well architecture rge 2008 jp szezuka

Upload: rahulsaraf2

Post on 05-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    1/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTUREDESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    2/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WHAT IS AN HOLE WELL ?

    An Oil well is a bit more than just a hole in the Earth.

    Due to the various Formations drilled

    (nature, unstability, reservoirs, )

    it is necessary to regularly protect the well bore.

    For this the hole is covered using steel tubulars

    called Casings which are furthermore Cemented.

    The result is a telescopic succession of holes

    ending at different depthsand having decreasing diameters.

    This is what is called the Architecture of the well.

    Various equipments are installed inside the last(s) casing(s)to allow Production of the Hydrocarbons.

    This is the Completion phase.

    An Oil well can be Vertical, Deviated or Horizontal.

    It can be a Producer or an Injector.

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    3/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Well Architecture Exemple & Conventional Representation

    Hole 26 (660 mm)

    Casing 20 (508 mm)

    Hole 171/2 (660 mm)

    Casing 133/8 (340

    mm)

    Hole 1214 (311 mm)

    Casing 95/8 (224 mm)

    Hole 81/2 (216

    mm)

    Casing 7 (178

    mm)

    Hole 53/4 (146 mm)

    Casing 41/2 (114,3 mm)

    Conductor pipe

    50 m (164 ft)

    Surface casing

    240 m (787 ft)

    Production casing

    3300 m (10 826 ft)

    Intermediary casing

    2400 m (7 874 ft)

    Production liner

    3600 m (11 811 ft)

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    4/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Casing Pipes

    A casing pipe is composed of a body, threaded male at each of its extremities,

    On one of the extremities is screwed a casing collar, threaded femelle x femelle,

    used to connect the casing pipes between them.

    Casing pipes exist in various sizes, weights and threads.

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    5/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WHAT IS AN HOLE WELL ?

    Open Hole

    Annular

    PreviousCasing

    Casing Shoe

    Cement

    Cementation

    The cement is mixed on surface,

    pumped inside the casing

    and displaced in the annular

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    6/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    OIL WELL

    Well at end of drilling operations Perforated & Completed well

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    7/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    When designing a new well the first step is to determine its

    ARCHITECTURE

    i.e to determine the Phases of the well

    Depth

    Drilling size

    Casing size

    Casing characteristics

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    8/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    The well architecture depends on :

    The well final depth ( From some hundred meters to 10 000 meters + )

    The formation pressures & fracturation pressures.

    The nature of the drilled formations ( Stability, Fluid bearing or not, )

    Some formations may lead to case the hole (shales, salt, )

    The shoe is better located in an impermeable formation.

    The production programme.

    DB - 11/01/2005

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    9/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    The well architecture design can be done in five steps :

    1 - GATHER INFORMATION

    2 - DETERMINE THE REQUIRED DRILLING FLUID DENSITIES

    3 - DETERMINE THE CASING SHOE DEPTHS

    4 - DETERMINE THE CASING SIZES AND DRILLING SIZES

    5 CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    10/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    1 - GATHER INFORMATION

    INFORMATIONS ON THE GEOLOGICAL BEDS (LITHOLOGY, TYPE)

    EXPECTED DEPTHS OF THE DIFFERENT FORMATIONS AND RESERVOIRS

    EXPECTED FORMATION PRESSURES

    EXPECTED FRACTURATION PRESSURES

    POTENTIAL ABNORMAL FORMATION PRESSURE

    POTENTIAL FLUENT FORMATIONS

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    11/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters)

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00

    Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Hydrostatic

    Pressure

    BRENT BAA2

    DRAUPNE BAA5

    HEATHER ABB5

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    Pressure PlotPLIOCEN

    E

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALA

    ND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    12/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters)

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    Hydrostatic

    Pressure

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    Gradient PlotPLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJ

    UR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    13/83JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Formation Pressure Determination

    The formation pressure can be estimated from various sources :

    Drilling operations

    Mud logging (connection gas, )

    Pressure measurements from wire line logs

    DST (Drill Stem Testing)

    DST (Drill Stem Testing)

    A DST allows to produce a well for a limited period of time,

    i.e. to accurately measure the formation pressure

    and to recover formation fluids.

