welfare reform and homelessness natalie branosky inclusion

19
Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Upload: jerome-kelly

Post on 01-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Welfare reform and homelessness

Natalie Branosky

Inclusion

Page 2: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Political context

A new localism…

Flexibility, devolution, both or neither?

Impact of DWP job cuts…

Who delivers services?

Shift in focus from JSA to economically inactive

Emphasis on IB reform, but JSA on the rise

Page 3: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

The Government’s approach

– A tougher line on benefits– Active help in training, jobsearch, and provision of

work– Making work more attractive

Page 4: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

80% employment?

“Our long-term aim is to raise the employment rate to 80 per cent.”

“We will build on the successful Pathways to Work programme and reform Incapacity Benefit, with the main elements of the new benefit regime in place from 2008.”

 Labour Party Manifesto 2005 “We are determined to go much further and will set a new aspiration

of moving towards the equivalent of 80 per cent of the working-age population in work.”

DWP Five year Strategy (Feb 2005) & the Welfare Reform Green Paper (Feb 2006)

Page 5: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

We will need ….

2.8 million more people in work On current trend it will take 12 years Assuming the jobs are created, who do we

need to get into work, and …..

– close employment gaps– not fuel inflation.

Page 6: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton Dumbarton & Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank& Cly debank

East East East East East East East East East DunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshireDunbartonshire

Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, City ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity of

Inv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly deInv ercly de

Argy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & ButeArgy ll & Bute

South LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth LanarkshireSouth Lanarkshire

East Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshireEast Renf rewshire

Renf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireRenf rewshireNorth North North North North North North North North

LanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshireLanarkshire

North Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshireNorth Ay rshire

West West West West West West West West West LothianLothianLothianLothianLothianLothianLothianLothianLothian

MidlothianMidlothianMidlothianMidlothianMidlothianMidlothianMidlothianMidlothianMidlothian

Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, City ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity ofCity of

East Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshireEast Ay rshire

Dumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & GallowayDumf ries & Galloway

South Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshireSouth Ay rshire

Aberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City ofAberdeen, City of

AberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshireAberdeenshire

AngusAngusAngusAngusAngusAngusAngusAngusAngus

ClackmannanClackmannanClackmannanClackmannanClackmannanClackmannanClackmannanClackmannanClackmannan

Dundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City ofDundee, City of

East LothianEast LothianEast LothianEast LothianEast LothianEast LothianEast LothianEast LothianEast Lothian

FalkirkFalkirkFalkirkFalkirkFalkirkFalkirkFalkirkFalkirkFalkirk

Fif eFif eFif eFif eFif eFif eFif eFif eFif e

HighlandHighlandHighlandHighlandHighlandHighlandHighlandHighlandHighland

MorayMorayMorayMorayMorayMorayMorayMorayMoray

Perthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & KinrossPerthshire & Kinross

StirlingStirlingStirlingStirlingStirlingStirlingStirlingStirlingStirling

Western IslesWestern IslesWestern IslesWestern IslesWestern IslesWestern IslesWestern IslesWestern IslesWestern Isles

The BordersThe BordersThe BordersThe BordersThe BordersThe BordersThe BordersThe BordersThe Borders

LABOUR MARKET STATISTICS TEAM 27/01/2005 © CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED

ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT RATES 2003/4 DEFINED BY UALADS WITHIN SCOTLAND

Orkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney IslandsOrkney Islands

Shetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland IslandsShetland Islands

Percent80% and over74.2% or more but less than 80%64.4% or more but less than 74.2% (UK Average)Less than 64.4% (EU Average)

Source: Annual local area labour force survey: 2003/4, National Statistics

Page 7: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Closing the gapsEmployment rates of disadvantaged groups

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Em

p R

ate

(%)

Working age population over 50s Disabled

Lowest qualfied Lone parents Ethnic Minorities

Page 8: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Southern England male employment is over 80%

60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85%

Northern Ireland

London

North East

Wales

North West

West Midlands

Yorkshire & the Humber

Scotland

East Midlands

East

South West

South East

Male Female All

Page 9: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Most able-bodied people are over 80%

30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Northern Ireland

Wales

North East

North West

London

Scotland

West Midlands

Yorkshire and Humberside

South West

East Midlands

Eastern

South East

Disabled Not disabled

Page 10: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

White population has higher employment

50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85%

Wales

Scotland

Yorkshire & the Humber

West Midlands

North East

London

North West

East Midlands

East of England

South East

South West

BME groups White

Page 11: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

All mothers are below 80%, but big gap for lone parents

40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80%

Northern Ireland

London

West Midlands

North East

Yorkshire and Humberside

North West (inc Merseyside)

Scotland

South East

Eastern

Wales

South West

East Midlands

Lone mothers Mothers in couples

Page 12: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Every region has over 80% for NVQ3+

50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90%

London

Northern Ireland

North East

North W est

Scotland

W ales

Yorkshire & the Humber

W est M idlands

East M idlands

South East

South W est

East of England

Low Qualifications (Under 2-0) NVQ Level 2 High Qualifications (3+)

Page 13: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Homeless people and work

The qualitative research base and anecdotal evidence shows:

Low employment rates-- approx 5% of hostel residents in work, but decreasing

But, a desire to work-- strong awareness of the multiple benefits of paid employment, work aspirations are there to build on (St Mungo’s research).

Page 14: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Employment support

A varied range: from nothing, to structured programmes of ‘meaningful activities’, to formal agreements that require residents to participate in learning and employability services.

No cross sector of evaluation.

New research for Off the Streets and Into Work (OSW) which has mapped all of the models on offer in London and the Northeast.

Page 15: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

New Deal 18-24 returners

% of first starts 65%

% of returners35%

Sept 2001 – Sept 2003

Page 16: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Reaching 80% in the Cities

295

221

90

55 50 50

29 28 28 27 27 20 19 18 17 12 11 11 10 4

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

Page 17: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Who is poor?Composition of children in relative low income by economic

status and family type

34%

16%9%

41%

Workless lone parent

Workless couple

Working lone parent

Working couple

Page 18: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

The welfare reform bill

Reducing by 1 million the number receiving IB Helping 300,000 lone parents into work Increasing by 1 million the number of older workers.

City Strategies – consortia of local partners with a shared interest in improving emp rates. Bids to receive start up £ and rewards (focus on areas of inactivity – cities). In Scotland: Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee

Page 19: Welfare reform and homelessness Natalie Branosky Inclusion

Other issues

Jobcentre Plus and learning services need to go ‘where no service has gone before.’

LHA pilots - rapid roll-out, but there needs to be acknowledgement that the HB taper and high hostel rents remain a barrier to employment

KEY ARGUMENT: Significant proportion of homeless people want to work – this can help the Government meet its 80% goal