks and not top quarks.
These decays occur because systems go to their lowest energy state.
As an example, free neutrons decay into protons, electrons and electron anti-neutrinos:
np e e
This example is called beta decay.
Question: why don’t neutrons within an atomic nucleus decay?
_
Particle decay
In such decays, several quantities are conserved:
Energy, linear momentum, angular momentum
Electric charge
The total number of leptons (anti-leptons count as -1)
The total number of baryons (anti-baryons count as -1)
np e e
We have one baryon to start, one baryon to end.We have zero leptons to start and zero to end (the antineutrino counts as -1, the electron as +1)
The “bar” means “antiparticle”
_
Particle Decay
All decays can go in reverse, too (inverse beta decay)
epne or enpe
General rule: When you move a particle from one side of the decay equation to the other, it changes into it’s antiparticle
Verify that lepton number and baryon number are conserved in this decay.
Beta decay and supernovas
Why is this important in astrophysics?
Beta decay is crucial in the generation in stars of all the chemical elements.
And inverse beta decay plays a central role in Type II supernovas
Supernova 1064 remnant
A Type II supernova occurs due to gravitational collapse
Type II supernovas
In type II supernovas (stars much more massive than our sun), when all the nuclear fuel is used up, the gravitational pressure is so great that the atoms collapse!
The electrons and protons undergo inverse beta decay:
epne
Every proton in the star becomes a neutron, forming a neutron star. The neutrinos escape(1057 of them!) and carry away a large part of the supernova energy.
Galaxy M31 with a SN on the outter edge
Type II Supernovas
The neutron star resulting from a Type II supernova is about 10 km in radius and rotates with periods of seconds or less.
In 1987 neutrinos from a nearby supernova were detected in two detectors on earth!
Here’s a problem for students: If a star the size of our sun with a rotation period of 10 hours collapses to a radius of 10km, how fast would it be rotating to conserve angular momentum?
Dark Matter
As early as 1933 Zwicky showed that gravitational effects in galaxy clusters could not be explained by the visible matter.
In the 1980’s, rotational curves of galaxies gave more evidence for the existence of unseen or dark matter.
Rotational velocity vs distance from the galactic center
Gravitational Lensing
Einstein predicted in 1936 that light from distant objects could be bent by massive objects between us and the distant object.
Multiple, distorted images are evidence for gravitational lensing.
Dark matter
Quantitative calculations of gravitational lensing give strong evidence that galaxies have much more matter than we see.
Galactic Haloes
The rotational curves of galaxies and the observed gravitational lensing can be explained if galaxies are surrounded by a huge halo of dark matter.
The dark matter makes up 80% of the matter in galaxies!
What is the dark matter?
We don’t know, but the answer almost certainly lies in particle physics.
In the 1980’s particle theorists developed what is still a leading candidate for a theory beyond the Standard Model. Supersymmetry predicts that every particle we know has a supersymmetric partner which is much more massive and interacts only weakly with regular matter.
Supersymmetry solves deep problems in the mathematics of the Standard Model. It was developed for this reason, and not because it solves the dark matter problem.
Is Supersymmetry real?
“Supersymmetry is an offer nature can’t refuse” Dmitri Nanopolis, theorist
“There ain’t no supersymmetry”, Leo Bellantoni, experimental physicist
“Experiment is the sole judge of scientific truth”, Richard Feynman
We are pushing hard to find supersymmetry. But as yet there is no direct experimental evidence for it.
Dark Energy
It gets weirder…around 2000 it was found that the expansion of the universe is speeding up.
The stuff in the universe is dominated by dark energy, which acts like anti-gravity.
Dark energy is pushing the universe apart faster and faster.
It’s nature is unknown.
The cosmic connectionThe science of the very big and the science of the very small are in a close, synergistic relationship.
Aerial view of Fermilab
Deployment of the Hubble Space Telescope from the shuttle
Summary-what we don’t know (yet)
1. Have we reached the bottom yet? (is there another layer of substructure?)2. What is the origin of mass, and why do particles
have the masses they do?3. What is the origin of the matter-antimatter
asymmetry of the universe? 4. What is the dark matter making up galactic
halos? ( Not neutrinos)
Where do we do these experiments?
Aerial view of Fermilab, near Chicago, and Wilson Hall
One of the collider detectors
And a typical event
More views of Fermilab
Visit www.fnal.gov and pdg.lbl.gov to learn more about particle physics and the labs