    This is done using the drillstring and one or two packers.

    This can be done :

    in open hole

    in a cased perforated hole

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    14/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Pumped volume (litres) Time (mn)

    0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2 4 6 8 10

    Pump stoppedLeak-off point

    (Trend change)

    Pr

    essure(bar)

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    LOT (Leak Off Test)

    A LOT allows to determine the formation strength

    (Fracturation gradient) at a given depth

    LOT Data

    Depth 1010 mV

    Shoe at 1000 mVMud weight 1.20 sg

    Flow rate 50 lpm

    Frac pressure 40 bars

    Results

    Pressure at shoe = 40 + (1000 x 1.20) / 10.2 = 157.7 bars

    Frac gradient = 1.20 + (40 x 10.2) / 1000 = 1.61

    or = (157.7 x 10.2) / 1000 = 1.61

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    15/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    LOT (Leak Off Test)

    Objective of a LOT

    LOT are carried out during the drilling phase of a well to:

    Confirme the strength of the cement bond around the casing shoe Investigate the capability of the well to withstand additional pressure

    below the casing shoe

    Collect local data on formation strength

    When to do a LOT

    After drilling of the casing shoe

    in order to determine the weak point of the coming hole

    During drilling of the next hole section

    After drilling of a weak zone

    After drilling of a permeable zone

    Before a transition zone

    Before a important increase of mud density

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    16/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    LOT (Leak Off Test)

    LOT Procedure

    Drill out cement and 5 to 6 meters of new formation.

    Circulate and condition mud, accuretely measure the mud density.

    Pull the bit back inside the casing.

    Make sure than the well is filled up.

    Close the BOP on a drillpipe.

    Use a high pressure, low volume pump (cement pump).

    Line up calibrated pressure gauges (on the stand pipe).

    Start pumping slowly (50 to 100 lpm) until the pressure builds up.

    Record and plot the volume pumped against pressure.

    The leak-off value is defined as the first point where the pressure

    deviates from the observed trend.

    Stop pumping and keep the well closed in and observe the pressure

    If the pressure does not stabilize, this may be an indication of a

    system link or a bad cement bond.

    Bleed off the pressure and measure the volume of mud lost into the

    formation.

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    17/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters)

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    BRENT BAA2

    DRAUPNE BAA5

    HEATHER ABB5

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJ

    UR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    W ll A hit t

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    18/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Hydrostatic

    Pressure

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters)

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJ

    UR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    W ll A hit t

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    19/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    2 - DETERMINE THE REQUIRED DRILLING FLUID DENSITIES

    TO CONTROL THE PORE PRESSURE OF THE DRILLED FORMATIONS

    TO AVOID FRACTURATION OF THE ROCKS

    TO AVOID SWELLING OF THE SHALES

    TO AVOID FLUID LOSSES IN THE FORMATIONS.

    THIS IS DONE USING SAFETY MARGINS DETERMINING THE MUD WINDOW.

    THE REQUIRED MUD WEIGHT IS USUALLY SELECTED

    AS THE MINIMUM WEIGHT ALLOWING TO CONTROL THE FORMATION PRESSURE.

    W ll A hit t

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    20/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    RequiredMud

    Weight

    Safety margin

    (trip margin)

    Safety margin(kick margin)

    Mud

    Window

    PLIOCE

    NE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJ

    UR.A

    SSIC

    HORDAL

    AND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    21/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    3 - DETERMINE THE CASING SHOE DEPTHS

    DETERMINE WHERE THE REQUIRED MUD WEIGHT CAN BE SAFELY USED IN ORDER TO :

    CONTROL THE FORMATION PRESSURE

    AVOID FRACTURATION OF THE ROCKS

    CONSIDERING ANY POTENTIAL PROBLEM (FLUID LOSSES, FLUENT FORMATIONS, )

    THIS IS DONE FROM BOTTOM TO TOP OF THE WELL.

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    22/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Casing Shoe Depths Determination

    Casing shoe depths are determined in order to be able to control a kick

    without risk to fracture the drilled formation,

    Then function of :

    Expected formation and fracturation pressures,

    Expected fluids,

    Casing type,

    Selected hypothesis (well full of gas or limited volumeof invasion (few m3),

    Preferably set in an impermeable formation :

    Shale,

    Limestone,

    Anhydrite,

    This is done starting from the bottom of the well.

    DB - 11/01/2005

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    23/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Casing Shoe Depths Determination

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    Required

    MudWeight

    Depth to be reached

    Casing required

    at this depth

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    24/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Casing Shoe Depths Determination

    Depth to be reached

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    Gas

    gradient

    Casing required

    at this depth

    Well head pressure

    If well full of gas

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    25/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    PLIOCE

    NE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDAL

    AND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    200 mV

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    26/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    4 - DETERMINE THE CASING SIZES AND DRILLING SIZES

    ACCORDING TO REQUIRED PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT

    USING AVAILABLE CASING (STANDARD SIZES WHENEVER POSSIBLE)

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    27/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    200 mV

    Liner 7

    at 5060 mV

    Csg 95/8

    at 4200 mV

    Csg 133/8

    at 3200 mV

    Csg 185/8

    at 1300 mV

    Csg 24

    at 200 m

    Phase 22

    Phase 171/2

    Phase 121/4

    Phase 81/2

    Phase 6

    PLIOCE

    NE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDAL

    AND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Liner 41/2 at TD

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    28/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    5 CASING DESIGN

    SELECT THE MECHANICAL RESISTANCE OF THE CASING PIPES

    (GRADE, WEIGHT AND THREAD)

    IN ORDER TO SATISFY THE VARIOUS CONDITIONS THAT THE CASING WILL MEET.

    TRACTION

    BURST PRESSURE

    COLLAPSE PRESSURE

    CONSIDERING THE CEMENTING PROGRAMME

    CONSIDERING THE PRODUCTION PROGRAMME

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    29/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Casing Pipes Characterisation

    External diameter (body) (inches or mm)

    Linear weight (body) (pounds/foot - lbs/ft - # or kg/m)

    Grade (a letter followed by a number)

    (The number indicates the steel minimum yield strength in kpsi)

    Type of Connection (API, BTC,VAM,)

    Example:

    133/8 40.0 lbs/ft K55 BTC

    All casing pipes characteristics are regulated by the American Petroleum Institute API 5CT

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    30/83

    JPS-04-08

    e c tectu e

    WELL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    31/83

    JPS-04-08

    2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters)

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00

    Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Hydrostatic

    Pressure

    BRENT BAA2

    DRAUPNE BAA5

    HEATHER ABB5

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    32/83

    JPS-04-08

    Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters)

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    BRENT BAA2

    DRAUPNE BAA5

    HEATHER ABB5

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    33/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    Mud

    Window

    Safety margin

    (trip margin)

    Safety margin

    (kick margin)

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    34/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    Estimated

    Formation

    Pressure

    Estimated

    Fracturation

    Gradient

    Required

    Mud

    Weight

    Safety margin

    (trip margin)

    Safety margin

    (kick margin)

    Mud

    Window

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    35/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    The BRENT reservoir has a

    lower pressure gradient

    This requires to set a casing

    at its top to be able to decrease

    the mud density.

    > A Casing (/ Liner) will be set

    at 5060 mV.

    > A Liner will cover the BRENT

    to 5450 mV TD.

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    36/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    A 2.07 mud weight is required

    to drill this section.

    This gradient intercept the

    fracturation line at 4200 mV.

    > A Casing must be set

    at 4200 mV.

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    37/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    A 1.80 mud weight is required

    to drill this section.

    This gradient intercept the

    fracturation line at 3200 mV.

    > A Casing must be set

    at 3200 mV.

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    38/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    There is a risk of mud losses

    in the OLIGOCENE.

    A 1.22 mud weight is

    required to drill the

    abnormally pressured

    EOCENE.

    > This requires to cover theOLIGOCENE

    A casing must be set after

    penetration in the EOCENE

    (+/- 1300 mV)

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    39/83

    JPS-04-08

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    200 mV

    A Conductor pipe with a

    50 m penetration in the sea bed

    is required.

    > It must be set at 200 mV

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    40/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    200 mV

    Liner 7

    at 5060 mV

    Csg 95/8

    at 4200 mV

    Csg 133/8

    at 3200 mV

    Csg 185/8

    at 1300 mV

    Csg 24

    at 200 m

    The Production Departement

    requires a 41/2 liner

    in the reservoir.

    > This allows to determine the

    above casing sizes

    (using standard sizes).

    > The 7 will preferably be a liner.

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Liner 41/2 at TD

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    41/83

    JPS-04-08

    Casing & Drilling Sizes

    143/4

    16

    105/8

    113/4

    77/8

    85/8

    65/8

    43/4

    4

    20

    24

    143/4

    16

    97/8 105/883/4

    113/4103/4

    75/8 85/8

    5

    61/4 61/2

    24

    30

    171/2

    20

    121/4

    95/8

    133/8

    51/2

    77/8

    26

    185/8

    171/2

    185/8

    133/8

    95/8

    81/2

    7

    6 61/857/8

    41/2

    121/4

    20

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    42/83

    JPS-04-08

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters) Pressure (bars)100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    200 mV

    Liner 7

    at 5060 mV

    Csg 95/8

    at 4200 mV

    Csg 133/8

    at 3200 mV

    Csg 185/8

    at 1300 mV

    Csg 24

    at 200 m

    Phase 22

    Phase 171/2

    Phase 121/4

    Phase 81/2

    Phase 6

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UP

    JUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDA

    LAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Liner 41/2 at TD

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    43/83

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    44/83

    JPS-04-08

    Hydrostatic

    Pressure

    Equivalent mud weight1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(m

    eters)

    AAB1

    ABA1

    ABB5

    BAA2

    BAA5

    AAB2

    AAA1

    DST

    LOT

    Reference Wells

    PLIOC

    ENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/UPJUR.A

    SSIC

    HORDALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    45/83

    JPS-04-08Equivalent mud weight

    1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters)

    Hydrostatic

    Pressure

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/U

    PJUR.A

    SSIC

    HORD

    ALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    46/83

    JPS-04-08Equivalent mud weight

    1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    Depth(meters)

    5060 mV

    4200 mV

    3200 mV

    1300 mV

    200 mV

    PLIOCENE

    OLIGOCENE

    EOCENE

    PALEOCENE

    CENOMAN.

    /MAASTR.I

    CHIAN

    ALBIAN

    MID/U

    PJUR.A

    SSIC

    HORD

    ALAND/NORDALAND

    GROUP

    ROGALAND

    SHETLAND

    GROUP

    CROMER

    VIKING

    BRENT

    Sea

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    47/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    48/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Conductor pipe

    Surface casing

    Production casing

    Intermediary casing

    Production liner

    A column of casings is composed of several sections called :

    - Conductorpipe

    - Surface casing

    - Intermediate casing(s)

    - Production casing or liner(s)

    Each section must :

    - Enter in the previous casing & open hole

    - Allow the next bit to go down

    - Resists to Burst (Kick, Production)

    - Resists to Collapse (Fluent formations, Empty column)

    - Resists to Traction (Running in, Tests)

    - Resists to Buckling (Running in)

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    49/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Once the shoe depths and the casing sizes are determined,

    each casing must be dimensionned in order to resist to the

    Loading conditions depending on the type of section.

    For each size of casing exist :

    Various Grades

    Various Nominal Weight (pipe wall thickness)

    Various type of Threads

    Different Safety coefficients will be used according to the type of section.

    A casing column may be composed of different section of pipes.

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    50/83

    JPS-04-08

    Casing Pipes Characterisation

    External diameter (body) (inches or mm)

    Linear weight (body) (pounds/foot - lbs/ft - # or kg/m)

    Grade (a letter followed by a number)

    (The number indicates the steel minimum yield strength in kpsi)

    Type of Connection (API, BTC,VAM,)

    Example:

    133/8 40.0 lbs/ft K55 BTC

    All casing pipes characteristics are regulated by the American Petroleum Institute API 5CT

    Well Architecture

    C i G d & M i Ch t i ti

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    51/83

    JPS-04-08

    Casings Grades & Main Characteristics

    1351251201051001009595957560Tensile Str mini Mpa

    1501401351101051109590808080Yield maxi kpsi

    1251101059590808075555540Yield mini kpsi

    Q125P110P105C95C90N80L80C75K55J55H40Grade

    From the Drilling Data Handbook

    Well Architecture

    St d d C i C ti

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    52/83

    JPS-04-08

    Standard Casing Connections

    API Round Thread & Coupling

    Buttress Thread & Coupling

    VAM Coupling (Buttress Thread)

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    53/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Conductor pipe

    Objective:

    Maintain the surface formations.

    Length :

    from a few meters to some tenths of meters.

    Cimentation :

    To surface (complementary cementation if necessary)

    Often installed before the arrival of the drilling rig

    (Civil works, hammering or drilling)

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    54/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Surface Casing

    Objectives :

    Maintain the formations

    Protect the hole from these formations

    Protect the aquifer formations

    Support the BOPs

    Support the next casings

    Length :

    from a few meters to some hundreds of meters.

    Cimentation :

    To surface

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    55/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Intermediary Casing(s)

    Objectives :

    Maintain the formations

    Solve potential problems between the formations

    o Pressure, too high or too low

    o Salt and/or Fluent formations

    Length :

    As required

    Cimentation :

    To surface or partial (stage cementation if necessary)

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    56/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Production Casing(s) or Liner(s)

    (Any casing or liner exposed to the production operations)

    Objectives :

    Maintain the formations

    Protect the reservoir

    Allows to install the production equipment

    Length :

    As required

    Shoe at top reservoir if open hole completion

    Cimentation :

    To surface or partial (stage cementation if necessary)

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    57/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Internal Pressure

    Nothing (empty well)

    Gas

    Mud weight

    Cement

    External Pressure

    Water

    Mud weight

    Cement

    Formation

    The cement isolation is usually ignored,

    except during the cementing operations,

    > the fluid outside the casing is the mud

    of the previous phase.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    58/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    While drilling then producing the well

    a casing is submitted to various constraints :

    While drilling the next phase

    While being cemented

    During the production phase (production casing)

    The coming calculations will take care of these different conditions.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    59/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Collapse Criteria

    Collapse may occur as a result of:

    an increase of the external pressure, a decrease of the internal pressure,

    a combination of both.

    Various operations may lead to collapse :

    1) Partial or full Evacuation (mud losses)

    2) Air, Foam, Aerated Mud, Underbalanced Drilling

    3) Cementing operations Floated Casing while running

    4) Cementing operations

    5) Drill Stem Testing6) Artificial Lift

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    60/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Collapse Criteria

    1a Partial Evacuation.

    Apply for all Casings.

    For Exploration Wells, the weakest zone will be taken at the final depth of the actual drilling

    phase and the gradient of the losses as the water gradient.

    Internal Pressure: The casing is empty down to the fluid level, the evacuation level will be

    calculated in order to balance the weakest zone with the actual drilling mud weight.

    1b Full Evacuation.

    Production casing only. Full Evacuation is considered for Exploration and Development Wells.

    Internal Pressure: The casing is empty.

    2 Air, Foam, Aerated Mud, Underbalanced Drilling.

    Full Evacuation must be considered for Exploration and Development Wells where these

    techniques are planned.

    Internal Pressure: The casing is considered as empty.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    61/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASING DESIGN

    Collapse Criteria

    3 Floated Casing While Running In Hole.

    Apply for all Floated Casings.

    Internal Pressure: The casing is empty down to the fluid level. The remaining fluid insidethe casing is the mud of the drilling phase.

    4 Cementing Operations

    Apply for all cemented Conductor and deep Surface Casings.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is the cement slurry up to the top of cement andthe mud of the drilling phase up to the surface.

    Internal Pressure: The fluid inside the casing is the displacement mud.

    5 Drill Stem Testing

    This case applies to both Production and Drill Stem Testing casings.

    Internal Pressure: Casing empty from the casing shoe to the production packer.

    Casing full of packer fluid (Production) or mud (DST) above the packer.

    6 Artificial Lift

    Development Wells only.

    Internal Pressure: The casing pressure profile is calculated according to the artificial lift scenario.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    62/83

    JPS-04-08

    Collapse Pressure

    Casing Collapse lines

    Internal

    pressure

    Collapse

    pressure

    External

    Pressure

    Top

    cement

    Displacement

    mud

    Depth

    Pressure

    Casing cementation

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    63/83

    JPS-04-08

    Collapse Pressure

    Drilling

    Mud

    Fluid

    level

    Pressure

    Depth

    Casing Collapse lines

    Internal

    pressure

    Collapse

    pressure

    External

    Pressure

    Partial losses

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    64/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Criteria

    Burst may occur as a result of:

    an increase of the internal pressure, a decrease of the external pressure,

    a combination of both.

    Various conditions may lead to burst :

    1. Oil & Gas Kick

    2. Well full of Gas

    3. Pressure Integrity and leak tests while drilling

    4. Surface tubing leak during testing and production operations

    5. Surface tubing leak in water & gas injection wells

    6. Artificial Lift

    7. Bullheading.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    65/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Criteria

    1 - Oil & Gas Kick.

    Apply for Surface and Intermediate Casings in Appraisal and Development Wells when Oil &

    Gas kick are possible.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is the mud of the previous drilling phase.

    Internal Pressure: For oil, the resulting internal pressure profile will be a single phase

    reservoir oil gradient from bottom hole to a point in the well at which local

    crude saturation pressure is reached (bubble point), and a gas gradient

    from this point to the surface.

    2 - Well Full Of Gas

    Apply to all Surface and Intermediate Casings in Exploration wells and Appraisal &

    Development gas wells.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is the mud of the previous drilling phase.

    Internal Pressure: The fluid is gas (CH4) - gradient 0.1 psi/ft / 0.7 sgThe Bottom Hole Pressure is the anticipated reservoir pressure.

    The pressure profile is a straight line.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    66/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Criteria

    3 - Pressure integrity tests and Leak tests while drilling

    Apply to all Casings.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is the mud of the previous drilling phase.

    Internal Pressure: The internal pressure gradient is the actual mud gradient added

    of the testing pressure.

    4 - Surface Tubing Leak During Testing & Production Operations

    This case considers a Test/Production tubing leak at the top of the well.

    The Wellhead shut-in pressure is supposed to be transmitted to the tubing-casing annulus.

    Apply to Production Casings in Development Wells, and Delineation wells planned for a

    possible later recovery.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is clear water.

    Internal Pressure: The internal pressure gradient is the packer fluid gradient incremented by

    the wellhead shut-in pressure.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    67/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Criteria

    5 - Surface Tubing Leak In Water & Gas Injection Wells

    To apply for all Production Casings and Water & Gas Injection Wells.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is clear water.

    Internal Pressure: The internal pressure gradient is the packer fluid gradient incremented by

    the maximum anticipated Injection Pressure

    6 - Artificial Lift

    To apply to all Production Casings when Artificial Lift is planned.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is clear water.

    Internal Pressure: The internal pressure is the maximum anticipated pressure that can

    develop in the worst-case scenario (equipment failure).

    7 - Bullheading

    To apply for all Casings when Bullheading is the only way to kill the well.

    External Pressure: The fluid outside the casing is the mud of the previous drilling phase.

    Internal Pressure: The internal gradient is the actual mud gradient plus a margin of 2000 psi.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    68/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Pressure

    Pressure

    Depth Casing Burst lines

    Internal

    pressure

    Burstpressure

    External

    Pressure

    Reservoir

    pressure

    Well Head

    pressure

    Drilling

    Mud

    Top of

    buble

    Gas

    Gas Invasion

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    69/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Pressure

    Pressure

    Depth Casing Burst lines

    Internal

    pressure

    Burstpressure

    External

    Pressure

    Reservoir

    pressure

    Well Head

    pressure

    Gas

    Gas Invasion(Well full of gas)

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    70/83

    JPS-04-08

    Burst Pressure

    Pressure

    Depth Casing Burst lines

    Internal

    pressure

    Burstpressure

    External

    Pressure

    Reservoir

    pressure

    Well Head

    pressure

    Gas

    Gas Invasion(Well full of gas)

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    71/83

    JPS-04-08

    Triaxial Load capacity diagram (Von Mises diagram)

    The triaxial load Capacity diagram provides a visual determination

    of the casing string design adequacy

    by both API and equivalent triaxial-stress design factors.

    The triaxial load capacity diagram is a representation of

    the von Mises equivalent (VME) triaxial-stress intensity

    in relation to axial force and either internal or external pressure.

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    72/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    73/83

    JPS-04-08

    Triaxial Load capacity diagram (Von Mises diagram)

    Tri Axial Load

    (Without Safety Coefficients)

    Tri Axial Load

    (With Safety Coefficients)

    Collapse

    Compression

    Burst

    API operating window

    (including Safety

    Coefficients)

    Traction

    Well Architecture

    CASING DESIGN

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    74/83

    JPS-04-08

    Safety Factors

    Conventional Design Factors

    API uniaxial Loads

    Burst 1.10

    Collapse 1.00

    Tension 1.30

    Compression 1.00

    Triaxial Analysis Von Mises Combined Loads 1.25

    Well Architecture

    Onshore Drilling Sequence

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    75/83

    JPS-04-08

    It starts

    with civil works

    to build a platform,

    in particular

    the concrete base

    to support the rig

    and a cellar

    where the well begins.

    Well Architecture

    Drilling Drilling Drilling Drilling DrillingConductor Surface Intermediate Production Production

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    76/83

    JPS-04-08

    Onshore Drilling Sequence

    Drilling

    30

    Drilling

    1712

    Drilling

    1214

    Drilling

    812

    Drilling

    6Pipe

    20

    casing

    1338

    casing

    95/8

    casing

    7

    liner

    41/2

    1 pouce = 25,4 mm

    1 pied = 0,3048 m

    Lengths are measured in meters or feet

    Diameters are measured in mm or inches

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    77/83

    JPS-04-08

    CASINGS, WELL HEAD & BLOW OUT PREVENTER

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    78/83

    JPS-04-08

    PRODUCTION WELL HEAD (Christmas tree)

    Well Architecture

    Drilling Programme

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    79/83

    JPS-04-08

    Estimation Pression de pore

    & Gradient de fracturation

    (Extrait dun programme de forage)

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    80/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    81/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Programme de forage

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    82/83

    JPS-04-08

    Well Architecture

    Programme de forage

  • 8/2/2019 Well Architecture RGE 2008 JP Szezuka

    83/83

    JPS-04-08